The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 64 of 2162
Back to Result List

Stochastic and deterministic models for the metastatic emission process

  • Although the detection of metastases radically changes prognosis of and treatment decisions for a cancer patient, clinically undetectable micrometastases hamper a consistent classification into localized or metastatic disease. This chapter discusses mathematical modeling efforts that could help to estimate the metastatic risk in such a situation. We focus on two approaches: (1) a stochastic framework describing metastatic emission events at random times, formalized via Poisson processes, and (2) a deterministic framework describing the micrometastatic state through a size-structured density function in a partial differential equation model. Three aspects are addressed in this chapter. First, a motivation for the Poisson process framework is presented and modeling hypotheses and mechanisms are introduced. Second, we extend the Poisson model to account for secondary metastatic emission. Third, we highlight an inherent crosslink between the stochastic and deterministic frameworks and discuss its implications. For increased accessibilityAlthough the detection of metastases radically changes prognosis of and treatment decisions for a cancer patient, clinically undetectable micrometastases hamper a consistent classification into localized or metastatic disease. This chapter discusses mathematical modeling efforts that could help to estimate the metastatic risk in such a situation. We focus on two approaches: (1) a stochastic framework describing metastatic emission events at random times, formalized via Poisson processes, and (2) a deterministic framework describing the micrometastatic state through a size-structured density function in a partial differential equation model. Three aspects are addressed in this chapter. First, a motivation for the Poisson process framework is presented and modeling hypotheses and mechanisms are introduced. Second, we extend the Poisson model to account for secondary metastatic emission. Third, we highlight an inherent crosslink between the stochastic and deterministic frameworks and discuss its implications. For increased accessibility the chapter is split into an informal presentation of the results using a minimum of mathematical formalism and a rigorous mathematical treatment for more theoretically interested readers.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Christophe Gomez, Niklas HartungORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_10
ISBN:978-1-4939-7493-1
ISBN:978-1-4939-7492-4
ISSN:1064-3745
ISSN:1940-6029
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29344891
Title of parent work (English):Cancer Systems Biology
Subtitle (English):Formalisms and Crosslinks
Publisher:Humana Press Inc.
Place of publishing:Totowa
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2018/01/18
Publication year:2018
Release date:2022/03/30
Tag:Mathematical modeling; Metastasis; Poisson process; Structured population equation
Volume:1711
Number of pages:32
First page:193
Last Page:224
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Mathematik
DDC classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 51 Mathematik / 510 Mathematik
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.