• Treffer 9 von 67
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Decentralizing for performance?

  • In the last 10 years, the governments of most of the German Lander initiated administrative reforms. All of these ventures included the municipalization of substantial sets of tasks. As elsewhere, governments argue that service delivery by communes is more cost-efficient, effective and responsive. Empirical evidence to back these claims is inconsistent at best: a considerable number of case studies cast doubt on unconditionally positive appraisals. Decentralization effects seem to vary depending on the performance dimension and task considered. However, questions of generalizability arise as these findings have not yet been backed by more 'objective' archival data. We provide empirical evidence on decentralization effects for two different policy fields based on two studies. Thereby, the article presents alternative avenues for research on decentralization effects and matches the theoretical expectations on decentralization effects with more robust results. The analysis confirms that overly positive assertions concerningIn the last 10 years, the governments of most of the German Lander initiated administrative reforms. All of these ventures included the municipalization of substantial sets of tasks. As elsewhere, governments argue that service delivery by communes is more cost-efficient, effective and responsive. Empirical evidence to back these claims is inconsistent at best: a considerable number of case studies cast doubt on unconditionally positive appraisals. Decentralization effects seem to vary depending on the performance dimension and task considered. However, questions of generalizability arise as these findings have not yet been backed by more 'objective' archival data. We provide empirical evidence on decentralization effects for two different policy fields based on two studies. Thereby, the article presents alternative avenues for research on decentralization effects and matches the theoretical expectations on decentralization effects with more robust results. The analysis confirms that overly positive assertions concerning decentralization effects are only partially warranted. As previous case studies suggested, effects have to be looked at in a much more differentiated way, including starting conditions and distinguishing between the various relevant performance dimensions and policy fields.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Falk EbingerORCiD, Philipp RichterORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-405158
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):International review of administrative sciences
Untertitel (Englisch):a quantitative assessment of functional reforms in the German Länder
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe (92)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:17.05.2018
Erscheinungsjahr:2015
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:17.05.2018
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:de-concentration; decentralization; federalism; local government; performance meas- urement; public service delivery; social and environmental administration
Seitenanzahl:24
Quelle:International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82 (2016) Nr. 2, S. 291–314 DOI: 10.1177/0020852315586916
Organisationseinheiten:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access
Fördermittelquelle:Sage
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.