• Treffer 2 von 2
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Differences in Counting Skills Between Chinese and German Children Are Accompanied by Differences in Processing of Approximate Numerical Magnitude Information

  • Human beings are supposed to possess an approximate number system (ANS) dedicated to extracting and representing approximate numerical magnitude information as well as an object tracking system (OTS) for the rapid and accurate enumeration of small sets. It is assumed that the OTS and the ANS independently contribute to the acquisition of more elaborate numerical concepts. Chinese children have been shown to exhibit more elaborate numerical concepts than their non-Chinese peers, but it is still an open question whether similar cross-national differences exist with regard to the underlying systems, namely the ANS and the OTS. In the present study, we investigated this question by comparing Chinese and German preschool children with regard to their performance in a non-symbolic numerical magnitude comparison task (assessing the ANS) and in an enumeration task (assessing the OTS). In addition, we compared children’s counting skills. To ensure that possible between-group differences could not be explained by differences in more generalHuman beings are supposed to possess an approximate number system (ANS) dedicated to extracting and representing approximate numerical magnitude information as well as an object tracking system (OTS) for the rapid and accurate enumeration of small sets. It is assumed that the OTS and the ANS independently contribute to the acquisition of more elaborate numerical concepts. Chinese children have been shown to exhibit more elaborate numerical concepts than their non-Chinese peers, but it is still an open question whether similar cross-national differences exist with regard to the underlying systems, namely the ANS and the OTS. In the present study, we investigated this question by comparing Chinese and German preschool children with regard to their performance in a non-symbolic numerical magnitude comparison task (assessing the ANS) and in an enumeration task (assessing the OTS). In addition, we compared children’s counting skills. To ensure that possible between-group differences could not be explained by differences in more general performance factors, we also assessed children’s reasoning ability and processing speed. Chinese children showed a better counting performance and a more accurate performance in the non-symbolic numerical magnitude comparison task. These differences in performance could not be ascribed to differences in reasoning abilities and processing speed. In contrast, Chinese and German children did not differ significantly in the enumeration of small sets. The superior counting performance of Chinese children was thus found to be reflected in the ANS but not in the OTS.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • phr546.pdfeng
    (639KB)

    SHA-1: 585ac386239f71a0d3bf0c0963d3aace18c1bf89

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Jan LonnemannORCiDGND, Su Li, Pei Zhao, Janosch Linkersdörfer, Sven Lindberg, Marcus HasselhornORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-427425
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-42742
ISSN:1866-8364
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch):Postprints der Universität Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (546)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:11.04.2019
Erscheinungsjahr:2018
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:11.04.2019
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:approximate number system; counting; cross-national comparison; preschool; subitizing
Ausgabe:546
Seitenanzahl:8
Quelle:Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2019) Art. 2656 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02656
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Bildungswissenschaften
DDC-Klassifikation:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.