• search hit 5 of 8
Back to Result List

Reply to Comment on 'Fully covariant radiation force on a polarizable particle'

  • We argue that the theories of Volokitin and Persson (2014 New J. Phys. 16 118001), Dedkov and Kyasov (2008 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 354006), and Pieplow and Henkel (2013 New J. Phys. 15 023027) agree on the electromagnetic force on a small, polarizable particle that is moving parallel to a planar, macroscopic body, as far as the contribution of evanescent waves is concerned. The apparent differences are discussed in detail and explained by choices of units and integral transformations. We point out in particular the role of the Lorentz contraction in the procedure used by Volokitin and Persson, where a macroscopic body is 'diluted' to obtain the force on a small particle. Differences that appear in the contribution of propagating photons are briefly mentioned.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Carsten HenkelORCiDGND, Gregor Pieplow
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/118002
ISSN:1367-2630
Title of parent work (English):New journal of physics : the open-access journal for physics
Publisher:IOP Publ. Ltd.
Place of publishing:Bristol
Publication type:Preprint
Language:English
Year of first publication:2014
Publication year:2014
Release date:2017/03/27
Tag:Brownian motion; applied classical electromagnetism; fluctuation phenomena; mechanical effects of light; noise; random processes
Volume:16
Number of pages:8
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Physik und Astronomie
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.