320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (152)
- Part of a Book (89)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (27)
- Other (22)
- Doctoral Thesis (15)
- Review (9)
- Master's Thesis (5)
- Postprint (3)
- Report (3)
- Working Paper (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (331)
Keywords
- Germany (8)
- Integration (5)
- Security Council (5)
- World Bank (5)
- decision-making (5)
- Migration (4)
- Politikunterricht (4)
- digitalization (4)
- discourse (4)
- executive personalism (4)
- governance (4)
- human rights (4)
- international organisations (4)
- separation of powers (4)
- Australia (3)
- Deutschland (3)
- Föderalismus (3)
- bicameralism (3)
- civil war (3)
- counterterrorism (3)
- crisis (3)
- democracy (3)
- institutional design (3)
- international organizations (3)
- parliamentary government (3)
- political education (3)
- semi-parliamentary government (3)
- territorial reforms (3)
- terrorism (3)
- BSW (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Coordination (2)
- Eurobarometer (2)
- European Union (2)
- Ferdinand von Schirach (2)
- International (2)
- International Financial Institutions (2)
- Krise (2)
- Krisenmanagement (2)
- Liberia (2)
- Local authorities (2)
- Politikberatung (2)
- Politische Bildung (2)
- United Nations (2)
- authoritarianism (2)
- bias (2)
- climate change (2)
- constitutional design (2)
- contestation (2)
- crisis management (2)
- democratic theory (2)
- digital transformation (2)
- drug control (2)
- e-government (2)
- elections (2)
- feminism (2)
- gender (2)
- institutions (2)
- international (2)
- international law (2)
- international non-governmental organizations (2)
- international public administration (2)
- international relations (2)
- legal change (2)
- local government (2)
- margins of error (2)
- metamorphosis of international law (2)
- new public management (2)
- pandemic (2)
- patterns of democracy (2)
- peacebuilding (2)
- policy (2)
- policy advice (2)
- populism (2)
- presidential government (2)
- presidentialism (2)
- semi-parliamentarism (2)
- transitional justice (2)
- value change (2)
- (Justiz-) Roman (1)
- (post) new public management (1)
- 1848/49 revolution (1)
- AKP (1)
- Active learning (1)
- Administration (1)
- Administrative reform (1)
- AfD (1)
- Al-Qaida (1)
- Alternative für Deutschland (1)
- Anti-Imperialismus (1)
- Antifeminismus (1)
- Antisemitism (1)
- Antisemitismus (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Artefakte (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Augmented reality (1)
- Ausländerbehörde (1)
- Australien (1)
- Auswertung (1)
- Automatisierung (1)
- Bedrohungsvorstellung (1)
- Benchmarking (1)
- Berliner Mauer (1)
- Beutelsbach consensus (1)
- Beutelsbacher Konsens (1)
- Bildung (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Brazil (1)
- Bürgerbeteiligung (1)
- CORONA-Krise (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- CPPS (1)
- CPS (1)
- Chancengleichheit (1)
- Changing nature of armed conflict (1)
- China (1)
- Circular argumentation (1)
- Civic Education (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Comparative Public Administration (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Conseil de sécurité (1)
- Consejo de Seguridad (1)
- Constitutive Mechanism (1)
- Coordination structures (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Country experience (1)
- Covid-19-Pandemie (1)
- Daten (1)
- Decarbonisation (1)
- Decision Probability (1)
- Decoloniale Theorie (1)
- Dekarbonisierung (1)
- Demokratie (1)
- Demokratieförderung (1)
- Demokratietheorie (1)
- Der Fall Collini (1)
- Development cooperation (1)
- Dezentralisierung (1)
- Dicranopteris linearis (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Diskurs (1)
- Diskursanalyse (1)
- Diskurstheorie (1)
- EU external borders (1)
- EU-Außengrenzen (1)
- EU-Integration (1)
- Education (1)
- Effektivität (1)
- Egalitarismus (1)
- Electoral systems (1)
- Emanzipation (1)
- Energiesysteme (1)
- Energiewende (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Entscheidungsunterstützung (1)
- Entwicklungstheorien (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Erde (1)
- Erdogan (1)
- Erneuerbare Energie (1)
- Erzählungen, (1)
- Europe (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Green Deal (1)
- European Immigration Policies (1)
- Europäisierung (1)
- Existentialismus (1)
- Expert Authority (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Feminismus (1)
- Feministische Philosophie (1)
- Finanzrisiken (1)
- Flüchtlingskrise (1)
- Folter (1)
- Forms of government (1)
- Forschungsmethoden (1)
- Foucault (1)
- France (1)
- Frauen (1)
- Frauenbewegung (1)
