320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (196)
- Postprint (45)
- Part of a Book (44)
- Doctoral Thesis (31)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (28)
- Other (15)
- Review (8)
- Master's Thesis (6)
- Working Paper (4)
- Journal/Publication series (1)
Language
- English (378) (remove)
Keywords
- Germany (14)
- European Union (11)
- democracy (8)
- parliamentary government (8)
- Europäische Union (7)
- governance (7)
- international organizations (7)
- presidential government (7)
- bicameralism (6)
- Integration (5)
- Security Council (5)
- United Nations (5)
- World Bank (5)
- decision-making (5)
- semi-parliamentary government (5)
- Deutschland (4)
- civil war (4)
- decentralization (4)
- discourse (4)
- innovation (4)
- institutions (4)
- international organisations (4)
- public administration (4)
- visions of democracy (4)
- Außenpolitik (3)
- Coordination (3)
- Demokratisierung (3)
- Governance (3)
- Iran (3)
- Islam (3)
- Migration (3)
- Modernisierung (3)
- Poland (3)
- Verwaltung (3)
- administration (3)
- authoritarianism (3)
- climate change (3)
- counterterrorism (3)
- democratization (3)
- digitalization (3)
- evaluation (3)
- executive personalism (3)
- gender (3)
- human rights (3)
- institutional design (3)
- institutional interplay (3)
- local government (3)
- modernization (3)
- policy (3)
- political equality (3)
- populism (3)
- power (3)
- public management (3)
- resilience (3)
- separation of powers (3)
- territorial reforms (3)
- terrorism (3)
- transitional justice (3)
- Australia (2)
- BSW (2)
- China (2)
- Dezentralisierung (2)
- Eastern Europe (2)
- European Foreign Policy (2)
- European Neighbourhood Policy (2)
- Europäische Nachbarschaftspolitik (2)
- Executive-legislative relations (2)
- GIZ (2)
- International (2)
- International Financial Institutions (2)
- Legislative organisation (2)
- Liberia (2)
- Local authorities (2)
- Paris Agreement (2)
- Polen (2)
- Quality management (2)
- REDD (2)
- Rechenschaftspflicht (2)
- Russia (2)
- Sierra Leone (2)
- Telekommunikation (2)
- Vereinte Nationen (2)
- Verwaltungsreform (2)
- accountability (2)
- administrative reforms (2)
- aid effectiveness (2)
- authority (2)
- bias (2)
- capacity (2)
- climate mitigation (2)
- committee governance (2)
- constitutional design (2)
- contestation (2)
- cooperation (2)
- coordination (2)
- crisis (2)
- debt (2)
- democratic theory (2)
- digital transformation (2)
- digitalisation (2)
- drug control (2)
- e-government (2)
- economy (2)
- elections (2)
- electoral systems (2)
- environmental policy (2)
- expert authority (2)
- expertise (2)
- feminism (2)
- food security governance (2)
- foreign policy (2)
- globalization (2)
- higher education (2)
- institutional complexity (2)
- inter-organizational order (2)
- inter-organizational relations (2)
- international (2)
- international bureaucracies (2)
- international institutions (2)
- international law (2)
- international non-governmental organizations (2)
- international public administration (2)
- international relations (2)
- job demands-resources model (2)
- land management (2)
- legal change (2)
- margins of error (2)
- metamorphosis of international law (2)
- multi-level study (2)
- narratives (2)
- natural climate solutions (2)
- new public management (2)
- organizational fields (2)
- parliamentary opposition (2)
- party competition (2)
- patterns of democracy (2)
- peacebuilding (2)
- peacekeeping (2)
- policy advice (2)
- policy analysis (2)
- policy-making (2)
- politics (2)
- presidentialism (2)
- process tracing (2)
- protection (2)
- race (2)
- research communication (2)
- restoration (2)
- skills (2)
- societal impact of research (2)
- sustainable economy (2)
- telework (2)
- value change (2)
- veto players (2)
- violence (2)
- wicked problems (2)
- work-place behavior (2)
- (post) new public management (1)
- 2 degrees C target (1)
- 3C (1)
- AKP (1)
- Abendland (1)
- Absolute Advantage (1)
- Absoluter Kostenvorteil (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Active learning (1)
- Adam Smith (1)
- Administration (1)
- Administrative reform (1)
- AfD (1)
- Affiliationsnetzwerke (1)
- Africa (1)
- African American literature (1)
- Aid conditionalities (1)
- Air pollution (1)
- Akteursinteraktion (1)
- Alternative für Deutschland (1)
- Antisemitism (1)
- Apartheid (1)
- Arbeitsmarktpolitik (1)
- Argentina (1)
- Artefakte (1)
- Atomwaffen (1)
- Atomwaffensperrvertrag (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Augmented reality (1)
- Ausschüsse (1)
- Australian bicameralism (1)
- Autoritarismus (1)
- Außenhandel (1)
- Benchmarking (1)
- Berlin (1)
- Beschaffungswesen (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Brazil (1)
- Buenos Aires (1)
- Bundeswehr (1)
- Bürgerschaft (1)
- CDM (1)
- CESCR Committee (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- CPPS (1)
- CPS (1)
- Cabinet (1)
- Cambodia (1)
- Campaign finance (1)
- Carl Schmitt (1)
- Case studies (1)
- Catholicism (1)
- Changing nature of armed conflict (1)
- Character (1)
- Circular argumentation (1)
- Cities (1)
- Civil service career (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Climate change adaptation (1)
- Climate governance (1)
- Colombia (1)
- Common Foreign and Security Policy (1)
- Comparative Advantage (1)
- Comparative Public Administration (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Conseil de sécurité (1)
- Consejo de Seguridad (1)
- Consolidation (1)
- Constitutive Mechanism (1)
- Coordination structures (1)
- Corruption risks (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Country experience (1)
- Decarbonisation (1)
- Decentralization in government (1)
- Decision Probability (1)
- Dekarbonisierung (1)
- Democracy Promotion (1)
- Demokratie (1)
- Demokratieförderung (1)
- Design Thinking (1)
- Development aid (1)
- Development aid End of history (1)
- Development aid criticism (1)
- Development cooperation (1)
- Dezentralisation (1)
- Dicranopteris linearis (1)
- EU regional policy (1)
- EU-Regionalpolitik (1)
- Eastern policy (1)
- Economic policy (1)
- Edouard Glissant (1)
- Education (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit mit Indien (1)
- Erdogan (1)
- Erneuerbare Energie (1)
- Estonia (1)
- Eurasian Economic Union (1)
- Eurobarometer (1)
- Eurocentrism (1)
- Europaidentität (1)
- Europe (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Constitution (1)
- European Green Deal (1)
- European Immigration Policies (1)
- European Neighborhood Policy (1)
- European identity (1)
- European integration (1)
- Europäische Außenpolitik (1)
- Europäische Integration (1)
- Europäische Verfassung (1)
- Evaluierung (1)
- Evidence-based policy making (1)
- Evolutionary economics (1)
- Evolutorische Ökonomik (1)
- Expert Authority (1)
- Expertenautorität (1)
- Extreme weather (1)
- Federal administration (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Foreign policy (1)
- France (1)
- Franco (1)
- Franco-Prussian War (1)
- Friedensforschung (1)
- Friedenssicherung (1)
- Föderalismus (1)
- GREVIO (1)
- Galwan Valley (1)
- Game (1)
- Geberharmonisierung (1)
- Gemeindem (1)
- Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik (1)
- Gender (1)
- Generalized knowledge constructin axiom (1)
- Geneva convention of 1864 (1)
- George W. Bush (1)
- Gerald Gaus (1)
- Gesellschaftstheorie (1)
- Gleichgewicht der Kräfte (1)
- Gleichstellung (1)
- Global Environmental Governance (1)
- Global South (1)
- Global order (1)
- Global warming potential (1)
- Gobernanza de los Comités (1)
- Greece (1)
- Green infrastructure investment (1)
- HFCS (1)
- Haiti (1)
- Hanoi (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Holocaust (1)
- IHL (1)
- IHRL (1)
- IMF (1)
- INGOs (1)
- ISIS (1)
- Impartiality (1)
- Income (1)
- India (1)
- Indo-Pacific (1)
- Industry 4.0 (1)
- Informal and formal (1)
- Informal reform (1)
- Informationsflüsse (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Institution (1)
- Institutional change (1)
- Institutionelle Komplexität (1)
- Integration Policy (1)
- Integration strategy (1)
- International Bureaucracies (1)
- International Migration (1)
- International Monetary Fund (1)
- International Practices (1)
- International bureaucrats (1)
- International policy (1)
- International relations (1)
- International trade (1)
- Internationale Migration (1)
- Internet of things (1)
- Investitionsverhalten (1)
- Investment Behavior (1)
- Irak (1)
- Iraq (1)
- Islamic movements (1)
- Israeli-Palestinian conflict (1)
- Istanbul Convention (1)
- Jawaharlal Nehru (1)
- Jewish question (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Jordanien (1)
- Kambodscha (1)
- Klimagovernance (1)
- Klimapolitik (1)
- Klimawandel (1)
- Kolumbien (1)
- Komparativer Kostenvorteil (1)
- Koordination (1)
- Korruption (1)
- Korruptionsrisiken (1)
- Kultur (1)
- Kulturwissenschaft (1)
- Kyrgyzstan (1)
- Labor supply (1)
- Landscape planning (1)
- Landwehr (1)
- Lateinamerika (1)
- Latin America (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Lifetime income (1)
- Local Civil Society Networks (1)
- Local Governance (1)
- Local administrative systems (1)
- Local autonomy (1)
- Local government reform (1)
- Longitudinal and panel data (1)
- Lucha antiterrorista (1)
- Macht (1)
- Management control (1)
- Managerial autonomy (1)
- Market Dynamics (1)
- Market failure (1)
- Marktdynamik (1)
- Marktversagen (1)
- Marokko (1)
- Max Weber (1)
- Mayoralty (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Measurement theory (1)
- Media (1)
- Mehrebenen-System (1)
- Meta-model (1)
- Methane (1)
- Migrants (1)
- Migration Policy (1)
- Mikropolitik (1)
- Minderheiten (1)
- Ministries (1)
- Missing rich (1)
- Mixed methods (1)
- Modellierung (1)
- Modelling (1)
- Moderation (1)
