320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (196)
- Postprint (45)
- Part of a Book (44)
- Doctoral Thesis (31)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (28)
- Other (15)
- Review (8)
- Master's Thesis (6)
- Working Paper (4)
- Journal/Publication series (1)
Language
- English (378) (remove)
Keywords
- Germany (14)
- European Union (11)
- democracy (8)
- parliamentary government (8)
- Europäische Union (7)
- governance (7)
- international organizations (7)
- presidential government (7)
- bicameralism (6)
- Integration (5)
- Security Council (5)
- United Nations (5)
- World Bank (5)
- decision-making (5)
- semi-parliamentary government (5)
- Deutschland (4)
- civil war (4)
- decentralization (4)
- discourse (4)
- innovation (4)
- institutions (4)
- international organisations (4)
- public administration (4)
- visions of democracy (4)
- Außenpolitik (3)
- Coordination (3)
- Demokratisierung (3)
- Governance (3)
- Iran (3)
- Islam (3)
- Migration (3)
- Modernisierung (3)
- Poland (3)
- Verwaltung (3)
- administration (3)
- authoritarianism (3)
- climate change (3)
- counterterrorism (3)
- democratization (3)
- digitalization (3)
- evaluation (3)
- executive personalism (3)
- gender (3)
- human rights (3)
- institutional design (3)
- institutional interplay (3)
- local government (3)
- modernization (3)
- policy (3)
- political equality (3)
- populism (3)
- power (3)
- public management (3)
- resilience (3)
- separation of powers (3)
- territorial reforms (3)
- terrorism (3)
- transitional justice (3)
- Australia (2)
- BSW (2)
- China (2)
- Dezentralisierung (2)
- Eastern Europe (2)
- European Foreign Policy (2)
- European Neighbourhood Policy (2)
- Europäische Nachbarschaftspolitik (2)
- Executive-legislative relations (2)
- GIZ (2)
- International (2)
- International Financial Institutions (2)
- Legislative organisation (2)
- Liberia (2)
- Local authorities (2)
- Paris Agreement (2)
- Polen (2)
- Quality management (2)
- REDD (2)
- Rechenschaftspflicht (2)
- Russia (2)
- Sierra Leone (2)
- Telekommunikation (2)
- Vereinte Nationen (2)
- Verwaltungsreform (2)
- accountability (2)
- administrative reforms (2)
- aid effectiveness (2)
- authority (2)
- bias (2)
- capacity (2)
- climate mitigation (2)
- committee governance (2)
- constitutional design (2)
- contestation (2)
- cooperation (2)
- coordination (2)
- crisis (2)
- debt (2)
- democratic theory (2)
- digital transformation (2)
- digitalisation (2)
- drug control (2)
- e-government (2)
- economy (2)
- elections (2)
- electoral systems (2)
- environmental policy (2)
- expert authority (2)
- expertise (2)
- feminism (2)
- food security governance (2)
- foreign policy (2)
- globalization (2)
- higher education (2)
- institutional complexity (2)
- inter-organizational order (2)
- inter-organizational relations (2)
- international (2)
- international bureaucracies (2)
- international institutions (2)
- international law (2)
- international non-governmental organizations (2)
- international public administration (2)
- international relations (2)
- job demands-resources model (2)
- land management (2)
- legal change (2)
- margins of error (2)
- metamorphosis of international law (2)
- multi-level study (2)
- narratives (2)
- natural climate solutions (2)
- new public management (2)
- organizational fields (2)
- parliamentary opposition (2)
- party competition (2)
- patterns of democracy (2)
- peacebuilding (2)
- peacekeeping (2)
- policy advice (2)
- policy analysis (2)
- policy-making (2)
- politics (2)
- presidentialism (2)
- process tracing (2)
- protection (2)
- race (2)
- research communication (2)
- restoration (2)
- skills (2)
- societal impact of research (2)
- sustainable economy (2)
- telework (2)
- value change (2)
- veto players (2)
- violence (2)
- wicked problems (2)
- work-place behavior (2)
- (post) new public management (1)
- 2 degrees C target (1)
- 3C (1)
- AKP (1)
- Abendland (1)
- Absolute Advantage (1)
- Absoluter Kostenvorteil (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Active learning (1)
- Adam Smith (1)
- Administration (1)
- Administrative reform (1)
- AfD (1)
- Affiliationsnetzwerke (1)
- Africa (1)
- African American literature (1)
- Aid conditionalities (1)
- Air pollution (1)
- Akteursinteraktion (1)
- Alternative für Deutschland (1)
- Antisemitism (1)
- Apartheid (1)
- Arbeitsmarktpolitik (1)
- Argentina (1)
- Artefakte (1)
- Atomwaffen (1)
- Atomwaffensperrvertrag (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Augmented reality (1)
- Ausschüsse (1)
- Australian bicameralism (1)
- Autoritarismus (1)
- Außenhandel (1)
- Benchmarking (1)
- Berlin (1)
- Beschaffungswesen (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Brazil (1)
- Buenos Aires (1)
- Bundeswehr (1)
- Bürgerschaft (1)
- CDM (1)
- CESCR Committee (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- CPPS (1)
- CPS (1)
- Cabinet (1)
- Cambodia (1)
- Campaign finance (1)
- Carl Schmitt (1)
- Case studies (1)
- Catholicism (1)
- Changing nature of armed conflict (1)
- Character (1)
- Circular argumentation (1)
- Cities (1)
- Civil service career (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Climate change adaptation (1)
- Climate governance (1)
- Colombia (1)
- Common Foreign and Security Policy (1)
- Comparative Advantage (1)
- Comparative Public Administration (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Conseil de sécurité (1)
- Consejo de Seguridad (1)
- Consolidation (1)
- Constitutive Mechanism (1)
- Coordination structures (1)
- Corruption risks (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Country experience (1)
- Decarbonisation (1)
- Decentralization in government (1)
- Decision Probability (1)
- Dekarbonisierung (1)
- Democracy Promotion (1)
- Demokratie (1)
- Demokratieförderung (1)
- Design Thinking (1)
- Development aid (1)
- Development aid End of history (1)
- Development aid criticism (1)
- Development cooperation (1)
- Dezentralisation (1)
- Dicranopteris linearis (1)
- EU regional policy (1)
- EU-Regionalpolitik (1)
- Eastern policy (1)
- Economic policy (1)
- Edouard Glissant (1)
- Education (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit mit Indien (1)
- Erdogan (1)
- Erneuerbare Energie (1)
- Estonia (1)
- Eurasian Economic Union (1)
- Eurobarometer (1)
- Eurocentrism (1)
- Europaidentität (1)
- Europe (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Constitution (1)
- European Green Deal (1)
- European Immigration Policies (1)
- European Neighborhood Policy (1)
- European identity (1)
- European integration (1)
- Europäische Außenpolitik (1)
- Europäische Integration (1)
- Europäische Verfassung (1)
- Evaluierung (1)
- Evidence-based policy making (1)
- Evolutionary economics (1)
- Evolutorische Ökonomik (1)
- Expert Authority (1)
- Expertenautorität (1)
- Extreme weather (1)
- Federal administration (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Foreign policy (1)
- France (1)
- Franco (1)
- Franco-Prussian War (1)
- Friedensforschung (1)
- Friedenssicherung (1)
- Föderalismus (1)
- GREVIO (1)
- Galwan Valley (1)
- Game (1)
- Geberharmonisierung (1)
- Gemeindem (1)
- Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik (1)
- Gender (1)
- Generalized knowledge constructin axiom (1)
- Geneva convention of 1864 (1)
- George W. Bush (1)
- Gerald Gaus (1)
- Gesellschaftstheorie (1)
- Gleichgewicht der Kräfte (1)
- Gleichstellung (1)
- Global Environmental Governance (1)
- Global South (1)
- Global order (1)
- Global warming potential (1)
- Gobernanza de los Comités (1)
- Greece (1)
- Green infrastructure investment (1)
- HFCS (1)
- Haiti (1)
- Hanoi (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Holocaust (1)
- IHL (1)
- IHRL (1)
- IMF (1)
- INGOs (1)
- ISIS (1)
- Impartiality (1)
- Income (1)
- India (1)
- Indo-Pacific (1)
- Industry 4.0 (1)
- Informal and formal (1)
- Informal reform (1)
- Informationsflüsse (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Institution (1)
- Institutional change (1)
- Institutionelle Komplexität (1)
- Integration Policy (1)
- Integration strategy (1)
- International Bureaucracies (1)
- International Migration (1)
- International Monetary Fund (1)
- International Practices (1)
- International bureaucrats (1)
- International policy (1)
- International relations (1)
- International trade (1)
- Internationale Migration (1)
- Internet of things (1)
- Investitionsverhalten (1)
- Investment Behavior (1)
- Irak (1)
- Iraq (1)
- Islamic movements (1)
- Israeli-Palestinian conflict (1)
- Istanbul Convention (1)
- Jawaharlal Nehru (1)
- Jewish question (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Jordanien (1)
- Kambodscha (1)
- Klimagovernance (1)
- Klimapolitik (1)
- Klimawandel (1)
- Kolumbien (1)
- Komparativer Kostenvorteil (1)
- Koordination (1)
- Korruption (1)
- Korruptionsrisiken (1)
- Kultur (1)
- Kulturwissenschaft (1)
- Kyrgyzstan (1)
- Labor supply (1)
- Landscape planning (1)
- Landwehr (1)
- Lateinamerika (1)
- Latin America (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Lifetime income (1)
- Local Civil Society Networks (1)
- Local Governance (1)
- Local administrative systems (1)
- Local autonomy (1)
- Local government reform (1)
- Longitudinal and panel data (1)
- Lucha antiterrorista (1)
- Macht (1)
- Management control (1)
- Managerial autonomy (1)
- Market Dynamics (1)
- Market failure (1)
- Marktdynamik (1)
- Marktversagen (1)
- Marokko (1)
- Max Weber (1)
- Mayoralty (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Measurement theory (1)
- Media (1)
- Mehrebenen-System (1)
- Meta-model (1)
- Methane (1)
- Migrants (1)
- Migration Policy (1)
- Mikropolitik (1)
- Minderheiten (1)
- Ministries (1)
- Missing rich (1)
- Mixed methods (1)
- Modellierung (1)
- Modelling (1)
- Moderation (1)
- Moderne (1)
- Modernisierungstheorie (1)
- Modernization (1)
- Monetary Fund (1)
