The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 11 of 1337
Back to Result List

Individual variation in cognitive style reflects foraging and antipredator strategies in a small mammal

  • Balancing foraging gain and predation risk is a fundamental trade-off in the life of animals. Individual strategies to acquire, process, store and use information to solve cognitive tasks are likely to affect speed and flexibility of learning, and ecologically relevant decisions regarding foraging and predation risk. Theory suggests a functional link between individual variation in cognitive style and behaviour (animal personality) via speed-accuracy and risk-reward trade-offs. We tested whether cognitive style and personality affect risk-reward trade-off decisions posed by foraging and predation risk. We exposed 21 bank voles (Myodes glareolus) that were bold, fast learning and inflexible and 18 voles that were shy, slow learning and flexible to outdoor enclosures with different risk levels at two food patches. We quantified individual food patch exploitation, foraging and vigilance behaviour. Although both types responded to risk, fast animals increasingly exploited both food patches, gaining access to more food and spending lessBalancing foraging gain and predation risk is a fundamental trade-off in the life of animals. Individual strategies to acquire, process, store and use information to solve cognitive tasks are likely to affect speed and flexibility of learning, and ecologically relevant decisions regarding foraging and predation risk. Theory suggests a functional link between individual variation in cognitive style and behaviour (animal personality) via speed-accuracy and risk-reward trade-offs. We tested whether cognitive style and personality affect risk-reward trade-off decisions posed by foraging and predation risk. We exposed 21 bank voles (Myodes glareolus) that were bold, fast learning and inflexible and 18 voles that were shy, slow learning and flexible to outdoor enclosures with different risk levels at two food patches. We quantified individual food patch exploitation, foraging and vigilance behaviour. Although both types responded to risk, fast animals increasingly exploited both food patches, gaining access to more food and spending less time searching and exercising vigilance. Slow animals progressively avoided high-risk areas, concentrating foraging effort in the low-risk one, and devoting >50% of visit to vigilance. These patterns indicate that individual differences in cognitive style/personality are reflected in foraging and anti-predator decisions that underlie the individual risk-reward bias.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • pmnr761.pdfeng
    (1236KB)

    SHA-1: 643613f23fb5c95df14716505bdb088b140fcc73

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author:Valeria MazzaORCiD, Jens JacobORCiDGND, Melanie DammhahnGND, Marco ZaccaroniORCiD, Jana A. EccardORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-437118
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-43711
ISSN:1866-8372
Parent Title (German):Postprints der Universität Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe
Series (Serial Number):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe (761)
Document Type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first Publication:2019/10/29
Year of Completion:2019
Publishing Institution:Universität Potsdam
Release Date:2019/10/29
Tag:animal personality; bank voles; behavioral flexibility; coping styles; exploratory-behavior; mustelid predation; social information; stress; trade-offs; voles clethrionomys-glareolus
Issue:761
Pagenumber:9
Source:Scientific Reports 9 (2019) Art. 10157 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46582-1
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Biochemie und Biologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 50 Naturwissenschaften / 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik
6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 60 Technik / 600 Technik, Technologie
Peer Review:Referiert
Publication Way:Open Access
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung, 4.0 International
Notes extern:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle