Refine
Year of publication
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (65)
Keywords
- entrepreneurship (8)
- Entrepreneurship (6)
- Evaluation (6)
- survival (6)
- innovation (5)
- Start-up subsidies (4)
- mental health (4)
- Employment (3)
- Innovation (3)
- Start-Up Subsidies (3)
- job creation (3)
- locus of control (3)
- minimum wage (3)
- start-up subsidies (3)
- training (3)
- unemployment (3)
- Active labor market policy (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Job Creation (2)
- Job search (2)
- Locus of control (2)
- Matching (2)
- Minimum Wage (2)
- Obesity (2)
- PHQ-4 score (2)
- Personality (2)
- Policy Reform (2)
- Self-employment (2)
- Survival (2)
- alcohol consumption (2)
- depression (2)
- drugs (2)
- evaluation (2)
- firm growth (2)
- firm performance (2)
- gender (2)
- general self-efficacy (2)
- health (2)
- health behavior (2)
- inequality (2)
- persistence (2)
- personality (2)
- policy reform (2)
- prescriptions (2)
- representative longitudinal survey data (2)
- resilience (2)
- risk perception (2)
- sanctions (2)
- self-employment (2)
- sickness (2)
- startups (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Bewertung (1)
- Big five (1)
- Business Grow (1)
- C14 (1)
- Cardiovascular disease (1)
- Counterfactual Analysis (1)
- Critics (1)
- Deadweight effects (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- Difference-in-difference (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Earnings (1)
- Efectos regionales (1)
- Effect heterogeneity (1)
- Effet heterogene (1)
- Effets regionaux (1)
- Empleo autonomo (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Employment effects (1)
- Employment stability (1)
- Evaluacion (1)
- Existenzgrundungszuschusse (1)
- Female labor-force participation (1)
- Fertility (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Gender Wage Gap (1)
- Gender differences (1)
- Heterogeneidad del efecto (1)
- Heterogenitat von Effekten (1)
- Human Capital Investment (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Instrumental Variables (1)
- Instrumental variable approach (1)
- Internal migration (1)
- J68 (1)
- Job Search (1)
- L26 (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Labor demand (1)
- Labor market mobility (1)
- Labor supply (1)
- Long-term effects (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Marginal employment (1)
- Mini-job (1)
- Minimum wage (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Multivariate duration models (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Personality traits (1)
- Propensity Score Matching (1)
- Propensity score matching (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- R11 (1)
- Reciprocity (1)
- Regional Bite (1)
- Regional bite (1)
- Regional effects (1)
- Regionale Auswirkungen (1)
- Reviewer (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk tolerance (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Selbststandigkeit (1)
- Selection bias (1)
- Selection effects (1)
- Semiparametric regression (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Start-up Subsidies (1)
- Start-ups (1)
- Subvenciones a proyectos empresariales (1)
- Subventions de demarrage (1)
- Travail independant (1)
- Treatment effects (1)
- Trust (1)
- Unconfoundedness (1)
- Unemployment duration (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Unobservables (1)
- Wages (1)
- Well-Being (1)
- Work-related Training (1)
- Working Hours (1)
- active labor market policies (1)
- attitudes (1)
- behavior (1)
- beliefs (1)
- benefit systems (1)
- business expansion (1)
- business growth (1)
- business venturing (1)
- cardiovascular disease (1)
- confidence (1)
- creation (1)
- decision-making (1)
- decomposition analysis (1)
- difference-in-differences (1)
- divergent thinking (1)
- employee training (1)
- employer (1)
- employment growth (1)
- entrepreneurial performance (1)
- ethnicity (1)
- gender gap (1)
- gender wage gap (1)
- hourly wages (1)
- human capital investments (1)
- illusion of control (1)
- institutions (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- job (1)
- job search (1)
- labor force participation (1)
- labor market policies (1)
- manager decisions (1)
- matching (1)
- migration (1)
- optimism (1)
- preference for agency (1)
- propensity score matching (1)
- public policy (1)
- push and pull theories (1)
- regional bite (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- scientific use file (1)
- selection bias (1)
- skills (1)
- social activity (1)
- social investment (1)
- spam (1)
- spam filter (1)
- start-up motivation (1)
- survey data (1)
- wage and earnings structure (1)
- wage distribution (1)
- youth unemployment (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (33)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (22)
- Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA) (17)
- Extern (5)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (3)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (3)
- DV und Statistik Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (1)
- Sozialwissenschaften (1)
This study analyses the impact of managers’ risk preferences on their training allocation decisions. We begin by providing nationally representative evidence that managers’ risk-aversion is negatively correlated with the likelihood that their firms engage in any worker training. Using a novel vignette study, we then demonstrate that risk-tolerant and risk-averse decision makers have significantly different training preferences. Risk aversion results in increased sensitivity to turnover risk. Managers who are risk-averse offer less general training and are more reluctant to train workers with a history of job mobility. Adopting a weighting approach to flexibly control for observed differences in the characteristics of risk-averse and risk-tolerant managers, we show that our findings cannot be explained by heterogeneity in either managers’ observed characteristics or the type of firms where they work. All managers, irrespective of their risk preferences, are sensitive to the investment risk associated with training, avoiding training that is more costly or that targets those with less occupational expertise or nearing retirement. This provides suggestive evidence that the risks of training are primarily due to the risk that trained workers will leave the firm (turnover risk) rather than the risk that the benefits of training do not outweigh the costs (investment risk).