- Moderne (1)
- Modernisierungstheorie (1)
- Modernization (1)
- Monetary Fund (1)
- Morocco (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- NATO (1)
- Nachhaltige Entwicklung (1)
- National state communication (1)
- Nazi Germany (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Nelson Mandela (1)
- Neo-institutionalismus (1)
- Neoliberalism (1)
- Neoliberalismus (1)
- Netzwerkanalyse (1)
- Neutrality (1)
- New public management (1)
- Nicht-Gleichgewichtsökonomik (1)
- Nichtverbreitung von Kernwaffen (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- Non-equilibrium economics (1)
- Norm collisions (1)
- Nuclear non-proliferation (1)
- Operation Euphrates Shield (1)
- Organisations (1)
- Organizational change (1)
- Organizational innovation (1)
- Orthodoxy (1)
- Osteuropa (1)
- Ostpolitik (1)
- P/CVE (1)
- Pakistan (1)
- Palestine (1)
- Pareto distribution (1)
- Paris agreement (1)
- Parliamentary questions (1)
- Partizipation (1)
- Peace Studies (1)
- Peacebuilding (1)
- Performance (1)
- Performance management (1)
- Permanent income (1)
- Policy (1)
- Policy Changes (1)
- Policy advice (1)
- Policymaking (1)
- Political civil servant (1)
- Political craft (1)
- Political economy Socio-economic development (1)
- Political establishment (1)
- Politicisation (1)
- Politik (1)
- Politikdiffusion (1)
- Politikempfehlungen (1)
- Politiktransfer (1)
- Politikänderungen (1)
- Politische Theorie (1)
- Polizeireform (1)
- Populism (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Potassium (1)
- Precedent (1)
- President Trump (1)
- Price floor (1)
- Price review (1)
- Proceso debido (1)
- Process modeling (1)
- Procurement (1)
- Protestantism (1)
- Prozessanalyse (1)
- Prozessexpertise (1)
- Prozessgestaltung (1)
- Public Management (1)
- Public opinion (1)
- Public sector (1)
- Public-private partnerships (1)
- QCA (1)
- Quad (1)
- Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (1)
- Qualität des Projektmanagements (1)
- Rankings (1)
- Ratchet Effect (1)
- Rechtsstaatlichkeit (1)
- Recipient performance (1)
- Reform des Öffentlichen Dienstes (1)
- Regierungskooperation (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Renewable Energy (1)
- Reputation der Geber (1)
- Resozialisierung (1)
- Responsibility to Protect (1)
- Rio Conventions (1)
- Sanciones de la ONU (1)
- Sebastian Kurz (1)
- Security council (1)
- Security council reform (1)
- Senegal (1)
- Short-lived climate pollutants (1)
- Simmel (1)
- Simulation process building (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Slovakia (1)
- Slowakei (1)
- Social Choice Theory (1)
- Social class (1)
- South Afrika (1)
- Soziologie (1)
- Spain (1)
- Strukturfonds (1)
- Sub-Sahara Africa (1)
- Sub-national Autonomy (1)
- Supermacht (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Survey (1)
- Sustainability indicators (1)
- Sustainable Development (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Syria (1)
- System Dynamics (1)
- System failure (1)
- Systemversagen (1)
- Teilhabe der BürgerInnen (1)
- Transformation (1)
- Transparenz (1)
- Trump phenomenon (1)
- Turkish military in Syria (1)
- Turkish politics (1)
- U.S. Armed Forces (1)
- UN (1)
- UN human rights treaty bodies (1)
- UN sanctions (1)
- UN-REDD (1)
- US foreign policy (1)
- US-Außenpolitik (1)
- Ukraine (1)
- Ukraine war (1)
- Ultimatum (1)
- Unilateralismus (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Use cases Morphologic box (1)
- Versöhnung (1)
- Verteidigungspolitik (1)
- Vertiefung (1)
- Verwaltungsmodernisierung (1)
- Verwaltungsreformen (1)
- Veto Player (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Vietnamesen (1)
- Wahlkampffinanzierung (1)
- Wannsee conference (1)
- Wasserentwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Weak and strong sustainability (1)
- Wealth distribution (1)
- Weber (1)
- Weberian bureaucracy (1)
- West Africa (1)
- Wicked problems (1)
- Winning Coalition (1)
- Wirksamkeit der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Wirtschaft (1)
- Wirtschaftspolitik (1)
- Wissensmanagement (1)
- Yiddish culturalism (1)
- Zivilgesellschaft (1)
- Zusammenarbeit in Sicherheitsfragen (1)
- academic disengagement (1)
- acteurs non-étatiques (1)
- active labor market policies (1)
- actor constellations (1)
- actor interplay (1)
- administración pública (1)
- administration publique (1)
- administrative culture (1)
- advocacy coalitions (1)
- affiliation networks (1)
- agency (1)
- agent-based modeling (1)
- agentes no estatales (1)
- agricultural policy (1)
- aid (1)
- aid allocation (1)
- al-Bab Battle (1)
- anniversary issue (1)
- anthropocene (1)
- anti-gender (1)
- antifeminist (1)
- application (1)
- artefacts (1)
- attitudes (1)
- authoritarian resilience (1)
- authoritarian rule (1)
- balance of power (1)
- balancing (1)
- behavior (1)
- benefit systems (1)
- border regime (1)
- borders (1)
- boundary spanning (1)
- bullying (1)
- burden of disease (1)
- bureaucracy (1)
- bureaucraties internationales (1)
- burocracias internacionales (1)
- candidates (1)
- capabilities framework (1)
- child labour (1)
- childcare (1)
- citizen participation (1)
- citizenship (1)
- civil service reform (1)
- civil service survey (1)
- civil society (1)
- civilian infrastructure (1)
- climate and energy policy (1)
- climate change mitigation (1)
- climate finance (1)
- climate governance (1)
- climate policy (1)
- climate politics (1)
- closing civic space (1)
- coalitions (1)
- coercion (1)
- collaboration (1)
- collaborative governance (1)
- collective memory (1)
- collective targeting (1)
- comparative (1)
- comparative development (1)
- comparative environmental politics (1)
- comparative public administration (1)
- competition (1)
- competitiveness (1)
- complex problems (1)
- concept of the political (1)
- conceptualization (1)
- conduct of life (1)
- conflict (1)
- conflict management (1)
- conflict resolution (1)
- consensus (1)
- consensus democracy (1)
- constitution-making (1)
- containment (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- contractor/provider split (1)
- conventional donors (1)
- corruption (1)
- crises (1)
- crisis management (1)
- cross-cultural competence (1)
- cross-national (1)
- cultural studies (1)
- culture (1)
- culture-general skills (1)
- cyber-attack (1)
- cyberwar (1)
- data and methods (1)
- de facto authority (1)
- de jure authority (1)
- death (1)
- death penalty (1)
- decadence (1)
- decarbonization (1)
- defence policy (1)
- definition (1)
- delegation (1)
- democratic performance (1)
- democratic quality (1)
- demografischer Wandel (1)
- demographic change (1)
- dependency (1)
- depression (1)
- design options (1)
- developing countries (1)
- development (1)
- development aid India (1)
- development cooperation (1)
- development projects (1)
- dictatorship (1)
- difference-in-differences (1)
- digital government (1)
- digital overload (1)
- digitale Verwaltung (1)
- direct democracy (1)
- disability-adjusted life years (1)
- discrimination (1)
- discriminatory dimensions of forced evictions (1)
- diversified quality production (1)
- doctrine (1)
- domestic politics (1)
- donor harmonization (1)
- donor reputation (1)
- drivers for change (1)
- due process (1)
- e-services (1)
- earth system governance (1)
- ecological modernization (1)
- economic policy (1)
- economics (1)
- effective district magnitude (1)
- employment (1)
- employment services (1)
- energy (1)
- ensuring state (1)
- entrepreneurship (1)
- environmental agreements (1)
- environmental degradation (1)
- environmental governance (1)
- environmental mainstreaming (1)
- environmental policy effects (1)
- environmental policy performance (1)
- epistemic injustice (1)
- equal opportunities (1)
- ethnicity (1)
- evidence-based policy making (1)
- evolutionary economics (1)
- executive head (1)
- executive-legislative relations (1)
- executive-parties dimension (1)
- executives (1)
- experiment (1)
- expert recommendations (1)
- facilitation (1)
- far right (1)
- far-right extremism (1)
- far-right groups (1)
- far-right parties (1)
- far-right populism (1)
- featured (1)
- federalism (1)
- fern (1)
- field experiment (1)
- field theory (1)
- film (1)
- financial policy (1)
- fisheries policy (1)
- flexibility (1)
- fluctuation (1)
- forced evictions (1)
- formale Institution (1)
- fragile and conflict-affected states (1)
- fragile und konfliktbeladene Staaten (1)
- francs-tireurs (1)
- function of cross-cultural competence (1)
- gender equality (1)
- gender mainstreaming (1)
- gender research (1)
- genre (1)
- geographical proximity (1)
- global (1)
- global commons (1)
- global environmental governance (1)
- global environmental politics (1)
- global governance (1)
- global health (1)
- global public policy (1)
- global south (1)
- globale Umweltpolitik (1)
- good governance (1)
- gouvernance de comité (1)
- government (1)
- government formation (1)
- government policymaking (1)
- government-formation (1)
- green finance (1)
- green recovery (1)
- growth strategy (1)
- gute Regierungsführung (1)
- health security (1)
- health services (1)
- hegemony (1)
- herkömmliche Geber (1)
- hermeneutical capability (1)
- hermeneutical injustice (1)
- heterogeneity (1)
- hierarchy (1)
- history (1)
- hospitals (1)
- huella ecológica (1)
- human mind (1)
- human rights treaty monitoring bodies (1)
- human trafficking (1)
- identity (1)
- impact evaluation (1)
- impartiality (1)
- incels (1)
- indigene Völker (1)
- indigenous peoples (1)
- individual complaints procedures (1)
- industrial organization (1)
- industrial relations (1)
- industrial restructuring (1)
- information and communication technologies (1)
- information flow (1)
- informelle Institution (1)
- innovation adoption (1)
- innovation systems (1)
- institutional change (1)
