Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (79) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (79)
Language
- English (79)
Keywords
- experiment (12)
- communication (6)
- COVID-19 (4)
- Entrepreneurship (4)
- Innovation (4)
- cartel (4)
- entrepreneurship (4)
- gender (4)
- machine learning (4)
- E-DSGE (3)
- Start-Up Subsidies (3)
- air pollution (3)
- collusion (3)
- cooperation (3)
- mental health (3)
- Experiment (2)
- Human Capital Investment (2)
- Job Creation (2)
- Minimum Wage (2)
- Policy Reform (2)
- Productivity (2)
- R&D (2)
- Survival (2)
- Work-related Training (2)
- carbon pricing (2)
- climate policy (2)
- energy prices (2)
- gender pay gap (2)
- health (2)
- inequality (2)
- innovation (2)
- labor supply (2)
- linked employer-employee data (2)
- migration (2)
- population density (2)
- self-employment (2)
- strategic uncertainty (2)
- survival (2)
- welfare (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Africa (1)
- Ask avoidance (1)
- Backward ownership (1)
- Balancing weights (1)
- Business Grow (1)
- Carbon Capture (1)
- Carbon Dioxide Removal (1)
- Charitable giving (1)
- Climate Policy (1)
- Continuous Treatment (1)
- Counterfactual Analysis (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- DiD (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- Earnings (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Employment (1)
- Entry deterrence (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Foreclosure (1)
- Gender Wage Gap (1)
- High growth firms (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Impermanence (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Instrumental Variables (1)
- Intertemporal Choice (1)
- Job Satisfaction (1)
- Job Search (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Language (1)
- Large firms (1)
- Linguistic Saving Hypothesis (1)
- Long-term Crisis (1)
- MSMEs (1)
- Macroeconomic Dynamics (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Matching (1)
- Minority shareholdings (1)
- Monte-Carlo simulation (1)
- Observational studies (1)
- PHQ-4 score (1)
- Partial ownership (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Policy Design (1)
- Propensity Score Matching (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- Quality of regional governments (1)
- Regional Bite (1)
- Regions (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Repeated request (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Service Sector (1)
- Small firms (1)
- Social Cost of Carbon (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Start-up Subsidies (1)
- Start-ups (1)
- Ultimatum Game (1)
- Uniform pricing (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Vertical integration (1)
- Well-Being (1)
- Working Hours (1)
- accidents (1)
- alcohol consumption (1)
- ambiguity attitudes (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- beliefs (1)
- blended learning (1)
- board diversity (1)
- business expansion (1)
- business services (1)
- business venturing (1)
- buyer behavior (1)
- carbon debt (1)
- carbon emissions (1)
- carbon price (1)
- carbon removal (1)
- cardiovascular disease (1)
- career costs of children (1)
- child care (1)
- childcare provision (1)
- climate (1)
- climate change (1)
- commuting (1)
- compliance behavior (1)
- congestion (1)
- corporate leniency program (1)
- crowding out (1)
- cycling (1)
- decomposition (1)
- decomposition methods (1)
- deliberate ignorance (1)
- depression (1)
- developing country cities (1)
- dictator game (1)
- discrete choice (1)
- discrimination (1)
- divergent thinking (1)
- double dividend (1)
- drugs (1)
- dynamic binary choice (1)
- dynamic panel estimation (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emergency-aid (1)
- emotion regulation (1)
- employer (1)
- employment (1)
- employment growth (1)
- endogenous growth (1)
- energy expenditure (1)
- energy policy (1)
- entrepreneurial performance (1)
- entrepreneurship policy (1)
- environment (1)
- environmental tax reform (1)
- envy (1)
- equity crowdfunding (1)
- extensive margin (1)
- finance (1)
- financial access and inclusion (1)
- firm growth (1)
- firm performance (1)
- fiscal policy (1)
- food prices (1)
- gambler’s fallac (1)
- gender wage gap (1)
- general self-efficacy (1)
- generalized difference-in-difference (1)
- gentrification (1)
- goal-setting (1)
- gratitude (1)
- gridded data (1)
- habit formation (1)
- hate crime (1)
- health behavior (1)
- high-dimensional fixed effects (1)
- home office (1)
- horizontal equity (1)
- horizontal innovation (1)
- hot hand fallacy (1)
- hours restrictions (1)
- housing market (1)
- human capital (1)
- incidental parameter bias correction (1)
- income (1)
- inequality of opportunity (1)
- infinitely repeated game (1)
- inflation (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- involuntary unemployment (1)
- irrelevant information (1)
- job creation (1)
- judgment of communication (1)
- just transition (1)
