Department Linguistik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (268) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (268) (remove)
Keywords
- Patholinguistik (52)
- Sprachtherapie (52)
- patholinguistics (52)
- information structure (31)
- Syntax (29)
- Festschrift (28)
- Informationsstruktur (28)
- Linguistik (28)
- Morphologie (28)
- festschrift (28)
- linguistics (28)
- morphology (28)
- syntax (28)
- speech/language therapy (27)
- geistige Behinderung (18)
- mental deficiency (18)
- primary progessive aphasia (18)
- primär progessive Aphasie (18)
- speech therapy (18)
- Cochlea-Implantat (15)
- Hören (15)
- Hörstörungen (15)
- cochlear implant (15)
- hearing (15)
- hearing loss (15)
- Dysphagie (12)
- Schluckstörung (12)
- Schlucktherapie (12)
- dysphagia (12)
- dysphagia therapy (12)
- swallowing disorders (12)
- Bilingualismus (7)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (7)
- Sprachförderung (7)
- bilingualism (7)
- speech and language therapy (7)
- focus (6)
- Focus (3)
- Japanese (3)
- Optimality Theory (3)
- Prosody (3)
- Topic (3)
- givenness (3)
- Adverbial Quantification (2)
- Intonation (2)
- Minimalist Program (2)
- Object Shift (2)
- cleft constructions (2)
- contrastive focus (2)
- focus intonation (2)
- intonation (2)
- presupposition (2)
- prosody (2)
- scope of focus (2)
- topicalization (2)
- wh-question (2)
- (implicit) prosody (1)
- A-bar-movement (1)
- Aboutness Topics (1)
- Adverbs of Frequency (1)
- Adverbs of Quantity (1)
- Afro-Asiatic (1)
- Agreement (1)
- Alternative Semantics (1)
- Bias (1)
- Candidate Set (1)
- Chechen (1)
- Chomskyan linguistics (1)
- Competition (1)
- Complex Speech Acts (1)
- Complexity (1)
- Contrast (1)
- Covert Variables (1)
- Derivation-and-Evaluation model (1)
- Deutschunterricht (1)
- Domain Restriction (1)
- Downstep (1)
- Duration (1)
- Economy (1)
- Evolution of Language (1)
- Foodo (1)
- Givenness (1)
- HTP (1)
- Handedness (1)
- Indefinites (1)
- Information Structure (1)
- Information structure (1)
- Intervention Effect (1)
- Konkomba (1)
- Left-Dislocation (1)
- Lehrmittel (1)
- Levels of adequacy (1)
- Movement (1)
- Multiple Spell-Out (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Negative (1)
- OT syntax (1)
- Order preservation (1)
- Parallelism Requirement (1)
- Parameters (1)
- Partition (1)
- Pitch (1)
- Pitch Reset (1)
- Polar Questions (1)
- Post-Focus Reduction (1)
- Quantificational Variability (1)
- Quantificational Variability Effects (1)
- Recursivity (1)
- Reference Set (1)
- SDRT (1)
- Second Occurrence Focus (1)
- Sekundarstufe 2 (1)
- Simplicity (1)
- Situations (1)
- Sprachwandel (1)
- Swiss German (1)
- Tag Questions (1)
- Tense Semantics (1)
- Tone (language) (1)
- Topic/Comment (1)
- Uninterpretablity (1)
- VP-topicalisation (1)
- Wh-question (1)
- Whinterrogatives (1)
- Wide Scope (1)
- adverbial quantification (1)
- affect (1)
- alternative semantics presupposition projection (1)
- applicatives (1)
- argument/adjunct focus (1)
- bilingual word processing (1)
- branching (1)
- breadth of focus (1)
- cleft (1)
- clitic doubling (1)
- conjunction (1)
- constraints (1)
- contextual markedness (1)
- contrast (1)
- correction (1)
- corrective focus (1)
- cyclicity (1)
- dative (1)
- de-accenting (1)
- definites (1)
- discourse (1)
- discourse expectability (1)
- discourse structure (1)
- dummy prepositions (1)
- early Germanic (1)
- economy (1)
- emphasis (1)
- evaluator (1)
- experimental linguistics (1)
- extraposition (1)
- focus ambiguity (1)
- focus anaphoricity (1)
- focus asymmetries (1)
- focus constructions (1)
- focus copula (1)
- focus meaning (1)
- focus movement (1)
- focus position (1)
- focus type (1)
- focus types (1)
- generator (1)
- gesture (1)
- infants (1)
- informational focus (1)
- inherent Case (1)
- intonation (language) (1)
- lexical tone (1)
- markedness (1)
- mayan (1)
- metalinguistic (1)
- minimalism (1)
- minimalist program (1)
- morphological focus marking (1)
- narrative structure (1)
- negation (1)
- negative polarity item (NPI) (1)
- nepali (1)
- oblique case (1)
- operator movement (1)
- optimality (1)
- optimality theory (1)
- palauan (1)
