Nicht ermittelbar
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (112)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (97)
- Part of a Book (65)
- Conference Proceeding (33)
- Other (12)
- Doctoral Thesis (9)
- Review (8)
- Working Paper (6)
- Report (3)
- Postprint (2)
Language
- English (347) (remove)
Keywords
Institute
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (53)
- Institut für Mathematik (47)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (44)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (23)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (23)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (18)
- Öffentliches Recht (18)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (16)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (12)
- Department Musik und Kunst (11)
- Department Psychologie (9)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (9)
- Institut für Chemie (9)
- Department Linguistik (8)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (8)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (7)
- Institut für Germanistik (6)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (5)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (5)
- Institut für Romanistik (4)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (4)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (2)
- Historisches Institut (2)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (2)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dynamik komplexer Systeme (2)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (2)
- Sozialwissenschaften (2)
- Arbeitskreis Militär und Gesellschaft in der Frühen Neuzeit e. V. (1)
- Bürgerliches Recht (1)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (1)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (1)
As AI technology is increasingly used in production systems, different approaches have emerged from highly decentralized small-scale AI at the edge level to centralized, cloud-based services used for higher-order optimizations. Each direction has disadvantages ranging from the lack of computational power at the edge level to the reliance on stable network connections with the centralized approach. Thus, a hybrid approach with centralized and decentralized components that possess specific abilities and interact is preferred. However, the distribution of AI capabilities leads to problems in self-adapting learning systems, as knowledgebases can diverge when no central coordination is present. Edge components will specialize in distinctive patterns (overlearn), which hampers their adaptability for different cases. Therefore, this paper aims to present a concept for a distributed interchangeable knowledge base in CPPS. The approach is based on various AI components and concepts for each participating node. A service-oriented infrastructure allows a decentralized, loosely coupled architecture of the CPPS. By exchanging knowledge bases between nodes, the overall system should become more adaptive, as each node can “forget” their present specialization.
A Case for Serious Play
(2017)
'Tools' in public management
(2022)
Tools are methods or procedures, and thus operational patterns of action, applied in public administrations to solve standard problems. It is also possible to consider them as structured communication according to professional standards aiming at complexity reduction. Regularly, tools in management stem on a deductive-synoptic rationale offering a seemingly ‘objective’ decision basis. They have a strong formative influence on the organization, regularly also beyond the intended effects. The prominence of tools is sometimes confused with management as such, e.g. introducing tools is mistaken as equivalent to managing for a particular purpose. However, tools have to be closely and carefully managed regarding the objectives and purposes they should serve.
At the suggestion of the then editor of 'Studia Celtica Japonica,' Professor Toshio Doi, this bibliography lists the returns of a questionnaire sent to all scholars in Germany who were actively involved in Celtic Studies between 1980 and 1995. They were asked to list all their publications in the field of Celtic Studies, so as to allow to carry out a survey of their research activities during this period. While most scholars kindly obliged by returning their lists, there were notable exceptions who never answered the query. Regretably, the present bibliography therefore contains important gaps, which, however, may be quite telling as far as the research situation in Germany was concerned during that period.
This article provides a survey of the research carried out by Celtic scholars in Germany during the 15 years between 1980 and 1995. It is based on the respective bibliography published in 'Studia Celtica Japonica' 9 (1997). The major research fields covered are IE Studies, Celtic philology, linguistics, literature, archaeology and cultural studies.