- labor productivity (1)
- labour migration (1)
- leadership (1)
- locus of control (1)
- loss aversion (1)
- market-entry game (1)
- maternal employment (1)
- meta-analysis (1)
- military conflicts (1)
- mother’s labor supply (1)
- multi-valued treatment (1)
- natural field experiment (1)
- net-negative emissions (1)
- non-Ricardian households (1)
- obesity (1)
- objective health measures (1)
- parental leave (1)
- personality (1)
- physical activity (1)
- pollution (1)
- prescriptions (1)
- price competition (1)
- primary school (1)
- prisoners' dilemma (1)
- prisoner’s dilemma (1)
- productivity slowdown (1)
- promises (1)
- property taxes (1)
- public good (1)
- public transport (1)
- punishment (1)
- quantile regression (1)
- rebate and discount (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- redistribution (1)
- refugees (1)
- regulation of dominant firms (1)
- removal subsidies (1)
- renewable energy subsidies (1)
- rent control (1)
- representative longitudinal survey data (1)
- representative real-time survey data (1)
- resilience (1)
- retirement policies (1)
- returns to education (1)
- revenue recycling (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- risk aversion (1)
- risk perception (1)
- sanctions (1)
- school health examinations (1)
- selection into employment (1)
- self-employed (1)
- sickness (1)
- social investment (1)
- soft information (1)
- spillover effects (1)
- stag-hunt game (1)
- stochastic uncertainty (1)
- strategic ignorance (1)
- strategic-uncertainty attitudes (1)
- subjective survival probability (1)
- sustainability (1)
- tax competition (1)
- taxpayer subsidies (1)
- terms-of-trade effects (1)
- text analysis (1)
- trade (1)
- trade policy (1)
- traffic (1)
- training (1)
- transport subsidies (1)
- treatment effects (1)
- two-way fixed effects (1)
- unemployment (1)
- unilateral climate policy (1)
- urban (1)
- vocational education (1)
- voting (1)
- voucher (1)
- wages (1)
- wars (1)
- wealth (1)
- windfall gains (1)
- women in management (1)
- women’s careers (1)
Institute
- Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA) (79) (remove)
We analyze workers’ risk preferences and training investments. Our conceptual framework differentiates between the investment risk and insurance mechanisms underpinning training decisions. Investment risk leads risk-averse workers to train less; they undertake more training if it insures them against future losses. We use the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) to demonstrate that risk affinity is associated with more training, implying that, on average, investment risks dominate the insurance benefits of training. Crucially, this relationship is evident only for general training; there is no relationship between risk attitudes and specific training. Thus, as expected, risk preferences matter more when skills are transferable – and workers have a vested interest in training outcomes – than when they are not. Finally, we provide evidence that the insurance benefits of training are concentrated among workers with uncertain employment relationships or limited access to public insurance schemes.
Stochastic uncertainty can cause difficult coordination problems that may hinder mutually beneficial cooperation. We propose a mechanism of ex-post voluntary transfers designed to circumvent these coordination problems and ask whether it can do so. To test this, we implement a controlled laboratory experiment based on a repeatedly played Ultimatum Game with a stochastic endowment. Contrary to our hypothesis, we find that allowing voluntary transfers does not entail an efficiency increase. We suggest and analyze two main reasons for this finding: First, the stochastic uncertainty forces proposers to accept high strategic uncertainty if they intend to cooperate by claiming a low amount (which many proposers do not). Second, many responders behave only incompletely conditionally cooperative by transferring too little (which hinders cooperation in future periods).
Envy is an unpleasant emotion. If individuals anticipate that comparing their payoff with the (potentially higher) payoff of others will make them envious, they may want to actively avoid information about other people’s payoffs. Given the opportunity to reduce another person’s payoff, an individual’s envy may trigger behavior that is detrimental to welfare. In this case, if individuals anticipate that they will react in a welfare-reducing way, they may also avoid information about other people’s payoffs from the outset. We investigated these two hypotheses using three experiments. We found that 13% of our potentially envious subjects avoided information when they did not have the opportunity to reduce another participant’s payoff. Psychological scales do not explain this behavior. We also found that voluntarily uninformed subjects did neither deduct less of the payoff nor less frequently than subjects who could not avoid the information.