- institutional investors (1)
- institutional policy (1)
- institutional processes (1)
- institutional reform (1)
- institutional theory (1)
- institutionelle Komplexität (1)
- inter-governmental relations (1)
- inter-organizational control (1)
- intercultural communication (1)
- interdepartmental committee (1)
- interest group (1)
- intergovernmental cooperation (1)
- intergovernmental reforms (1)
- intergovernmental relations (1)
- intergovernmental treaty secretariats (1)
- interkulturelle Kompetenz (1)
- interministerielle Arbeitsgruppe (1)
- internal migration (1)
- international administration (1)
- international bureaucracy (1)
- international cooperation (1)
- international development (1)
- international human rights (1)
- international humanitarian law (1)
- international legal order (1)
- international organisation (1)
- international trade (1)
- internationale Beziehungen (1)
- internationale Institutionen (1)
- internationale Organisationen (1)
- internationale Verwaltungen (1)
- internationale Zusammenarbeit (1)
- interne Migration (1)
- interoperability (1)
- interpretative declarations (1)
- intertextuality (1)
- islamistische Bewegungen (1)
- issue market (1)
- job autonomy (1)
- job satisfaction (1)
- job search (1)
- just transition (1)
- knowledge (1)
- knowledge creep (1)
- knowledge management (1)
- knowledge utilization (1)
- kulturell-kognitive Institution (1)
- labor force participation (1)
- labor market policies (1)
- law and technology (1)
- leadership (1)
- legislatures (1)
- levee en masse (1)
- lifestyle (1)
- local and urban governance (1)
- local autonomy (1)
- local community (1)
- local finance (1)
- local governance (1)
- local government systems (1)
- local politics (1)
- long-term policy (1)
- lutte contre le terrorisme (1)
- majority formation (1)
- majority rule (1)
- male supremacy (1)
- managerial reforms (1)
- manosphere (1)
- manufacturing (1)
- marginality (1)
- marine governance (1)
- market failures (1)
- marketization (1)
- measurement (1)
- men's rights (1)
- meso-level of government (1)
- micro-credit (1)
- micro-politics (1)
- micropolitics (1)
- migration (1)
- military culture (1)
- military effectiveness (1)
- ministry of agriculture (1)
- minorities (1)
- minority rights (1)
- misogyny (1)
- mixed methods (1)
- modernity (1)
- modernización ecológica (1)
- modernization theory (1)
- monopoly of legitimate use of force (1)
- mots clés (1)
- multi-level governance (1)
- multi-level government (1)
- multi-level system (1)
- multi-party systems (1)
- multilateral (1)
- multilateralism (1)
- multinational oganizations (1)
- multiplicity (1)
- municipalities (1)
- municipally owned corporation (1)
- myth of Franktireurkrieg (1)
- national ecological footprint (1)
- national ministries (1)
- nationale Ministerien (1)
- nationalism (1)
- nativism (1)
- neo weberian state (1)
- neo-liberal governance (1)
- neo-liberalism (1)
- network analysis (1)
- neue Geber (1)
- neue Parteien (1)
- neuer Institutionalismus (1)
- new democracies (1)
- new donors (1)
- new parties (1)
- new technologies (1)
- newsfeed (1)
- nineteenth and twentieth century (1)
- non-alignment; (1)
- non-equilibrium economics (1)
- non-state actors (1)
- nonstate actors (1)
- norm change (1)
- norm collisions (1)
- norm dynamics (1)
- norm robustness (1)
- norms (1)
- nuclear non-proliferation treaty (1)
- nuclear weapons (1)
- opinion polls (1)
- opposition (1)
- orchestration (1)
- organisational change (1)
- organisations internationales (1)
- organizaciones internacionales (1)
- organization theory (1)
- organizational epistemology (1)
- organizational reform (1)
- organizational reputation (1)
- organizations (1)
- palabras clave (1)
- pandemic (1)
- parental leave (1)
- parenthood (1)
- parliament (1)
- parliamentarism (1)
- parliamentary democracy (1)
- parties (1)
- patterns (1)
- peace (1)
- peace process (1)
- performance (1)
- peripherality (1)
- personal data (1)
- personality (1)
- phytolith (1)
- planetarity (1)
- planetary boundaries (1)
- planning (1)
- pledge fulfillment (1)
- police reform (1)
- policy agendas (1)
- policy diffusion (1)
- policy output (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy scope (1)
- policy signals (1)
- policy strategy (1)
- policy substitutes (1)
- policy transfer (1)
- policy-profession conflict (1)
- political campaigns (1)
- political integration (1)
- political opportunism (1)
- political preferences (1)
- political repression (1)
- political sociology (1)
- political stability (1)
- political symbols (1)
- politics and the media (1)
- politics of relation (1)
- polling (1)
- polycrisis (1)
- política ambiental comparada (1)
- pooling (1)
- populist radical right (1)
- post-Soviet (1)
- post-conflict peace (1)
- post-development (1)
- post-new public management (1)
- precedent (1)
- preferences (1)
- privacy (1)
- problem-solving (1)
- process design (1)
- process expertise (1)
- procédure officielle (1)
- production concepts (1)
- professionalization (1)
- professions (1)
- project management quality (1)
- proportionality analysis (1)
- protest (1)
- proxy force (1)
- public (1)
- public administration reform (1)
- public good (1)
- public health (1)
- public opinion (1)
- public opinion polls (1)
- public participation (1)
- public policy (1)
- public sector innovation (1)
- public sector reform (1)
- public value (1)
- public values (1)
- public-reason liberalism (1)
- punctuated equilibrium theory (1)
- qualitative Fallstudie (1)
- qualitative case study (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- quality management (1)
- racial discrimination (1)
- racism (1)
- radical (1)
- radicalization (1)
- rationalism (1)
- re-municipalization (1)
- reasonableness (1)
- rebel attacks (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- reconciliation (1)
- regime complexity (1)
- regional organizations (1)
- regulación estatal (1)
- regulation (1)
- regulations (1)
- regulative Institution (1)
- regulatory environment (1)
- renewable energy (1)
- representation (1)
- research (1)
- reservations to human rights treaties (1)
- resistance (1)
- resocialisation (1)
- responsibility (1)
- restrictions to civil society (1)
- revolution (1)
- right parties and movements (1)
- right to housing (1)
- right-wing politics (1)
- romance (1)
- sanctions (1)
- sanctions de l’ONU (1)
- schlechte Regierungsführung (1)
- scholar-practitioners (1)
- science & technology (1)
- scientific use file (1)
- second chambers (1)
- second-order compliance (1)
- security cooperation (1)
- security–development nexus (1)
- selection (1)
- self-employed women (1)
- self-governance (1)
- semi-parliamentarism (1)
- service provider strategies (1)
- set theory (1)
- siege of Paris 1870 (1)
- single mothers (1)
- social epistemology (1)
- social networking sites (1)
- social theory (1)
- sozialistische Orientierung der Marktwirtschaft (1)
- space (1)
- standardization (STANAG) (1)
- start-up subsidies (1)
- state (1)
- state repression (1)
- state security (1)
- stochastic uncertainty (1)
- strategic uncertainty (1)
- structural change (1)
- structural funds (1)
- superpower (1)
- survey (1)
- survey data (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survival analysis (1)
- symbolic representation (1)
- system failure (1)
- teaching (1)
- termination (1)
- territorial administration (1)
- trade-offs (1)
- training (1)
- transdisciplinarity (1)
- transformation (1)
- transformative justice (1)
- transition economies (1)
- transition policy (1)
- translation theory (1)
- transnational city networks (1)
- transnational governance (1)
- transnational institutional interplay (1)
- treadmill of production (1)
- triple nexus (1)
- trust (1)
- turnout (1)
- un-cancelling the future (1)
- unemployment (1)
- unilateralism (1)
- urban warfare (1)
- vertrackte Probleme (1)
- veto point (1)
- vote choice (1)
- vote switching (1)
- voters (1)
- voting (1)
- voting potential (1)
- water development aid (1)
- welfare state benefits (1)
- weo-weberian State (1)
- window of opportunity (1)
- women's empowerment (1)
- work (1)
- work-family policies (1)
- working hours (1)
- working time (1)
- world bank (1)
- world literature (1)
- world-makers (1)
- youth unemployment (1)
- ÖVP (1)
- Öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
- Übergangsjustiz (1)
- öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (182)
- Sozialwissenschaften (76)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (33)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (25)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (15)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (14)
- Extern (8)
- Historisches Institut (6)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (5)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (5)
Arend Lijphart uses an average of five standardized variables – the executive-parties dimension (EPD) – to describe patterns of democracy and explain differences in democracies’ performance. The article suggests ways to improve the descriptive part of the project. It argues that the EPD maps different approaches to achieving accountability and representation, rather than differences in consensus. This re-conceptualization leads to a more coherent and valid measurement. It is also argued that more systematic adjustments are needed for differences in constitutional structures (presidentialism and bicameralism). The article presents data on a revised EPD and its components for 36 democracies in the period from 1981 to 2010. As to the explanatory part of the project, we contend that the EPD often hinders adequate causal analysis rather than facilitating it. We show this by re-analysing democracies’ performance with respect to turnout and capital punishment.