- Frauenhass (1)
- Freiheit (1)
- GIZ (1)
- Gemeinden (1)
- Gender (1)
- Generalized knowledge constructin axiom (1)
- Gerechtigkeit (1)
- German science council (1)
- German women's movement (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Gewalt (1)
- Gewaltenteilung (1)
- Global South (1)
- Global order (1)
- Gobernanza de los Comités (1)
- Green infrastructure investment (1)
- Grundwerte (1)
- Hackathon (1)
- Hanau (1)
- Hochkommissariat für Menschenrechte (OHCHR) (1)
- IMF (1)
- INGOs (1)
- Identität (1)
- Impartiality (1)
- Incels (1)
- Industry 4.0 (1)
- Informal reform (1)
- Inhaltsanalyse (1)
- Institutional change (1)
- Integration Policy (1)
- Integration strategy (1)
- Integrationspolitik (1)
- Interdisciplinary research (1)
- Interdisziplinarität (1)
- International Bureaucracies (1)
- International Monetary Fund (1)
- International Practices (1)
- International bureaucrats (1)
- International cooperation (1)
- International relations (1)
- Internationale Beziehungen (1)
- Internationalisierung (1)
- Internet of things (1)
- Investitionsverhalten (1)
- Investment Behavior (1)
- Irak (1)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (1)
- Isla Vista (1)
- Juden (1)
- Kategorienbildung (1)
- Klassik (1)
- Klimagovernance (1)
- Klimakrise (1)
- Klimapolitik (1)
- Klimawandel (1)
- Koalitionsbildung (1)
- Kommune (1)
- Kompetenzen (1)
- Kontext (1)
- Kontroversität (1)
- Kontroversitätsgebot (1)
- Koordinierung (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (1)
- Lateinamerika (1)
- Legitimität (1)
- Lehrkompetenz (1)
- Leistungsverwaltung (1)
- Liberalismus (1)
- Lieferkettengesetz (1)
- Local Civil Society Networks (1)
- Local Governance (1)
- Local administrative systems (1)
- Local autonomy (1)
- Local government reform (1)
- Louise Otto-Peters (1)
- Lucha antiterrorista (1)
- Macht (1)
- Manosphere (1)
- Market Dynamics (1)
- Markt (1)
- Marktdynamik (1)
- Measurement theory (1)
- Media (1)
- Medien (1)
- Medizintechnik (1)
- Mehrebenen-System (1)
- Mehrebenensystem (1)
- Meinungsbildung (1)
- Mensch-Tier-Beziehung (1)
- Menschen- rechtserklärungen/-übereinkommen (1)
- Menschenrechte (1)
- Meta-model (1)
- Methodenpluralismus (1)
- Methodological pluralism (1)
- Migrants (1)
- Migration Policy (1)
- Migrationspolitik (1)
- Mikropolitik (1)
- Modellierung (1)
- Moderation (1)
- Monetary Fund (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Nachwuchsförderung (1)
- Narration (1)
- Narrationen (1)
- Narrative (1)
- National state communication (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Neoliberalismus (1)
- Neutrality (1)
- New public management (1)
- Nicht-Beherrschung (1)
- Nicht-ideale Theorie (1)
- Norm collisions (1)
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (1)
- Open Governance (1)
- Ordnungsverwaltung (1)
- Organisations (1)
- Othering (1)
- P/CVE (1)
- Pandemie (1)
- Paris Agreement (1)
- Parteigeschlossenheit (1)
- Peacebuilding (1)
- Performance (1)
- Pluralismus (1)
- Poland (1)
- Policy (1)
- Policy Changes (1)
- Policy recommendations (1)
- Politikänderungen (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Poststrukturalismus (1)
- Potassium (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Proceso debido (1)
- Process modeling (1)
- Promoting young researchers (1)
- Prozessexpertise (1)
- Prozessgestaltung (1)
- Präferenzen (1)
- Public Management (1)
- Public opinion (1)
- Public-private partnerships (1)
- QCA (1)
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (1)
- Quality management (1)
- Rankings (1)
- Ratchet Effect (1)
- Recht (1)
- Rechtserziehung (1)
- Rechtsextremismus (1)
- Rechtsstaat (1)
- Rechtsterrorismus (1)
- Recipient performance (1)
- Reddit (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Religionsfreiheit (1)
- Renewable Energy (1)
- Republikanismus (1)
- Research methods (1)
- Responsibility to Protect (1)
- Revolution 1848/49 (1)
- Rio Conventions (1)
- Risikoauferlegung (1)
- Sachbearbeitung (1)
- Sanciones de la ONU (1)
- Sanktionen (1)
- Schulbuchanalyse (1)
- Sebastian Kurz (1)
- Security council (1)
- Security council reform (1)
- Semi-Parlamentarismus (1)
- Serene Khader (1)
- Sexismus (1)
- Sicherheit (1)
- Sicherheitspolitik (1)
- Sicherheitsrat (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
- Simulation process building (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Social Choice Theory (1)
- Soziale Gleichheit (1)
- Sozialer Status (1)
- Soziologie (1)
- Staatliche Leistungsfähigkeit (1)
- Stakeholder (1)
- Storytelling (1)
- Strafgerichtsverfahren (1)
- Sub-national Autonomy (1)
- Sudan (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Survey (1)
- Sustainability indicators (1)
- Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Syria (1)
- Systemisches Risiko (1)
- Terrorismus (1)
- The Collini Case (1)
- Transformation (1)
- Transformationsforschung (1)
- Transnationale Demokratie (1)
- Turkish politics (1)
- Types of democracy (1)
- UN (1)
- UN Security Council (1)
- UN human rights treaty bodies (1)
- UN sanctions (1)
- Umweltperformanz (1)
- Umweltpolitik (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Universalismus (1)
- Unterrichtskonzeption (1)
- Unterrichtsmedium (1)
- Use cases Morphologic box (1)
- Verflechtung (1)
- Verschwindenlassen (1)
- Verwaltung (1)
- Veto Player (1)
- Vetopunkte (1)
- Vetospieler (1)
- Weak and strong sustainability (1)
- West Africa (1)
- Wicked problems (1)
- Winning Coalition (1)
- Wirksamkeit von Entwicklungspolitik (1)
- Wissenschaft (1)
- Wissenschaftsrat (1)
- Wissenssoziologie (1)
- actor constellations (1)
- administration (1)
- administrative culture (1)
- administrative reforms (1)
- advocacy coalitions (1)
- agency (1)
- aid (1)
- aid allocation (1)
- aid effectiveness (1)
- anthropocene (1)
- anti-gender (1)
- antifeminist (1)
- artefacts (1)
- authoritarian resilience (1)
- authoritarian rule (1)
- authority (1)
- borders (1)
- boundary spanning (1)
- bourgeoisie (1)
- burden of disease (1)
- bureaucracy (1)
- bürgerliches Frauenbild (1)
- capacity (1)
- child labour (1)
- citizen participation (1)
- citizenship (1)
- civil service survey (1)
- civilian infrastructure (1)
- climate and energy policy (1)
- climate finance (1)
- climate governance (1)
- climate mitigation (1)
- climate policy (1)
- closing civic space (1)
- coalition formation (1)
- collaboration (1)
- collaborative governance (1)
- collective targeting (1)
- committee governance (1)
- comparative (1)
- comparative environmental politics (1)
- comparative public administration (1)
- competencies (1)
- complex problems (1)
- computerunterstütze Datenanalyse (1)
- conflict management (1)
- conflict resolution (1)
- consensus democracy (1)
- constitution-making (1)
- constitutional state (1)
- containment (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- coordination (1)
- corruption (1)
- criminal proceeding (1)
- crises (1)
- data (1)
- data and methods (1)
- de facto authority (1)
- de jure authority (1)
- death (1)
- death penalty (1)
- decarbonization (1)
- decentralization (1)
- delegation (1)
- deliberative Demokratie (1)
- democratic performance (1)
- democratization (1)
- dependency (1)
- development (1)
- development projects (1)
- dictatorship (1)
- digital government (1)
- digital overload (1)
- digitale Demokratie (1)
- digitale Verwaltung (1)
- direct democracy (1)
- direkte Demokratie (1)
- disability-adjusted life years (1)
- discrimination (1)
- doctrine (1)
- domestic politics (1)
- drivers for change (1)
- due process (1)
- e-services (1)
- earth system governance (1)
- ecological modernization (1)
- effective district magnitude (1)
- energy (1)
- environmental degradation (1)
- environmental mainstreaming (1)
- environmental policy (1)
- environmental policy effects (1)
- environmental policy performance (1)
- epistemic injustice (1)
- epistemische Ungerechtigkeit (1)
- europäische Einwanderungspolitiken (1)
- executive head (1)
- executive-parties dimension (1)
- executives (1)
- exekutiver Personalismus (1)
- expert authority (1)
- expert recommendations (1)
- expertise (1)
- facilitation (1)
- far right (1)
- far-right extremism (1)
- far-right groups (1)
- far-right parties (1)
- far-right populism (1)
- featured (1)
- federalism (1)
- fern (1)
- financial policy (1)
- fisheries policy (1)
- formale Modelle (1)
- fragile epistemische Subjekte (1)
- gender mainstreaming (1)
- gender research (1)
- geographical proximity (1)
- global commons (1)
- global environmental governance (1)
- global environmental politics (1)
- global governance (1)
- global health (1)
- global public policy (1)
- globale Umweltpolitik (1)
- globalization (1)
- gouvernance de comité (1)
- government policymaking (1)
- green finance (1)
- green recovery (1)
- hackathon (1)
- health security (1)
- health services (1)
- hermeneutical capability (1)
- hermeneutical injustice (1)
- hierarchy (1)
- higher education (1)
- history (1)
- hospitals (1)
- huella ecológica (1)
- human mind (1)
- human trafficking (1)
- human-animal relationship (1)
- impact evaluation (1)
- impartiality (1)
- incels (1)
- individual complaints procedures (1)
- information and communication technologies (1)
- institutional change (1)
- institutional interplay (1)
- institutional investors (1)
- institutional policy (1)
- institutional reform (1)
- institutional theory (1)
- inter-governmental relations (1)