Labor market policy tools such as training and sanctions are commonly used to help bring workers back to work. By analogy to medical treatments, the individual exposure to these tools may have side effects. We study effects on health using individual-level population registers on labor market events outcomes, drug prescriptions and sickness absence, comparing outcomes before and after exposure to training and sanctions. We find that training improves cardiovascular and mental health and lowers sickness absence. The results suggest that this is not due to improved employment prospects but rather to instantaneous features of participation such as, perhaps, the adoption of a more rigorous daily routine. Unemployment benefits sanctions cause a short-run deterioration of mental health, possibly due higher stress levels, but this tapers out quickly.
Interest in evaluating the effects of continuous treatments has been on the rise recently. To facilitate the estimation of causal effects in this setting, the present paper introduces entropy balancing for continuous treatments (EBCT) by extending the original entropy balancing methodology of Hainmüller (2012). In order to estimate balancing weights, the proposed approach solves a globally convex constrained optimization problem, allowing for much more computationally efficient implementation compared to other available methods. EBCT weights reliably eradicate Pearson correlations between covariates and the continuous treatment variable. This is the case even when other methods based on the generalized propensity score tend to yield insufficient balance due to strong selection into different treatment intensities. Moreover, the optimization procedure is more successful in avoiding extreme weights attached to a single unit. Extensive Monte-Carlo simulations show that treatment effect estimates using EBCT display similar or lower bias and uniformly lower root mean squared error. These properties make EBCT an attractive method for the evaluation of continuous treatments. Software implementation is available for Stata and R.
Entrepreneurial persistence is demonstrated by an entrepreneur’s continued positive maintenance of entrepreneurial motivation and constantly-renewed active engagement in a new business venture despite counter forces or enticing alternatives. It is thus a crucial factor for entrepreneurs when pursuing and exploiting their business opportunities and to realize potential economic gains and benefits. Using rich data on a representative sample of German business founders, we investigate the determinants of entrepreneurial persistence. Next to observed survival we also construct a hybrid persistence measure capturing also the motivational dimension of persistence. We analyze the influence of individual-level (human capital and personality) and business-related characteristics on both measures as well as their relative importance. We find that the two indicators emphasize different aspects of persistence. For the survival indicator, the predictive power is concentrated in business characteristics and human capital, while for hybrid persistence, the dominant factors are business characteristics and personality. Finally, we show that results are heterogeneous across subgroups. In particular, formerly-unemployed founders do not differ in survival chances, but they are more likely to lack a high psychological commitment to their business ventures.
From an active labor market policy perspective, start-up subsidies for unemployed individuals are very effective in improving long-term labor market outcomes for participants. From a business perspective, however, the assessment of these public programs is less clear since they might attract individuals with low entrepreneurial abilities and produce businesses with low survival rates and little contribution to job creation, economic growth, and innovation. In this paper, we use a rich data set to compare participants of a German start-up subsidy program for unemployed individuals to a group of regular founders who started from nonunemployment and did not receive the subsidy. The data allows us to analyze their business performance up until 40 months after business formation. We find that formerly subsidized founders lag behind not only in survival and job creation, but especially also in innovation activities. The gaps in these business outcomes are relatively constant or even widening over time. Hence, we do not see any indication of catching up in the longer run. While the gap in survival can be entirely explained by initial differences in observable start-up characteristics, the gap in business development remains and seems to be the result of restricted access to capital as well as differential business strategies and dynamics. Considering these conflicting results for the assessment of the subsidy program from an ALMP and business perspective, policy makers need to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of such a strategy to find the right policy mix.
Being ignorant of key aspects of a strategic interaction can represent an advantage rather than a handicap. We study one particular context in which ignorance can be beneficial: iterated strategic interactions in which voluntary cooperation may be sustained into the final round if players voluntarily forego knowledge about the time horizon. We experimentally examine this option to remain ignorant about the time horizon in a finitely repeated two-person prisoners’ dilemma game. We confirm that pairs without horizon knowledge avoid the drop in cooperation that otherwise occurs toward the end of the game. However, this effect is superposed by cooperation declining more rapidly in pairs without horizon knowledge during the middle phase of the game, especially if players do not know that the other player also wanted to remain ignorant of the time horizon.
