Institut für Germanistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (30) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (18)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Review (2)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (30)
Keywords
- E-Learning (2)
- Rechtschreibung (2)
- 1950er Jahre (1)
- AfD (1)
- Bankrott <Motiv> (1)
- DDR (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Deutschunterricht Unterrichtsplanung Literaturdidaktik (1)
- Dialogliteratur (1)
- Drittes Reich (1)
This paper attempts to account for the syntactic distribution of the particle sey in Turkish, in particular its suffixed variant which is a placeholder for expressions that have to be inserted into the discourse later. The paper argues that the distribution of suffixed sey is determined by constituent structure, meaning that Bey can only substitute for syntactic constituents. Thus, sey acts as a pro-form, similar, for instance, to pronouns substituting for noun phrases. This has two implications: First, as sey is a quasi-universal pro-form with the ability to substitute for a wide range of constituents, sey-substitution can be used as a constituency test to peek into the constituent structure of virtually any major syntactic domain. Second, the overall sey-substitution pattern across different syntactic domains constitutes evidence for Kayne's binary branching hypothesis.
Mit 52 Texten versammelt diese Dokumentation sämtliche uns heute bekannten Rezensionen zu Theodor Fontanes „Der Krieg gegen Frankreich 1870–1871“, das in zwei Bänden, bestehend aus insgesamt vier Halbbänden, zwischen März 1873 und September 1876 im Verlag der Königlichen Geheimen Ober-Hofbuchdruckerei (R. v. Decker) erschien. Der Text der Rezensionen wird jeweils nach dem Erstdruck in Zeitungen oder Zeitschriften zeichengetreu konstituiert. Damit wird der Forschung zu Fontanes Darstellung über den Deutsch-Französischen Krieg erstmals eine wichtige rezeptionsgeschichtliche Materialgruppe als Ausgabe zur Verfügung gestellt.
The present work deals with the variation in the linearisation of German infinitival complements from a diachronic perspective. Based on the observation that in present-day German the position of infinitival complements is restricted by properties of the matrix verb (Haider, 2010, Wurmbrand, 2001), whereas this appears much more liberal in older stages of German (Demske, 2008, Maché and Abraham, 2011, Demske, 2015), this dissertation investigates the emergence of those restrictions and the factors that have led to a reduced, yet still existing variability. The study contrasts infinitival complements of two types of matrix verbs, namely raising and control verbs. In present-day German, these show different syntactic behaviour and opposite preferences as far as the position of the infinitive is concerned: while infinitival complements of raising verbs build a single clausal domain with the with the matrix verb and occur obligatorily intraposed, infinitive complements of control verbs can form clausal constituents and occur predominantly extraposed. This correlation is not attested in older stages of German, at least not until Early New High German.
Drawing on diachronic corpus data, the present work provides a description of the changes in the linearisation of infinitival complements from Early New High German to present-day German which aims at finding out when the correlation between infinitive type and word order emerged and further examines their possible causes. The study shows that word order change in German infinitival complements is not a case of syntactic change in the narrow sense, but that the diachronic variation results from the interaction of different language-internal and language-external factors and that it reflects, on the one hand, the influence of language modality on the emerging standard language and, on the other hand, a process of specialisation.
Rainald Goetz’ novel Johann Holtrop has repeatedly been read as a failed satire of the 21st century’s financial crisis: On the one hand, its descriptions were understood as opinionated and sententious. On the other hand, critics were irritated by what was seen as an inconsequent integration of realistic narration into Goetz’ hyperbolic style of writing. This paper takes a different stance on the text: First, it discusses the work’s allusions to realistic narration and the financial crisis in detail. Second, it argues that Johann Holtrop transfers the idea of a collapsing economy into an only partially realistic poetic of distortion. Third, it suggests that this strategy can be fruitfully compared to a crumbling system of credit. On this basis, the novel is read as an inherently literary depiction of the financial crisis.
The ability to spell correctly is a fundamental skill for participating in society and engaging in professional work. In the German language, the capitalization of nouns and proper names presents major difficulties for both native and nonnative learners, since the definition of what is a noun varies according to one’s linguistic perspective. In this paper, we hypothesize that learners use different cognitive strategies to identify nouns. To this end, we examine capitalization exercises from more than 30,000 users of an online spelling training platform. The cognitive strategies identified are syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and morphological approaches. The strategies used by learners overlap widely but differ by individual and evolve with grade level. The results show that even though the pragmatic strategy is not taught systematically in schools, it is the most widespread and most successful strategy used by learners. We therefore suggest that highly granular learning process data can not only provide insights into learners’ capabilities and enable the creation of individualized learning content but also inform curriculum development.
Praxis und Theorie der Prosa
(2021)