• search hit 1 of 4
Back to Result List

Pollen-vegetation richness and diversity relationships in the tropics

  • Tracking changes in biodiversity through time requires an understanding of the relationship between modern diversity and how this diversity is preserved in the fossil record. Fossil pollen is one way in which past vegetation diversity can be reconstructed. However, there is limited understanding of modern pollen-vegetation diversity relationships from biodiverse tropical ecosystems. Here, pollen (palynological) richness and diversity (Hill N (1)) are compared with vegetation richness and diversity from forest and savannah ecosystems in the New World and Old World tropics (Neotropics and Palaeotropics). Modern pollen data were obtained from artificial pollen traps deployed in 1-ha vegetation study plots from which vegetation inventories had been completed in Bolivia and Ghana. Pollen counts were obtained from 15 to 22 traps per plot, and aggregated pollen sums for each plot were > 2,500. The palynological richness/diversity values from the Neotropics were moist evergreen forest = 86/6.8, semi-deciduous dry forest = 111/21.9, woodedTracking changes in biodiversity through time requires an understanding of the relationship between modern diversity and how this diversity is preserved in the fossil record. Fossil pollen is one way in which past vegetation diversity can be reconstructed. However, there is limited understanding of modern pollen-vegetation diversity relationships from biodiverse tropical ecosystems. Here, pollen (palynological) richness and diversity (Hill N (1)) are compared with vegetation richness and diversity from forest and savannah ecosystems in the New World and Old World tropics (Neotropics and Palaeotropics). Modern pollen data were obtained from artificial pollen traps deployed in 1-ha vegetation study plots from which vegetation inventories had been completed in Bolivia and Ghana. Pollen counts were obtained from 15 to 22 traps per plot, and aggregated pollen sums for each plot were > 2,500. The palynological richness/diversity values from the Neotropics were moist evergreen forest = 86/6.8, semi-deciduous dry forest = 111/21.9, wooded savannah = 138/31.5, and from the Palaeotropics wet evergreen forest = 144/28.3, semi-deciduous moist forest = 104/4.4, forest-savannah transition = 121/14.1; the corresponding vegetation richness/diversity was 100/36.7, 80/38.7 and 71/39.4 (Neotropics), and 101/54.8, 87/45.5 and 71/34.5 (Palaeotropics). No consistent relationship was found between palynological richness/diversity, and plot vegetation richness/diversity, due to the differential influence of other factors such as landscape diversity, pollination strategy, and pollen source area. Palynological richness exceeded vegetation richness, while pollen diversity was lower than vegetation diversity. The relatively high global diversity of tropical vegetation was found to be reflected in the pollen rain.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:William D. GoslingORCiD, Adele C. M. Julier, Stephen Adu-Bredu, Gloria D. Djagbletey, Wesley T. Fraser, Phillip E. JardineORCiD, Barry H. Lomax, Yadvinder Malhi, Emmanuel A. Manu, Francis E. Mayle, Sam Moore
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0642-y
ISSN:0939-6314
ISSN:1617-6278
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31983811
Title of parent work (English):Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
Publisher:Springer
Place of publishing:New York
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2018/10/09
Publication year:2018
Release date:2022/01/17
Tag:Forest-savannah; Neotropics; Palaeotropics; Palynology; Pollen trap; Savanna
Volume:27
Issue:2
Number of pages:8
First page:411
Last Page:418
Funding institution:University of Leicester; Royal SocietyRoyal Society of London; British Ecological Society; NERCNERC Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K005294/1, NE/1014705/1]; Leverhulme Trust-Royal Society of UK [A130026]
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Geowissenschaften
DDC classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 55 Geowissenschaften, Geologie / 550 Geowissenschaften
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
External remark:Zweitveröffentlichung in der Schriftenreihe Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 562
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.