- intergovernmental reforms (1)
- intergovernmental relations (1)
- intergovernmental treaty secretariats (1)
- international administration (1)
- international bureaucracy (1)
- international development (1)
- international institutions (1)
- international legal order (1)
- international organisation (1)
- international trade (1)
- internationale Beziehungen (1)
- job autonomy (1)
- job satisfaction (1)
- just transition (1)
- justice (1)
- land management (1)
- law (1)
- law education (1)
- legislative Erfolgsraten (1)
- legislative success rates (1)
- legislatures (1)
- legitimacy (1)
- liberalism (1)
- local and urban governance (1)
- local autonomy (1)
- local community (1)
- local finance (1)
- local government systems (1)
- local politics (1)
- lokale Autonomie (1)
- lokale Netzwerke der Zivilgesellschaft (1)
- lokale Verwaltung (1)
- lutte contre le terrorisme (1)
- male supremacy (1)
- managerial reforms (1)
- manosphere (1)
- marine governance (1)
- men's rights (1)
- meso-level of government (1)
- micro-politics (1)
- micropolitics (1)
- minority rights (1)
- misogyny (1)
- mixed methods (1)
- modernización ecológica (1)
- modernization (1)
- multi-level governance (1)
- multi-level government (1)
- multi-level system (1)
- multi-party systems (1)
- multilateralism (1)
- multiplicity (1)
- municipalities (1)
- narration (1)
- narrative approach (1)
- narrativer Ansatz (1)
- national ecological footprint (1)
- nativism (1)
- natural climate solutions (1)
- neo weberian state (1)
- neue Parteien (1)
- new parties (1)
- newsfeed (1)
- nineteenth and twentieth century (1)
- non-state actors (1)
- norm change (1)
- norm collisions (1)
- norm dynamics (1)
- norm robustness (1)
- norms (1)
- novel (1)
- open governance (1)
- opinion polls (1)
- orchestration (1)
- organization theory (1)
- organizational reform (1)
- organizational reputation (1)
- organizations (1)
- othering (1)
- parliamentary democracy (1)
- partizipative Demokratie (1)
- party competition (1)
- party unity (1)
- pathozentrische epistemische Ungerechtigkeit (1)
- peace (1)
- peace process (1)
- peacekeeping (1)
- performance (1)
- phytolith (1)
- planetary boundaries (1)
- policy agendas (1)
- policy analysis (1)
- policy output (1)
- policy scope (1)
- policy signals (1)
- policy strategy (1)
- policy substitutes (1)
- political campaigns (1)
- political equality (1)
- political repression (1)
- political science (1)
- political stability (1)
- politics (1)
- politics and the media (1)
- politische Bildung (1)
- politische Einstellung (1)
- politische Kultur (1)
- politische Urteilsbildung (1)
- polling (1)
- polycrisis (1)
- política ambiental comparada (1)
- pooling (1)
- populist radical right (1)
- post-conflict peace (1)
- post-development (1)
- post-new public management (1)
- power (1)
- precedent (1)
- principle of controversy (1)
- problem-solving (1)
- process design (1)
- process expertise (1)
- process tracing (1)
- procédure officielle (1)
- protection (1)
- protest (1)
- public administration (1)
- public health (1)
- public management (1)
- public opinion polls (1)
- public participation (1)
- public sector reform (1)
- public value (1)
- public values (1)
- qualitative Daten (1)
- qualitative content analysis (1)
- racism (1)
- radical (1)
- radicalization (1)
- rationalism (1)
- re-municipalization (1)
- rebel attacks (1)
- regime complexity (1)
- regional organizations (1)
- regulación estatal (1)
- regulation (1)
- renewable energy (1)
- representation (1)
- research (1)
- resilience (1)
- responsibility (1)
- restoration (1)
- restrictions to civil society (1)
- right parties and movements (1)
- right-wing politics (1)
- sanctions (1)
- sanctions committee (1)
- sanctions de l’ONU (1)
- scholar-practitioners (1)
- school book analysis (1)
- science (1)
- science & technology (1)
- second-order compliance (1)
- security–development nexus (1)
- selection (1)
- self-governance (1)
- set theory (1)
- social closure (1)
- social epistemology (1)
- social networking sites (1)
- soziale Schließung (1)
- state (1)
- state repression (1)
- state security (1)
- storytelling (1)
- structural change (1)
- subnationale Autonomie (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survival analysis (1)
- teaching (1)
- teaching concept (1)
- teaching tool (1)
- termination (1)
- territorial administration (1)
- trade-offs (1)
- transdisciplinarity (1)
- transition policy (1)
- treadmill of production (1)
- triple nexus (1)
- turnout (1)
- un-cancelling the future (1)
- vergleichende öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
- violence (1)
- vote choice (1)
- vote switching (1)
- voters (1)
- voting (1)
