Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Keywords
- cognitive modeling (2)
- sentence processing (2)
- ACT-R (1)
- Aphasie (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Diagnostik (1)
- German (1)
- Informationsstruktur (1)
- Kognitive Modellierung (1)
- Mandarin (1)
Institute
It is well-known that individuals with aphasia (IWA) have difficulties understanding sentences that involve non-adjacent dependencies, such as object relative clauses or passives (Caplan, Baker, & Dehaut, 1985; Caramazza & Zurif, 1976). A large body of research supports the view that IWA’s grammatical system is intact, and that comprehension difficulties in aphasia are caused by a processing deficit, such as a delay in lexical access and/or in syntactic structure building (e.g., Burkhardt, Piñango, & Wong, 2003; Caplan, Michaud, & Hufford, 2015; Caplan, Waters, DeDe, Michaud, & Reddy, 2007; Ferrill, Love, Walenski, & Shapiro, 2012; Hanne, Burchert, De Bleser, & Vasishth, 2015; Love, Swinney, Walenski, & Zurif, 2008). The main goal of this dissertation is to computationally investigate the processing sources of comprehension impairments in sentence processing in aphasia.
In this work, prominent theories of processing deficits coming from the aphasia literature are implemented within two cognitive models of sentence processing –the activation-based model (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005) and the direct-access model (McEl- ree, 2000)–. These models are two different expressions of the cue-based retrieval theory (Lewis, Vasishth, & Van Dyke, 2006), which posits that sentence processing is the result of a series of iterative retrievals from memory. These two models have been widely used to account for sentence processing in unimpaired populations in multiple languages and linguistic constructions, sometimes interchangeably (Parker, Shvarts- man, & Van Dyke, 2017). However, Nicenboim and Vasishth (2018) showed that when both models are implemented in the same framework and fitted to the same data, the models yield different results, because the models assume different data- generating processes. Specifically, the models hold different assumptions regarding the retrieval latencies. The second goal of this dissertation is to compare these two models of cue-based retrieval, using data from individuals with aphasia and control participants. We seek to answer the following question: Which retrieval mechanism is more likely to mediate sentence comprehension?
We model 4 subsets of existing data: Relative clauses in English and German; and control structures and pronoun resolution in German. The online data come from either self-paced listening experiments, or visual-world eye-tracking experiments. The offline data come from a complementary sentence-picture matching task performed at the end of the trial in both types of experiments. The two competing models of retrieval are implemented in the Bayesian framework, following Nicenboim and Vasishth (2018). In addition, we present a modified version of the direct-acess model that – we argue – is more suitable for individuals with aphasia.
This dissertation presents a systematic approach to implement and test verbally- stated theories of comprehension deficits in aphasia within cognitive models of sen- tence processing. The conclusions drawn from this work are that (a) the original direct-access model (as implemented here) cannot account for the full pattern of data from individuals with aphasia because it cannot account for slow misinterpretations; and (b) an activation-based model of retrieval can account for sentence comprehension deficits in individuals with aphasia by assuming a delay in syntactic structure building, and noise in the processing system. The overall pattern of results support an activation-based mechanism of memory retrieval, in which a combination of processing deficits, namely slow syntax and intermittent deficiencies, cause comprehension difficulties in individuals with aphasia.
Die vorliegende Dissertation verfolgt das Ziel, die diagnostischen Möglichkeiten für das Stö-rungsbild der erworbenen Dyslexie bei deutschsprachigen Personen mit Dyslexie (PmD) zu erweitern und zu spezifizieren.
In der Literatur werden verschiedene Sprachverarbeitungsmodelle diskutiert, die den kognitiven Prozess der Schriftsprachverarbeitung zu erklären versuchen. Alle Überlegungen, Erhebungen und Analysen dieser Dissertation fußen auf den theoretischen Annahmen des kognitiven Zwei-Routen-Lesemodells, welches zwischen lexikalisch-semantischer und segmentaler, sub-lexikalischer Verarbeitung beim Lesen unterscheidet und so die voneinander unabhängigen Fähigkeiten zum Lesen bekannter und unbekannter Wörter abbilden kann. Mit dem im Rahmen der Dissertation entwickelten, kognitiv orientierten Diagnostikverfahren DYMO (Dyslexie Mo-dellorientiert) soll durch die Erhebung der Lesefähigkeiten von PmD eine möglichst genaue modelltheoretische Verortung der Lesebeeinträchtigung erreicht und eine Grundlage für die Planung einer lesebezogenen Therapie geschaffen werden. Dabei werden auch Modellkomponenten des Zwei-Routen-Lesemodells berücksichtigt, die bisher im deutschsprachigen Raum noch nicht etabliert sind. Dazu zählen Unterkomponenten der Visuellen Analyse, die für die Identifikation von Buchstaben und das Kodieren von Buchstabenpositionen verantwortlich sind und Unterkomponenten der segmentalen Leseroute, die den einzelheitlichen Leseprozess auf dieser Modellroute schrittweise abbilden. Das Itemmaterial aus DYMO ist nach diversen psycholinguistisch kontrollierten Variablen kontrolliert. Hierbei werden auch Variablen berücksichtigt, die bisher in der Dyslexiediagnostik für deutschsprachige PmD nicht systematisch erfasst werden können, wie die Wortlänge und die graphematische Komplexität von Pseudowörtern.
