• Treffer 1 von 17
Zurück zur Trefferliste

The interaction of predictive processing and similarity-based retrieval interference

  • Language processing requires memory retrieval to integrate current input with previous context and making predictions about upcoming input. We propose that prediction and retrieval are two sides of the same coin, i.e. functionally the same, as they both activate memory representations. Under this assumption, memory retrieval and prediction should interact: Retrieval interference can only occur at a word that triggers retrieval and a fully predicted word would not do that. The present study investigated the proposed interaction with event-related potentials (ERPs) during the processing of sentence pairs in German. Predictability was measured via cloze probability. Memory retrieval was manipulated via the position of a distractor inducing proactive or retroactive similarity-based interference. Linear mixed model analyses provided evidence for the hypothesised interaction in a broadly distributed negativity, which we discuss in relation to the interference ERP literature. Our finding supports the proposal that memory retrieval andLanguage processing requires memory retrieval to integrate current input with previous context and making predictions about upcoming input. We propose that prediction and retrieval are two sides of the same coin, i.e. functionally the same, as they both activate memory representations. Under this assumption, memory retrieval and prediction should interact: Retrieval interference can only occur at a word that triggers retrieval and a fully predicted word would not do that. The present study investigated the proposed interaction with event-related potentials (ERPs) during the processing of sentence pairs in German. Predictability was measured via cloze probability. Memory retrieval was manipulated via the position of a distractor inducing proactive or retroactive similarity-based interference. Linear mixed model analyses provided evidence for the hypothesised interaction in a broadly distributed negativity, which we discuss in relation to the interference ERP literature. Our finding supports the proposal that memory retrieval and prediction are functionally the same.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Pia SchoknechtORCiD, Dietmar RoehmORCiDGND, Matthias SchlesewskyORCiDGND, Ina Bornkessel-SchlesewskyORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2026421
ISSN:2327-3798
ISSN:2327-3801
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Language, cognition and neuroscience
Untertitel (Englisch):an ERP study
Verlag:Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Verlagsort:Abingdon
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:20.01.2022
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Datum der Freischaltung:19.01.2024
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:ERP; Language; interaction; interference; memory retrieval; prediction; predictive; processing
Band:37
Ausgabe:7
Seitenanzahl:19
Erste Seite:883
Letzte Seite:901
Fördernde Institution:University of Salzburg; Australian Research Council [FT160100437]
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC-Klassifikation:4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.