• Treffer 6 von 6
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Testing the Consensus Model

  • The structure and definition of professional knowledge is a continuing focus of science education research. In 2012, a pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) summit was held and it suggested a model of professional knowledge and skill including PCK, which was later often called the Consensus Model (Gess-Newsome, 2015. A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (1st ed., pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge). The Consensus Model proposes a potential powerful framework for the relations among teachers’ different professional knowledge bases, but to date it has neither been investigated empirically nor systematically. In this study, we investigated the relationships suggested by the Consensus Model among different aspects of teachers’ knowledge and skill. A sample of 35 physics teachers and their classes participatedThe structure and definition of professional knowledge is a continuing focus of science education research. In 2012, a pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) summit was held and it suggested a model of professional knowledge and skill including PCK, which was later often called the Consensus Model (Gess-Newsome, 2015. A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (1st ed., pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge). The Consensus Model proposes a potential powerful framework for the relations among teachers’ different professional knowledge bases, but to date it has neither been investigated empirically nor systematically. In this study, we investigated the relationships suggested by the Consensus Model among different aspects of teachers’ knowledge and skill. A sample of 35 physics teachers and their classes participated in the investigation; both teachers and their students in these classes took paper-and-pencil tests. Furthermore, a lesson taught by each of the teachers was videotaped and analysed. The video analysis focused on the interconnectedness of the content structure of the lesson as representation of the in-class actions of the teachers. The interconnectedness is understood as a direct result of the application of professional knowledge of the teachers to their teaching. The teachers’ knowledge showed no significant influence on the interconnectedness of the lesson content structure. However, the results confirmed the influence of interconnectedness and certain aspects of professional knowledge on students’ outcomes. Therefore, interconnectedness of content structure could be verified as one indicator of teachers’ instructional quality.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • pmnr482.pdfeng
    (2024KB)

    SHA-1: 532a6348d9d3d22bb2ba1c22348769f7cc606e3e

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Sven LiepertzORCiDGND, Andreas BorowskiORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-416857
ISSN:1866-8372
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe
Untertitel (Englisch):relationships among physics teachers’ professional knowledge, interconnectedness of content structure and student achievement
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe (482)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:03.12.2018
Erscheinungsjahr:2018
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:03.12.2018
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:PCK; professional knowledge; the Consensus Model
Ausgabe:482
Seitenanzahl:22
Quelle:International Journal of Science Education (2018) DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1478165
Organisationseinheiten:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät
DDC-Klassifikation:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access
Fördermittelquelle:Taylor & Francis Open Access Agreement
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.