Die erste dieser Dissertation zugrundeliegende Publikation (Originalarbeit I) befasst sich mit den Parametern und Modellkomponenten, die für eine umfassende modelltheoretisch basierte Di-agnostik bei erworbener Dyslexie entscheidend sind. Es werden außerdem Überlegungen zu Fehlertypen-Kategorisierung angestellt.
Die zweite Publikation (Originalarbeit II) stellt das Testverfahren DYMO dar. Das dazugehörige Handbuch liefert detaillierte Informationen zum Aufbau und der Konstruktion des Testverfah-rens, zur Durchführung und Auswertung der einzelnen Untertests und zur Einstufung einer Leistung in einen Leistungsbereich. Anhand von ausführlich beschriebenen Fallbeispielen zweier PmD werden die Durchführung, Auswertung, Interpretation und das Ableiten von Therapiezielen dargestellt. Die Ergebnisse dieser Fallbeschreibungen verdeutlichen die diagnostische Ergänzung durch DYMO und zeigen, dass das explizite Untersuchen der Unterkomponenten der Visuellen Analyse und der segmentalen Leseroute sowie der Einbezug der Variablen Wortlänge und gra-phematische Komplexität den Lesebefund spezifizieren und den Therapieeinstieg konkretisieren können.
Die dritte Publikation (Originalarbeit III) zeigt in einer systematischen Vergleichsstudie anhand einer Fallserie von zwölf PmD die Unterschiede zwischen dem Diagnostikverfahren DYMO und einem weiteren kognitiv basierten Diagnostikverfahren. Es wird diskutiert, inwieweit DYMO eine sinnvolle Ergänzung im Diagnostikprozess erworbener Dyslexien darstellen kann. Außerdem werden leicht und schwer beeinträchtigte PmD in Gruppenanalysen verglichen, um zu prüfen, ob DYMO insbesondere bei leicht beeinträchtigten PmD eine Ergänzung bieten kann. Aufgrund des komplexeren Itemmaterials von DYMO (beispielsweise aufgrund der Kontrolle der Wortlänge) wurde angenommen, dass leicht beeinträchtigte PmD in DYMO-Untertests auffälligere Leseleistungen zeigen als in Aufgaben des gegenübergestellten anderen Diagnostikverfahrens. Diese Hypothese konnte teilweise bestätigt werden. Leicht beeinträchtigte PmD zeigten häufiger Längeneffekte als schwer beeinträchtigte PmD. Insgesamt fiel der Gruppenunterschied jedoch nicht so deutlich aus, wie erwartet.
Mit dem kriteriumsorientiert normierten und finalisierten Material von DYMO wurden 17 PmD getestet. Ausführliche Befunde für jede einzelne PmD mit darauffolgenden Therapieimplikationen zeigen, dass insbesondere die Spezifizierung eines segmentalen Lesedefizits bei einer schwer beeinträchtigten Leistung im Lesen von Pseudowörtern zur erweiterten Aussage bezüglich des modelltheoretischen Störungsortes beitragen kann. Dies verdeutlicht die hohe Aussagekraft der DYMO-Untertests und die Relevanz einer spezifischen und detaillierten modellbasierten Befunderhebung für eine explizite, individuelle Therapieplanung bei erworbenen Dyslexien.
Successful communication is often explored by people throughout their life courses. To effectively transfer one’s own information to others, people employ various linguistic tools, such as word order information, prosodic cues, and lexical choices. The exploration of these linguistic cues is known as the study of information structure (IS). Moreover, an important issue in the language acquisition of children is the investigation of how they acquire IS. This thesis seeks to improve our understanding of how children acquire different tools (i.e., prosodical cues, syntactical cues, and the focus particle only) of focus marking in a cross linguistic perspective.
