Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (58) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (58) (remove)
Keywords
- Eye movements (5)
- German (5)
- Reading (5)
- Sentence processing (5)
- interference (5)
- Bayesian data analysis (4)
- Cue-based retrieval (4)
- eye-tracking (4)
- Aphasia (3)
- ERP (3)
- Individual differences (3)
- Parsing (3)
- Scanpaths (3)
- Similarity-based interference (3)
- Working memory (3)
- antilocality (3)
- computational modeling (3)
- individual differences (3)
- locality (3)
- ACT-R (2)
- Bayesian hierarchical modeling (2)
- Bayesian inference (2)
- Chance performance (2)
- Chinese (2)
- Chinese reflexives (2)
- Cognitive modeling (2)
- Computational modeling (2)
- DLT (2)
- Eastern Armenian (2)
- Relative clause (2)
- Sentence comprehension (2)
- Spanish (2)
- Surprisal (2)
- Swedish (2)
- Underspecification (2)
- activation (2)
- anaphors (2)
- comprehension (2)
- content-addressable memory (2)
- cue-based retrieval (2)
- entropy (2)
- expectation (2)
- possessives (2)
- psycholinguistics (2)
- reflexives (2)
- sentence processing (2)
- statistical (2)
- working memory capacity (2)
- working-memory (2)
- ziji (2)
- Adaptation (1)
- Aging (1)
- Agrammatic aphasia (1)
- Agreement (1)
- Agreement attraction (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Autocorrelation (1)
- BEI (1)
- Bayes factor (1)
- Bayes factors (1)
- Bayesian meta-analysis (1)
- Bayesian model comparison (1)
- Bayesian parameter estimation (1)
- Bayesian random effects meta-analysis (1)
- Broca's aphasia (1)
- Canonicity and interference effects (1)
- Case (1)
- Classifiers (1)
- Computer model (1)
- Confirmatory versus exploratory data analysis (1)
- Corpus (1)
- Cue‐based retrieval (1)
- Development (1)
- Expectation (1)
- Experience (1)
- Experimental time series (1)
- Exploratory and confirmatory analyses (1)
- Eye tracking (1)
- Eye-tracking (1)
- Final devoicing (1)
- Gender effects (1)
- Generalized additive mixed models (1)
- German syntax (1)
- Good-enough processing (1)
- Hypothesis testing (1)
- Incomplete neutralization (1)
- Information structure (1)
- It- clefts (1)
- Journal policy (1)
- Language understanding (1)
- Linear mixed effect model (1)
- Linear mixed models (1)
- Locality (1)
- Meta-analysis (1)
- Meta-research (1)
- Model selection (1)
- Morphological cues (1)
- N400 (1)
- Non-canonical sentences (1)
- Null hypothesis significance testing (1)
- Number interference (1)
- Object manipulation (1)
- Oculo-motor control (1)
- Online and offline processing (1)
- Online morpho-syntactic processing (1)
- Online sentence processing (1)
- Only-foci (1)
- Open (1)
- Open data (1)
- Parallel processing (1)
- Parameter estimation (1)
- Patholinguistik (1)
- Power (1)
- Prediction (1)
- Prior and posterior predictive (1)
- Psycholinguistics (1)
- Reanalysis (1)
- Reflexives (1)
- Regressions (1)
- Replicability (1)
- Replication (1)
- Reproducibility (1)
- Reproducible statistical analyses (1)
- Self-paced listening (1)
- Self-paced reading (1)
- Sentence Comprehension (1)
- Sentence comprehension deficits (1)
- Sentence comprehension disorders (1)
- Sentence comprehension in aphasia (1)
- Sentence-picture matching (1)
- Sprachtherapie (1)
- Storage cost (1)
- Structural expectation (1)
- Syntactic reanalysis (1)
- Task demands (1)
- Test-retest reliability (1)
- Type M error (1)
- URM (1)
- Unrestricted race model (1)
- Variability (1)
- Visual world paradigm (1)
- Voice onset time (1)
- Vowel duration (1)
- Within-experiment adaptation (1)
- Working-memory (1)
- a priori (1)
- anaphor resolution (1)
- antecedent complexity (1)
- anterior PNP (1)
- attraction (1)
- bilingualism (1)
- competition-integration model (1)
- confirmatory analysis (1)
- constraint (1)
- context (1)
- contrasts (1)
- control (1)
- cue-based (1)
- dependencies (1)
- distributions (1)
- dynamical models (1)
- ellipsis processing (1)
- experimental linguistics (1)
- exploratory analysis (1)
- eye tracking (1)
- features (1)
- garden-path effect (1)
- gardenpath model (1)
- geistige Behinderung (1)
- grammatical gender (1)
- hypotheses (1)
- implicit meter (1)
- inference (1)
- language production (1)
- latent processes (1)
- linear models (1)
- linguistic (1)
- locality effects (1)
- long distance (1)
- memory pointer (1)
- memory retrieval (1)
- mental deficiency (1)
- mixture modeling (1)
- multinomial processing tree (1)
- null hypothesis significance testing (1)
- oculomotor (1)
- open science (1)
- patholinguistics (1)
- picture-word interference (1)
- plausibility (1)
- posterior (1)
- posterior P600 (1)
- power (1)
- pre-activation (1)
- preactivation (1)
- predictability (1)
- predictions (1)
- preregistration (1)
- primary progessive aphasia (1)
- primär progessive Aphasie (1)
- prior (1)
- probabilistic processing (1)
- re-reading probability (1)
- reading (1)
- reading eye movements (1)
- reanalysis (1)
- retrieval (1)
- science (1)
- self-paced reading (1)
- semantic interference (1)
- silent prosody (1)
- simulation-based calibration (1)
- skipping rate (1)
- speech therapy (1)
- statistical data analysis (1)
- stress-clash (1)
- subject-verb agreement (1)
- syntactic reanalysis (1)
- temporal decay (1)
- uncertainty quantification (1)
- unrestricted race model (1)
- word embeddings (1)
- working memory (1)
Institute
- Department Linguistik (58) (remove)
Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects
(2006)
Although proximity between arguments and verbs (locality) is a relatively robust determinant of sentence-processing difficulty (Hawkins 1998, 2001, Gibson 2000), increasing argument-verb distance can also facilitate processing (Konieczny 2000). We present two self-paced reading (SPR) experiments involving Hindi that provide further evidence of antilocality, and a third SPR experiment which suggests that similarity-based interference can attenuate this distance-based facilitation. A unified explanation of interference, locality, and antilocality effects is proposed via an independently motivated theory of activation decay and retrieval interference (Anderson et al. 2004).*
Multiple focus
(2009)
This paper presents the results of an experimental study on multiple focus configurations, that is, structures containing two nested focus-sensitive operators plus two foci supposed to associate with those operators. There has been controversial discussion in the semantic literature regarding whether or not an interpretation is acceptable that corresponds to this association. While the data are unclear, the issue is of considerable theoretical significance, as it distinguishes between the available theories of focus interpretation. Some theories (e. g. Rooth's 1992) predict such a pattern of association with focus to be impossible, while others (such as Wold's 1996) predict it to be acceptable. The results of our study show the data to be unacceptable rather than acceptable, favouring important aspects of the theory of focus interpretation developed by Rooth.
Seven experiments using self-paced reading and eyetracking suggest that omitting the middle verb in a double centre embedding leads to easier processing in English but leads to greater difficulty in German. One commonly accepted explanation for the English pattern-based on data from offline acceptability ratings and due to Gibson and Thomas (1999)- is that working-memory overload leads the comprehender to forget the prediction of the upcoming verb phrase (VP), which reduces working-memory load. We show that this VP-forgetting hypothesis does an excellent job of explaining the English data, but cannot account for the German results. We argue that the English and German results can be explained by the parser's adaptation to the grammatical properties of the languages; in contrast to English, German subordinate clauses always have the verb in clause-final position, and this property of German may lead the German parser to maintain predictions of upcoming VPs more robustly compared to English. The evidence thus argues against language- independent forgetting effects in online sentence processing; working-memory constraints can be conditioned by countervailing influences deriving from grammatical properties of the language under study.
