Refine
Year of publication
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (65)
Keywords
- entrepreneurship (8)
- Entrepreneurship (6)
- Evaluation (6)
- survival (6)
- innovation (5)
- Start-up subsidies (4)
- mental health (4)
- Employment (3)
- Innovation (3)
- Start-Up Subsidies (3)
- job creation (3)
- locus of control (3)
- minimum wage (3)
- start-up subsidies (3)
- training (3)
- unemployment (3)
- Active labor market policy (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Job Creation (2)
- Job search (2)
- Locus of control (2)
- Matching (2)
- Minimum Wage (2)
- Obesity (2)
- PHQ-4 score (2)
- Personality (2)
- Policy Reform (2)
- Self-employment (2)
- Survival (2)
- alcohol consumption (2)
- depression (2)
- drugs (2)
- evaluation (2)
- firm growth (2)
- firm performance (2)
- gender (2)
- general self-efficacy (2)
- health (2)
- health behavior (2)
- inequality (2)
- persistence (2)
- personality (2)
- policy reform (2)
- prescriptions (2)
- representative longitudinal survey data (2)
- resilience (2)
- risk perception (2)
- sanctions (2)
- self-employment (2)
- sickness (2)
- startups (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Bewertung (1)
- Big five (1)
- Business Grow (1)
- C14 (1)
- Cardiovascular disease (1)
- Counterfactual Analysis (1)
- Critics (1)
- Deadweight effects (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- Difference-in-difference (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Earnings (1)
- Efectos regionales (1)
- Effect heterogeneity (1)
- Effet heterogene (1)
- Effets regionaux (1)
- Empleo autonomo (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Employment effects (1)
- Employment stability (1)
- Evaluacion (1)
- Existenzgrundungszuschusse (1)
- Female labor-force participation (1)
- Fertility (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Gender Wage Gap (1)
- Gender differences (1)
- Heterogeneidad del efecto (1)
- Heterogenitat von Effekten (1)
- Human Capital Investment (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Instrumental Variables (1)
- Instrumental variable approach (1)
- Internal migration (1)
- J68 (1)
- Job Search (1)
- L26 (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Labor demand (1)
- Labor market mobility (1)
- Labor supply (1)
- Long-term effects (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Marginal employment (1)
- Mini-job (1)
- Minimum wage (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Multivariate duration models (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Personality traits (1)
- Propensity Score Matching (1)
- Propensity score matching (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- R11 (1)
- Reciprocity (1)
- Regional Bite (1)
- Regional bite (1)
- Regional effects (1)
- Regionale Auswirkungen (1)
- Reviewer (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk tolerance (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Selbststandigkeit (1)
- Selection bias (1)
- Selection effects (1)
- Semiparametric regression (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Start-up Subsidies (1)
- Start-ups (1)
- Subvenciones a proyectos empresariales (1)
- Subventions de demarrage (1)
- Travail independant (1)
- Treatment effects (1)
- Trust (1)
- Unconfoundedness (1)
- Unemployment duration (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Unobservables (1)
- Wages (1)
- Well-Being (1)
- Work-related Training (1)
- Working Hours (1)
- active labor market policies (1)
- attitudes (1)
- behavior (1)
- beliefs (1)
- benefit systems (1)
- business expansion (1)
- business growth (1)
- business venturing (1)
- cardiovascular disease (1)
- confidence (1)
- creation (1)
- decision-making (1)
- decomposition analysis (1)
- difference-in-differences (1)
- divergent thinking (1)
- employee training (1)
- employer (1)
- employment growth (1)
- entrepreneurial performance (1)
- ethnicity (1)
- gender gap (1)
- gender wage gap (1)
- hourly wages (1)
- human capital investments (1)
- illusion of control (1)
- institutions (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- job (1)
- job search (1)
- labor force participation (1)
- labor market policies (1)
- manager decisions (1)
- matching (1)
- migration (1)
- optimism (1)
- preference for agency (1)
- propensity score matching (1)
- public policy (1)
- push and pull theories (1)
- regional bite (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- scientific use file (1)
- selection bias (1)
- skills (1)
- social activity (1)
- social investment (1)
- spam (1)
- spam filter (1)
- start-up motivation (1)
- survey data (1)
- wage and earnings structure (1)
- wage distribution (1)
- youth unemployment (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (33)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (22)
- Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA) (17)
- Extern (5)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (3)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (3)
- DV und Statistik Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (1)
- Sozialwissenschaften (1)
In many countries, women are over-represented among low-wage employees, which is why a wage floor could benefit them particularly. Following this notion, we analyse the impact of the German minimum wage introduction in 2015 on the gender wage gap. Germany poses an interesting case study in this context, since it has a rather high gender wage gap and set the minimum wage at a relatively high level, affecting more than four million employees. Based on individual data from the Structure of Earnings Survey, containing information for over one million employees working in 60,000 firms, we use a difference-in-difference framework that exploits regional differences in the bite of the minimum wage. We find a significant negative effect of the minimum wage on the regional gender wage gap. Between 2014 and 2018, the gap at the 10th percentile of the wage distribution was reduced by 4.6 percentage points (or 32%) in regions that were strongly affected by the minimum wage compared to less affected regions. For the gap at the 25th percentile, the effect still amounted to 18%, while for the mean it was smaller (11%) and not particularly robust. We thus find that the minimum wage can indeed reduce gender wage disparities. While the effect is highest for the low-paid, it also reaches up into higher parts of the wage distribution.