This open access book presents a topical, comprehensive and differentiated analysis of Germany's public administration and reforms. It provides an overview on key elements of German public administration at the federal, Länder and local levels of government as well as on current reform activities of the public sector. It examines the key institutional features of German public administration; the changing relationships between public administration, society and the private sector; the administrative reforms at different levels of the federal system and numerous sectors; and new challenges and modernization approaches like digitalization, Open Government and Better Regulation. Each chapter offers a combination of descriptive information and problem-oriented analysis, presenting key topical issues in Germany which are relevant to an international readership.
Federal Administration
(2021)
The federal administration is significantly small (around 10 percent of all public employees). This speciality of the German administrative system is based on the division of responsibilities: the central (federal) level drafts and adopts most of the laws and public programmes, and the state level (together with the municipal level) implements them. The administration of the federal level comprises the ministries, subordinated agencies for special and selected operational tasks (e.g. the authorisation of drugs, information security and registration of refugees) in distinct administrative sectors (e.g. foreign service, armed forces and federal police). The capacity for preparing and monitoring government bills and statutory instruments is well developed. Moreover, the instruments and tools of coordination are exemplary compared with other countries, although the recent digital turn has been adopted less advanced than elsewhere.
This chapter describes the most prominent public management reform trajectories in German public administration over the past decades since unification. In the 1990s, the New Steering Model emerged as a German variant of the NPM. Since the mid-2000s, local governments in Germany have been subjected to a mandatory reform of their budgeting and accounting system known as the New Municipal Financial Management reforms. Both reforms have led to a substantial change in terms of internal decentralisation, customer orientation, transparency in resource use and the financial situation of administrative bodies. But the emerging reform patterns and their impacts have not replaced the dominance of a strong legalist culture with hierarchical, centralised control. However, in the course of the reforms, a citizen-customer perspective, more participation of citizens and limited application of new management instruments have been accommodated within the persisting bureaucratic system.
Over the last decades, Better Regulation has become a major reform topic at the federal and—in some cases—also at the Länder level. Although the debate about improving regulatory quality and reducing unnecessary burdens created by bureaucracy and red tape date back to the 1960s and 1970s, the introduction by law in 2006 of a new independent institutionalised body for regulatory control at the federal level of government has brought a new quality to the discourse and practice of Better Regulation in Germany. This chapter introduces the basic features of the legislative process at the federal level in Germany, addresses the issue of Better Regulation and outlines the role of the National Regulatory Control Council (Nationaler Normenkontrollrat—NKR) as a ‘watchdog’ for compliance costs, red tape and regulatory impacts.
Although German bureaucracy is typically categorised as Weberian, a clear distinction between politics and administration has never been a defining characteristic of the German political-administrative system. Many close interrelations and interactions between elected politicians and appointed civil servants can be observed at all levels of administration. Higher-ranking civil servants in Germany are used to and generally appreciate the functional politicisation of their jobs, that is their close involvement in all stages of the policy process, from policy formation, goal definition, negotiation within and outside government to the implementation and evaluation of policies. For top positions, therefore, a class of ‘political civil servants’ is a special feature of the German system, and obtaining ‘political craft’ has become an important part of the learning and job experience of higher-ranking civil servants.
German Public Administration
(2021)
The international community of public administration and administrative sciences shows a great interest in the basic features of the German administrative system. The German public administration with its formative decentralisation (called: administrative federalism) is regarded as a prime example of multilevel governance and strong local self-government. Furthermore, over the past decades, the traditional profile of the German administrative system has significantly been reshaped and remoulded through reforms, processes of modernisation and the transformation process in East Germany. Studies on the German administrative system should focus especially on
key institutional features of public administration;
changing relationships between public administration, society and the private sector;
administrative reforms at different levels of the federal system; and
new challenges and modernisation approaches, such as digitalisation, open government and better regulation.
Human resource management (HRM) reform has not been the focus of attention in Germany despite its obvious relevance for effective policy implementation. Although there is a general trend worldwide towards convergence between public and private HRM strategies and practices, management of the workforce in German public administration still remains largely traditional and bureaucratic. This chapter describes and analyses German practices regarding the central functions and elements of HRM such as planning, recruitment, training and leadership. Furthermore, it explores the importance and contribution of public service motivation, performance-related pay and diversity management in the context of German practices. The chapter concludes by highlighting some of the major paradoxes of German public HRM in light of current challenges, such as demographic change, digital transformation and organisational development capabilities.
The chapter analyses recent reforms in the multilevel system of the Länder, specifically territorial, functional and structural reforms, which represent three of the most crucial and closely interconnected reform trajectories at the subnational level. It sheds light on the variety of reform approaches pursued in the different Länder and also highlights some factors that account for these differences. The transfer of state functions to local governments is addressed as well as the restructuring of Länder administrations (e.g. abolishment of the meso level of the Länder administration and of single-purpose state agencies) and the rescaling of territorial boundaries at county and municipal levels, including a brief review of the recently failed (territorial) reforms in Eastern Germany.
The German system of public sector employment (including civil servants and public employees) qualifies as a classical European continental civil service model moulded in traditional forms of a Weberian bureaucracy. Its features include a career-based employment system with entry based on levels of formal qualification. Coordinated by legal frames and centralised collective bargaining, the civil service is, at the same time, decentralised and flexible enough to accommodate regional differences and societal changes. In comparison, the civil service system stands out for its high degrees of professionalism and legal fairness with low levels of corruption or cronyism.
Balancing the Moods
(2018)
Quality management (QM) has spread around the world and reached higher education in Europe in the early 1990s (Mendel, 2006, 137; Kernegger and Vettori, 2013, 1). However, researchers were rather more interested in national quality assurance policies (macro-level) and accreditation systems (meso-level) than in intra-organizational perspectives about the day-to-day implementation of quality assurance policies by various actors (micro-level). Undoubtedly, organizational change is a challenging endeavor for all kinds of groups. On the one hand, it provides the opportunity of further development and innovation, but on the other hand, it exposes organizations and actors to the risk of losing established structures and accepted routines.
Like in many other organizations, actors may not necessarily perceive change as a promoter of innovation and development. Instead, they may consider change as a threat to the existing status quo or, as March points out, as an “interplay between rationality and foolishness” (March, 1981, 563). Consequently, change provokes either affective or behavioral actions (Armenakis and Bedeian, 1999, 308–310), such as, for example, resistance. Anderson (2006, 2008) and Lucas (2014) have shown, for example, that academic resistance is an important issue. However, Piderit characterizes resistance as a multidimensional construct (Piderit, 2000, 786–787) subject to a wide variety of issues related to quality and QM. Although QM has been described as a “fashion” (Stensaker, 2007, 101) in the higher education sector that provokes many different reactions, its implementation in higher education institutions (HEIs) is still a rather unexplored field. Thus, the evidence provided by Anderson (2006, 2008) and others (Newton, 2000, 2002; McInnis et al., 1995; Fredman and Doughney, 2012; Lucas, 2014; etc.) needs to be expanded, because they only consider the perspective of academia. In particular, the view of other actors during the implementation of quality assurance policies is a missing piece in this empirical puzzle. Nearly nothing is known about how quality managers deal with reactions to organizational change like resistance and obstruction. Until now, only a few studies have focused on intra-organizational dynamics (see, for example: Csizmadia et al., 2008; Lipnicka, 2016).
Besides the lack of research on the implementation of quality assurance policies in HEIs, quality managers seem to be an interesting subject for further investigations because they are “endogenous” to institutional processes. On the one hand, quality managers are the result of quality assurance policies, and on the other hand, they influence the implementation of quality assurance policies, which affect other actors (like academics, administrative staff, etc.). Here, quality managers, as members of an emerging higher education profession, are involved in various conflict lines between QM, HEI management and departments, which need further research (Seyfried and Pohlenz, 2018, 9).
