Institut für Germanistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (2)
- 2023 (15)
- 2022 (21)
- 2021 (19)
- 2020 (24)
- 2019 (16)
- 2018 (6)
- 2017 (15)
- 2016 (15)
- 2015 (4)
- 2014 (8)
- 2013 (30)
- 2012 (18)
- 2011 (20)
- 2010 (15)
- 2009 (31)
- 2008 (34)
- 2007 (28)
- 2006 (24)
- 2005 (38)
- 2004 (28)
- 2003 (49)
- 2002 (35)
- 2001 (51)
- 2000 (51)
- 1999 (55)
- 1998 (38)
- 1997 (38)
- 1996 (54)
- 1995 (46)
- 1994 (41)
- 1993 (16)
- 1992 (14)
- 1991 (10)
Document Type
- Article (909) (remove)
Keywords
- Poetik (7)
- Argumentationstheorie (6)
- Deutsche Literatur der Frühen Neuzeit (5)
- Frühe Neuzeit (5)
- Enthusiasmus (4)
- Inspiration (4)
- Kiezdeutsch (3)
- Philipp Melanchthon (3)
- Andreas Gryphius (2)
- Aristoteles (2)
Institute
- Institut für Germanistik (909)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (4)
- Historisches Institut (2)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) (2)
- Department Grundschulpädagogik (1)
- Department Linguistik (1)
- Extern (1)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (1)
- Institut für Slavistik (1)
- Philosophische Fakultät (1)
Auf dem Weg zu Anna Seghers
(2006)
The point of departure of this paper is the claim by Heyvaert, Maekelberghe & Buyle (2019) that the suffix -ing has no aspectual meaning in English gerunds. Rather, the interpretation of nominal and verbal gerunds depends, so they argue, on situation or viewpoint aspect, a claim that contradicts the wide-spread view that the aspectual meaning of English gerunds is brought about by the nominalizing suffix. The present paper addresses the issue from a comparative perspective, focusing on German ung-nominals: while they share aspectual features with their English counterparts, empirical evidence from productivity, distribution, and argument linking shows (i) that the derivational suffix -ung imposes aspectual restrictions on possible verb bases, and (ii) that with respect to argument linking, the deverbal nominal favors the state component of a complex event predicate over its process component. From the historical record of German, we learn that these aspectual restrictions do not hold for ung-nominals in earlier periods of German. With the rise of aspectual restrictions, the nominalization pattern turns more nominal resulting in a position further towards the nominal end of the deverbalization continuum. It appears, then, that it is only in the historical pariods of German that ung-nominals pattern with English nominals as regards their aspectual features. Currently, German ung-nominals are more noun-like than nominal (and verbal) gerunds in English. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Art. Berhardi
(1996)
Anglizismen im Deutschen
(2013)
Allemand
(1992)
Alle dürfen wieder lernen
(1999)
Verfasserin beschäftigt sich mit den Problemen der Getrennt- und Zusammenschreibung bei der Umsetzung der neuen Rechtschreibregelung. Insbesondere werden dabei die Strukturen aus Substantiv und Partizip (z.B. ratsuchend -> Rat suchen) sowie Adjektiv und Verb/Partizip (z.B. schwerbehindert ->schwer behindert) behandelt sowie Schwierigkeiten und Widersprüche beschrieben, denen der Schreiber bei der Anwendung der neuen Regelung gegenübersteht.