• Treffer 4 von 19
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Between-School Variation in Students' Achievement, Motivation, Affect, and Learning Strategies

  • To plan group-randomized trials where treatment conditions are assigned to schools, researchers need design parameters that provide information about between-school differences in outcomes as well as the amount of variance that can be explained by covariates at the student (L1) and school (L2) levels. Most previous research has offered these parameters for U.S. samples and for achievement as the outcome. This paper and the online supplementary materials provide design parameters for 81 countries in three broad outcome categories (achievement, affect and motivation, and learning strategies) for domain-general and domain-specific (mathematics, reading, and science) measures. Sociodemographic characteristics were used as covariates. Data from representative samples of 15-year-old students stemmed from five cycles of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA; total number of students/schools: 1,905,147/70,098). Between-school differences as well as the amount of variance explained at L1 and L2 varied widely across countriesTo plan group-randomized trials where treatment conditions are assigned to schools, researchers need design parameters that provide information about between-school differences in outcomes as well as the amount of variance that can be explained by covariates at the student (L1) and school (L2) levels. Most previous research has offered these parameters for U.S. samples and for achievement as the outcome. This paper and the online supplementary materials provide design parameters for 81 countries in three broad outcome categories (achievement, affect and motivation, and learning strategies) for domain-general and domain-specific (mathematics, reading, and science) measures. Sociodemographic characteristics were used as covariates. Data from representative samples of 15-year-old students stemmed from five cycles of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA; total number of students/schools: 1,905,147/70,098). Between-school differences as well as the amount of variance explained at L1 and L2 varied widely across countries and educational outcomes, demonstrating the limited generalizability of design parameters across these dimensions. The use of the design parameters to plan group-randomized trials is illustrated.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Martin BrunnerORCiDGND, Ulrich Keller, Marina Wenger, Antoine Fischbach, Oliver Lüdtke
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1375584
ISSN:1934-5747
ISSN:1934-5739
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Journal of research on educational effectiveness / Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)
Untertitel (Englisch):Results from 81 Countries for Planning Group-Randomized Trials in Education
Verlag:Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Verlagsort:Abingdon
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:29.11.2017
Erscheinungsjahr:2017
Datum der Freischaltung:28.03.2022
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:affect; design parameters; intraclass correlation; large-scale assessment; learning styles; motivation; multilevel models; student achievement
Band:11
Ausgabe:3
Seitenanzahl:27
Erste Seite:452
Letzte Seite:478
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Bildungswissenschaften / Department Erziehungswissenschaft
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Bronze Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.