- Morocco (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- NATO (1)
- Nachhaltige Entwicklung (1)
- National state communication (1)
- Nazi Germany (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Nelson Mandela (1)
- Neo-institutionalismus (1)
- Neoliberalism (1)
- Neoliberalismus (1)
- Netzwerkanalyse (1)
- Neutrality (1)
- New public management (1)
- Nicht-Gleichgewichtsökonomik (1)
- Nichtverbreitung von Kernwaffen (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- Non-equilibrium economics (1)
- Norm collisions (1)
- Nuclear non-proliferation (1)
- Operation Euphrates Shield (1)
- Organisations (1)
- Organizational change (1)
- Organizational innovation (1)
- Orthodoxy (1)
- Osteuropa (1)
- Ostpolitik (1)
- P/CVE (1)
- Pakistan (1)
- Palestine (1)
- Pareto distribution (1)
- Paris agreement (1)
- Parliamentary questions (1)
- Partizipation (1)
- Peace Studies (1)
- Peacebuilding (1)
- Performance (1)
- Performance management (1)
- Permanent income (1)
- Policy (1)
- Policy Changes (1)
- Policy advice (1)
- Policymaking (1)
- Political civil servant (1)
- Political craft (1)
- Political economy Socio-economic development (1)
- Political establishment (1)
- Politicisation (1)
- Politik (1)
- Politikdiffusion (1)
- Politikempfehlungen (1)
- Politiktransfer (1)
- Politikänderungen (1)
- Politische Theorie (1)
- Polizeireform (1)
- Populism (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Potassium (1)
- Precedent (1)
- President Trump (1)
- Price floor (1)
- Price review (1)
- Proceso debido (1)
- Process modeling (1)
- Procurement (1)
- Protestantism (1)
- Prozessanalyse (1)
- Prozessexpertise (1)
- Prozessgestaltung (1)
- Public Management (1)
- Public opinion (1)
- Public sector (1)
- Public-private partnerships (1)
- QCA (1)
- Quad (1)
- Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (1)
- Qualität des Projektmanagements (1)
- Rankings (1)
- Ratchet Effect (1)
- Rechtsstaatlichkeit (1)
- Recipient performance (1)
- Reform des Öffentlichen Dienstes (1)
- Regierungskooperation (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Renewable Energy (1)
- Reputation der Geber (1)
- Resozialisierung (1)
- Responsibility to Protect (1)
- Rio Conventions (1)
- Sanciones de la ONU (1)
- Sebastian Kurz (1)
- Security council (1)
- Security council reform (1)
- Senegal (1)
- Short-lived climate pollutants (1)
- Simmel (1)
- Simulation process building (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Slovakia (1)
- Slowakei (1)
- Social Choice Theory (1)
- Social class (1)
- South Afrika (1)
- Soziologie (1)
- Spain (1)
- Strukturfonds (1)
- Sub-Sahara Africa (1)
- Sub-national Autonomy (1)
- Supermacht (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Survey (1)
- Sustainability indicators (1)
- Sustainable Development (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Syria (1)
- System Dynamics (1)
- System failure (1)
- Systemversagen (1)
- Teilhabe der BürgerInnen (1)
- Transformation (1)
- Transparenz (1)
- Trump phenomenon (1)
- Turkish military in Syria (1)
- Turkish politics (1)
- U.S. Armed Forces (1)
- UN (1)
- UN human rights treaty bodies (1)
- UN sanctions (1)
- UN-REDD (1)
- US foreign policy (1)
- US-Außenpolitik (1)
- Ukraine (1)
- Ukraine war (1)
- Ultimatum (1)
- Unilateralismus (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Use cases Morphologic box (1)
- Versöhnung (1)
- Verteidigungspolitik (1)
- Vertiefung (1)
- Verwaltungsmodernisierung (1)
- Verwaltungsreformen (1)
- Veto Player (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Vietnamesen (1)
- Wahlkampffinanzierung (1)
- Wannsee conference (1)
- Wasserentwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Weak and strong sustainability (1)
- Wealth distribution (1)
- Weber (1)
- Weberian bureaucracy (1)
- West Africa (1)
- Wicked problems (1)
- Winning Coalition (1)
- Wirksamkeit der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Wirtschaft (1)
- Wirtschaftspolitik (1)
- Wissensmanagement (1)
- Yiddish culturalism (1)
- Zivilgesellschaft (1)
- Zusammenarbeit in Sicherheitsfragen (1)
- academic disengagement (1)
- acteurs non-étatiques (1)
- active labor market policies (1)
- actor constellations (1)
- actor interplay (1)
- administración pública (1)
- administration publique (1)
- administrative culture (1)
- advocacy coalitions (1)
- affiliation networks (1)
- agency (1)
- agent-based modeling (1)
- agentes no estatales (1)
- agricultural policy (1)
- aid (1)
- aid allocation (1)
- al-Bab Battle (1)
- anniversary issue (1)
- anthropocene (1)
- anti-gender (1)
- antifeminist (1)
- application (1)
- artefacts (1)
- attitudes (1)
- authoritarian resilience (1)
- authoritarian rule (1)
- balance of power (1)
- balancing (1)
- behavior (1)
- benefit systems (1)
- border regime (1)
- borders (1)
- boundary spanning (1)
- bullying (1)
- burden of disease (1)
- bureaucracy (1)
- bureaucraties internationales (1)
- burocracias internacionales (1)
- candidates (1)
- capabilities framework (1)
- child labour (1)
- childcare (1)
- citizen participation (1)
- citizenship (1)
- civil service reform (1)
- civil service survey (1)
- civil society (1)
- civilian infrastructure (1)
- climate and energy policy (1)
- climate change mitigation (1)
- climate finance (1)
- climate governance (1)
- climate policy (1)
- climate politics (1)
- closing civic space (1)
- coalitions (1)
- coercion (1)
- collaboration (1)
- collaborative governance (1)
- collective memory (1)
- collective targeting (1)
- comparative (1)
- comparative development (1)
- comparative environmental politics (1)
- comparative public administration (1)
- competition (1)
- competitiveness (1)
- complex problems (1)
- concept of the political (1)
- conceptualization (1)
- conduct of life (1)
- conflict (1)
- conflict management (1)
- conflict resolution (1)
- consensus (1)
- consensus democracy (1)
- constitution-making (1)
- containment (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- contractor/provider split (1)
- conventional donors (1)
- corruption (1)
- crises (1)
- crisis management (1)
- cross-cultural competence (1)
- cross-national (1)
- cultural studies (1)
- culture (1)
- culture-general skills (1)
- cyber-attack (1)
- cyberwar (1)
- data and methods (1)
- de facto authority (1)
- de jure authority (1)
- death (1)
- death penalty (1)
- decadence (1)
- decarbonization (1)
- defence policy (1)
- definition (1)
- delegation (1)
- democratic performance (1)
- democratic quality (1)
- demografischer Wandel (1)
- demographic change (1)
- dependency (1)
- depression (1)
- design options (1)
- developing countries (1)
- development (1)
- development aid India (1)
- development cooperation (1)
- development projects (1)
- dictatorship (1)
- difference-in-differences (1)
- digital government (1)
- digital overload (1)
- digitale Verwaltung (1)
- direct democracy (1)
- disability-adjusted life years (1)
- discrimination (1)
- discriminatory dimensions of forced evictions (1)
- diversified quality production (1)
- doctrine (1)
- domestic politics (1)
- donor harmonization (1)
- donor reputation (1)
- drivers for change (1)
- due process (1)
- e-services (1)
- earth system governance (1)
- ecological modernization (1)
- economic policy (1)
- economics (1)
- effective district magnitude (1)
- employment (1)
- employment services (1)
- energy (1)
- ensuring state (1)
- entrepreneurship (1)
- environmental agreements (1)
- environmental degradation (1)
- environmental governance (1)
- environmental mainstreaming (1)
- environmental policy effects (1)
- environmental policy performance (1)
- epistemic injustice (1)
- equal opportunities (1)
- ethnicity (1)
- evidence-based policy making (1)
- evolutionary economics (1)
- executive head (1)
- executive-legislative relations (1)
- executive-parties dimension (1)
- executives (1)
- experiment (1)
- expert recommendations (1)
- facilitation (1)
- far right (1)
- far-right extremism (1)
- far-right groups (1)
- far-right parties (1)
- far-right populism (1)
- featured (1)
- federalism (1)
- fern (1)
- field experiment (1)
- field theory (1)
- film (1)
- financial policy (1)
- fisheries policy (1)
- flexibility (1)
- fluctuation (1)
- forced evictions (1)
- formale Institution (1)
- fragile and conflict-affected states (1)
- fragile und konfliktbeladene Staaten (1)
- francs-tireurs (1)
- function of cross-cultural competence (1)
- gender equality (1)
- gender mainstreaming (1)
- gender research (1)
- genre (1)
- geographical proximity (1)
- global (1)
- global commons (1)
- global environmental governance (1)
- global environmental politics (1)
- global governance (1)
- global health (1)
- global public policy (1)
- global south (1)
- globale Umweltpolitik (1)
- good governance (1)
- gouvernance de comité (1)
- government (1)
- government formation (1)
- government policymaking (1)
- government-formation (1)
- green finance (1)
- green recovery (1)
- growth strategy (1)
- gute Regierungsführung (1)
- health security (1)
- health services (1)
- hegemony (1)
- herkömmliche Geber (1)
- hermeneutical capability (1)
- hermeneutical injustice (1)
- heterogeneity (1)
- hierarchy (1)
- history (1)
- hospitals (1)
- huella ecológica (1)
- human mind (1)
- human rights treaty monitoring bodies (1)
- human trafficking (1)
- identity (1)
- impact evaluation (1)
- impartiality (1)
- incels (1)
- indigene Völker (1)
- indigenous peoples (1)
- individual complaints procedures (1)
- industrial organization (1)
- industrial relations (1)
- industrial restructuring (1)
- information and communication technologies (1)
- information flow (1)
- informelle Institution (1)
- innovation adoption (1)
- innovation systems (1)
- institutional change (1)
- institutional investors (1)
- institutional policy (1)
- institutional processes (1)
- institutional reform (1)
- institutional theory (1)
- institutionelle Komplexität (1)