- voting potential (1)
- weo-weberian State (1)
- window of opportunity (1)
- world bank (1)
- world-makers (1)
- ÖVP (1)
- Öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
- öffentliche Meinung (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (331) (remove)
Introduction
(2022)
Several global governance initiatives launched in recent years have explicitly sought to integrate concern for gender equality and gendered harms into efforts to counter terrorism and violent extremism (CT/CVE). As a result, commitments to gender-sensitivity and gender equality in international and regional CT/CVE initiatives, in national action plans, and at the level of civil society programming, have become a common aspect of the multilevel governance of terrorism and violent extremism. In light of these developments, aspects of our own research have turned in the past years to explore how concerns about gender are being incorporated in the governance of (counter-)terrorism and violent extremism, and how this development has affected (gendered) practices and power relations in counterterrorism policymaking and implementation. We were inspired by the growing literature on gender and CT/CVE, and critical scholarship on terrorism and political violence, to bring together a collection of new research addressing these questions.
The past few years have witnessed a growing interest among scholars and policy-makers in the interplay of international bureaucracies with civil society organizations, non-profit entities, and the private sector. Authors concerned with global environmental politics have made considerable progress in capturing this phenomenon. Nevertheless, we still lack in-depth empirical knowledge on the precise nature of such institutional interlinkages across governance levels and scales. Building upon the concept oforchestration, this article focuses on the relationship between specific types of international bureaucracies and actors other than the nation-state. In particular, we investigate how the secretariats of the three Rio Conventions reach out to non-state actors in order to exert influence on the outcome of international environmental negotiations. Our analysis demonstrates that the three intergovernmental treaty secretariats utilize various styles of orchestration in their relation to non-state actors and seek to push the global responses to the respective transboundary environmental problems forward. This article points to a recent trend towards a direct collaboration between these secretariats and non-state actors which gives rise to the idea that new alliances between these actors are emerging in global environmental governance.
Der Untersuchungsgegenstand der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die Praxis der Europäischen Bürgerinitiative (EBI) nach Art. 11 Abs. 4 EUV, dem weltweit ersten und einzigen Instrument transnationaler, partizipativer und digitaler Demokratie. Im Mittelpunkt der Untersuchung steht die Frage, welchen Beitrag die EBI zur weiteren Demokratisierung der EU leisten kann und auf welche Art und Weise insoweit noch weitere Verbesserungen erzielt werden können. Nach zehnjähriger Anwendungspraxis von 2012 bis 2022 liegen inzwischen ausreichend empirische Daten vor, um den Forschungsgegenstand umfassend zu erforschen und das Instrument mit Blick auf seinen von den EU-Institutionen versprochenen Legitimations- und Demokratisierungsbeitrag bewerten zu können. Insbesondere wird das EBI-Verfahren in dieser Arbeit auf seine empirisch nachweisbare Nutzung, auf seine prozedurale Nutzerfreundlichkeit sowie auf seine politische wie rechtliche Wirkmächtigkeit untersucht. Zum Zwecke der korrekten Kategorisierung, Bewertung sowie der nutzerfreundlichen Ausgestaltung des EBI-Verfahrens werden Vergleiche mit Bürger- und Volksinitiativverfahren in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten sowie mit Bürgerbeteiligungsverfahren auf EU-Ebene vorgenommen. Den empirischen und komparativen Analysen werden eine historische Analyse über die Genese der EBI seit dem EU-Verfassungskonvent sowie theoretisch-normative Überlegungen und praktische Untersuchungen zu unterschiedlichen beteiligungszentrierten Demokratiemodellen vorangestellt, um die EBI einzuordnen und die Steigerungsmöglichkeiten ihres Demokratisierungsbeitrags zu erschließen. Letzteres zielt schließlich auf die Frage nach der prozeduralen Kombination und Kompatibilität der EBI mit demokratischen Innovationen aus dem Bereich der deliberativen und direkten Demokratie ab. Die Arbeit schließt mit einem Ausblick und unterbreitet umfassende EBI-Reformoptionen sowohl auf der primär- und sekundärrechtlichen als auch auf der informellen Ebene.
