Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (230) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (230) (remove)
Keywords
- Adverbs (2)
- evidentiality (2)
- modal verbs (2)
- modality (2)
- pragmaticalisation (2)
- Córdoba (1)
- Geschichte (1)
- Grammatik; Syntax; Gebrauch; Universalität; einzelsprachliche Besonderheiten (1)
- Hispanistik (1)
- Humboldt (1)
- Ideologues (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Linguistik (1)
- Linguistique d´intervention (1)
- Orden de las palabras (1)
- Relativisme linguistique (1)
- Series de textos (1)
- Word order (1)
- arbitrariedad (1)
- claridad (1)
- clarity (1)
- deaf-mutes (1)
- enguas artificiales (1)
- filosofía sensualista (1)
- function (1)
- functional unit (1)
- grammar (1)
- grammatography (1)
- inversion (1)
- inversión (1)
- language and abstraction (1)
- language and thought (1)
- lengua hablada (1)
- lenguaje de signos (1)
- lenguaje y abstracción (1)
- meaning (1)
- natural order (1)
- néohumboldtiens (1)
- oppositions (1)
- orden natural (1)
- racionalista (1)
- rationalist (1)
- sensualist philosophy (1)
- sign (1)
- sign language (1)
- signo (1)
- sistema de escritura universal, concepto, signo, nomenclatura. (1)
- sordomudos (1)
- teoría lingüística (1)
- universal writing system, concept, sign, nomenclature (1)
- vision linguistique du monde (1)
Institute
In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker’s knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker’s knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality – often context bound – by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.
En esta contribución estudiaré las denominaciones de las formas verbales espanolas, focalizando la atención en las formas del así llamado pasado y la relación de su potencial conceptual a la función de las formas respectivas. Las denominaciones de las formas verbales en las gramáticas espanolas desde el siglo XVII hasta el siglo XX se determinan por la tradición gramatical latina, pero también por posiciones teoréticas de sus autores.
Ramón Campos fue un autor muy influenciado por la corriente sensualista del
pensamiento lingüístico francés, el que había incluso llevado a sus extremos más
radicales. Para él, la abstracción se llevaba a cabo por medio de las palabras, del
lenguaje articulado, sin intervención del pensamiento. Los nombres adjetivos son en su
origen sustantivos. La memoria y la formación de las ideas generales son efectos del
don de la palabra, y de ningún modo operaciones del pensamiento. El lenguaje de
acción no es suficiente para la operación de la abstracción. La tendencia del
pensamiento hacia la concretización hace cundir las abstracciones. Ninguna palabra
dependiente o referencial es palabra primitiva. Estas ideas se reafirman también en el
contexto de su obra De la desigualdad personal en la sociedad civil donde sirven de
base para una nueva ética de la comunicación. Estudiaré el concepto de ‘el don de la
palabra’, que en este contexto es el instrumento único de la abstracción o
descomposición, capaz de partir el pensamiento en dos facultades o potencias
diferentes, ‘imaginación’ y ‘memoria’.
In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.
Las teorías sobre el orden de las palabras del siglo XVII han encontrado mucha repercusión en las investigaciones actuales sobre la estructura de la información. No obstante, estas alusiones tienden a ser inconscientes. ¿Cómo deben evaluar los historiógrafos tales similitudes, mucho más allá de determinar su continuidad? ¿Se pueden derivar tal vez conclusiones sobre este tema complejo, que es relevante en la discusión de hoy en día, tomando en cuenta las diversas posiciones opuestas y el intenso discurso del siglo XVIII?
En esta contribución se explicará la influencia que tuvo el Curso de lingüística general de Ferdinand de Saussure en la lingüística estructural, así como el desarrollo de algunos conceptos prominentes en esta obra antes y después de Saussure. El estructuralismo es un fenómeno que se ha caracterizado por ser una corriente importante de la lingüística europea y americana del siglo XX. Se demostrará que la lingüística estructural no hace más que acentuar una actitud que ya se encontraba presente anteriormente en la lingüística y que todavía sigue estando presente. Esto también se puede ver en España donde la lingüística estructural no se puede explicar solamente como una importación tardía. También se observará, por el otro lado, que el pensamiento de Ferdinand de Saussure, considerado el fundador del estructuralismo, es menos opuesto a todo lo que se considera ajeno al estructuralismo. En esta contribución me propongo hacer una revisión de los conceptos que se consideran iniciadores del estructuralismo. La publicación de los manuscritos de la lingüística general de Saussure (2002) permite adquirir una visión más amplia y más detallada de los conceptos de las teorías lingüísticas en cuestión.
El centenario de la publicación del Curso de lingüística general (1916) de Saussure nos ha invitado a reexaminar la importancia de esta obra para instaurar una lingüística integrada en la semiología. Indudablemente la simplificación de las ideas de Saussure y la exageración de su concepto sistémico del lenguaje llevadas a cabo por los editores Bally y Sechehaye han contribuido a la acogida exitosa de la obra. En esta contribución, se propone, primero, introducir el concepto de ‘series de textos’, antes de analizar una serie “olvidada” y una nueva serie de obras por medio de las cuales se introdujeron conceptos semióticos en la época dominante de la lingüística histórica. En el análisis de estas dos series se pondrá el foco en el concepto de la arbitrariedad del signo.
The assumption of linguistics relativity and the definition of languages as epiphenomena are certainly known as two contradictory positions from the last century. But I will start my discussion of them in the period of their appearance and then use this as a basis to evaluate the heuristic value of these positions in present day linguistics. I will start with the definition of language as an epiphenomenon and then I will go on with the linguistic relativity.
The notion of ʽepiphenomenon’ is usually used to exclude certain aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ʽepiphenomenonʼ, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically.
In this paper evidential and modal adverbs will be studied, such as French apparemment, évidemment, visiblement, Italian apparentemente, evidentemente, ovviamente, and Spanish aparentemente, evidentemente and visiblemente. The development of their signification will be discussed, including German adverbs like offensichtlich. In these means of expression, the functional-semantic categories evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to overlap: on the one hand, they are used if the state of affairs talked about cannot be verified, that is, if there is still a moment of insecurity concerning the transmitted information. Then adverbials with a special structure (preposition + article + nominal form of a verb) will be analysed, and we will examine if they behave in the same way.
Definit oder indefinit?
(2018)
The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (idéologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac’s (1714–1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740–1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.