- inter-governmental relations (1)
- inter-organizational control (1)
- intercultural communication (1)
- interdepartmental committee (1)
- interest group (1)
- intergovernmental cooperation (1)
- intergovernmental reforms (1)
- intergovernmental relations (1)
- intergovernmental treaty secretariats (1)
- interkulturelle Kompetenz (1)
- interministerielle Arbeitsgruppe (1)
- internal migration (1)
- international administration (1)
- international bureaucracy (1)
- international cooperation (1)
- international development (1)
- international human rights (1)
- international humanitarian law (1)
- international legal order (1)
- international organisation (1)
- international trade (1)
- internationale Beziehungen (1)
- internationale Institutionen (1)
- internationale Organisationen (1)
- internationale Verwaltungen (1)
- internationale Zusammenarbeit (1)
- interne Migration (1)
- interoperability (1)
- interpretative declarations (1)
- intertextuality (1)
- islamistische Bewegungen (1)
- issue market (1)
- job autonomy (1)
- job satisfaction (1)
- job search (1)
- just transition (1)
- knowledge (1)
- knowledge creep (1)
- knowledge management (1)
- knowledge utilization (1)
- kulturell-kognitive Institution (1)
- labor force participation (1)
- labor market policies (1)
- law and technology (1)
- leadership (1)
- legislatures (1)
- levee en masse (1)
- lifestyle (1)
- local and urban governance (1)
- local autonomy (1)
- local community (1)
- local finance (1)
- local governance (1)
- local government systems (1)
- local politics (1)
- long-term policy (1)
- lutte contre le terrorisme (1)
- majority formation (1)
- majority rule (1)
- male supremacy (1)
- managerial reforms (1)
- manosphere (1)
- manufacturing (1)
- marginality (1)
- marine governance (1)
- market failures (1)
- marketization (1)
- measurement (1)
- men's rights (1)
- meso-level of government (1)
- micro-credit (1)
- micro-politics (1)
- micropolitics (1)
- migration (1)
- military culture (1)
- military effectiveness (1)
- ministry of agriculture (1)
- minorities (1)
- minority rights (1)
- misogyny (1)
- mixed methods (1)
- modernity (1)
- modernización ecológica (1)
- modernization theory (1)
- monopoly of legitimate use of force (1)
- mots clés (1)
- multi-level governance (1)
- multi-level government (1)
- multi-level system (1)
- multi-party systems (1)
- multilateral (1)
- multilateralism (1)
- multinational oganizations (1)
- multiplicity (1)
- municipalities (1)
- municipally owned corporation (1)
- myth of Franktireurkrieg (1)
- national ecological footprint (1)
- national ministries (1)
- nationale Ministerien (1)
- nationalism (1)
- nativism (1)
- neo weberian state (1)
- neo-liberal governance (1)
- neo-liberalism (1)
- network analysis (1)
- neue Geber (1)
- neue Parteien (1)
- neuer Institutionalismus (1)
- new democracies (1)
- new donors (1)
- new parties (1)
- new technologies (1)
- newsfeed (1)
- nineteenth and twentieth century (1)
- non-alignment; (1)
- non-equilibrium economics (1)
- non-state actors (1)
- nonstate actors (1)
- norm change (1)
- norm collisions (1)
- norm dynamics (1)
- norm robustness (1)
- norms (1)
- nuclear non-proliferation treaty (1)
- nuclear weapons (1)
- opinion polls (1)
- opposition (1)
- orchestration (1)
- organisational change (1)
- organisations internationales (1)
- organizaciones internacionales (1)
- organization theory (1)
- organizational epistemology (1)
- organizational reform (1)
- organizational reputation (1)
- organizations (1)
- palabras clave (1)
- pandemic (1)
- parental leave (1)
- parenthood (1)
- parliament (1)
- parliamentarism (1)
- parliamentary democracy (1)
- parties (1)
- patterns (1)
- peace (1)
- peace process (1)
- performance (1)
- peripherality (1)
- personal data (1)
- personality (1)
- phytolith (1)
- planetarity (1)
- planetary boundaries (1)
- planning (1)
- pledge fulfillment (1)
- police reform (1)
- policy agendas (1)
- policy diffusion (1)
- policy output (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy scope (1)
- policy signals (1)
- policy strategy (1)
- policy substitutes (1)
- policy transfer (1)
- policy-profession conflict (1)
- political campaigns (1)
- political integration (1)
- political opportunism (1)
- political preferences (1)
- political repression (1)
- political sociology (1)
- political stability (1)
- political symbols (1)
- politics and the media (1)
- politics of relation (1)
- polling (1)
- polycrisis (1)
- política ambiental comparada (1)
- pooling (1)
- populist radical right (1)
- post-Soviet (1)
- post-conflict peace (1)
- post-development (1)
- post-new public management (1)
- precedent (1)
- preferences (1)
- privacy (1)
- problem-solving (1)
- process design (1)
- process expertise (1)
- procédure officielle (1)
- production concepts (1)
- professionalization (1)
- professions (1)
- project management quality (1)
- proportionality analysis (1)
- protest (1)
- proxy force (1)
- public (1)
- public administration reform (1)
- public good (1)
- public health (1)
- public opinion (1)
- public opinion polls (1)
- public participation (1)
- public policy (1)
- public sector innovation (1)
- public sector reform (1)
- public value (1)
- public values (1)
- public-reason liberalism (1)
- punctuated equilibrium theory (1)
- qualitative Fallstudie (1)
- qualitative case study (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- quality management (1)
- racial discrimination (1)
- racism (1)
- radical (1)
- radicalization (1)
- rationalism (1)
- re-municipalization (1)
- reasonableness (1)
- rebel attacks (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- reconciliation (1)
- regime complexity (1)
- regional organizations (1)
- regulación estatal (1)
- regulation (1)
- regulations (1)
- regulative Institution (1)
- regulatory environment (1)
- renewable energy (1)
- representation (1)
- research (1)
- reservations to human rights treaties (1)
- resistance (1)
- resocialisation (1)
- responsibility (1)
- restrictions to civil society (1)
- revolution (1)
- right parties and movements (1)
- right to housing (1)
- right-wing politics (1)
- romance (1)
- sanctions (1)
- sanctions de l’ONU (1)
- schlechte Regierungsführung (1)
- scholar-practitioners (1)
- science & technology (1)
- scientific use file (1)
- second chambers (1)
- second-order compliance (1)
- security cooperation (1)
- security–development nexus (1)
- selection (1)
- self-employed women (1)
- self-governance (1)
- semi-parliamentarism (1)
- service provider strategies (1)
- set theory (1)
- siege of Paris 1870 (1)
- single mothers (1)
- social epistemology (1)
- social networking sites (1)
- social theory (1)
- sozialistische Orientierung der Marktwirtschaft (1)
- space (1)
- standardization (STANAG) (1)
- start-up subsidies (1)
- state (1)
- state repression (1)
- state security (1)
- stochastic uncertainty (1)
- strategic uncertainty (1)
- structural change (1)
- structural funds (1)
- superpower (1)
- survey (1)
- survey data (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survival analysis (1)
- symbolic representation (1)
- system failure (1)
- teaching (1)
- termination (1)
- territorial administration (1)
- trade-offs (1)
- training (1)
- transdisciplinarity (1)
- transformation (1)
- transformative justice (1)
- transition economies (1)
- transition policy (1)
- translation theory (1)
- transnational city networks (1)
- transnational governance (1)
- transnational institutional interplay (1)
- treadmill of production (1)
- triple nexus (1)
- trust (1)
- turnout (1)
- un-cancelling the future (1)
- unemployment (1)
- unilateralism (1)
- urban warfare (1)
- vertrackte Probleme (1)
- veto point (1)
- vote choice (1)
- vote switching (1)
- voters (1)
- voting (1)
- voting potential (1)
- water development aid (1)
- welfare state benefits (1)
- weo-weberian State (1)
- window of opportunity (1)
- women's empowerment (1)
- work (1)
- work-family policies (1)
- working hours (1)
- working time (1)
- world bank (1)
- world literature (1)
- world-makers (1)
- youth unemployment (1)
- ÖVP (1)
- Öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
- Übergangsjustiz (1)
- öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (182)
- Sozialwissenschaften (76)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (33)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (25)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (15)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (14)
- Extern (8)
- Historisches Institut (6)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (5)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (5)
Geleitwort
(2020)
This study assesses and explains international bureaucracies’ performance and role as policy advisors and as expert authorities from the perspective of domestic stakeholders. International bureaucracies are the secretariats of international organizations that carry out their work including generating knowledge, providing policy advice and implementing policy programs and projects. Scholars increasingly regard them as governance actors that are able to influence global and domestic policy making. In order to explain this influence, research has mainly focused on international bureaucracies’ formal features and/or staff characteristics. The way in which they are actually perceived by their domestic stakeholders, in particular by national bureaucrats, has not been systematically studied. Yet, this is equally important, given that they represent international bureaucracies’ addressees and are actors that (potentially) make use of international bureaucracies’ policy advice, which can be seen as an indicator for international bureaucracies’ influence. Accordingly, I argue that domestic stakeholders’ assessments can likewise contribute to explaining international bureaucracies’ influence.
The overarching research questions the study addresses are what are national stakeholders’ perspectives on international bureaucracies and under which conditions do they consider international bureaucracies’ policy advice? In answering these questions, I focus on three specific organizational features that the literature has considered important for international bureaucracies’ independent influence, namely international bureaucracies’ performance and their role as policy advisors and as expert authorities. These three features are studied separately in three independent articles, which are presented in Part II of this article-based dissertation.
To answer the research questions, I draw on novel data from a global survey among ministry officials of 121 countries. The survey captures ministry officials’ assessments of international bureaucracies’ features and their behavior with respect to international bureaucracies’ policy advice. The overall sample comprises the bureaucracies of nine global and nine regional international organizations in eight thematic areas in the policy fields of agriculture and finance.
The overall finding of this study is that international bureaucracies’ performance and their role as policy advisors and expert authorities as perceived by ministry officials are highly context-specific and relational. These features vary not only across international bureaucracies but much more intra-organizationally across the different thematic areas that an international bureaucracy addresses, i.e. across different thematic contexts. As far as to the relational nature of international bureaucracies’ features, the study generally finds strong variation across the assessments by ministry officials from different countries and across thematic areas. Hence, the findings highlight that it is likewise important to study international bureaucracies via the perspective of their stakeholders and to take account of the different thematic areas and contexts in which international bureaucracies operate.
The study contributes to current research on international bureaucracies in various ways. First, it directly surveys one important type of domestic stakeholders, namely national ministry officials, as to how they evaluate certain aspects of international bureaucracies instead of deriving them from their structural features, policy documents or assessments by their staff. Furthermore, the study empirically tests a range of theoretical hypotheses derived from the literature on international bureaucracies’ influence, as well as related literature. Second, the study advances methods of assessing international bureaucracies through a large-N, cross-national expert survey among ministry officials. A survey of this type of stakeholder and of this scope is – to my knowledge – unprecedented. Yet, as argued above, their perspectives are equally important for assessing and explaining international bureaucracies’ influence. Third, the study adapts common theories of international bureaucracies’ policy influence and expert authority to the assessments by ministry officials. In so doing, it tests hypotheses that are rooted in both rationalist and constructivist accounts and combines perspectives on international bureaucracies from both International Relations and Public Administration. Empirically supporting and challenging these hypotheses further complements the theoretical understanding of the determinants of international bureaucracies’ influence among national bureaucracies from both rationalist and constructivist perspectives.
Overall, this study advances our understanding of international bureaucracies by systematically taking into account ministry officials’ perspectives in order to determine under which conditions international bureaucracies are perceived to perform well and are able to have an effect as policy advisors and expert authorities among national bureaucracies. Thereby, the study helps to specify to what extent international bureaucracies – as global governance actors – are able to permeate domestic governance via ministry officials and, thus, contribute to the question of why some international bureaucracies play a greater role and are ultimately able to have more influence than others.
West German anticommunism and the SED’s Westarbeit were to some extentinterrelated. From the beginning, each German state had attemted to stabilise itsown social system while trying to discredit its political opponent. The claim tosole representation and the refusal to acknowledge each other delineated governmentalaction on both sides. Anticommunism inWest Germany re-developed under theconditions of the Cold War, which allowed it to become virtually the reason ofstate and to serve as a tool for the exclusion of KPD supporters. In its turn, theSED branded the West German State as‘revanchist’and instrumentalised itsanticommunism to persecute and eliminate opponents within the GDR. Bothphenomena had an integrative and exclusionary element.
This chapter outlines the strategy of the European Group for Public Administration (EGPA) and reflects on some of its key strengths, and how these may equip the European community of scholars and practitioners of public administration (PA) to contribute to the development of the field. The chapter reviews the key trait of the EGPA organisational model: the Permanent Study Groups, which are communities of scholars centred on the key areas of the administrative sciences in Europe. It also discusses the partnerships that EGPA has developed with key institutions in Europe and beyond, and highlights the significance of the EGPA policy papers on European governance. Finally, it discusses the strategic, forward-looking project European Perspectives on Public Administration, which aims to reflect on the future of the research and teaching of public administration.
With the aim to improve the quality of public administration (PA) programmes in Europe, EGPA established in 1999—together with the Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe (NISPAcee)—the European Association for Public Administration Accreditation (EAPAA). This chapter presents the development of EAPAA in the last two decades and the experiences made with voluntary accreditation of academic PA programmes in Europe. The authors illustrate the basic accreditation concept of EAPAA, its integration into the European quality assurance institutions and the scope of accreditation missions over time. Finally, the effects of accreditation measures in the educational field of PA are discussed.
Kuhlmann, Laffin and Wayenberg point out three main strands of subnational changes that have significantly dominated the research field and focus of Permanent Study Group 5. Elaborating upon the Study Group’s contributions, the chapter overviews relevant research questions, approaches and findings that have been touched upon concerning local and regional government systems, subnational reforms and their evaluation in a multi-level governance setting. The chapter concludes with zooming in on austerity as a main driver of future developments upon and amongst all levels of government.
The contribution summarises the scientific discussion and research activities of the EGPA Permanent Study Group 4 (PSG 4) “Local Governance and Local Democracy”, founded in 2005. The impetus for proposing this specific PSG was the growing importance of the local level within the multi-level governance system in the European Union and most of its member states. The PSG 4 acts as a European network of research activities inside and outside EGPA, producing joint publications and organising scientific debates on many problems of the development of municipalities and local authorities. Our focus was on discussing both how to improve democracy by increased participation and deliberation, and how to secure provision of services in an efficient way in developed welfare societies. This includes analysing several forms of administrative changes and reforms at the local level and research of representative, direct and cooperative democracy at local level in a cross-European comparison.
The chapter aims at addressing collaboration between the two main professional organizations in the field of Public Administration in Europe—the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA) and the Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe (NISPAcee)—in their contribution to understanding, creating and institutionalizing the European Administrative Space. While the chapter gives an overview of both informal collaboration between Eastern and Western European scholars, and a joint accreditation initiative (EAPAA), its main focus is on Trans-European Dialogue (TED). The chapter outlines the challenges for the future of TED and proposes other potential ways of EGPA-NISPAcee collaboration.
This chapter highlights the role and contribution of EGPA in educating and socializing the next generation of young researchers into the interdisciplinary community of public administration, management and policy scholars in Europe. In doing so, it also provides an overview of the current state of the art in doctoral education in the field of public administration in Europe. Against this background, the chapter presents the annual “EGPA Workshop for PhDs and Young Researchers” (or for short: the EGPA PhD project) in the context of changing institutional settings and academic markets of PhD education in Europe. Consequently, EGPA carries an important responsibility as a representative of the public administration community in shaping the course of PhD education in our field in Europe.
The German Sonderweg thesis has been discarded in most research fields. Yet in regards to the military, things differ: all conflicts before the Second World War are interpreted as prelude to the war of extermination between 1939–1945. This article specifically looks at the Franco-Prussian War 1870–71 and German behaviour vis-à-vis regular combatants, civilians and irregular guerrilla fighters, the so-called francs-tireurs. The author argues that the counter-measures were not exceptional for nineteenth century warfare and also shows how selective reading of the existing secondary literature has distorted our view on the war.
A widespread view in political science is that minority cabinets govern more flexibly and inclusively, more in line with a median-oriented and 'consensual' vision of democracy. Yet there is only little empirical evidence for it. We study legislative coalition-building in the German state of North-Rhine-Westphalia, which was ruled by a minority government between 2010 and 2012. We compare the inclusiveness of legislative coalitions under minority and majority cabinets, based on 1028 laws passed in the 1985–2017 period, and analyze in detail the flexibility of legislative coalition formation under the minority government. Both quantitative analyses are complemented with brief case studies of specific legislation. We find, first, that the minority cabinet did not rule more inclusively. Second, the minority cabinet’s legislative flexibility was fairly limited; to the extent that it existed, it follows a pattern that cannot be explained on the basis of the standard spatial model with policy-seeking parties.
