The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 9 of 24
Back to Result List

The relevance of vegetation structures and small water bodies for bats foraging above farmland

  • Bats are known to forage and commute close to vegetation structures when moving across the agricultural matrix, but the role of isolated landscape elements in arable fields for bat activity is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the influence of small isolated ponds which lie within arable fields close to vegetation structures on the flight and foraging activity of bats. Additionally, we compared species-specific activity measures between forest edges and linear structures such as hedgerows. We repeatedly recorded bat activity using passive acoustic monitoring along 20 transects extending from the vegetation edge up to 200 m into the arable field (hereafter: edge-field interface) with a small pond present at five transects per edge type (linear vs. forest). Using generalized linear mixed effect models, we analyzed the effects of edge type, pond presence and the season on species-specific flight and foraging activity within the edge-field interface. We found a higher flight activity of Nyctalus noctula and Pipistrellus pygmaeus aboveBats are known to forage and commute close to vegetation structures when moving across the agricultural matrix, but the role of isolated landscape elements in arable fields for bat activity is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the influence of small isolated ponds which lie within arable fields close to vegetation structures on the flight and foraging activity of bats. Additionally, we compared species-specific activity measures between forest edges and linear structures such as hedgerows. We repeatedly recorded bat activity using passive acoustic monitoring along 20 transects extending from the vegetation edge up to 200 m into the arable field (hereafter: edge-field interface) with a small pond present at five transects per edge type (linear vs. forest). Using generalized linear mixed effect models, we analyzed the effects of edge type, pond presence and the season on species-specific flight and foraging activity within the edge-field interface. We found a higher flight activity of Nyctalus noctula and Pipistrellus pygmaeus above the arable field when a pond was present. Furthermore, Pipistrellus nathusii and Pipistrellus pipistrellus foraged more frequently at forest edges than at linear structures (e.g. hedgerows). Additionally, we found three major patterns of seasonal variation in the activity of bats along the edge-field interface. This study highlights the species-specific and dynamic use of forest and hedgerow or tree line edges by bats and their importance for different bat species in the agricultural landscape. Further, additional landscape elements such as small isolated ponds within arable fields might support the activity of bats above the open agricultural landscape, thereby facilitating agroecosystem functioning. Therefore, additional landscape elements within managed areas should be restored and protected against the conversion into arable land and better linked to surrounding landscape elements in order to efficiently support bats within the agroecosystem.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Olga HeimORCiD, Johannes Lenski, Jelena Schulze, Kirsten Jung, Stephanie Kramer-SchadtORCiD, Jana EccardORCiDGND, Christian C. Voigt
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2017.12.001
ISSN:1439-1791
ISSN:1618-0089
Title of parent work (English):Basic and applied ecology : Journal of the Gesellschaft für Ökologie
Publisher:Elsevier GMBH
Place of publishing:München
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2017/12/12
Publication year:2017
Release date:2022/01/10
Tag:Agricultural landscape; European bats; Forest edge; Hedgerow; Pond; Wind turbines
Volume:27
Number of pages:11
First page:9
Last Page:19
Funding institution:Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research; Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftGerman Research Foundation (DFG) [DFG-GRK 2118/1]; University of Potsdam; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Biochemie und Biologie
DDC classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.