Divergent thinking is the ability to produce numerous and diverse responses to questions or tasks, and it is used as a predictor of creative achievement. It plays a significant role in the business organization’s innovation process and the recognition of new business opportunities. Drawing upon the cumulative process model of creativity in entrepreneurship, we hypothesize that divergent thinking has a lasting effect on post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes related to innovation and growth, but that this relation might not always be linear. Additionally, we hypothesize that domain-specific experience has a moderating role in this relation. We test our hypotheses based on a representative longitudinal sample of 457 German business founders, which we observe up until 40 months after start-up. We find strong relative effects for innovation and growth outcomes. For survival, we find conclusive evidence for non-linearities in the effects of divergent thinking. Additionally, we show that such effects are moderated by the type of domain-specific experience that entrepreneurs gathered pre-launch, as it shapes the individual’s ideational abilities to fit into more sophisticated strategies regarding entrepreneurial creative achievement. Our findings have relevant policy implications in characterizing and identifying business start-ups with growth and innovation potential, allowing a more efficient allocation of public and private funds.
Self-efficacy reflects the self-belief that one can persistently perform difficult and novel tasks while coping with adversity. As such beliefs reflect how individuals behave, think, and act, they are key for successful entrepreneurial activities. While existing literature mainly analyzes the influence of the task-related construct of entrepreneurial self-efficacy, we take a different perspective and investigate, based on a representative sample of 1,405 German business founders, how the personality characteristic of generalized self-efficacy influences start-up performance as measured by a broad set of business outcomes up to 19 months after business creation. Outcomes include start-up survival and entrepreneurial income, as well as growth-oriented outcomes such as job creation and innovation. We find statistically significant and economically important positive effects of high scores of self-efficacy on start-up survival and entrepreneurial income, which become even stronger when focusing on the growth-oriented outcome of innovation. Furthermore, we observe that generalized self-efficacy is similarly distributed between female and male business founders, with effects being partly stronger for female entrepreneurs. Our findings are important for policy instruments that are meant to support firm growth by facilitating the design of more target-oriented offers for training, coaching, and entrepreneurial incubators.
Self-efficacy reflects the self-belief that one can persistently perform difficult and novel tasks while coping with adversity. As such beliefs reflect how individuals behave, think, and act, they are key for successful entrepreneurial activities. While existing literature mainly analyzes the influence of the task-related construct of entrepreneurial self-efficacy, we take a different perspective and investigate, based on a representative sample of 1,405 German business founders, how the personality characteristic of generalized self-efficacy influences start-up performance as measured by a broad set of business outcomes up to 19 months after business creation. Outcomes include start-up survival and entrepreneurial income, as well as growth-oriented outcomes such as job creation and innovation. We find statistically significant and economically important positive effects of high scores of self-efficacy on start-up survival and entrepreneurial income, which become even stronger when focusing on the growth-oriented outcome of innovation. Furthermore, we observe that generalized self-efficacy is similarly distributed between female and male business founders, with effects being partly stronger for female entrepreneurs. Our findings are important for policy instruments that are meant to support firm growth by facilitating the design of more target-oriented offers for training, coaching, and entrepreneurial incubators.