In the first study, following Szendrői and her colleagues (2017)- the sentence-picture verification task- was performed to investigate whether three- to five-year-old Mandarin-speaking children as well as Mandarin-speaking adults could apply prosodic information to recognize focus in sentences. More, in the second study, not only Mandarin-speaking adults and Mandarin-speaking children but also German-speaking adults and German-speaking children were included to confirm the assumption that children could have adult-like performance in understanding sentence focus by identifying language specific cues in their mother tongue from early onwards. In this study, the same paradigm- the sentence-picture verification task- as in the first study was employed together with the eye-tracking method. Finally, in the last study, an issue of whether five-year-old Mandarin-speaking children could understand the pre-subject only sentence was carried out and again whether prosodic information would help them to better understand this kind of sentences.
The overall results seem to suggest that Mandarin-speaking children from early onwards could make use of the specific linguistic cues in their ambient language. That is, in Mandarin, a Topic-prominent and tone language, the word order information plays a more important rule than the prosodic information and even three-year-old Mandarin-speaking children could follow the word order information. More, although it seems that German-speaking children could follow the prosodic information, they did not have the adult-like performance in the object-accented condition. A feasible reason for this result is that there are more possibilities of marking focus in German, such as flexible word order, prosodic information, focus particles, and thus it would take longer time for German-speaking children to manage these linguistic tools. Another important empirical finding regarding the syntactically-marked focus in German is that it seems that the cleft construction is not a valid focus construction and this result corroborates with the previous observations (Dufter, 2009). Further, eye-tracking method did help to uncover how the parser direct their attention for recognizing focus. In the final study, it is showed that with explicit verbal context Mandarin-speaking children could understand the pre-subject only sentence and the study brought a better understanding of the acquisition of the focus particle- only with the Mandarin-speaking children.
The goal of this dissertation is to empirically evaluate the predictions of two classes of models applied to language processing: the similarity-based interference models (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005; McElree, 2000) and the group of smaller-scale accounts that we will refer to as faulty encoding accounts (Eberhard, Cutting, & Bock, 2005; Bock & Eberhard, 1993). Both types of accounts make predictions with regard to processing the same class of structures: sentences containing a non-subject (interfering) noun in addition to a subject noun and a verb. Both accounts make the same predictions for processing ungrammatical sentences with a number-mismatching interfering noun, and this prediction finds consistent support in the data. However, the similarity-based interference accounts predict similar effects not only for morphosyntactic, but also for the semantic level of language organization. We verified this prediction in three single-trial online experiments, where we found consistent support for the predictions of the similarity-based interference account. In addition, we report computational simulations further supporting the similarity-based interference accounts. The combined evidence suggests that the faulty encoding accounts are not required to explain comprehension of ill-formed sentences.
For the processing of grammatical sentences, the accounts make conflicting predictions, and neither the slowdown predicted by the similarity-based interference account, nor the complementary slowdown predicted by the faulty encoding accounts were systematically observed. The majority of studies found no difference between the compared configurations. We tested one possible explanation for the lack of predicted difference, namely, that both slowdowns are present simultaneously and thus conceal each other. We decreased the amount of similarity-based interference: if the effects were concealing each other, decreasing one of them should allow the other to surface. Surprisingly, throughout three larger-sample single-trial online experiments, we consistently found the slowdown predicted by the faulty encoding accounts, but no effects consistent with the presence of inhibitory interference.
The overall pattern of the results observed across all the experiments reported in this dissertation is consistent with previous findings: predictions of the interference accounts for the processing of ungrammatical sentences receive consistent support, but the predictions for the processing of grammatical sentences are not always met. Recent proposals by Nicenboim et al. (2016) and Mertzen et al. (2020) suggest that interference might arise only in people with high working memory capacity or under deep processing mode. Following these proposals, we tested whether interference effects might depend on the depth of processing: we manipulated the complexity of the training materials preceding the grammatical experimental sentences while making no changes to the experimental materials themselves. We found that the slowdown predicted by the faulty encoding accounts disappears in the deep processing mode, but the effects consistent with the predictions of the similarity-based interference account do not arise.
Independently of whether similarity-based interference arises under deep processing mode or not, our results suggest that the faulty encoding accounts cannot be dismissed since they make unique predictions with regard to processing grammatical sentences, which are supported by data. At the same time, the support is not unequivocal: the slowdowns are present only in the superficial processing mode, which is not predicted by the faulty encoding accounts. Our results might therefore favor a much simpler system that superficially tracks number features and is distracted by every plural feature.