- phase (1)
- phases (1)
- pitch accent (1)
- polarity focus (1)
- political speech (1)
- predicate focus (1)
- presentational constructions (1)
- processing (1)
- prosodic focus (1)
- prosodic phrasing (1)
- prosodic prominence (1)
- reconstruction (1)
- relative clauses (1)
- research programme (1)
- resumption (1)
- scrambling (1)
- situation variables (1)
- split ergative (1)
- spoken discourse (1)
- syntactic focus marking (1)
- syntax-phonology interface (1)
- syntax-phonology mapping (1)
- syntax-semantics interface (1)
- topic affixes (1)
- topic-comment (1)
- universal quantifiers (1)
- variation (1)
- verb-initial (1)
- verb-initial cleft constructions (1)
- verb-second (1)
- wh-scope (1)
The paper presents a novel approach to explaining word order variation in the early Germanic languages. Initial observations about verb placement as a device marking types of rhetorical relations made on data from Old High German (cf. Hinterhölzl & Petrova 2005) are now reconsidered on a larger scale and compared with evidence from other early Germanic languages. The paper claims that the identification of information-structural domains in a sentence is best achieved by taking into account the interaction between the pragmatic features of discourse referents and properties of discourse organization.
A form-function mismatch?
(2019)
Accusative Unaccusatives
(2019)
Alltagsorientierte Therapie
(2010)
The material reported on in this paper is part of a set of experiments in which the role of Information Structure on L2 processing of words is tested. Pitch and duration of 4 sets of experimental material in German and English are measured and analyzed in this paper. The well-known finding that accent boosts duration and pitch is confirmed. Syntactic and lexical means of marking focus, however, do not give the duration and the pitch of a word an extra boost.
Holmberg (1997, 1999) assumes that Holmberg's generalisation (HG) is derivational, prohibiting Object Shift (OS) across an intervening non-adverbial element at any point in the derivation. Counterexamples to this hypothesis are given in Fox & Pesetsky (2005) which show that remnant VP-topicalisations are possible in Scandinavian as long as the VP-internal order relations are maintained. Extending the empirical basis concerning remnant VP-topicalisations, we argue that HG and the restrictions on object stranding result from the same, more general condition on order preservation. Considering this condition to be violable and to interact with various constraints on movement in an Optimality-theoretic fashion, we suggest an account for various asymmetries in the interaction between remnant VP-topicalisations and both OS and other movement operations (especially subject raising) as to their order preserving characteristics and stranding abilities.
ANNIS
(2004)
In this paper, we discuss the design and implementation of our first version of the database "ANNIS" ("ANNotation of Information Structure"). For research based on empirical data, ANNIS provides a uniform environment for storing this data together with its linguistic annotations. A central database promotes standardized annotation, which facilitates interpretation and comparison of the data. ANNIS is used through a standard web browser and offers tier-based visualization of data and annotations, as well as search facilities that allow for cross-level and cross-sentential queries. The paper motivates the design of the system, characterizes its user interface, and provides an initial technical evaluation of ANNIS with respect to data size and query processing.
Aspect splits can affect agreement, Case, and even preposition insertion. This paper discusses the functional ‘why’ and the theoretical ‘how’ of aspect splits. Aspect splits are an economical way to mark aspect by preserving or suppressing some independent element in one aspect. In formal terms, they are produced in the same way as coda conditions in phonology, with positional/contextual faithfulness.This approach captures the additive effects of cross-cutting splits. Aspect splits are analyzed here from Hindi, Nepali, Yucatec Maya, Chontal, and Palauan.