Background: In addition to the canonical subject-verb-object (SVO) word order, German also allows for non-canonical order (OVS), and the case-marking system supports thematic role interpretation. Previous eye-tracking studies (Kamide et al., 2003; Knoeferle, 2007) have shown that unambiguous case information in non-canonical sentences is processed incrementally. For individuals with agrammatic aphasia, comprehension of non-canonical sentences is at chance level (Burchert et al., 2003). The trace deletion hypothesis (Grodzinsky 1995, 2000) claims that this is due to structural impairments in syntactic representations, which force the individual with aphasia (IWA) to apply a guessing strategy. However, recent studies investigating online sentence processing in aphasia (Caplan et al., 2007; Dickey et al., 2007) found that divergences exist in IWAs' sentence-processing routines depending on whether they comprehended non-canonical sentences correctly or not, pointing rather to a processing deficit explanation. Aims: The aim of the current study was to investigate agrammatic IWAs' online and offline sentence comprehension simultaneously in order to reveal what online sentence-processing strategies they rely on and how these differ from controls' processing routines. We further asked whether IWAs' offline chance performance for non-canonical sentences does indeed result from guessing. Methods Procedures: We used the visual-world paradigm and measured eye movements (as an index of online sentence processing) of controls (N = 8) and individuals with aphasia (N = 7) during a sentence-picture matching task. Additional offline measures were accuracy and reaction times. Outcomes Results: While the offline accuracy results corresponded to the pattern predicted by the TDH, IWAs' eye movements revealed systematic differences depending on the response accuracy. Conclusions: These findings constitute evidence against attributing IWAs' chance performance for non-canonical structures to mere guessing. Instead, our results support processing deficit explanations and characterise the agrammatic parser as deterministic and inefficient: it is slowed down, affected by intermittent deficiencies in performing syntactic operations, and fails to compute reanalysis even when one is detected.
Many comprehension theories assert that increasing the distance between elements participating in a linguistic relation (e.g., a verb and a noun phrase argument) increases the difficulty of establishing that relation during on-line comprehension. Such locality effects are expected to increase reading times and are thought to reveal properties and limitations of the short-term memory system that supports comprehension. Despite their theoretical importance and putative ubiquity, however, evidence for on-line locality effects is quite narrow linguistically and methodologically: It is restricted almost exclusively to self-paced reading of complex structures involving a particular class of syntactic relation. We present 4 experiments (2 self-paced reading and 2 eyetracking experiments) that demonstrate locality effects in the course of establishing subject-verb dependencies; locality effects are seen even in materials that can be read quickly and easily. These locality effects are observable in the earliest possible eye-movement measures and are of much shorter duration than previously reported effects. To account for the observed empirical patterns, we outline a processing model of the adaptive control of button pressing and eye movements. This model makes progress toward the goal of eliminating linking assumptions between memory constructs and empirical measures in favor of explicit theories of the coordinated control of motor responses and parsing.
While it is widely acknowledged in the formal semantic literature that both the truth-functional focus particle only and it-clefts convey exhaustiveness, the nature and source of exhaustiveness effects with it-clefts remain contested. We describe a questionnaire study (n = 80) and an event-related brain potentials (ERP) study (n = 16) that investigated the violation of exhaustiveness in German only-foci versus it-clefts. The offline study showed that a violation of exhaustivity with only is less acceptable than the violation with it-clefts, suggesting a difference in the nature of exhaustivity interpretation in the two environments. The ERP-results confirm that this difference can be seen in online processing as well: a violation of exhaustiveness in only-foci elicited a centro-posterior positivity (600-800ms), whereas a violation in it-clefts induced a globally distributed N400 pattern (400-600ms). The positivity can be interpreted as a reanalysis process and more generally as a process of context updating. The N400 effect in it-clefts is interpreted as indexing a cancelation process that is functionally distinct from the only case. The ERP study is, to our knowledge, the first evidence from an online experimental paradigm which shows that the violation of exhaustiveness involves different underlying processes in the two structural environments.