Evolving order?
(2019)
Global food security governance is fraught with fragmentation, overlap and complexity. While calls for coordination and coherence abound, establishing an inter-organizational order at this level seems to remain difficult. While the emphasis in the literature has so far been on the global level, we know less about dynamics of inter-organizational relations in food security governance at the country level, and empirical studies are lacking. It is this research gap the article seeks to address by posing the following research question: In how far does inter-organizational order develop in the organizational field of food security governance at the country level? Theoretically and conceptually, the article draws on sociological institutionalism, and on work on inter-organizational relations. Empirically, the article conducts an exploratory case study of the organizational field of food security governance in Côte d’Ivoire, building on a qualitative content analysis of organizational documents covering a period from 2003 to 2016 and semi-structured interviews with staff of international organizations from 2016. The article demonstrates that not all of the developments attributed to food security governance at the global level play out in the same way at the country level. Rather, in the case of Côte d’Ivoire there are signs for a certain degree of coherence between IOs in the field of food security governance and even for an – albeit limited – division of labour. However, this only holds for specific dimensions of the inter-organizational order and appears to be subject to continuous contestation and reinterpretation under the surface.
Speaking the unspeakable
(2019)
This article discusses the filmic representation of the infamous Wannsee Conference, when fifteen senior German officials met at a villa on the shore of a Berlin lake to discuss and co-ordinate the implementation of the so-called final solution to the Jewish question. The understanding reached during the course of the ninety-minute meeting cleared the way for the Europe-wide killing of six million Jews. The article sets out to answer the principal challenge facing anyone attempting to recreate the Wannsee Conference on film: what was the atmosphere of this conference and the attitude of the participants? Moreover, it discusses various ethical aspects related to the portrayal of evil, not in actions but in words, using the medium of film. In doing so, it focuses on the BBC/HBO television film Conspiracy (2001), directed by Frank Pierson, probing its historical accuracy and discussing its artistic credibility.
On a small scale
(2018)
This study argues that micro relations matter in peacekeeping. Asking what makes the implementation of peacekeeping interventions complex and how complexity is resolved, I find that formal, contractual mechanisms only rarely effectively reduce complexity – and that micro relations fill this gap. Micro relations are personal relationships resulting from frequent face-to-face interaction in professional and – equally importantly – social contexts.
This study offers an explanation as to why micro relations are important for coping with complexity, in the form of a causal mechanism. For this purpose, I bring together theoretical and empirical knowledge: I draw upon the current debate on ‘institutional complexity’ (Greenwood et al. 2011) in organizational institutionalism as well as original empirical evidence from a within-case study of the peacekeeping intervention in Haiti, gained in ten weeks of field research. In this study, scholarship on institutional complexity serves to identify theoretical causal channels which guide empirical analysis. An additional, secondary aim is pursued with this mechanism-centered approach: testing the utility of Beach and Pedersen’s (2013) theory-testing process tracing.
Regarding the first research question – what makes the implementation of peacekeeping interventions complex –, the central finding is that complexity manifests itself in the dual role of organizations as cooperation partners and competitors for (scarce) resources, turf and influence. UN organizations, donor agencies and international NGOs implementing peacekeeping activities in post-conflict environments have chronic difficulty mastering both roles because they entail contradictory demands: effective cooperation requires information exchange, resource and responsibility-sharing as well as external scrutiny, whereas prevailing over competitors demands that organizations conceal information, guard resources, increase relative turf and influence, as well as shield themselves from scrutiny. Competition fuels organizational distrust and friction – and impedes cooperation.
How is this complexity resolved? The answer to this second research question is that deep-seated organizational competition is routinely mediated – and cooperation motivated – in micro relations and micro interaction. Regular, frequent face-to-face interaction between individual organizational members generates social resources that help to transcend organizational distrust and conflict, most importantly familiarity with each other, personal trust and belief in reciprocity. Furthermore, informal conflict mediation and control mechanisms – namely, open discussion, mutual monitoring in direct interaction and social exclusion – enhance solidarity and mutual support.
Why choice matters
(2018)
Measures of democracy are in high demand. Scientific and public audiences use them to describe political realities and to substantiate causal claims about those realities. This introduction to the thematic issue reviews the history of democracy measurement since the 1950s. It identifies four development phases of the field, which are characterized by three recurrent topics of debate: (1) what is democracy, (2) what is a good measure of democracy, and (3) do our measurements of democracy register real-world developments? As the answers to those questions have been changing over time, the field of democracy measurement has adapted and reached higher levels of theoretical and methodological sophistication. In effect, the challenges facing contemporary social scientists are not only limited to the challenge of constructing a sound index of democracy. Today, they also need a profound understanding of the differences between various measures of democracy and their implications for empirical applications. The introduction outlines how the contributions to this thematic issue help scholars cope with the recurrent issues of conceptualization, measurement, and application, and concludes by identifying avenues for future research.
The main thread of this review article is to identify the reasons of how to account for the trajectory of American power in the region. Leaving behind the vast amount of highly politicised and hastily compiled volumes of recent years (notwithstanding valuable exceptions), the monographs composed by Lawrence Freedman, Trita Parsi and Oliver Roy attempt to subtly disentangle the intricacies of US involvement in the region from highly distinct perspectives. One caveat for International Relations theorists is that none of the
aforementioned authors intends to provide theoretical frameworks for his examination. However, since IR theory has damagingly neglected history in the last decades, the works under review here, at least in part, compensate for this disciplinary and intellectual failure. In conclusion, Freedman’s in-depth approach as a diplomatic historian, with its under-lying reference to the various traditions in US foreign policy thinking, is most illuminating, while Parsi’s contestable account focuses too narrowly on the Iran-Israel relationship. Roy’s explications fail to show how and why the ‘ideological’ element in US foreign policy came to carry exceedingly more weight after 2001 than it did in the 1990s.
German international legal scholarship has been known for its practice-oriented, doctrinal approach to international law. On the basis of archival material, this article tracks how this methodological take on international law developed in Germany between the 1920s and the 1980s. In 1924, as a reaction to the establishment of judicial institutions in the Treaty of Versailles, the German Reich founded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. Director Viktor Bruns institutionalized the practice-oriented method to advance the idea of international law as a legal order as well as to safeguard the interests of the Weimar government before the various courts. Under National Socialism, members of the Institute provided legal justifications for Hitler’s increasingly radical foreign policy. At the same time, some of them did not engage with völkisch-racist theories, but systematized the existing ius in bello. After 1945, Hermann Mosler, as director of the renamed Max Planck Institute, took the view that the practice-oriented approach was not as discredited as the more theoretical approach of völkisch international law. Furthermore, he regarded the method as a promising vehicle to support the policy of Westintegration of Konrad Adenauer. Also, he tried to promote the idea of ‘international society as a legal community’ by analysing international practice.
Conclusion
(2019)
Anthropocene has become an environmental buzzword. It denotes a new geological epoch that is human?dominated. As mounting scientific evidence reveals, humankind has fundamentally altered atmospheric, geological, hydrological, biospheric, and other Earth system processes to an extent that the risk of an irreversible system change emerges. Human societies must therefore change direction and navigate away from critical tipping points in the various ecosystems of our planet. This hypothesis has kicked off a debate not only on the geoscientific definition of the Anthropocene era, but increasingly also in the social sciences. However, the specific contribution of the social sciences disciplines and in particular that of political science still needs to be fully established.
This edited volume analyzes, from a political science perspective, the wider social dynamics underlying the ecological and geological changes, as well as their implications for governance and politics in the Anthropocene. The focus is on two questions: (1) What is the contribution of political science to the Anthropocene debate, e.g. in terms of identified problems, answers, and solutions? (2) What are the conceptual and practical implications of the Anthropocene debate for the discipline of political science?
Overall, this book contributes to the Anthropocene debate by providing novel theoretical and conceptual accounts of the Anthropocene, engaging with contemporary politics and policy-making in the Anthropocene, and offering a critical reflection on the Anthropocene debate as such. The volume will be of great interest to students and scholars of political science, global environmental politics and governance, and sustainable development.
Stuck in the past?
(2018)
After the Civil War the Spanish army functioned as a guardian of domestic order, but suffered from antiquated material and little financial means. These factors have been described as fundamental reasons for the army’s low potential wartime capability. This article draws on British and German sources to demonstrate how Spanish military culture prevented an augmented effectiveness and organisational change. Claiming that the army merely lacked funding and modern equipment, falls considerably short in grasping the complexities of military effectiveness and organisational cultures, and might prove fatal for current attempts to develop foreign armed forces in conflict or post-conflict zones.
The article explores Europeanisation as an effect of European political integration, a process driven by struggles over the legitimate political and social order that is to prevail in Europe. Firstly, an analytic framework is constructed, drawing on insights from Pierre Bourdieu’s work on similar struggles over nation-stateness. Secondly, the mechanisms identified are used to assess the role played by economic experts and expertise in the process of European political integration. It is argued that concepts arising from economic disciplines, agents educated in economics, and practising economic professionals influence European political integration and have benefited from Europeanisation initiated by this process. Special emphasis is placed on strategies of integrating Europe by law or by market, on governing Europe using economic expertise, on the role played by economic academia in researching and objectifying Europe, and on staffing European institutions with economists.