AVWS »meets« LRS
(2013)
1 Einleitung 2 Zusammenhänge zwischen zentral-auditiven Wahrnehmungs- und Verarbeitungsstörungen (AVWS) und Beeinträchtigungen im Lesen und Schreiben 3 Therapeutische Möglichkeiten zur Behandlung von komorbiden Störungen im Lesen und Schreiben bei Kindern mit AVWS 4 Fallbeschreibung 5 Schlussfolgerung 6 Literatur
This article takes stock of the basic notions of Information Structure (IS). It first provides a general characterization of IS — following Chafe (1976) — within a communicative model of Common Ground(CG), which distinguishes between CG content and CG management. IS is concerned with those features of language that concern the local CG. Second, this paper defines and discusses the notions of Focus (as indicating alternatives) and its various uses, Givenness (as indicating that a denotation is already present in the CG), and Topic (as specifying what a statement is about). It also proposes a new notion, Delimitation, which comprises contrastive topics and frame setters, and indicates that the current conversational move does not entirely satisfy the local communicative needs. It also points out that rhetorical structuring partly belongs to IS.
Bienenfresserortungsversuch
(2019)
Bonner Stotterherapie
(2020)
Branching constraints
(2009)
Rejecting approaches with a directionality parameter, mainstream minimalism has adopted the notion of strict (or unidirectional) branching. Within optimality theory however, constraints have recently been proposed that presuppose that the branching direction scheme is language specific. I show that a syntactic analysis of Chechen word order and relative clauses using strict branching and movement triggered by feature checking seems very unlikely, whereas a directionality approach works well. I argue in favor of a mixed directionality approach for Chechen, where the branching direction scheme depends on the phrase type. This observation leads to the introduction of context variants of existing markedness constraints, in order to describe the branching processes in terms of optimality theory. The paper discusses how and where the optimality theory selection of the branching directions can be implemented within a minimalist derivation.
In the recent literature there is a hypothesis that the human parser uses number and case information in different ways to resolve an initially incorrect case assignment. This paper investigates what role morphological case information plays during the parser’s detection of an ungrammaticality or its recognition that a reanalysis is necessary. First, we compare double nominative with double accusative ungrammaticalities in a word by word, speeded grammaticality task and in this way show that only double nominatives lead to a so-called ”illusion of grammaticality” (a low rate of ungrammaticality detection). This illusion was found to disappear when the second argument was realized by a pronoun rather than by a full definite determiner phrase, i.e. when the saliency of the second argument was increased. Thus, the accuracy in recognizing an ungrammaticality induced by the case feature of the second argument is dependent on the type of this argument. Furthermore, we found that the accuracy in detecting such case ungrammaticalities is distance sensitive insofar as a shorter distance leads to a higher accuracy. The results are taken as support for an ”expectationdriven” parse strategy in which the way the parser uses the information of a current input item depends on the expectation resulting from the parse carried out so far. By contrast, ”input-driven” parse strategies, such as the diagnosis model (Fodor & Inoue, 1999) are unable to explain the data presented here.
Contrastive focus
(2007)
The article puts forward a discourse-pragmatic approach to the notoriously evasive phenomena of contrastivity and emphasis. It is argued that occurrences of focus that are treated in terms of ‘contrastive focus’, ‘kontrast’ (Vallduví & Vilkuna 1998) or ‘identificational focus’ (É. Kiss 1998) in the literature should not be analyzed in familiar semantic terms like introduction of alternatives or exhaustivity. Rather, an adequate analysis must take into account discourse-pragmatic notions like hearer expectation or discourse expectability of the focused content in a given discourse situation. The less expected a given content is judged to be for the hearer, relative to the Common Ground, the more likely a speaker is to mark this content by means of special grammatical devices, giving rise to emphasis.
Counting Markedness
(2003)
This paper reports the results of a corpus investigation on case conflicts in German argument free relative constructions. We investigate how corpus frequencies reflect the relative markedness of free relative and correlative constructions, the relative markedness of different case conflict configurations, and the relative markedness of different conflict resolution strategies. Section 1 introduces the conception of markedness as used in Optimality Theory. Section 2 introduces the facts about German free relative clauses, and section 3 presents the results of the corpus study. By and large, markedness and frequency go hand in hand. However, configurations at the highest end of the markedness scale rarely show up in corpus data, and for the configuration at the lowest end we found an unexpected outcome: the more marked structure is preferred.