In many countries, women are over-represented among low-wage employees, which is why a wage floor could benefit them particularly. Following this notion, we analyse the impact of the German minimum wage introduction in 2015 on the gender wage gap. Germany poses an interesting case study in this context, since it has a rather high gender wage gap and set the minimum wage at a relatively high level, affecting more than four million employees. Based on individual data from the Structure of Earnings Survey, containing information for over one million employees working in 60,000 firms, we use a difference-in- difference framework that exploits regional differences in the bite of the minimum wage. We find a significant negative effect of the minimum wage on the regional gender wage gap. Between 2014 and 2018, the gap at the 10th percentile of the wage distribution was reduced by 4.6 percentage points (or 32%) in regions that were strongly affected by the minimum wage compared to less affected regions. For the gap at the 25th percentile, the effect still amounted to -18%, while for the mean it was smaller (-11%) and not particularly robust. We thus find that the minimum wage can indeed reduce gender wage disparities. While the effect is highest for the low-paid, it also reaches up into higher parts of the wage distribution.
While a growing body of literature finds positive impacts of Start-Up Subsidies (SUS) on labor market outcomes of participants, little is known about how the design of these programs shapes their effectiveness and hence how to improve policy. As experimental variation in program design is unavailable, we exploit the 2011 reform of the current German SUS program for the unemployed which strengthened case-workers’ discretionary power, increased entry requirements and reduced monetary support. We estimate the impact of the reform on the program’s effectiveness using samples of participants and non-participants from before and after the reform. To control for time-constant unobserved heterogeneity as well as differential selection patterns based on observable characteristics over time, we combine Difference-in-Differences with inverse probability weighting using covariate balancing propensity scores. Holding participants’ observed characteristics as well as macroeconomic conditions constant, the results suggest that the reform was successful in raising employment effects on average. As these findings may be contaminated by changes in selection patterns based on unobserved characteristics, we assess our results using simulation-based sensitivity analyses and find that our estimates are highly robust to changes in unobserved characteristics. Hence, the reform most likely had a positive impact on the effectiveness of the program, suggesting that increasing entry requirements and reducing support in-creased the program’s impacts while reducing the cost per participant.
While a growing body of literature finds positive impacts of Start-Up Subsidies (SUS) on labor market outcomes of participants, little is known about how the design of these programs shapes their effectiveness and hence how to improve policy. As experimental variation in program design is unavailable, we exploit the 2011 reform of the current German SUS program for the unemployed which strengthened caseworkers' discretionary power, increased entry requirements and reduced monetary support. We estimate the impact of the reform on the program's effectiveness using samples of participants and non-participants from before and after the reform. To control for time-constant unobserved heterogeneity as well as differential selection patterns based on observable characteristics over time, we combine Difference-in-Differences with inverse probability weighting using covariate balancing propensity scores. Holding participants' observed characteristics as well as macroeconomic conditions constant, the results suggest that the reform was successful in raising employment effects on average. As these findings may be contaminated by changes in selection patterns based on unobserved characteristics, we assess our results using simulation-based sensitivity analyses and find that our estimates are highly robust to changes in unobserved characteristics. Hence, the reform most likely had a positive impact on the effectiveness of the program, suggesting that increasing entry requirements and reducing support increased the program's impacts while reducing the cost per participant. (C) 2021 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
The German start-up subsidy (SUS) program for the unemployed has recently undergone a major make-over, altering its institutional setup, adding an additional layer of selection and leading to ambiguous predictions of the program’s effectiveness. Using propensity score matching (PSM) as our main empirical approach, we provide estimates of long-term effects of the post-reform subsidy on individual employment prospects and labor market earnings up to 40 months after entering the program. Our results suggest large and persistent long-term effects of the subsidy on employment probabilities and net earned income. These effects are larger than what was estimated for the pre-reform program. Extensive sensitivity analyses within the standard PSM framework reveal that the results are robust to different choices regarding the implementation of the weighting procedure and also with respect to deviations from the conditional independence assumption. As a further assessment of the results’ sensitivity, we go beyond the standard selection-on-observables approach and employ an instrumental variable setup using regional variation in the likelihood of receiving treatment. Here, we exploit the fact that the reform increased the discretionary power of local employment agencies in allocating active labor market policy funds, allowing us to obtain a measure of local preferences for SUS as the program of choice. The results based on this approach give rise to similar estimates. Thus, our results indicating that SUS are still an effective active labor market program after the reform do not appear to be driven by “hidden bias”.