Therefore, the aim of our paper is twofold: firstly, to answer the question of how quality managers perceive resistance, and secondly, which measures they take in situations of perceived resistance. We offer a new research perspective and argue that resistance is not merely provoked by organizational change; it also provokes counter-reactions by actors who are confronted with resistance. Thus, resistance seems to be rather endogenous.
To theorize our argument, we apply parts of the work of Christine Oliver (1991), which provides theoretical insights into strategic responses to institutional processes, ranging from acquiescence to manipulation (Oliver, 1991, 152). We, therefore, investigate the introduction of QM in teaching and learning, and the emergence of quality managers as higher education professionals as one of the results of quality assurance policies. Consequently, the introduction of QM may be considered as an institutional process provoking reactions and counter-reactions of various organizational units within HEIs. These circumstances are constitutive for how quality managers deal with resistance and other reactions toward organizational change. We use this theoretical framework to analyze the German higher education sector, because this particular case can be considered as a latecomer in New Public Management reforms (Schimank, 2005, 369) and Germany is a country where academic self-governance plays a very important role, and strongly influences academics’ behavior when it comes to organizational change (Wolter, 2004).
Our empirical results are based on a mixed-methods research design and integrate half-structured interviews and a nationwide survey at the central level in German HEIs, which excludes faculty members of QM (decentral level). They reveal that quality managers take different types of action when resistance occurs during the implementation of quality assurance policies. Furthermore, quality managers mainly react with different tactics. These tactics seem to be relevant for convincing academics and for the enhancement of their commitment to improve the quality of teaching and learning, instead of provoking further resistance or avoidance practices.
This article proceeds as follows: the next sections describe the context and explain our main theoretical concepts referring to the work of Oliver (1991) and others. After that, we present our case selection and the methodological framework, including the data sources and the operationalization of selected variables. Finally, we provide our empirical results about quality managers’ perceptions on resistance and we draw conclusions.
In this introductory chapter, the editors describe the main theoretical basis of analysis of this book and the methodological approach. The core of this book consists of 14 country-specific chapters, which allow a European comparison and show the increasing variance in migration policy approaches within and between European countries. The degree of local autonomy, the level of centralisation and the traditional forms of migration policy are factors that especially influence the possibilities for local authorities to formulate their own integration policies.
This chapter focuses on the relationship between public opinion on migration and its media coverage. Different explanatory models, including individual characteristics, cultural factors and the impact of media and politics, have been proposed to explain public attitudes towards migrants. Understanding the local context is important, as the shares of migrants living in each region and city vary considerably. Providing correct statistical information, stressing the diversity of current migration patterns in Europe and taking part in media and public discussions are ways in which to impact public attitudes at the local level.
The chapter begins with a brief historical overview of Germany’s transition in the twentieth and twenty-first century from a transit and emigration country to one of immigration. The next part of this chapter looks at the challenges and problems facing German immigration policy within a multi-level federal system. Finally, the chapter gives an analysis of some of the trends in German migration policy since the refugee crisis in 2015, such as changes in the party system and in the concepts underlying migration policies to better manage, control and limit immigration to Germany.
As expected, the traditions of national-state migration policies continue to play a very important role, path-dependence in this policy field remains high. The distribution of competences in migration policy and the integration of migrants in the nation states continues to be very different. When implementing integration strategies at grassroots level, the respective policies should be tailored to the profile of both the local migrant community and the native population. Besides better migration management in local administration and the interaction of top-down and bottom-up efforts to integrate migrants is of importance.
This book presents an overview of European migration policy and the various institutional arrangements within and between various actors, such as local councils, local media, local economies, and local civil society initiatives. Both the role of local authorities in this policy field and their cooperation with civil society initiatives or networks are under-explored topics for research. In response, this book provides a range of detailed case studies focusing on the six main groups of national and administrative traditions in Europe: Germanic, Scandinavian, Napoleonic, Southeastern European, Central-Eastern European and Anglo-Saxon.
Das Abendland
(2019)
The religious borders of Europe, which are more evident and controversial than ever, challenge established forms of political legitimacy and the legal requirements for citizenship. Perhaps covertly rather than overtly, they shape politics and policies. While scholars have once again resorted to Edward Said’s Orientalism to describe the dynamic at play, this article argues that the Orientalism narrative of East and West is too simple to capture the actual complexity of Europe’s borders. There are four religious and thus four cultural-symbolic borders, which are increasingly defining the continent: north-western Europe is Protestant, southern Europe is Catholic, the East is Orthodox and increasingly nationalist, and the South and Near East are Muslim. The cultural purity and the values that Europe craves in search of identity and order are simply not available in a world of global interconnectedness and social diversity.
Feigning Democracy
(2017)
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation plus the sustainable management of forest and enhancement of carbon stocks (REDD+) is a global climate change mitigation initiative. The United Nations REDD Programme (UN-REDD) is training governments in developing countries, including Nigeria, to implement REDD+. To protect local people, UN-REDD has developed social safeguards including a commitment to strengthen local democracy to prevent an elite capture of REDD+ benefits. This study examines local participation and representation in the UN-REDD international policy board and in the national-level design process for the Nigeria-REDD proposal, to see if practices are congruent with the UN-REDD commitment to local democracy. It is based on research in Nigeria in 2012 and 2013, and finds that local representation in the UN-REDD policy board and in Nigeria-REDD is not substantive. Participation is merely symbolic. For example, elected local government authorities, who ostensibly represent rural people, are neither present in the UN-REDD board nor were they invited to the participatory forums that vetted the Nigeria-REDD. They were excluded because they were politically weak. However, UN-REDD approved the Nigeria-REDD proposal without a strategy to include or strengthen elected local governments. The study concludes with recommendations to help the UN-REDD strengthen elected local government authority in Nigeria in support of democratic local representation.
This introduction to the special section on Poland’s wars of symbols analyzes the symbolic contestation that has characterized the country in recent years, studying a range of phenomena including nation, gender, memory, and religious symbolism within the overall framework of political conflict. In doing so, it offers a multidisciplinary view on political fractures that have resonated throughout Europe and the “West.” Overall, the four case studies in this section study ways in which national symbols, topoi, and narratives have been deployed as tools in drawing and redrawing boundaries within society, polarizing and mobilizing the political camps as well as contesting and resisting power. These studies enable us to situate recent political events in a historical perspective, mapping the rise of populism in Poland against the background of legacies specific to the East-Central European region.
In this volume, Egeberg and Trondal put forward an ‘organizational approach to public governance’ (p. 1) that, in their view, complements existing explanations for organizational change and behaviour in governance processes (‘Understanding’) and produces relevant advice for practitioners, specifically anyone involved in reorganizing public administration (‘Design’). Following the authors’ introduction of the theoretical reasoning behind their approach (chapter 1), they present supporting findings that are based on new material (chapters 2 and 9), but mainly draw on six previously published research articles (chapters 3–8). Egeberg and Trondal conclude with possible ‘design implications’ of said findings (chapter 9). Their ‘organizational approach’ focuses on the impact of selected organizational characteristics on decision‐making in and on behalf of government organizations in policy‐making generally (‘public governance’) and administrative politics more specifically (‘meta‐governance’). The authors concentrate on three sets of ‘classical’ organizational characteristics: structure (mainly vertical and horizontal specialization), demography (personnel composition), and locus (geographical location). The conceptual part of the volume convincingly summarizes ‘formal organization matters’—arguments from the literature for each of the individual organizational factors. Their main, already well‐established argument is that the way an organization is formally set up makes some (reform) decisions more likely than others—a line of reasoning that the authors present as neglected in governance literature.
In the following five empirical chapters, the authors show that aspects of horizontal and vertical specialization—mainly operationalized by Gulicks’ principles of horizontal specialization and the idea of primary versus secondary affiliation of staff—affect organizational behaviour. Readers learn that whether government levels are organized according to a territorial or non‐territorial principle impacts the power relationship between levels: non‐territorial organization at the supranational level tends to empower the centre against lower levels of government. There are two chapters on the decision‐making behaviour of commissioners and officials in the European Commission, both showing that organizational affiliation trumps demographic background factors such as nationality, even with temporary staff.
Chapter 5 addresses coordination dynamics in the European multi‐level system and finds that coordination at the territorially organized national level thwarts non‐territorially organized coordination at the supranational level, resulting in the phenomenon of ‘direct’ national administration bypassing their national executives. Further, the authors show that vertical specialization—while controlling for other factors such as issue salience—has an effect on officials’ behaviour at the national level: agency officials in Norway report significantly less sensitivity towards political signals from the political executive than their colleagues in ministries. Chapter 7 discusses the relevance of geographical location for the relationship between subordinated organizations and their political executive. The authors find that the site of Norwegian agencies does not significantly affect their autonomy, influence, or inter‐institutional coordination with the superior ministry.
