• Treffer 1 von 5
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Does antecedent complexity affect ellipsis processing?

  • In two self-paced reading experiments, we investigated the effect of changes in antecedent complexity on processing times for ellipsis. Pointer- or “sharing”-based approaches to ellipsis processing (Frazier & Clifton 2001, 2005; Martin & McElree 2008) predict no effect of antecedent complexity on reading times at the ellipsis site while other accounts predict increased antecedent complexity to either slow down processing (Murphy 1985) or to speed it up (Hofmeister 2011). Experiment 1 manipulated antecedent complexity and elision, yielding evidence against a speedup at the ellipsis site and in favor of a null effect. In order to investigate possible superficial processing on part of participants, Experiment 2 manipulated the amount of attention required to correctly respond to end-of-sentence comprehension probes, yielding evidence against a complexity-induced slowdown at the ellipsis site. Overall, our results are compatible with pointer-based approaches while casting doubt on the notion that changes antecedent complexity lead toIn two self-paced reading experiments, we investigated the effect of changes in antecedent complexity on processing times for ellipsis. Pointer- or “sharing”-based approaches to ellipsis processing (Frazier & Clifton 2001, 2005; Martin & McElree 2008) predict no effect of antecedent complexity on reading times at the ellipsis site while other accounts predict increased antecedent complexity to either slow down processing (Murphy 1985) or to speed it up (Hofmeister 2011). Experiment 1 manipulated antecedent complexity and elision, yielding evidence against a speedup at the ellipsis site and in favor of a null effect. In order to investigate possible superficial processing on part of participants, Experiment 2 manipulated the amount of attention required to correctly respond to end-of-sentence comprehension probes, yielding evidence against a complexity-induced slowdown at the ellipsis site. Overall, our results are compatible with pointer-based approaches while casting doubt on the notion that changes antecedent complexity lead to measurable differences in ellipsis processing speed.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Dario L. J. F. PaapeORCiDGND, Bruno NicenboimORCiDGND, Shravan VasishthORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-403373
Untertitel (Englisch):An empirical investigation
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (350)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:10.11.2017
Erscheinungsjahr:2017
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:10.11.2017
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Bayes factor; antecedent complexity; ellipsis processing; memory pointer; self-paced reading
Seitenanzahl:29
Quelle:Glossa 2 (2017) Nr. 1, S. 1-29. - DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.290
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC-Klassifikation:4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.