Divergent thinking is the ability to produce numerous and diverse responses to questions or tasks, and it is used as a predictor of creative achievement. It plays a significant role in the business organization’s innovation process and the recognition of new business opportunities. Drawing upon the cumulative process model of creativity in entrepreneurship, we hypothesize that divergent thinking has a lasting effect on post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes related to innovation and growth, but that this relation might not always be linear. Additionally, we hypothesize that domain-specific experience has a moderating role in this relation. We test our hypotheses based on a representative longitudinal sample of 457 German business founders, which we observe up until 40 months after start-up. We find strong relative effects for innovation and growth outcomes. For survival we find conclusive evidence for non-linearities in the effects of divergent thinking. Additionally, we show that such effects are moderated by the type of domain-specific experience that entrepreneurs gathered pre-launch, as it shapes the individual’s ideational abilities to fit into more sophisticated strategies regarding entrepreneurial creative achievement. Our findings have relevant policy implications in characterizing and identifying business start-ups with growth and innovation potential, allowing a more efficient allocation of public and private funds.
Predicting entrepreneurial development based on individual and business-related characteristics is a key objective of entrepreneurship research. In this context, we investigate whether the motives of becoming an entrepreneur influence the subsequent entrepreneurial development. In our analysis, we examine a broad range of business outcomes including survival and income, as well as job creation, and expansion and innovation activities for up to 40 months after business formation. Using the self-determination theory as conceptual background, we aggregate the start-up motives into a continuous motivational index. We show – based on a unique dataset of German start-ups from unemployment and non-unemployment – that the later business performance is better, the higher they score on this index. Effects are particularly strong for growth-oriented outcomes like innovation and expansion activities. In a next step, we examine three underlying motivational categories that we term opportunity, career ambition, and necessity. We show that individuals driven by opportunity motives perform better in terms of innovation and business expansion activities, while career ambition is positively associated with survival, income, and the probability of hiring employees. All effects are robust to the inclusion of a large battery of covariates that are proven to be important determinants of entrepreneurial performance.
We conduct a laboratory experiment to study how locus of control operates through people's preferences and beliefs to influence their decisions. Using the principal-agent setting of the delegation game, we test four key channels that conceptually link locus of control to decision-making: (i) preference for agency; (ii) optimism and (iii) confidence regarding the return to effort; and (iv) illusion of control. Knowing the return and cost of stated effort, principals either retain or delegate the right to make an investment decision that generates payoffs for themselves and their agents. Extending the game to the context in which the return to stated effort is unknown allows us to explicitly study the relationship between locus of control and beliefs about the return to effort. We find that internal locus of control is linked to the preference for agency, an effect that is driven by women. We find no evidence that locus of control influences optimism and confidence about the return to stated effort, or that it operates through an illusion of control.
We analyze workers’ risk preferences and training investments. Our conceptual framework differentiates between the investment risk and insurance mechanisms underpinning training decisions. Investment risk leads risk-averse workers to train less; they undertake more training if it insures them against future losses. We use the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) to demonstrate that risk affinity is associated with more training, implying that, on average, investment risks dominate the insurance benefits of training. Crucially, this relationship is evident only for general training; there is no relationship between risk attitudes and specific training. Thus, consistent with our conceptual framework, risk preferences matter more when skills are transferable – and workers have a vested interest in training outcomes – than when they are not. Finally, we provide evidence that the insurance benefits of training are concentrated among workers with uncertain employment relationships or limited access to public insurance schemes.
In many countries, women are over-represented among low-wage employees, which is why a wage floor could benefit them particularly. Following this notion, we analyse the impact of the German minimum wage introduction in 2015 on the gender wage gap. Germany poses an interesting case study in this context, since it has a rather high gender wage gap and set the minimum wage at a relatively high level, affecting more than four million employees. Based on individual data from the Structure of Earnings Survey, containing information for over one million employees working in 60,000 firms, we use a difference-in-difference framework that exploits regional differences in the bite of the minimum wage. We find a significant negative effect of the minimum wage on the regional gender wage gap. Between 2014 and 2018, the gap at the 10th percentile of the wage distribution was reduced by 4.6 percentage points (or 32%) in regions that were strongly affected by the minimum wage compared to less affected regions. For the gap at the 25th percentile, the effect still amounted to 18%, while for the mean it was smaller (11%) and not particularly robust. We thus find that the minimum wage can indeed reduce gender wage disparities. While the effect is highest for the low-paid, it also reaches up into higher parts of the wage distribution.
We extend standard models of work-related training by explicitly incorporating workers’ locus of control into the investment decision through the returns they expect. Our model predicts that higher internal control results in increased take-up of general, but not specific, training. This prediction is empirically validated using data from the German Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP). We provide empirical evidence that locus of control influences participation in training through its effect on workers’ expectations about future wage increases rather than actual wage increases. Our results provide an important explanation for underinvestment in training and suggest that those with an external sense of control may require additional training support.