The last empirical chapter focuses on the effect of formal organization on meta‐governance, that is, administrative politics. Based on a qualitative case study of a reorganization process in Norway in 2003 involving the synchronized relocation of several agencies after many failed attempts, the authors conclude that administrative reforms can be politically steered and controlled through the organization of the reform process. They argue that amongst other factors the strategic exclusion of opposing actors from the reform process as well as the deliberate increase in situations demanding quick decisions (‘action rationality’, p. 119) by political leaders helps explain the reform's unexpected success. The last chapter is dedicated to the synthesis of the results and to design implications. Supported by new data from a 2016 survey among Norwegian public officials, the authors conclude that organizational position is the most important influencer of decision‐making behaviour, with educational background and previous job experience also playing a large role (p. 135). Consequently, their suggestions for practitioners involved in meta‐governance processes concentrate on aspects of the deliberate crafting of organizational specialization to shape organizational positions, and spend less time discussing location and employee demographics. The authors illustrate and contextualize their recommendations with the help of three empirical examples: organizing good governance by balancing political control and independence in the case of agencification, organizing for coping with boundary‐spanning challenges such as climate change through inter‐organizational structural arrangements, and designing permanent organizational structures for innovative reforms in the public sector (pp. 137 ff.).
This volume is an excellent compilation of theoretically informed applications of the all too often undefined ‘organization matters’ argument. It juxtaposes—particularly in the theory chapter and in the last chapter on design implications—organizational arguments against other explanations of organizational change like historical institutionalism or the garbage can model of decision‐making. However, two major aspects of the book's approach are less convincing. First, supplementary explanations such as the garbage can model that are discussed in the reflections on meta‐governance are neither argumentatively nor empirically applied to public governance; why should, for example, the ‘solutions in search of a problem’ idea only be applicable to decisions on reform policy, but not to decisions in all other policy areas? Similarly, it would have been nice to read more on the authors’ idea on the interaction between organizational factors and between them and other explanations in the empirical cases on public governance—this would have allowed the reader to get a better idea about how much formal organization matters. The view on bureaucrats’ demographic background is slightly confusing: it is presented as a competing approach (p. 7), but also as one of the main organizational factors (p. 12).
Second, as the authors themselves state, the concept of governance is about ‘steering through collective action’ (p. 3) and focuses on interactive processes, and explicitly includes non‐governmental actors in the policy‐making equation. Against this background it seems unfortunate that most of the work presented in the book takes an exclusively governmental perspective and the justification for it remains rather superficial. It would be preferable and even necessary to see the organizational arguments—at least theoretically or through discussing appropriate literature—applied to interactive governance processes involving other actors and/or to non‐bureaucratic organizations.
Regarding its methodology, the specifics of the proposed approach deserve to be addressed more systematically and critically in the book. Except for chapters 2, 3 and 5 (literature‐based studies) as well as chapter 8 (single case study), the empirical studies follow a quantitative logic and are informed by data on self‐reported behaviour through large‐N panel surveys with public officials. In terms of analysis, descriptive statistics or basic inferential statistics (linear regression) are employed. Certainly, the authors are aware of the limitations of their data sources, such as the results being possibly affected by social desirability, and they discuss and justify them in the chapters individually (e.g., on pp. 47, 89). Still, their approach could be strengthened with a more cautious account on the extent to which their choice of data and methods is able to uncover the ‘causal impact of organizational factors in public governance processes’ (p. 131, emphasis added) and with some suggestions for widening their methodological toolbox in the future. On this note, the survey method presented as new on p. 135 is not a particularly convincing choice. The authors do not lay out a research agenda; a surprising omission. This is, however, somewhat made up for by the concluding chapter's stimulating discussion of the possible real‐world implications of their findings and perspective, skilfully using organization theory as a ‘craft’ (p. 29).
In spring 2015, Turkey witnessed the unexpected rise of the HDP, founded by the Kurdish Liberation Movement together with the Turkish radical left, against President Erdoğan’s authoritarian rule. In this article, I will employ contemporary literature on left populism to explain the HDP’s rise as an alternative left hegemonic project against the neoliberal authoritarianism that Erdoğan represents. After discussing the historical context from which the HDP emerged and grew, I will evaluate its discourse and strategies based on a conceptualization of left-wing populism. Lastly, I will discuss the challenges that the HDP confronted after the June 2015 elections and the differences between the Turkish and Western European contexts for a left-wing populist strategy.
Conventional wisdom holds that large sums of money poured into election campaigns are the gateway to corruption. Allegations of the corrupting influence of money in politics and policy are widespread on the national level. Yet, little empirical evidence has advanced the understanding of such a link on the local level, coupled with blurred corruption measures. This master’s thesis tests the effect of campaign finance on public procurement corruption risks in Colombian municipalities, focusing on donations, small donations, and financial disclosure. To that end, I seized publicly disclosed contribution-level data from the 2015 municipal elections and a novel index of institutionalized public procurement corruption risks based upon contract-level data from the near population of local governments. The analysis shows that donations are negatively associated with overall corruption risk, yet they affect specific corruption risks differently. By contrast, small donations seem to correlate positively with direct awarding for a sub-sample of medium-sized municipalities, whereas in their large-sized counterparts the effect of the former on institutionalized corruption is adverse. Finally, financial misreporting is positively linked with market competition restrictions and direct awarding. In the conclusion, I discuss the implications of these findings for future research and outline a series of policy recommendations.
This article contributes to the politics of policy‐making in executive government. It introduces the analytical distinction between generalists and specialists as antagonistic players in executive politics and develops the claim that policy specialists are in a structurally advantaged position to succeed in executive politics and to fend off attempts by generalists to influence policy choices through cross‐cutting reform measures. Contrary to traditional textbook public administration, we explain the views of generalists and specialists not through their training but their positions within an organization. We combine established approaches from public policy and organization theory to substantiate this claim and to define the dilemma that generalists face when developing government‐wide reform policies (‘meta‐policies’) as well as strategies to address this problem. The article suggests that the conceptual distinction between generalists and specialists allows for a more precise analysis of the challenges for policy‐making across government organizations than established approaches.
Global food security governance is fraught with fragmentation, overlap and complexity. While calls for coordination and coherence abound, establishing an inter-organizational order at this level seems to remain difficult. While the emphasis in the literature has so far been on the global level, we know less about dynamics of inter-organizational relations in food security governance at the country level, and empirical studies are lacking. It is this research gap the article seeks to address by posing the following research question: In how far does inter-organizational order develop in the organizational field of food security governance at the country level? Theoretically and conceptually, the article draws on sociological institutionalism, and on work on inter-organizational relations. Empirically, the article conducts an exploratory case study of the organizational field of food security governance in Côte d’Ivoire, building on a qualitative content analysis of organizational documents covering a period from 2003 to 2016 and semi-structured interviews with staff of international organizations from 2016. The article demonstrates that not all of the developments attributed to food security governance at the global level play out in the same way at the country level. Rather, in the case of Côte d’Ivoire there are signs for a certain degree of coherence between IOs in the field of food security governance and even for an – albeit limited – division of labour. However, this only holds for specific dimensions of the inter-organizational order and appears to be subject to continuous contestation and reinterpretation under the surface.
A large literature exists examining the functions of legislatures and the behaviour of MPs in established democracies. But little efforts have been made to observe how MPs behave in new democratic assemblies. This article seeks to address this shortcoming through an exploration of the use of parliamentary questions in two new democracies: Kenya and Zambia. Analysing an innovative dataset we offer one of the few attempts to directly measure legislative behaviour in new democracies. We examine how the factors found in the literature on parliamentary questions in liberal democracies react to this shift of context and to what degree legislatures in these countries fulfil their core functions. Results show that opposition MPs are not necessarily among the most active but that electoral incentives such as the margin by which MPs have won their seats or the number of voters they represent explain the use and content of parliamentary questions.
In a critical approach to Mommsen’s classical thesis, which states the dependence of Weber’s sociology on his political position, the article reconstructs the foundation of Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’ on his sociological analyses of the political domain in the manuscripts for the posthumous publication of Economy and Society. The first two pages of his 1919 lecture particularly show that Weber can fall back on the definitions of State and politics that he had already developed for his political sociology. Yet, to appreciate the full extent of this theoretical contribution, it is necessary to present Weber’s entire ideal-typical analysis of the political. The article then shows that Weber provides an unlabelled definition of ‘modern politics’ that negates ante litteram Carl Schmitt’s foundation of politics on the idea of enmity. In this context, Weber’s sound plea for parliamentarism and against the fascination of civil war comes to the fore that he wanted to deliver to his audience of young revolutionaries in January 1919.
Narratives are shaping our understanding of the world. They convey values and norms and point to desirable future developments. In this way, they justify and legitimize political actions and social practices. Once a narrative has emerged and this world view is supported by broad societal groups, narratives can provide powerful momentum to trigger innovation and changes in the course of action. Narratives, however, are not necessarily based on evidence and precise categories, but can instead be vague and ambiguous in order to be acceptable and attractive to different actors. However, the more open and inclusive a narrative is, the less impact can be expected. We investigate whether there is a shared narrative in research for the sustainable economy and how this can be evaluated in terms of its potential societal impact. The paper carves out the visions for the future that have been underlying the research projects conducted within the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funding programme "The Sustainable Economy". It then analyzes whether these visions are compatible with narratives dominating societal discourse on the sustainable economy, and concludes how the use of visions and narratives in research can contribute to fostering societal transformations.
