Assessing patient preferences
- Despite the positive effects of including patients' preferences into therapy on psychotherapy outcomes, there are still few thoroughly validated assessment tools at hand. We translated the 18-item Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP) into German and aimed at replicating its factor structure. Further, we investigated the reliability of the questionnaire and its convergence with trait measures. A heterogeneous sample of N = 969 participants took part in our online survey. Performing ESEM models, we found acceptable model fit for a four-factor structure similar to the original factor structure. Furthermore, we propose an alternative model following the adjustment of single items. The German C-NIP showed acceptable to good reliability, as well as small correlations with Big-Five personality traits, trait and attachment anxiety, locus of control, and temporal focus. However, we recommend further replication of the factor structure and further validation of the C-NIP.
Verfasserangaben: | Peter Eric HeinzeORCiDGND, Florian WeckORCiDGND, Franziska KühneORCiDGND |
---|---|
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795776 |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
Pubmed ID: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35095681 |
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch): | Frontiers in psychology |
Untertitel (Englisch): | examination of the german cooper-norcross inventory of preferences |
Verlag: | Frontiers Media |
Verlagsort: | Lausanne |
Publikationstyp: | Wissenschaftlicher Artikel |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung: | 14.01.2022 |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2022 |
Datum der Freischaltung: | 12.10.2022 |
Freies Schlagwort / Tag: | activity preference; preference; preference assessment; psychotherapy; validation study |
Band: | 12 |
Aufsatznummer: | 795776 |
Seitenanzahl: | 10 |
Organisationseinheiten: | Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Psychologie |
DDC-Klassifikation: | 1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie |
Peer Review: | Referiert |
Publikationsweg: | Open Access / Gold Open-Access |
Lizenz (Deutsch): | CC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Externe Anmerkung: | Corrigendium*: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854955/full |