Transitional Justice and Nonviolent Resistance
- At different times and places, civic engagement in nonviolent resistance (NVR) has repeatedly shown to be an effective tool in times of conflict to initiate societal change from below. History teaches us that there have been successes (Mahatma Gandhi in India) and failures (the Tiananmen Square protests in China). Along with the recognition of the duality between transformative potential and stark consequences, the historical development of NVR was accompanied by the emergence of scholarly debate, fractured along disputes around purpose, character and effectivity of nonviolent actions taken by civil society stakeholders engaged in making their voices heard. One of the field’s current points of interest is the examination of the long-term effects of NVR movements resulting in societal transformation on the stability and adequacy of a subsequently altered or emerging democracy, suggesting that NVR contributes positively to the sustainable and representative design of an egalitarian governing system. The conclusion of the NepaleseAt different times and places, civic engagement in nonviolent resistance (NVR) has repeatedly shown to be an effective tool in times of conflict to initiate societal change from below. History teaches us that there have been successes (Mahatma Gandhi in India) and failures (the Tiananmen Square protests in China). Along with the recognition of the duality between transformative potential and stark consequences, the historical development of NVR was accompanied by the emergence of scholarly debate, fractured along disputes around purpose, character and effectivity of nonviolent actions taken by civil society stakeholders engaged in making their voices heard. One of the field’s current points of interest is the examination of the long-term effects of NVR movements resulting in societal transformation on the stability and adequacy of a subsequently altered or emerging democracy, suggesting that NVR contributes positively to the sustainable and representative design of an egalitarian governing system. The conclusion of the Nepalese civil war in 2006 should pose as an unambiguous example for the illustration of this phenomenon, but simultaneously raises the question why there was no successful implementation of a transitional process focusing on the needs of the victims.…
Author details: | Lucas Maaser |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570470 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-57047 |
ISBN: | 978-3-86956-473-9 |
ISSN: | 1869-2443 |
ISSN: | 1867-2663 |
Title of parent work (English): | Transitional Justice : Theoretical and Practical Approaches (Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik ; 7) |
Subtitle (English): | Mutually Reinforcing Frameworks for the Consolidation of Democracies? |
Publisher: | Universitätsverlag Potsdam |
Place of publishing: | Potsdam |
Publication type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Date of first publication: | 2022/01/27 |
Publication year: | 2022 |
Publishing institution: | Universität Potsdam |
Publishing institution: | Universitätsverlag Potsdam |
Release date: | 2022/12/08 |
Issue: | 7 |
Number of pages: | 27 |
First page: | 139 |
Last Page: | 165 |
RVK - Regensburg classification: | MK 3810, PR 2180, PR 2356, PR 2730, PR 2712, PR 2800, PC 4720 |
Organizational units: | Extern / Extern |
DDC classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft |
3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 341 Völkerrecht | |
Peer review: | Referiert |
Publishing method: | Universitätsverlag Potsdam |
Open Access / Bronze Open-Access | |
Collection(s): | Universität Potsdam / Schriftenreihen / Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik, ISSN 1867-2663 / Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik 7 (2022) |
License (German): | Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz |