Das Suchergebnis hat sich seit Ihrer Suchanfrage verändert. Eventuell werden Dokumente in anderer Reihenfolge angezeigt.
  • Treffer 6 von 1781
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Computational identification of protein complexes from network interactions: Present state, challenges, and the way forward

  • Physically interacting proteins form macromolecule complexes that drive diverse cellular processes. Advances in experimental techniques that capture interactions between proteins provide us with protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks from several model organisms. These datasets have enabled the prediction and other computational analyses of protein complexes. Here we provide a systematic review of the state-of-the-art algorithms for protein complex prediction from PPI networks proposed in the past two decades. The existing approaches that solve this problem are categorized into three groups, including: cluster-quality-based, node affinity-based, and network embedding-based approaches, and we compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages. We further include a comparative analysis by computing the performance of eighteen methods based on twelve well-established performance measures on four widely used benchmark protein-protein interaction networks. Finally, the limitations and drawbacks of both, current data and approaches,Physically interacting proteins form macromolecule complexes that drive diverse cellular processes. Advances in experimental techniques that capture interactions between proteins provide us with protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks from several model organisms. These datasets have enabled the prediction and other computational analyses of protein complexes. Here we provide a systematic review of the state-of-the-art algorithms for protein complex prediction from PPI networks proposed in the past two decades. The existing approaches that solve this problem are categorized into three groups, including: cluster-quality-based, node affinity-based, and network embedding-based approaches, and we compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages. We further include a comparative analysis by computing the performance of eighteen methods based on twelve well-established performance measures on four widely used benchmark protein-protein interaction networks. Finally, the limitations and drawbacks of both, current data and approaches, along with the potential solutions in this field are discussed, with emphasis on the points that pave the way for future research efforts in this field. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Sara OmranianORCiDGND, Zoran NikoloskiORCiDGND, Dominik G. Grimm
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.049
ISSN:2001-0370
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35685359
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Computational and structural biotechnology journal
Untertitel (Englisch):present state, challenges, and the way forward
Verlag:Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology (RNCSB)
Verlagsort:Gotenburg
Publikationstyp:Rezension
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:01.06.2022
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Datum der Freischaltung:08.03.2024
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Clustering Algorithms; Network; Network embedding; Protein Complex Prediction; Protein-Protein interaction network
Band:20
Seitenanzahl:14
Erste Seite:2699
Letzte Seite:2712
Fördernde Institution:Bavarian State Ministry for Economic Affairs Regional Development and; Energy [07 02/683 87/19/21/19/22/20/23]; Max-Planck Gesellschaft (MPG);; Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (MPIMP)
Organisationseinheiten:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Biochemie und Biologie
DDC-Klassifikation:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Gold Open-Access
DOAJ gelistet
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.