The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 5 of 91
Back to Result List

Marine carbon dioxide removal by alkalinization should no longer be overlooked

  • To achieve the Paris climate target, deep emissions reductions have to be complemented with carbon dioxide removal (CDR). However, a portfolio of CDR options is necessary to reduce risks and potential negative side effects. Despite a large theoretical potential, ocean-based CDR such as ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) has been omitted in climate change mitigation scenarios so far. In this study, we provide a techno-economic assessment of large-scale OAE using hydrated lime ('ocean liming'). We address key uncertainties that determine the overall cost of ocean liming (OL) such as the CO2 uptake efficiency per unit of material, distribution strategies avoiding carbonate precipitation which would compromise efficiency, and technology availability (e.g., solar calciners). We find that at economic costs of 130–295 $/tCO2 net-removed, ocean liming could be a competitive CDR option which could make a significant contribution towards the Paris climate target. As the techno-economic assessment identified no showstoppers, we argue for moreTo achieve the Paris climate target, deep emissions reductions have to be complemented with carbon dioxide removal (CDR). However, a portfolio of CDR options is necessary to reduce risks and potential negative side effects. Despite a large theoretical potential, ocean-based CDR such as ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) has been omitted in climate change mitigation scenarios so far. In this study, we provide a techno-economic assessment of large-scale OAE using hydrated lime ('ocean liming'). We address key uncertainties that determine the overall cost of ocean liming (OL) such as the CO2 uptake efficiency per unit of material, distribution strategies avoiding carbonate precipitation which would compromise efficiency, and technology availability (e.g., solar calciners). We find that at economic costs of 130–295 $/tCO2 net-removed, ocean liming could be a competitive CDR option which could make a significant contribution towards the Paris climate target. As the techno-economic assessment identified no showstoppers, we argue for more research on ecosystem impacts, governance, monitoring, reporting, and verification, and technology development and assessment to determine whether ocean liming and other OAE should be considered as part of a broader CDR portfolio.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Katarzyna A. Kowalczyk, Thorben Amann, Jessica Strefler, Maria-Elena Vorrath, Jens Hartmann, Serena de Marco, Phil Renforth, Spyros Foteinis, Elmar KrieglerORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5192
ISSN:1748-9326
Title of parent work (English):Environmental research letters
Publisher:IOP Publishing
Place of publishing:Bristol
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2024/06/17
Publication year:2024
Release date:2024/07/16
Tag:carbon dioxide removal (CDR); echno-economic assessment; ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE); ocean liming (OL); uptake efficiency
Volume:19
Issue:7
Article number:074033
Number of pages:12
Organizational units:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre
DDC classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 69 Hausbau, Bauhandwerk / 690 Hausbau, Bauhandwerk
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Gold Open-Access
DOAJ gelistet
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.