An egalitarian approach to the fair representation of voters specifies three main institutional requirements: proportional representation, legislative majority rule and a parliamentary system of government. This approach faces two challenges: the under-determination of the resulting democratic process and the idea of a trade-off between equal voter representation and government accountability. Linking conceptual with comparative analysis, the article argues that we can distinguish three ideal-typical varieties of the egalitarian vision of democracy, based on the stages at which majorities are formed. These varieties do not put different relative normative weight onto equality and accountability, but have different conceptions of both values and their reconciliation. The view that accountability is necessarily linked to clarity of responsibility', widespread in the comparative literature, is questioned - as is the idea of a general trade-off between representation and accountability. Depending on the vision of democracy, the two values need not be in conflict.
Political Narrations
(2018)
This book analyzes narrations embedded in political disputes, allowing readers to gain a deeper understanding of modern political reality. The author explores this theme in readings of the Sophocles tragedy Antigone, the Melian Dialogue of Thucydides, Heinrich von Kleist’s novella Michael Kohlhaas, Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Grand Inquisitor and E.L. Doctorow’s Ragtime novel, taking into account the relevant interdisciplinary aspects of the narratives. His study of these four narrations focuses on key political concepts, such as might and right, self-interest, legality and justice, the nation-state and democracy, and relates them compellingly to current actuality. Since narrations can exert comprehensive and lasting influence on individuals’ political discernment, this systematic analysis allows for a better comprehension of politics in education and civics.
The article analyses the type of bicameralism we find in Australia as
a distinct executive-legislative system – a hybrid between
parliamentary and presidential government – which we call ‘semi-
parliamentary government’. We argue that this hybrid presents an
important and underappreciated alternative to pure parliamentary
government as well as presidential forms of the power-separation,
and that it can achieve a certain balance between competing
models or visions of democracy. We specify theoretically how the
semi-parliamentary separation of powers contributes to the
balancing of democratic visions and propose a conceptual
framework for comparing democratic visions. We use this
framework to locate the Australian Commonwealth, all Australian
states and 22 advanced democratic nation-states on a two-
dimensional empirical map of democratic patterns for the period
from 1995 to 2015.
This article expands our current knowledge about ministerial selection in coalition governments and analyses why ministerial candidates succeed in acquiring a cabinet position after general elections. It argues that political parties bargain over potential office-holders during government-formation processes, selecting future cabinet ministers from an emerging bargaining pool'. The article draws upon a new dataset comprising all ministrable candidates discussed by political parties during eight government-formation processes in Germany between 1983 and 2009. The conditional logit regression analysis reveals that temporal dynamics, such as the day she enters the pool, have a significant effect on her success in achieving a cabinet position. Other determinants of ministerial selection discussed in the existing literature, such as party and parliamentary expertise, are less relevant for achieving ministerial office. The article concludes that scholarship on ministerial selection requires a stronger emphasis for its endogenous nature in government-formation as well as the relevance of temporal dynamics in such processes.
The project of public-reason liberalism faces a basic problem: publicly justified principles are typically too abstract and vague to be directly applied to practical political disputes, whereas applicable specifications of these principles are not uniquely publicly justified. One solution could be a legislative procedure that selects one member from the eligible set of inconclusively justified proposals. Yet if liberal principles are too vague to select sufficiently specific legislative proposals, can they, nevertheless, select specific legislative procedures? Based on the work of Gerald Gaus, this article argues that the only candidate for a conclusively justified decision procedure is a majoritarian or otherwise ‘neutral’ democracy. If the justification of democracy requires an equality baseline in the design of political regimes and if justifications for departure from this baseline are subject to reasonable disagreement, a majoritarian design is justified by default. Gaus’s own preference for super-majoritarian procedures is based on disputable specifications of justified liberal principles. These procedures can only be defended as a sectarian preference if the equality baseline is rejected, but then it is not clear how the set of justifiable political regimes can be restricted to full democracies.
The Rio Conventions stand at the centerpiece of international cooperation within the governance area of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Due to substantial environmental and political linkages, there are interrelations between the three regimes. This study seeks to examine the inter-institutional relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification by analyzing and assessing their horizontal interplay activities from the starting point of their genesis at Earth Summit in 1992 until today. In this research, I address the connections between the three conventions and identify the conflicting, cooperative, and synergetic aspects of inter-institutional relationship. While the overall empirical analysis suggests weak indications of a conflictive type, this research asserts that the interplay activities have thus far led to a cooperative relationship between the Rio Conventions. Moreover, increasing coordination and collaboration between the conventions’ treaty secretariats signals characteristics of a synergetic relationship, which could open up a potential window of opportunity for these actors to further engage and progress in institutional management in the future. In a conclusion, this study explores the possibility of the formation of an overarching environmental institution as a result of joint institutional management within the complex of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.
Long-term policy issues are a particularly vexing class of environmental policy issues which merit increasing attention due to the long-time horizons involved, the incongruity with political cycles, and the challenges for collective action. Following the definition of long-term environmental policy challenges, I pose three questions as challenges for future research, namely 1. Are present democracies well suited to cope with long-term policy challenges? 2. Are top-down or bottom-up solutions to long-term environmental policy challenges advisable? 3. Will mitigation and adaptation of environmental challenges suffice? In concluding, the contribution raises the issue of credible commitment for long-term policy issues and potential design options.
Although party competition is widely regarded as an important part of a working democracy, it is rarely analysed in political science literature. This article discusses the basic properties of party competition, especially the patterns of interaction in contemporary party systems. Competition as a phenomenon at the macro level has to be carefully distinguished from contest and cooperation as the forms of interaction at the micro level. The article gives special attention to the creation of issue innovations. Contrary to existing approaches, I argue that not only responsiveness but also innovation are necessary to guarantee a workable democratic competition. Competition takes place on an issue market, where parties can discover voters’ demands. Combined with the concept of institutional veto points, the article presents hypotheses on how institutions shape the possibility for programmatic innovations.
In the past decades, development cooperation (DC) led by conventional bi- and multilateral donors has been joined by a large number of small, private or public-private donors. This pluralism of actors raises questions as to whether or not these new donors are able to implement projects more or less effectively than their conventional counterparts. In contrast to their predecessors, the new donors have committed themselves to be more pragmatic, innovative and flexible in their development cooperation measures. However, they are also criticized for weakening the function of local civil society and have the reputation of being an intransparent and often controversial alternative to public services. With additional financial resources and their new approach to development, the new donors have been described in the literature as playing a controversial role in transforming development cooperation. This dissertation compares the effectiveness of initiatives by new and conventional donors with regard to the provision of public goods and services to the poor in the water and sanitation sector in India.
India is an emerging country but it is experiencing high poverty rates and poor water supply in predominantly rural areas. It lends itself for analyzing this research theme as it is currently being confronted by a large number of actors and approaches that aim to find solutions for these challenges .
In the theoretical framework of this dissertation, four governance configurations are derived from the interaction of varying actor types with regard to hierarchical and non-hierarchical steering of their interactions. These four governance configurations differ in decision-making responsibilities, accountability and delegation of tasks or direction of information flow. The assumption on actor relationships and steering is supplemented by possible alternative explanations in the empirical investigation, such as resource availability, the inheritance of structures and institutions from previous projects in a project context, gaining acceptance through beneficiaries (local legitimacy) as a door opener, and asymmetries of power in the project context.
Case study evidence from seven projects reveals that the actors' relationship is important for successful project delivery. Additionally, the results show that there is a systematic difference between conventional and new donors. Projects led by conventional donors were consistently more successful, due to an actor relationship that placed the responsibility in the hands of the recipient actors and benefited from the trust and reputation of a long-term cooperation. The trust and reputation of conventional donors always went along with a back-up from federal level and trickled down as reputation also at local level implementation. Furthermore, charismatic leaders, as well as the acquired structures and institutions of predecessor projects, also proved to be a positive influencing factor for successful project implementation.
Despite the mixed results of the seven case studies, central recommendations for action can be derived for the various actors involved in development cooperation. For example, new donors could fulfill a supplementary function with conventional donors by developing innovative project approaches through pilot studies and then implementing them as a supplement to the projects of conventional donors on the ground. In return, conventional donors would have to make room the new donors by integrating their approaches into already programs in order to promote donor harmonization. It is also important to identify and occupy niches for activities and to promote harmonization among donors on state and federal sides.
The empirical results demonstrate the need for a harmonization strategy of different donor types in order to prevent duplication, over-experimentation and the failure of development programs. A transformation to successful and sustainable development cooperation can only be achieved through more coordination processes and national self-responsibility.
The thesis focuses on the inter-departmental coordination of adaptation and mitigation of demographic change in East Germany. All Eastern German States (Länder) have set up inter-departmental committees (IDCs) that are expected to deliver joint strategies to tackle demographic change. IDCs provide an organizational setting for potential positive coordination, i.e. a joint approach to problem solving that pools and utilizes the expertise of many departments in a constructive manner from the very beginning. Whether they actually achieve positive coordination is contested within the academic debate. This motivates the first research question of this thesis: Do IDCs achieve positive coordination?
Interdepartmental committees and their role in horizontal coordination within the core executive triggered interest among scholars already more than fifty years ago. However, we don’t know much about their actual importance for the inter-departmental preparation of cross-cutting policies. Until now, few studies can be found that analyzes inter-departmental committees in a comparative way trying to identify whether they achieve positive coordination and what factors shape the coordination process and output of IDCs.