The chapter explores aspects of ‘memory games’ in postcommunist Poland vis-à-vis the country’s authoritarian communist past. In particular, it is interested in the populist moments of lustration and de-communization, and also after October 2015 when the right-wing Law and Justice party (PiS) won the parliamentary and presidential elections in Poland. The main argument is that even though legitimate considerations of lustration and de-communization play a role, a number of policies dealing with transitional justice are related to populist mobilization by the PiS. Against this background, the chapter discusses how far the transitional justice has been accompanied by the process of reframing the political memory about the guilt, suffering, and righteousness during communism. Populist legitimation aims at reconfiguring the public discourse on the transitional justice in a way that it is used to justify controversial public policies in tune with the interest of the groups currently in power, which present themselves as the true voice of the people. The core of the article deals with three main aspects of Polish memory games: (1) the meandering of lustration (mainly with regard to the position of the PiS/Law and Justice and PO/Civic Platform – the largest Polish political parties since 2005), (2) the lustration as the function of power, and (3) the role of the Institute of National Remembrance as a case of institutionalized memory games.
The digitization has permeated almost all aspects of an individual’s life. In the work context as well as in the private sphere, one readily encounters and relies on Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), such as Social Networking Sites (SNS), smartphones and so forth. By communicating with as well as obtaining information via such technologies, ICTs engage one’s mind as interaction happens. This interaction of ICTs and the human mind form the focal topic of this thesis. Within this thesis, the human mind is represented on behalf of a facilitated model comprising a perceptual, a cognitive and a motor subsystem. ICTs represent an external stimulus, which triggers the human mind's perceptual subsystem, the cognitive subsystem and eventually leads to a motoric response via the motor subsystem. The external stimulus causing this event chain is within this thesis an ICT. The digital environment and related ICTs are high attention environments offering large and easily accessible amounts of information. Not surprisingly, issues may arise, when the human mind deals with ICTs. Thus, the interplay between ICTs and the human mind entails downsides. This thesis investigates these downsides and in addition the ICT-based factors that cause these downsides. More specifically, the thesis investigates these two aspects as research questions in the context of SNSs as well as other ICTs (such as smartphones, e-learning etc.). Addressing the research questions, 8 articles are submitted within this thesis which address the topic with different methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods as well as systematic literature reviews. Article 1 investigates factors that lead to SNS fatigue and discontinuance intentions in a mixed-methods design. Article 2 explores if certain factors encountered on a newsfeed hamper sensemaking. Article 3 proposes a study design to explore the link between disorderly perceptions of a SNSs newsfeed and gender stereotype activations. Article 4 considers the interplay between users and algorithms via the newsfeed interface and the implications for relevance perceptions. Article 5 explores information acquisition, hampering factors and verification strategies of social media users. Article 6 systematically reviews addiction scales of various ICTs. Article 7 investigates click behavior in e-learning contexts and how this is linked to cultural and personality traits. Finally, article 8 offers a comprehensive overview of the antecedents and consequences of children’s smartphone usage. Within the specific context of SNSs, the thesis suggests that the cognitive tolls imposed on users’ minds cause adverse effects, such as impaired sensemaking, fatigue, stereotype activation as well as intentions to discontinue the service. Other ICTs lead to addiction, and i.e., smartphones evidence to cause cognitive impairments in children. Factors on the ICT side that promote these adverse effects are linked to specific features, such as the newsfeed for SNSs and entail overload or perceptions of disorder. The thesis adds theoretically to the understanding of downsides that arise from the interplay between human minds and ICTs. Especially, the context of SNSs is spotlighted and insights add to the growing body of literature on experiences and perceptions. For instance, one study’s result suggests that considering information organization is as important as merely decreasing overload perceptions from the users in countering adverse effects of SNS usage. Practically, the thesis emphasizes the importance of mindful interaction with ICTs. Future research is welcome to build on the exploratory investigations and may draw an even more holistic picture to enhance the interaction between ICTs and the human mind.