This paper investigates the nature of the attraction of XPs to clauseinitial position in German (and other languages). It argues that there are two different types of preposing. First, an XP can move when it is attracted by an EPP-like feature of Comp. Comp can, however, also attract elements that bear the formal marker of some semantic or pragmatic (information theoretic) function. This second type of movement is driven by the attraction of a formal property of the moved element. It has often been misanalysed as “operator” movement in the past. Japanese wh-questions always exhibit focus intonation (FI). Furthermore, the domain of FI exhibits a correspondence to the wh-scope. I propose that this phonology-semantics correspondence is a result of the cyclic computation of FI, which is explained under the notion of Multiple Spell-Out in the recent Minimalist framework. The proposed analysis makes two predictions: (1) embedding of an FI into another is possible; (2) (overt) movement of a wh-phrase to a phase edge position causes a mismatch between FI and wh-scope. Both predictions are tested experimentally, and shown to be borne out.
Das PNF-Konzept
(2011)
Der Einfluss subsilbischer Frequenzen auf die Verbflexion im normalen und gestörten Spracherwerb
(2010)
Der FinKon-Test
(2014)
Bei vielen schwerhörigen Kindern lassen sich Sprachentwicklungsverzögerungen oder Sprachentwicklungsstörungen im Bereich der Morphologie und Syntax beobachten. Noch ist nicht abschließend geklärt, wie diese Schwierigkeiten durch die Probleme im auditiven Bereich genau verursacht werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Wahrnehmbarkeit koronaler Konsonanten, die im Deutschen u. a. als Verbflexive fungieren. Der neue sprachaudiometrische FinKon-Test erfasst die Fähigkeit, diese Konsonanten im Wortauslaut auditiv wahrzunehmen und zu unterscheiden. In einer Pilotstudie mit 22 schwerhörigen und 15 hörenden Kindern erzielten Kinder mit einer Beeinträchtigung des Hörens schlechtere Ergebnisse als hörende Kinder. Die spezifische Schwierigkeit, Phoneme im Auslaut zu unterscheiden, kann den Erwerb der Verbflexion des Deutschen für schwerhörige Kinder deutlich erschweren. Daher ist es wichtig, die Wahrnehmung von Konsonanten im Auslaut im Rahmen der sprachaudiometrischen Überprüfung des kindlichen Hörvermögens mit einem entsprechenden diagnostischen Instrument, wie dem FinKon-Test, zu überprüfen.
Der Leseerwerb
(2011)
Der Weg zum neuen Hören
(2014)
The main claim of this paper is that the minimalist framework and optimality theory adopt more or less the same architecture of grammar: both assume that a generator defines a set S of potentially well-formed expressions that can be generated on the basis of a given input, and that there is an evaluator that selects the expressions from S that are actually grammatical in a given language L. The paper therefore proposes a model of grammar in which the strengths of the two frameworks are combined: more specifically, it is argued that the computational system of human language CHL from MP creates a set S of potentially well-formed expressions, and that these are subsequently evaluated in an optimality theoretic fashion.
Minimalist accounts lack a natural theory of markedness, whereas Optimality-Theoretical accounts fundamentally encode markedness. We think the duality of interfaces assumed in Minimalism is a step towards explaining pairedness behavior, where a given language exhibits a marked/ unmarked pair of items occupying the same niche. We argue that while Minimalism articulates the derivational aspect of language, and underlies grammaticality, an Optimality Theoretic articulation of PF and LF is conceptually natural and explains pairedness behavior. We adopt this ‘hybrid’ account, first, to explain the existence of marked (often termed ‘reflexive’) and unmarked anticausatives in German, recently studied in depth by Sch¨afer [2007].
Diagnostik und Therapie von Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten in der integrativen Lerntherapie
(2017)
Content: 1 The Typology 1.1 Object Placement 2 Treatment of StG in terms of LF Movement – with and without Head Movement 3 An OT-solution in terms of linearisation (‘LF-to-PF-Mapping’) 3.1 The trigger for additional orders: Focus 3.2 Competitions 3.3 Summary 4 RP 4.1 LF Movement – with and without Head Movement 4.2 The OT-account for RP 4.3 Competitions 5 Summary