Background:
The literature on start-up subsidies (SUS) for the unemployed finds positive effects on objective outcome measures such as employment or income. However, little is known about effects on subjective well-being of participants. Knowledge about this is especially important because subsidizing the transition into self-employment may have unintended adverse effects on participants’ well-being due to its risky nature and lower social security protection, especially in the long run.
Objective:
We study the long-term effects of SUS on subjective outcome indicators of well-being, as measured by the participants’ satisfaction in different domains. This extends previous analyses of the current German SUS program (“Gründungszuschuss”) that focused on objective outcomes—such as employment and income—and allows us to make a more complete judgment about the overall effects of SUS at the individual level.
Research design:
Having access to linked administrative-survey data providing us with rich information on pretreatment characteristics, we base our analysis on the conditional independence assumption and use propensity score matching to estimate causal effects within the potential outcomes framework. We perform several sensitivity analyses to inspect the robustness of our findings.
Results:
We find long-term positive effects on job satisfaction but negative effects on individuals’ satisfaction with their social security situation. Supplementary findings suggest that the negative effect on satisfaction with social security may be driven by negative effects on unemployment and retirement insurance coverage. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals substantial variation in effects across gender, age groups, and skill levels. Estimates are highly robust.
The German start-up subsidy (SUS) program for the unemployed has recently undergone a major makeover, altering its institutional setup, adding an additional layer of selection and leading to ambiguous predictions of the program's effectiveness. Using propensity score matching (PSM) as our main empirical approach, we provide estimates of long-term effects of the post-reform subsidy on individual employment prospects and labor market earnings up to 40 months after entering the program. Our results suggest large and persistent long-term effects of the subsidy on employment probabilities and net earned income. These effects are larger than what was estimated for the pre-reform program. Extensive sensitivity analyses within the standard PSM framework reveal that the results are robust to different choices regarding the implementation of the weighting procedure and also with respect to deviations from the conditional independence assumption. As a further assessment of the results' sensitivity, we go beyond the standard selection-on-observables approach and employ an instrumental variable setup using regional variation in the likelihood of receiving treatment. Here, we exploit the fact that the reform increased the discretionary power of local employment agencies in allocating active labor market policy funds, allowing us to obtain a measure of local preferences for SUS as the program of choice. The results based on this approach give rise to similar estimates. Thus, our results indicating that SUS are still an effective active labor market program after the reform do not appear to be driven by "hidden bias."
Mit der Reform des Gründungszuschusses im Jahr 2011 wurden die Rahmenbedingungen der Gründungsförderung für Arbeitslose im Sozialgesetzbuch III umfassend reformiert und die Förderzahlen reduzierten sich drastisch. Insgesamt ist das Arbeitsmarktinstrument weiterhin ein Erfolg: Die meisten Geförderten sind auch knapp 3,5 Jahre nach der Gründung noch selbstständig und etwa ein Drittel von ihnen hat mindestens einen Beschäftigen. Von denjenigen, die ihre Selbstständigkeit inzwischen beendet haben, sind die meisten sozialversicherungspflichtig beschäftigt. Damit haben Geförderte eine deutlich höhere Beschäftigungsquote als vergleichbare Personen ohne diese Förderung. Auch ihre monatlichen Nettoverdienste sowie ihre Jobzufriedenheit sind höher. Verbesserungspotenzial gibt es allerdings bei der sozialen Absicherung: Geförderte zahlen seltener in eine Rentenversicherung oder in die Arbeitslosenversicherung ein und sind mit ihrer sozialen Absicherung unzufriedener als vergleichbare Personen.
We estimate the long-term effects of start-up subsidies (SUS) for the unemployed on subjective outcome indicators of well-being, as measured by the participants’ satisfaction in different domains. This extends previous analyses of the current German SUS program (“Gründungszuschuss”) that focused on objective outcomes – such as employment and income – and allows us to make a more complete judgment about the overall effects of SUS at the individual level. This is especially important because subsidizing the transition into self-employment may have unintended adverse effects on participants’ well-being due to its risky nature and lower social security protection, especially in the long run. Having access to linked administrative-survey data providing us with rich information on pre-treatment characteristics, we base our analysis on the conditional independence assumption and use propensity score matching to estimate causal effects within the potential outcomes framework. We find long-term positive effects on job satisfaction but negative effects on individuals’ satisfaction with their social security situation. Further findings suggest that the negative effect on satisfaction with social security may be driven by negative effects on unemployment and retirement insurance coverage. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals substantial variation in effects across gender, age groups and skill levels. The sensitivity analyses show that these findings are highly robust.