We analyse the top tail of the wealth distribution in France, Germany, and Spain using the first and second waves of the Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS). Since top wealth is likely to be under-represented in household surveys, we integrate big fortunes from rich lists, estimate a Pareto distribution, and impute the missing rich. In addition to the Forbes list, we rely on national rich lists since they represent a broader base of the big fortunes in those countries. As a result, the top 1% wealth share increases notably for the three selected countries after imputing the top wealth. We find that national rich lists can improve the estimation of the Pareto coefficient in particular when the list of national USD billionaires is short.
The seven deadly sins of quality management: trade-offs and implications for further research
(2019)
Quality management in higher education is generally discussed with reference to commendable outcomes such as success, best practice, improvement or control. This paper, though, focuses on the problems of organising quality management. It follows the narrative of the seven deadly sins, with each ‘sin’ illustrating an inherent trade-off or paradox in the implementation of internal quality management in teaching and learning in higher education institutions. Identifying the trade-offs behind these sins is essential for a better understanding of quality management as an organisational problem.
‘The Territorialities of U.S. Imperialisms’ sets into relation U.S. imperial and Indigenous conceptions of territoriality as articulated in U.S. legal texts and Indigenous life writing in the 19th century. It analyzes the ways in which U.S. legal texts as “legal fictions” narratively press to affirm the United States’ territorial sovereignty and coherence in spite of its reliance on a variety of imperial practices that flexibly disconnect and (re)connect U.S. sovereignty, jurisdiction and territory.
At the same time, the book acknowledges Indigenous life writing as legal texts in their own right and with full juridical force, which aim to highlight the heterogeneity of U.S. national territory both from their individual perspectives and in conversation with these legal fictions. Through this, the book’s analysis contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the coloniality of U.S. legal fictions, while highlighting territoriality as a key concept in the fashioning of the narrative of U.S. imperialism.
Several scholars concerned with global policy-making have recently pointed to a reconfiguration of authority in the area of climate politics. They have shown that various new carbon governance arrangements have emerged, which operate simultaneously at different governmental levels. However, despite the numerous descriptions and mapping exercises of these governance arrangements, we have little systematic knowledge on their workings within national jurisdictions, let alone about their impact on public-administrative systems in developing countries. Therefore, this article opens the black box of the nation-state and explores how and to what extent two different arrangements, that is, Transnational City Networks and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, generate changes in the distribution of public authority in nation-states and their administrations. Building upon conceptual assumptions that the former is likely to lead to more decentralized, and the latter to more centralized policy-making, we provide insights from case studies in Indonesia, South Africa, Brazil, and India. In a nutshell, our analysis underscores that Transnational City Networks strengthen climate-related actions taken by cities without ultimately decentralizing climate policy-making. On the other hand, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation tends to reinforce the competencies of central governments, but apparently does not generate a recentralization of the forestry sector at large.
The Eye of the Beholder?
(2019)
The reaction of the German labor market to the Great Recession 2008/09 was relatively mild – especially compared to other countries. The reason lies not only in the specific type of the recession – which was favorable for the German economy structure – but also in a series of labor market reforms initiated between 2002 and 2005 altering, inter alia, labor supply incentives. However, irrespective of the mild response to the Great Recession, there are a number of substantial future challenges the German labor market will soon have to face. Female labor supply still lies well below that of other countries and a massive demographic change over the next 50 years will have substantial effects on labor supply as well as the pension system. In addition, due to a skill-biased technological change over the next decades, firms will face problems of finding employees with adequate skills. The aim of this paper is threefold. First, we outline why the German labor market reacted in such a mild fashion, describe current economic trends of the labor market in light of general trends in the European Union, and reveal some of the main associated challenges. Thereafter, the paper analyzes recent reforms of the main institutional settings of the labor market which influence labor supply. Finally, based on the status quo of these institutional settings, the paper gives a brief overview of strategies to combat adequately the challenges in terms of labor supply and to ensure economic growth in the future.
Each year, donor countries spend billions of Euros on development cooperation. Not surprisingly, a large strand of research has emerged which examines the impact of development cooperation. A sub-discipline within this strand of the literature deals with the question of whether the impact or effectiveness of development cooperation depends on the quality of the recipient country's policy and institutional environment. Over hundreds of studies have assessed this question at the macro level. In so doing, most of these studies test whether a potential effect of aid on the growth of a recipient country’s gross domestic product (GDP) is conditional on the country's policy and institutional environment. However, even after decades of research and hundreds of studies, no conclusive result has been found. One of the main reasons for the inconclusive state of the literature is that most macro-level studies have to deal with a high risk of endogeneity, treat aid as nothing but a pure income transfer, and rely on low-quality GDP data. To solve these three methodical issues, some authors have started to change the analytical focus from the macro to the micro level. Thus, these authors assess the determinants for the performance of individual development projects instead of the determinants for an effect of aid on GDP. Yet, even though the number of studies focusing on the micro level has increased steadily over the last few years, the state of the literature on the determinants for the performance of development projects still contains multiple highly relevant research gaps. The present thesis seeks to address three of these research gaps. The first research gap addressed by this thesis is related to the specific type of development cooperation. So far, nearly all existing studies focus on projects by Multilateral Development Banks. Research on the determinants for the performance of bilateral development projects is still rare. Thus, even though donors pledge to implement effective development projects, there are hardly any micro-level studies on bilateral projects. So far, only three studies use a sample which includes bilateral projects. Yet, none of the three studies assess the determinants for the performance of bilateral technical development projects. The first paper in the present thesis (GIZ paper) seeks to address this research gap by assessing the determinants for the performance of projects by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), a bilateral state-owned aid agency active in the area of technical cooperation. The results of the paper indicate that some but not all of the existing theoretical arguments can be extended to bilateral technical projects as well.. For example, the level of market interventions in the recipient county only affects the performance of financial development projects, while the recipient country’s government capacity affects both technical and financial development projects. The paper also indicates that effects of determinants may vary among project sectors. The paper also highlights a dilemma of technical development cooperation. The countries with low government capacity are usually the ones most in need of technical cooperation projects. But, at the same time, they are also the countries in which these projects have the poorest performance The second research gap addressed by this thesis is related to one specific factor in the policy and institutional environment of recipient countries, namely corruption. This determinant is often cited as essential for project performance but has gained surprisingly little coverage in empirical studies. The few existing studies on the effect of corruption on project performance are inconclusive. Some find a statistically significant correlation, while others do not. Furthermore, so far, all existing studies use corruption perception indices as a measurement for corruption, despite the fact that these indices have well-known deficits when it comes to this research topic. One of these deficits is that such indices do not distinguish between different forms of corruption, even though it is likely that the effect of corruption will vary depending on the type of development project and form of corruption. The second paper in this thesis (Corruption paper) seeks to address this inconclusive state of the research while focusing on one specific form of corruption, namely bribery between private firms and public officials. The paper finds a small but statistically significant correlation between the corruption level and the performance of World Bank projects. The systematic effect of corruption on project performance confirms the need to consider the risk of corruption in the design and during the implementation of projects. Nonetheless, the relatively small effect of corruption and the low pseudo R-squareds advise not to overestimate the relevance of corruption for project performance. At least for the project level, the paper finds no indication that corruption is a primary obstacle to aid effectiveness. The third research gap addressed by this thesis is related to one specific sample, namely recipient countries of the International Development Association (IDA). The question of whether the policy and institutional environment affects project performance is of particular relevance for these countries, given that the World Bank's ratings on a country's policy and institutional environment decide how much IDA resources it receives. One core justification of such an allocation system is that it helps to steer more resources to places where they are most effective. However, so far, there is no conclusive empirical evidence for this statement. The only study specifically focusing on this topic, a study by the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank from 2010, has essential methodological limitations. The third paper of this thesis (CPR paper) seeks to address this research gap by testing whether a more refined analysis confirms the assumption of previous studies that the policy and institutional environment of IDA-recipient countries, measured by the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment ratings, has an effect on the performance of World Bank projects. Overall, neither the main regression models nor any of the robustness tests indicate a substantial correlation between the policy and institutional environment and project performance. Only for Investments Loans is the coefficient large enough to assume some effect. The overall results not only contradict the results of previous studies, but also raise strong doubts around one of the core justifications for the allocation system of the IDA. All three papers rely on a statistical large-N analysis of the performance ratings of individual development projects. These ratings are usually assigned based on the final evaluation of a project and indicate the merit or worth of an activity. The merit or worth of an activity itself is measured by criteria like relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency. In the case of the two papers on World Bank projects, the needed data stem from different databases of the World Bank. The relevant data for the GIZ paper are gathered from internal evaluation reports of the GIZ. Logistic regressions are applied as the main analytical tool. Overall, the three papers show that the policy and institutional environment of recipient countries matters for project performance, but only to a small degree and under certain circumstances. This result highlights that many researchers and practitioners tend to overestimate the role that the policy and institutional environment of recipient countries plays in project performance. Furthermore, the thesis shows that authors of future studies should consider possible interactions between project- and country-level determinants whenever possible, both in their theoretical arguments and statistical models. Otherwise, the debate on the determinants for project performance is at risk of degenerating into a statistics tournament without any connection to reality.