Which repair strategy does the language system deploy when it gets garden-pathed, and what can regressive eye movements in reading tell us about reanalysis strategies? Several influential eye-tracking studies on syntactic reanalysis (Frazier & Rayner, 1982; Meseguer, Carreiras, & Clifton, 2002; Mitchell, Shen, Green, & Hodgson, 2008) have addressed this question by examining scanpaths, i.e., sequential patterns of eye fixations. However, in the absence of a suitable method for analyzing scanpaths, these studies relied on simplified dependent measures that are arguably ambiguous and hard to interpret. We address the theoretical question of repair strategy by developing a new method that quantifies scanpath similarity. Our method reveals several distinct fixation strategies associated with reanalysis that went undetected in a previously published data set (Meseguer et al., 2002). One prevalent pattern suggests re-parsing of the sentence, a strategy that has been discussed in the literature (Frazier & Rayner, 1982); however, readers differed tremendously in how they orchestrated the various fixation strategies. Our results suggest that the human parsing system non-deterministically adopts different strategies when confronted with the disambiguating material in garden-path sentences.
Eye fixation durations during normal reading correlate with processing difficulty, but the specific cognitive mechanisms reflected in these measures are not well understood. This study finds support in German readers' eye fixations for two distinct difficulty metrics: surprisal, which reflects the change in probabilities across syntactic analyses as new words are integrated; and retrieval, which quantifies comprehension difficulty in terms of working memory constraints. We examine the predictions of both metrics using a family of dependency parsers indexed by an upper limit on the number of candidate syntactic analyses they retain at successive words. Surprisal models all fixation measures and regression probability. By contrast, retrieval does not model any measure in serial processing. As more candidate analyses are considered in parallel at each word, retrieval can account for the same measures as surprisal. This pattern suggests an important role for ranked parallelism in theories of sentence comprehension.
What theories best characterise the parsing processes triggered upon encountering ambiguity, and what effects do these processes have on eye movement patterns in reading? The present eye-tracking study, which investigated processing of attachment ambiguities of an adjunct in Spanish, suggests that readers sometimes underspecify attachment to save memory resources, consistent with the good-enough account of parsing. Our results confirm a surprising prediction of the good-enough account: high-capacity readers commit to an attachment decision more often than low-capacity participants, leading to more errors and a greater need to reanalyse in garden-path sentences. These results emerged only when we separated functionally different types of regressive eye movements using a scanpath analysis; conventional eye-tracking measures alone would have led to different conclusions. The scanpath analysis also showed that rereading was the dominant strategy for recovering from garden-pathing. Our results may also have broader implications for models of reading processes: reanalysis effects in eye movements occurred late, which suggests that the coupling of oculo-motor control and the parser may not be as tight as assumed in current computational models of eye movement control in reading.
A general fact about language is that subject relative clauses are easier to process than object relative clauses. Recently, several self-paced reading studies have presented surprising evidence that object relatives in Chinese are easier to process than subject relatives. We carried out three self-paced reading experiments that attempted to replicate these results. Two of our three studies found a subject-relative preference, and the third study found an object-relative advantage. Using a random effects bayesian meta-analysis of fifteen studies (including our own), we show that the overall current evidence for the subject-relative advantage is quite strong (approximate posterior probability of a subject-relative advantage given the data: 78-80%). We argue that retrieval/integration based accounts would have difficulty explaining all three experimental results. These findings are important because they narrow the theoretical space by limiting the role of an important class of explanation-retrieval/integration cost-at least for relative clause processing in Chinese.