Each IDC has a chair organization that is responsible for managing the interactions within the IDCs. The chair organization is important, because it organizes and structures the overall process of coordination in the IDC. Consequently, the chair of an IDC serves as the main boundary-spanner and therefore has remarkable influence by arranging meetings and the work schedule or by distributing internal roles. Interestingly, in the German context we find two organizational approaches: while some states decided to put a line department (e.g. Department of Infrastructure) in charge of managing the IDC, others rely on the State Chancelleries, i.e. the center of government.
This situation allows for comparative research design that can address the role of the State Chancellery in inter-departmental coordination of cross-cutting policies. This is relevant, because the role of the center is crucial when studying coordination within central government. The academic debate on the center of government in the German politico-administrative system is essentially divided into two camps. One camp claims that the center can improve horizontal coordination and steer cross-cutting policy-making more effectively, while the other camp points to limits to central coordination due to departmental autonomy. This debate motivates the second research question of this thesis: Does the State Chancellery as chair organization achieve positive coordination in IDCs?
The center of government and its role in the German politic-administrative system has attracted academic attention already in the 1960s and 1970s. There is a research desiderate regarding the center’s role during the inter-departmental coordination process. There are only few studies that explicitly analyze centers of government and their role in coordination of cross-cutting policies, although some single case studies have been published. This gap in the academic debate will be addressed by the answer to the second research question.
The dependent variable of this study is the chair organization of IDCs. The value of this variable is dichotomous: either an IDC is chaired by a Line department or by a State Chancellery. We are interested whether this variable has an effect on two dependent variables. First, we will analyze the coordination process, i.e. interaction among bureaucrats within the IDC. Second, the focus of this thesis will be on the coordination result, i.e. the demography strategies that are produced by the respective IDCs.
In terms of the methodological approach, this thesis applies a comparative case study design based on a most-similar-systems logic. The German Federalism is quite suitable for such designs. Since the institutional framework largely is the same across all states, individual variables and their effect can be isolated and plausibly analyzed. To further control for potential intervening variables, we will limit our case selection to states located in East Germany, because the demographic situation is most problematic in the Eastern part of Germany, i.e. there is a equal problem pressure. Consequently, we will analyze five cases: Thuringia, Saxony-Anhalt (line department) and Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Saxony (State Chancellery).
There is no grand coordination theory that is ready to be applied to our case studies. Therefore, we need to tailor our own approach. Our assumption is that the individual chair organization has an effect on the coordination process and output of IDCs, although all cases are embedded in the same institutional setting, i.e. the German politico-administrative system. Therefore, we need an analytical approach than incorporates institutionalist and agency-based arguments. Therefore, this thesis will utilize Actor-Centered Institutionalism (ACI). Broadly speaking, ACI conceptualizes actors’ behavior as influenced - but not fully determined - by institutions. Since ACI is rather abstract we need to adapt it for the purpose of this thesis. Line Departments and State Chancelleries will be modeled as distinct actors with different action orientations and capabilities to steer the coordination process. However, their action is embedded within the institutional context of governments, which we will conceptualize as being comprised of regulative (formal rules) and normative (social norms) elements.
Conclusion : Tensions, Challenges, and Future "Flags" of Local Public Sector Reforms and Comparative
(2016)
Emmanuel Kant asked three important questions which will always be with us: What can we know? What should we do? What may we hope for? These three key existentialist questions are, of course, also relevant for a reflection on the future of Public Administration: What can we know, as researchers in the field of Public Administration, about our object of public administration? What should we do as researchers and teachers to make sure we remain part of a solution and to guarantee that we are ahead of reality and its future problems? What kind of improvement (or not) may we hope for a public sector in an increasingly complex society? This chapter tries to explore some possible answers to these three important questions for our field of Public Administration. The background is our common project about ‘European Perspectives for Public Administration’ (EPPA), which we hope to establish as a continuous dialogue and discourse in the context of European Public Administration and the ‘European Group for Public Administration’ (EGPA).
Translating innovation
(2017)
This doctoral thesis studies the process of innovation adoption in public administrations, addressing the research question of how an innovation is translated to a local context. The study empirically explores Design Thinking as a new problem-solving approach introduced by a federal government organisation in Singapore. With a focus on user-centeredness, collaboration and iteration Design Thinking seems to offer a new way to engage recipients and other stakeholders of public services as well as to re-think the policy design process from a user’s point of view. Pioneered in the private sector, early adopters of the methodology include civil services in Australia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, the United States as well as Singapore. Hitherto, there is not much evidence on how and for which purposes Design Thinking is used in the public sector.
For the purpose of this study, innovation adoption is framed in an institutionalist perspective addressing how concepts are translated to local contexts. The study rejects simplistic views of the innovation adoption process, in which an idea diffuses to another setting without adaptation. The translation perspective is fruitful because it captures the multidimensionality and ‘messiness’ of innovation adoption. More specifically, the overall research question addressed in this study is: How has Design Thinking been translated to the local context of the public sector organisation under investigation? And from a theoretical point of view: What can we learn from translation theory about innovation adoption processes?
Moreover, there are only few empirical studies of organisations adopting Design Thinking and most of them focus on private organisations. We know very little about how Design Thinking is embedded in public sector organisations. This study therefore provides further empirical evidence of how Design Thinking is used in a public sector organisation, especially with regards to its application to policy work which has so far been under-researched.
An exploratory single case study approach was chosen to provide an in-depth analysis of the innovation adoption process. Based on a purposive, theory-driven sampling approach, a Singaporean Ministry was selected because it represented an organisational setting in which Design Thinking had been embedded for several years, making it a relevant case with regard to the research question. Following a qualitative research design, 28 semi-structured interviews (45-100 minutes) with employees and managers were conducted. The interview data was triangulated with observations and documents, collected during a field research research stay in Singapore.
The empirical study of innovation adoption in a single organisation focused on the intra-organisational perspective, with the aim to capture the variations of translation that occur during the adoption process. In so doing, this study opened the black box often assumed in implementation studies. Second, this research advances translation studies not only by showing variance, but also by deriving explanatory factors. The main differences in the translation of Design Thinking occurred between service delivery and policy divisions, as well as between the first adopter and the rest of the organisation. For the intra-organisational translation of Design Thinking in the Singaporean Ministry the following five factors played a role: task type, mode of adoption, type of expertise, sequence of adoption, and the adoption of similar practices.
In the debate on how to govern sustainable development, a central question concerns the interaction between knowledge about sustainability and policy developments. The discourse on what constitutes sustainable development conflict on some of the most basic issues, including the proper definitions, instruments and indicators of what should be ‘developed’ or ‘sustained’. Whereas earlier research on the role of (scientific) knowledge in policy adopted a rationalist-positivist view of knowledge as the basis for ‘evidence-based policy making’, recent literature on knowledge creation and transfer processes has instead pointed towards aspects of knowledge-policy ‘co-production’ (Jasanoff 2004). It is highlighted that knowledge utilisation is not just a matter of the quality of the knowledge as such, but a question of which knowledge fits with the institutional context and dominant power structures. Just as knowledge supports and justifies certain policy, policy can produce and stabilise certain knowledge. Moreover, rather than viewing knowledge-policy interaction as a linear and uni-directional model, this conceptualization is based on an assumption of the policy process as being more anarchic and unpredictable, something Cohen, March and Olsen (1972) has famously termed the ‘garbage-can model’.
The present dissertation focuses on the interplay between knowledge and policy in sustainability governance. It takes stock with the practice of ‘Management by Objectives and Results’ (MBOR: Lundqvist 2004) whereby policy actors define sustainable development goals (based on certain knowledge) and are expected to let these definitions guide policy developments as well as evaluate whether sustainability improves or not. As such a knowledge-policy instrument, Sustainability Indicators (SI:s) help both (subjectively) construct ‘social meaning’ about sustainability and (objectively) influence policy and measure its success. The different articles in this cumulative dissertation analyse the development, implementation and policy support (personal and institutional) of Sustainability Indicators as an instrument for MBOR in a variety of settings. More specifically, the articles centre on the question of how sustainability definitions and measurement tools on the one hand (knowledge) and policy instruments and political power structures on the other, are co-produced.
A first article examines the normative foundations of popular international SI:s and country rankings. Combining theoretical (constructivist) analysis with factor analysis, it analyses how the input variable structure of SI:s are related to different sustainability paradigms, producing a different output in terms of which countries (developed versus developing) are most highly ranked. Such a theoretical input-output analysis points towards a potential problem of SI:s becoming a sort of ‘circular argumentation constructs’. The article thus, highlights on a quantitative basis what others have noted qualitatively – that different definitions and interpretations of sustainability influence indicator output to the point of contradiction. The normative aspects of SI:s does thereby not merely concern the question of which indicators to use for what purposes, but also the more fundamental question of how normative and political bias are intrinsically a part of the measurement instrument as such. The study argues that, although no indicator can be expected to tell the sustainability ‘truth-out-there’, a theoretical localization of indicators – and of the input variable structure – may help facilitate interpretation of SI output and the choice of which indicators to use for what (policy or academic) purpose.
A second article examines the co-production of knowledge and policy in German sustainability governance. It focuses on the German sustainability strategy ‘Perspektiven für Deutschland’ (2002), a strategy that stands out both in an international comparison of national sustainability strategies as well as among German government policy strategies because of its relative stability over five consecutive government constellations, its rather high status and increasingly coercive nature. The study analyses what impact the sustainability strategy has had on the policy process between 2002 and 2015, in terms of defining problems and shaping policy processes. Contrasting rationalist and constructivist perspectives on the role of knowledge in policy, two factors, namely the level of (scientific and political) consensus about policy goals and the ‘contextual fit’ of problem definitions, are found to be main factors explaining how different aspects of the strategy is used. Moreover, the study argues that SI:s are part of a continuous process of ‘structuring’ in which indicator, user and context factors together help structure the sustainability challenge in such a way that it becomes more manageable for government policy.
