• search hit 8 of 13167
Back to Result List

Does question format matter in assessing the prevalence of sexual aggression?

  • As research on sexual aggression has been growing, methodological issues in assessing prevalence rates have received increased attention. Building on work by Abbey and colleagues about effects of question format, participants in this study (1,253; 621 female; 632 male) were randomly assigned to one of two versions of the Sexual Aggression and Victimization Scale (SAV-S). In Version 1, the coercive tactic (use/threat of physical force, exploitation of the inability to resist, verbal pressure) was presented first, and sexual acts (sexual touch, attempted and completed sexual intercourse, other sexual acts) were presented as subsequent questions. In Version 2, sexual acts were presented first, and coercive tactics as subsequent questions. No version effects emerged for overall perpetration rates reported by men and women. The overall victimization rate across all items was significantly higher in the tactic-first than in the sexual-act-first conditions for women, but not for men. Classifying participants by their most severe experienceAs research on sexual aggression has been growing, methodological issues in assessing prevalence rates have received increased attention. Building on work by Abbey and colleagues about effects of question format, participants in this study (1,253; 621 female; 632 male) were randomly assigned to one of two versions of the Sexual Aggression and Victimization Scale (SAV-S). In Version 1, the coercive tactic (use/threat of physical force, exploitation of the inability to resist, verbal pressure) was presented first, and sexual acts (sexual touch, attempted and completed sexual intercourse, other sexual acts) were presented as subsequent questions. In Version 2, sexual acts were presented first, and coercive tactics as subsequent questions. No version effects emerged for overall perpetration rates reported by men and women. The overall victimization rate across all items was significantly higher in the tactic-first than in the sexual-act-first conditions for women, but not for men. Classifying participants by their most severe experience of sexual victimization showed that fewer women were in the nonvictim category and more men were in the nonconsensual sexual contact category when the coercive tactic was presented first. Sexual experience background did not moderate the findings. The implications for the measurement of self-reported sexual aggression victimization and perpetration are discussed.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • 844.pdfeng
    (501KB)

    SHA-512b95a2492947895b680f9d0a62c31806462870d2bc6385c0054e6bb80bb3fd034c21f4c80619fb7c9c06fd5eec491e79405a3f9dbe53af47f878c972326158688

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Isabell SchusterORCiDGND, Paulina TomaszewskaORCiDGND, Juliette MarchewkaORCiD, Barbara KrahéORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-546632
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-54663
ISSN:1866-8364
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32633571
Title of parent work (German):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Subtitle (English):A methodological study
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (844)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/07/07
Publication year:2020
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2024/04/26
Tag:assault; experiences survey; perpetration; rape; reliability; responses; risk-factors; self-report measures; victimization; women
Issue:4
Number of pages:13
Source:The Journal of Sex Research, 58:4, 502-511, DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1777927
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Psychologie
DDC classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Green Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
External remark:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.