Enacted in 2009, the National Policy on Climate Change (PNMC) is a milestone in the institutionalisation of climate action in Brazil. It sets greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets and a set of principles and directives that are intended to lay the foundations for a cross-sectoral and multilevel climate policy in the country. However, after more than a decade since its establishment, the PNMC has experienced several obstacles related to its governance, such as coordination, planning and implementation issues. All of these issues pose threats to the effectiveness of GHG mitigation actions in the country.
By looking at the intragovernmental and intergovernmental relationships that have taken place during the lifetime of the PNMC and its sectoral plans on agriculture (the Sectoral Plan for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change for the Consolidation of a Low-Carbon Economy in Agriculture [ABC Plan]), transport and urban mobility (the Sectoral Plan for Transportation and Urban Mobility for Mitigation and Adaption of Climate Change [PSTM]), this exploratory qualitative research investigates the Brazilian climate change governance guided by the following relevant questions: how are climate policy arrangements organised and coordinated among governmental actors to mitigate GHG emissions in Brazil? What might be the reasons behind how such arrangements are established? What are the predominant governance gaps of the different GHG mitigation actions examined? Why do these governance gaps occur?
Theoretically grounded in the literature on multilevel governance and coordination of public policies, this study employs a novel analytical framework that aims to identify and discuss the occurrence of four types of governance gaps (i.e. politics, institutions and processes, resources and information) in the three GHG mitigation actions (cases) examined (i.e. the PNMC, ABC Plan and PSTM). The research results are twofold. First, they reveal that Brazil has struggled to organise and coordinate governmental actors from different policy constituencies and different levels of government in the implementation of the GHG mitigation actions examined. Moreover, climate policymaking has mostly been influenced by the Ministry of Environment (MMA) overlooking the multilevel and cross-sectoral approaches required for a country’s climate policy to mitigate and adapt to climate change, especially if it is considered an economy-wide Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), as the Brazilian one is.
Second, the study identifies a greater manifestation of gaps in politics (e.g. lack of political will in supporting climate action), institutions and processes (e.g. failures in the design of institutions and policy instruments, coordination and monitoring flaws, and difficulties in building climate federalism) in all cases studied. It also identifies that there have been important advances in the production of data and information for decision-making and, to a lesser extent, in the allocation of technical and financial resources in the cases studied; however, it is necessary to highlight the limitation of these improvements due to turf wars, a low willingness to share information among federal government players, a reduced volume of financial resources and an unequal distribution of capacities among the federal ministries and among the three levels of government.
A relevant finding is that these gaps tend to be explained by a combination of general and sectoral set aspects. Regarding the general aspects, which are common to all cases examined, the following can be mentioned: i) unbalanced policy capabilities existing among the different levels of government, ii) a limited (bureaucratic) practice to produce a positive coordination mode within cross-sectoral policies, iii) the socioeconomic inequalities that affect the way different governments and economic sectors perceive the climate issue (selective perception) and iv) the reduced dialogue between national and subnational governments on the climate agenda (poor climate federalism). The following sectoral aspects can be mentioned: i) the presence of path dependencies that make the adoption of transformative actions harder and ii) the absence of perceived co-benefits that the climate agenda can bring to each economic sector (e.g. reputational gains, climate protection and access to climate financial markets).
By addressing the theoretical and practical implications of the results, this research provides key insights to tackle the governance gaps identified and to help Brazil pave the way to achieving its NDCs and net-zero targets. At the theoretical level, this research and the current country’s GHG emissions profile suggest that the Brazilian climate policy is embedded in a cross-sectoral and multilevel arena, which requires the effective involvement of different levels of political and bureaucratic powers and the consideration of the country’s socioeconomic differences. Thus, the research argues that future improvements of the Brazilian climate policy and its governance setting must frame climate policy as an economic development agenda, the ramifications of which go beyond the environmental sector. An initial consequence of this new perspective may be a shift in the political and technical leadership from the MMA to the institutions of the centre of government (Executive Office of the President of Brazil) and those in charge of the country’s economic policy (Ministry of Economy). This change could provide greater capacity for coordination, integration and enforcement as well as for addressing certain expected gaps (e.g. financial and technical resources). It could also lead to greater political prioritisation of the agenda at the highest levels of government. Moreover, this shift of the institutional locus could contribute to greater harmonisation between domestic development priorities and international climate politics. Finally, the research also suggests that this approach would reduce bureaucratic elitism currently in place due to climate policy being managed by Brazilian governmental institutions, which is still a theme of a few ministries and a reason for the occurrence of turf wars.