A third article examines how 31 European countries have built supportive institutions of MBOR between 1992 and 2012. In particular during the 1990s and early 2000s much hope was put into the institutionalisation of Environmental Policy Integration (EPI) as a way to overcome sectoral thinking in sustainability policy making and integrate issues of environmental sustainability into all government policy. However, despite high political backing (FN, EU, OECD), implementation of EPI seems to differ widely among countries. The study is a quantitative longitudinal cross-country comparison of how countries’ ‘EPI architectures’ have developed over time. Moreover, it asks which ‘EPI architectures’ seem to be more effective in producing more ‘stringent’ sustainability policy.
Bad governance causes economic, social, developmental and environmental problems in many developing countries. Developing countries have adopted a number of reforms that have assisted in achieving good governance. The success of governance reform depends on the starting point of each country – what institutional arrangements exist at the out-set and who the people implementing reforms within the existing institutional framework are. This dissertation focuses on how formal institutions (laws and regulations) and informal institutions (culture, habit and conception) impact on good governance. Three characteristics central to good governance - transparency, participation and accountability are studied in the research.
A number of key findings were: Good governance in Hanoi and Berlin represent the two extremes of the scale, while governance in Berlin is almost at the top of the scale, governance in Hanoi is at the bottom. Good governance in Hanoi is still far from achieved. In Berlin, information about public policies, administrative services and public finance is available, reliable and understandable. People do not encounter any problems accessing public information. In Hanoi, however, public information is not easy to access. There are big differences between Hanoi and Berlin in the three forms of participation. While voting in Hanoi to elect local deputies is formal and forced, elections in Berlin are fair and free. The candidates in local elections in Berlin come from different parties, whereas the candidacy of local deputies in Hanoi is thoroughly controlled by the Fatherland Front. Even though the turnout of voters in local deputy elections is close to 90 percent in Hanoi, the legitimacy of both the elections and the process of representation is non-existent because the local deputy candidates are decided by the Communist Party.
The involvement of people in solving local problems is encouraged by the government in Berlin. The different initiatives include citizenry budget, citizen activity, citizen initiatives, etc. Individual citizens are free to participate either individually or through an association.
Lacking transparency and participation, the quality of public service in Hanoi is poor. Citizens seldom get their services on time as required by the regulations. Citizens who want to receive public services can bribe officials directly, use the power of relationships, or pay a third person – the mediator ("Cò" - in Vietnamese).
In contrast, public service delivery in Berlin follows the customer-orientated principle. The quality of service is high in relation to time and cost. Paying speed money, bribery and using relationships to gain preferential public service do not exist in Berlin.
Using the examples of Berlin and Hanoi, it is clear to see how transparency, participation and accountability are interconnected and influence each other. Without a free and fair election as well as participation of non-governmental organisations, civil organisations, and the media in political decision-making and public actions, it is hard to hold the Hanoi local government accountable.
The key differences in formal institutions (regulative and cognitive) between Berlin and Hanoi reflect the three main principles: rule of law vs. rule by law, pluralism vs. monopoly Party in politics and social market economy vs. market economy with socialist orientation.
In Berlin the logic of appropriateness and codes of conduct are respect for laws, respect of individual freedom and ideas and awareness of community development. People in Berlin take for granted that public services are delivered to them fairly. Ideas such as using money or relationships to shorten public administrative procedures do not exist in the mind of either public officials or citizens.
In Hanoi, under a weak formal framework of good governance, new values and norms (prosperity, achievement) generated in the economic transition interact with the habits of the centrally-planned economy (lying, dependence, passivity) and traditional values (hierarchy, harmony, family, collectivism) influence behaviours of those involved.
In Hanoi “doing the right thing” such as compliance with law doesn’t become “the way it is”.
The unintended consequence of the deliberate reform actions of the Party is the prevalence of corruption. The socialist orientation seems not to have been achieved as the gap between the rich and the poor has widened.
Good governance is not achievable if citizens and officials are concerned only with their self-interest. State and society depend on each other. Theoretically to achieve good governance in Hanoi, institutions (formal and informal) able to create good citizens, officials and deputies should be generated. Good citizens are good by habit rather than by nature.
The rule of law principle is necessary for the professional performance of local administrations and People’s Councils. When the rule of law is applied consistently, the room for informal institutions to function will be reduced.
Promoting good governance in Hanoi is dependent on the need and desire to change the government and people themselves. Good governance in Berlin can be seen to be the result of the efforts of the local government and citizens after a long period of development and continuous adjustment.
Institutional transformation is always a long and complicated process because the change in formal regulations as well as in the way they are implemented may meet strong resistance from the established practice. This study has attempted to point out the weaknesses of the institutions of Hanoi and has identified factors affecting future development towards good governance. But it is not easy to determine how long it will take to change the institutional setting of Hanoi in order to achieve good governance.
In 2002 Germany adopted an ambitious national sustainability strategy, covering all three sustainability spheres and circling around 21 key indicators. The strategy stands out because of its relative stability over five consecutive government constellations, its high status and increasingly coercive nature. This article analyses the strategy's role in the policy process, focusing on the use and influence of indicators as a central steering tool. Contrasting rationalist and constructivist perspectives on the role of knowledge in policy, two factors, namely the level of consensus about policy goals and the institutional setting of the indicators, are found to explain differences in use and influence both across indicators and over time. Moreover, the study argues that the indicators have been part of a continuous process of ‘structuring’ in which conceptual and instrumental use together help structure the sustainability challenge in such a way that it becomes more manageable for government policy.
This cumulative dissertation contains four self-contained articles which are related to EU regional policy and its structural funds as the overall research topic. In particular, the thesis addresses the question if EU regional policy interventions can at all be scientifically justified and legitimated on theoretical and empirical grounds from an economics point of view. The first two articles of the thesis (“The EU structural funds as a means to hamper migration” and “Internal migration and EU regional policy transfer payments: a panel data analysis for 28 EU member countries”) enter into one particular aspect of the debate regarding the justification and legitimisation of EU regional policy. They theoretically and empirically analyse as to whether regional policy or the market force of the free flow of labour (migration) in the internal European market is the better instrument to improve and harmonise the living and working conditions of EU citizens. Based on neoclassical market failure theory, the first paper argues that the structural funds of the EU are inhibiting internal migration, which is one of the key measures in achieving convergence among the nations in the single European market. It becomes clear that European regional policy aiming at economic growth and cohesion among the member states cannot be justified and legitimated if the structural funds hamper instead of promote migration. The second paper, however, shows that the empirical evidence on the migration and regional policy nexus is not unambiguous, i.e. different empirical investigations show that EU structural funds hamper and promote EU internal migration. Hence, the question of the scientific justification and legitimisation of EU regional policy cannot be readily and unambiguously answered on empirical grounds. This finding is unsatisfying but is in line with previous theoretical and empirical literature. That is why, I take a step back and reconsider the theoretical beginnings of the thesis, which took for granted neoclassical market failure theory as the starting point for the positive explanation as well as the normative justification and legitimisation of EU regional policy. The third article of the thesis (“EU regional policy: theoretical foundations and policy conclusions revisited”) deals with the theoretical explanation and legitimisation of EU regional policy as well as the policy recommendations given to EU regional policymakers deduced from neoclassical market failure theory. The article elucidates that neoclassical market failure is a normative concept, which justifies and legitimates EU regional policy based on a political and thus subjective goal or value-judgement. It can neither be used, therefore, to give a scientifically positive explanation of the structural funds nor to obtain objective and practically applicable policy instruments. Given this critique of neoclassical market failure theory, the third paper consequently calls into question the widely prevalent explanation and justification of EU regional policy given in static neoclassical equilibrium economics. It argues that an evolutionary non-equilibrium economics perspective on EU regional policy is much more appropriate to provide a realistic understanding of one of the largest policies conducted by the EU. However, this does neither mean that evolutionary economic theory can be unreservedly seen as the panacea to positively explain EU regional policy nor to derive objective policy instruments for EU regional policymakers. This issue is discussed in the fourth article of the thesis (“Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective”). This article reconsiders the explanation of economic policy from an evolutionary economics perspective. It contrasts the neoclassical equilibrium notions of market and government failure with the dominant evolutionary neo-Schumpeterian and Austrian-Hayekian perceptions. Based on this comparison, the paper criticises the fact that neoclassical failure reasoning still prevails in non-equilibrium evolutionary economics when economic policy issues are examined. This is surprising, since proponents of evolutionary economics usually view their approach as incompatible with its neoclassical counterpart. The paper therefore argues that in order to prevent the otherwise fruitful and more realistic evolutionary approach from undermining its own criticism of neoclassical economics and to create a consistent as well as objective evolutionary policy framework, it is necessary to eliminate the equilibrium spirit. Taken together, the main finding of this thesis is that European regional policy and its structural funds can neither theoretically nor empirically be justified and legitimated from an economics point of view. Moreover, the thesis finds that the prevalent positive and instrumental explanation of EU regional policy given in the literature needs to be reconsidered, because these theories can neither scientifically explain the emergence and development of this policy nor are they appropriate to derive objective and scientific policy instruments for EU regional policymakers.