• Treffer 22 von 1161
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Coal transitions - part 1

  • A rapid coal phase-out is needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, but is hindered by serious challenges ranging from vested interests to the risks of social disruption. To understand how to organize a global coal phase-out, it is crucial to go beyond cost-effective climate mitigation scenarios and learn from the experience of previous coal transitions. Despite the relevance of the topic, evidence remains fragmented throughout different research fields, and not easily accessible. To address this gap, this paper provides a systematic map and comprehensive review of the literature on historical coal transitions. We use computer-assisted systematic mapping and review methods to chart and evaluate the available evidence on historical declines in coal production and consumption. We extracted a dataset of 278 case studies from 194 publications, covering coal transitions in 44 countries and ranging from the end of the 19th century until 2021. We find a relatively recent and rapidly expanding body of literature reflecting the growingA rapid coal phase-out is needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, but is hindered by serious challenges ranging from vested interests to the risks of social disruption. To understand how to organize a global coal phase-out, it is crucial to go beyond cost-effective climate mitigation scenarios and learn from the experience of previous coal transitions. Despite the relevance of the topic, evidence remains fragmented throughout different research fields, and not easily accessible. To address this gap, this paper provides a systematic map and comprehensive review of the literature on historical coal transitions. We use computer-assisted systematic mapping and review methods to chart and evaluate the available evidence on historical declines in coal production and consumption. We extracted a dataset of 278 case studies from 194 publications, covering coal transitions in 44 countries and ranging from the end of the 19th century until 2021. We find a relatively recent and rapidly expanding body of literature reflecting the growing importance of an early coal phase-out in scientific and political debates. Previous evidence has primarily focused on the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany, while other countries that experienced large coal declines, like those in Eastern Europe, are strongly underrepresented. An increasing number of studies, mostly published in the last 5 years, has been focusing on China. Most of the countries successfully reducing coal dependency have undergone both demand-side and supply-side transitions. This supports the use of policy approaches targeting both demand and supply to achieve a complete coal phase-out. From a political economy perspective, our dataset highlights that most transitions are driven by rising production costs for coal, falling prices for alternative energies, or local environmental concerns, especially regarding air pollution. The main challenges for coal-dependent regions are structural change transformations, in particular for industry and labor. Rising unemployment is the most largely documented outcome in the sample. Policymakers at multiple levels are instrumental in facilitating coal transitions. They rely mainly on regulatory instruments to foster the transitions and compensation schemes or investment plans to deal with their transformative processes. Even though many models suggest that coal phase-outs are among the low-hanging fruits on the way to climate neutrality and meeting the international climate goals, our case studies analysis highlights the intricate political economy at work that needs to be addressed through well-designed and just policies.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Francesca DiluisoORCiD, Paula Walk, Niccolo Manych, Nicola CeruttiORCiD, Vladislav Chipiga, Annabelle Workman, Ceren Ayas, Ryna Yiyun Cui, Diyang CuiORCiD, Kaihui SongORCiD, Lucy A. Banisch, Nikolaj Moretti, Max W. CallaghanORCiD, Leon Clarke, Felix CreutzigORCiD, Jerome Hilaire, Frank Jotzo, Matthias KalkuhlORCiDGND, William F. LambORCiD, Andreas LöschelORCiD, Finn Müller-Hansen, Gregory F. NemetORCiD, Pao-Yu Oei, Benjamin K. SovacoolORCiD, Jan Christoph SteckelORCiDGND, Sebastian Thomas, John Wiseman, Jan C. MinxORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1b58
ISSN:1748-9326
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Environmental research letters
Untertitel (Englisch):a systematic map and review of case study learnings from regional, national, and local coal phase-out experiences
Verlag:Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP)
Verlagsort:Bristol
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:10.11.2021
Erscheinungsjahr:2021
Datum der Freischaltung:10.01.2024
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:climate change mitigation; coal transitions; evidence synthesis; political economy; systematic map
Band:16
Ausgabe:11
Aufsatznummer:113003
Seitenanzahl:40
Fördernde Institution:German Federal Ministry of Education and ResearchFederal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF) [01LA1826A, 01LA1810A, 01LN1704A, IPCC-AR6-III- 2, 01LG1910A]; Heinrich-Boll-Foundation
Organisationseinheiten:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Gold Open-Access
DOAJ gelistet
Lizenz (Englisch):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 3.0 Unported
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.