In recent years the framings of global health security have shifted while the structures governing global health have largely remained the same. One feature of the emerging re-ordering is the unresolved allocation of accountability between state and non-state actors. This brings to critical challenges to global health security to the fore. The first is that the consensus on the seeming shift from state to human security framing with regard to the global human right to health (security) risks losing its salience. Second, this conceptual challenge is mirrored on the operational level: if states and non-state actors do not assume responsibility for health security, who or what can guarantee health security? In order to address global health security against the backdrop of these twenty-first Century challenges, this article proceeds in three parts. First, it analyses the shortcomings of the current state-based World Health Organization (WHO) definition of health security. Second, taking into account the rising pressures posed to global health security and the inadequacy both of state-based and of ad hoc non-state responses, it proposes a new framing. Third, the article offers initial insights into the operational application of beyond state responses to (health) security challenges.
We examine how and under what conditions informal institutional constraints, such as precedent and doctrine, are likely to affect collective choice within international organisations even in the absence of powerful bureaucratic agents. With a particular focus on the United Nations Security Council, we first develop a theoretical account of why such informal constraints might affect collective decisions even of powerful and strategically behaving actors. We show that precedents provide focal points that allow adopting collective decisions in coordination situations despite diverging preferences. Reliance on previous cases creates tacitly evolving doctrine that may develop incrementally. Council decision-making is also likely to be facilitated by an institutional logic of escalation driven by institutional constraints following from the typically staged response to crisis situations. We explore the usefulness of our theoretical argument with evidence from the Council doctrine on terrorism that has evolved since 1985. The key decisions studied include the 1992 sanctions resolution against Libya and the 2001 Council response to the 9/11 attacks. We conclude that, even within intergovernmentally structured international organisations, member states do not operate on a clean slate, but in a highly institutionalised environment that shapes their opportunities for action.
To date, there has been little research on how advocacy coalitions influence the dynamic relationships between norms. Addressing norm collisions as a particular type of norm dynamics, we ask if and how advocacy coalitions and the constellations between them bring such norm collisions to the fore. Norm collisions surface in situations in which actors claim that two or more norms are incompatible with each other, promoting different, even opposing, behavioural choices. We examine the effect of advocacy coalition constellations (ACC) on the activation and varying evolution of norm collisions in three issue areas: international drug control, human trafficking, and child labour. These areas have a legally codified prohibitive regime in common. At the same time, they differ with regard to the specific ACC present. Exploiting this variation, we generate insights into how power asymmetries and other characteristics of ACC affect norm collisions across our three issue areas.
Despite high institutional hurdles for constitutional change, one observes surprisingly many EU treaty revisions. This article takes up the questions of what determines whether a treaty provision is successfully changed and why provisions are renegotiated at subsequent Intergovernmental Conferences. The article presents an institutionalist theory explaining success and renegotiation and tests the theory using all core institutional provisions by means of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The causal analysis shows that low conflict potential of an issue is sufficient for successfully changing the treaties. Furthermore, high conflict potential of an issue and its fundamental change are sufficient for it to be renegotiated.
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is one of the most important multilateral institutions having the ambition to shape global governance and the only organ of the global community that can adopt legally binding resolutions for the maintenance of international peace and security and, if necessary, authorize the use of force. Created in the aftermath of World War II by its victors, the UNSC’s constellation looks increasingly anachronistic, however, in light of the changing global distribution of power. Adapting the institutional structure and decision-making procedures of the UNSC has proven to be one of the most difficult challenges of the last decades, while it is the institution that has probably been faced with the most vociferous calls for reform. Although there have been changes to the informal ways in which outside actors are drawn into the UNSC’s work and activities, many of the major players in the current international system seem to be deprived from equal treatment in its core patterns of decision-making. Countries such as Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, alongside emerging African nations such as Nigeria and South Africa, are among the states eager to secure permanent representation on the Council. By comparison, selected BRICS countries, China and Russia - in contrast to their role in other multilateral institutions - are permanent members of the UNSC and with this, have been “insiders” for a long time. This renders the situation of the UNSC different from global institutions, in which traditionally, Western powers have dominated the agenda.
Almost twenty years after its recognition in international human rights law, the human right to water continues to spark discussions about its scope and meaning. This article revisits the evolution and contestation of the right's first international legal framework, General Comment No. 15 from the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The analysis highlights the contestation of economic and social rights as a universal phenomenon at multiple levels, but argues that these meaning-making practices can support their validation and recognition.