Reconstructing democracy
(2020)
Across the world, democracies are suffering from a disconnect between the people and political elites. In communities where jobs and industry are scarce, many feel the government is incapable of understanding their needs or addressing their problems. The resulting frustration has fueled the success of destabilizing demagogues. To reverse this pattern and restore responsible government, we need to reinvigorate democracy at the local level. But what does that mean? Drawing on examples of successful community building in cities large and small, from a shrinking village in rural Austria to a neglected section of San Diego, Reconstructing Democracy makes a powerful case for re-engaging citizens. It highlights innovative grassroots projects and shows how local activists can form alliances and discover their own power to solve problems.
Since the economic crisis in 2008, European youth unemployment rates have been persistently high at around 20% on average. The majority of European countries spends significant resources each year on active labor market programs (ALMP) with the aim of improving the integration prospects of struggling youths. Among the most common programs used are training courses, job search assistance and monitoring, subsidized employment, and public work programs. For policy makers, it is of upmost importance to know which of these programs work and which are able to achieve the intended goals – may it be the integration into the first labor market or further education. Based on a detailed assessment of the particularities of the youth labor market situation, we discuss the pros and cons of different ALMP types. We then provide a comprehensive survey of the recent evidence on the effectiveness of these ALMP for youth in Europe, highlighting factors that seem to promote or impede their effectiveness in practice. Overall, the findings with respect to employment outcomes are only partly promising. While job search assistance (with and without monitoring) results in overwhelmingly positive effects, we find more mixed effects for training and wage subsidies, whereas the effects for public work programs are clearly negative. The evidence on the impact of ALMP on furthering education participation as well as employment quality is scarce, requiring additional research and allowing only limited conclusions so far.
The Government will create a motivated, merit-based, performance-driven, and professional civil service that is resistant to temptations of corruption and which provides efficient, effective and transparent public services that do not force customers to pay bribes.
— (GoIRA, 2006, p. 106)
We were in a black hole! We had an empty glass and had nothing from our side to fill it with! Thus, we accepted anything anybody offered; that is how our glass was filled; that is how we reformed our civil service.
— (Former Advisor to IARCSC, personal communication, August 2015)
How and under what conditions were the post-Taleban Civil Service Reforms of Afghanistan initiated? What were the main components of the reforms? What were their objectives and to which extent were they achieved? Who were the leading domestic and foreign actors involved in the process? Finally, what specific factors influenced the success and failure Afghanistan’s Civil Service Reforms since 2002? Guided by such fundamental questions, this research studies the wicked process of reforming the Afghan civil service in an environment where a variety of contextual, programmatic, and external factors affected the design and implementation of reforms that were entirely funded and technically assisted by the international community.
Focusing on the core components of reforms—recruitment, remuneration, and appraisal of civil servants—the qualitative study provides a detailed picture of the pre-reform civil service and its major human resources developments in the past. Following discussions on the content and purposes of the main reform programs, it will then analyze the extent of changes in policies and practices by examining the outputs and effects of these reforms.
Moreover, the study defines the specific factors that led the reforms toward a situation where most of the intended objectives remain unachieved. Doing so, it explores and explains how an overwhelming influence of international actors with conflicting interests, large-scale corruption, political interference, networks of patronage, institutionalized nepotism, culturally accepted cronyism and widespread ethnic favoritism created a very complex environment and prevented the reforms from transforming Afghanistan’s patrimonial civil service into a professional civil service, which is driven by performance and merit.
Growing out of the crisis
(2013)
Greece’s currently planned institutional reforms will help to get the country going with limited economic growth. With an economy based primarily on tourism, trade, and agriculture, Greece lacks an established competitive industry and an innovation-friendly environment, resulting in a low export ratio given the small size of the country and its long-time EU-membership. Instead, Greece exports only its nation's talent, with low returns. To become prosperous, the country must better capitalize on its Eurozone membership and add innovative sectors to its economic structure. Given Greece's hidden assets, such as the attractiveness of the country, a small number of strong research centers and an impressive diaspora in research, finance and business, we envision a Greek “Silicon Valley” and propose a ten point policy plan to achieve that goal.
The role of knowledge in the policy process remains a central theoretical puzzle in policy analysis and political science. This article argues that an important yet missing piece of this puzzle is the systematic exploration of the political use of policy knowledge. While much of the recent debate has focused on the question of how the substantive use of knowledge can improve the quality of policy choices, our understanding of the political use of knowledge and its effects in the policy process has remained deficient in key respects. A revised conceptualization of the political use of knowledge is introduced that emphasizes how conflicting knowledge can be used to contest given structures of policy authority. This allows the analysis to differentiate between knowledge creep and knowledge shifts as two distinct types of knowledge effects in the policy process. While knowledge creep is associated with incremental policy change within existing policy structures, knowledge shifts are linked to more fundamental policy change in situations when the structures of policy authority undergo some level of transformation. The article concludes by identifying characteristics of the administrative structure of policy systems or sectors that make knowledge shifts more or less likely.
This article discusses the challenges for providers of local public services to adapt to increasing marketization and competition in the public sector. Based on some empirical evidence from local government in Germany, the article describes different adaptive measures in the past and shows the legal restrictions to strengthening performance and particularly competitiveness. Furthermore, the article presents some findings from good practice cases of local service providers in Germany who have successfully exposed themselves to market mechanisms. Finally, the article discusses observed results of increased competitiveness in the local government sector, with special regard to quality, efficiency and public employment. The article concludes with describing necessary elements of a competitive regime for public services and with some general reflections about the role of competition in the public sector.
This reference paper describes the sampling and contents of the IZA Evaluation Dataset Survey and outlines its vast potential for research in labor economics. The data have been part of a unique IZA project to connect administrative data from the German Federal Employment Agency with innovative survey data to study the out-mobility of individuals to work. This study makes the survey available to the research community as a Scientific Use File by explaining the development, structure, and access to the data. Furthermore, it also summarizes previous findings with the survey data.
In light of the debate on the consequences of competitive contracting out of traditionally public services, this research compares two mechanisms used to allocate funds in development cooperation—direct awarding and competitive contracting out—aiming to identify their potential advantages and disadvantages.
The agency theory is applied within the framework of rational-choice institutionalism to study the institutional arrangements that surround two different money allocation mechanisms, identify the incentives they create for the behavior of individual actors in the field, and examine how these then transfer into measurable differences in managerial quality of development aid projects. In this work, project management quality is seen as an important determinant of the overall project success.
For data-gathering purposes, the German development agency, the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), is used due to its unique way of work. Whereas the majority of projects receive funds via direct-award mechanism, there is a commercial department, GIZ International Services (GIZ IS) that has to compete for project funds.
The data concerning project management practices on the GIZ and GIZ IS projects was gathered via a web-based, self-administered survey of project team leaders. Principal component analysis was applied to reduce the dimensionality of the independent variable to total of five components of project management. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis identified the differences between the separate components on these two project types. Enriched by qualitative data gathered via interviews, this thesis offers insights into everyday managerial practices in development cooperation and identifies the advantages and disadvantages of the two allocation mechanisms.
The thesis first reiterates the responsibility of donors and implementers for overall aid effectiveness. It shows that the mechanism of competitive contracting out leads to better oversight and control of implementers, fosters deeper cooperation between the implementers and beneficiaries, and has a potential to strengthen ownership of recipient countries. On the other hand, it shows that the evaluation quality does not tremendously benefit from the competitive allocation mechanism and that the quality of the component knowledge management and learning is better when direct-award mechanisms are used. This raises questions about the lacking possibilities of actors in the field to learn about past mistakes and incorporate the finings into the future interventions, which is one of the fundamental issues of aid effectiveness. Finally, the findings show immense deficiencies in regard to oversight and control of individual projects in German development cooperation.
This article analyses salient trade-offs in the design of democracy. It grounds this analysis in a distinction between two basic models of democracy: simple and complex majoritarianism. These models differ not only in their electoral and party systems, but also in the style of coalition-building. Simple majoritarianism concentrates executive power in a single majority party; complex majoritarianism envisions the formation of shifting, issue-specific coalitions among multiple parties whose programs differ across multiple conflict dimensions. The latter pattern of coalition formation is very difficult to create and sustain under pure parliamentary government. A separation of powers between executive and legislature can facilitate such a pattern, while also achieving central goals of simple majoritarianism: identifiable cabinet alternatives before the election and stable cabinets afterward. The separation of powers can thus balance simple and complex majoritarianism in ways that are unavailable under parliamentarism. The article also compares the presidential and semi-parliamentary versions of the separation of powers. It argues that the latter has important advantages, e.g., when it comes to resolving inter-branch deadlock, as it avoids the concentration of executive power in a single human being.
This article analyses salient trade-offs in the design of democracy. It grounds this analysis in a distinction between two basic models of democracy: simple and complex majoritarianism. These models differ not only in their electoral and party systems, but also in the style of coalition-building. Simple majoritarianism concentrates executive power in a single majority party; complex majoritarianism envisions the formation of shifting, issue-specific coalitions among multiple parties whose programs differ across multiple conflict dimensions. The latter pattern of coalition formation is very difficult to create and sustain under pure parliamentary government. A separation of powers between executive and legislature can facilitate such a pattern, while also achieving central goals of simple majoritarianism: identifiable cabinet alternatives before the election and stable cabinets afterward. The separation of powers can thus balance simple and complex majoritarianism in ways that are unavailable under parliamentarism. The article also compares the presidential and semi-parliamentary versions of the separation of powers. It argues that the latter has important advantages, e.g., when it comes to resolving inter-branch deadlock, as it avoids the concentration of executive power in a single human being.