The German start-up subsidy (SUS) program for the unemployed has recently undergone a major make-over, altering its institutional setup, adding an additional layer of selection and leading to ambiguous predictions of the program’s effectiveness. Using propensity score matching (PSM) as our main empirical approach, we provide estimates of long-term effects of the post-reform subsidy on individual employment prospects and labor market earnings up to 40 months after entering the program. Our results suggest large and persistent long-term effects of the subsidy on employment probabilities and net earned income. These effects are larger than what was estimated for the pre-reform program. Extensive sensitivity analyses within the standard PSM framework reveal that the results are robust to different choices regarding the implementation of the weighting procedure and also with respect to deviations from the conditional independence assumption. As a further assessment of the results’ sensitivity, we go beyond the standard selection-on-observables approach and employ an instrumental variable setup using regional variation in the likelihood of receiving treatment. Here, we exploit the fact that the reform increased the discretionary power of local employment agencies in allocating active labor market policy funds, allowing us to obtain a measure of local preferences for SUS as the program of choice. The results based on this approach give rise to similar estimates. Thus, our results indicating that SUS are still an effective active labor market program after the reform do not appear to be driven by “hidden bias”.
Getting a Yes
(2019)
This paper studies how the request for a favor has to be devised in order to maximize its chance of success. We present results from a mini-dictator game, in which the recipient can send a free-form text message to the dictator before the latter decides. We find that putting effort into the message, writing in a humorous way and mentioning reasons why the money is needed pays off. Additionally, we find differences in the behavior of male and female dictators. Only men react positively to efficiency arguments, while only women react to messages that emphasize the dictator’s power and responsibility.
This paper presents an experiment on the effect of retroactive price-reduction schemes on buyers’ repeated purchase decisions. Such schemes promise buyers a reduced price for all units that are bought in a certain time frame if the total quantity that is purchased passes a given threshold. This study finds a loyalty-enhancing effect of retroactive price-reduction schemes only if the buyers ex-ante expected that entering into the scheme would maximize their monetary gain, but later learn that they should leave the scheme. Furthermore, the effect crucially hinges on the framing of the price reduction.
”Thanks in Advance”
(2019)
This paper studies the effect of the commonly used phrase “thanks in advance” on compliance with a small request. In a controlled laboratory experiment we ask participants to give a detailed answer to an open question. The treatment variable is whether or not they see the phrase “thanks in advance.” Our participants react to the treatment by exerting less effort in answering the request even though they perceive the phrase as polite.
The paper extends a static discrete-choice labor supply model by adding participation and hours constraints. We identify restrictions by survey information on the eligibility and search activities of individuals as well as actual and desired hours. This provides for a more robust identification of preferences and constraints. Both, preferences and restrictions are allowed to vary by and are related through observed and unobserved characteristics. We distinguish various restrictions mechanisms: labor demand rationing, working hours norms varying across occupations, and insufficient public childcare on the supply side of the market. The effect of these mechanisms is simulated by relaxing different constraints at a time. We apply the empirical frame- work to evaluate an in-work benefit for low-paid parents in the German institutional context. The benefit is supposed to increase work incentives for secondary earners. Based on the structural model we are able to disentangle behavioral reactions into the pure incentive effect and the limiting impact of constraints at the intensive and extensive margin. We find that the in-work benefit for parents substantially increases working hours of mothers of young children, especially when they have a low education. Simulating the effects of restrictions shows their substantial impact on employment of mothers with young children.
We use panel data from Germany to analyze the effect of population density on urban air pollution (nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and ozone). To address unobserved heterogeneity and omitted variables, we present long difference/fixed effects estimates and instrumental variables estimates, using historical population and soil quality as instruments. Our preferred estimates imply that a one-standard deviation increase in population density increases air pollution by 3-12%.
We estimate the long-term effects of start-up subsidies (SUS) for the unemployed on subjective outcome indicators of well-being, as measured by the participants’ satisfaction in different domains. This extends previous analyses of the current German SUS program (“Gründungszuschuss”) that focused on objective outcomes – such as employment and income – and allows us to make a more complete judgment about the overall effects of SUS at the individual level. This is especially important because subsidizing the transition into self-employment may have unintended adverse effects on participants’ well-being due to its risky nature and lower social security protection, especially in the long run. Having access to linked administrative-survey data providing us with rich information on pre-treatment characteristics, we base our analysis on the conditional independence assumption and use propensity score matching to estimate causal effects within the potential outcomes framework. We find long-term positive effects on job satisfaction but negative effects on individuals’ satisfaction with their social security situation. Further findings suggest that the negative effect on satisfaction with social security may be driven by negative effects on unemployment and retirement insurance coverage. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals substantial variation in effects across gender, age groups and skill levels. The sensitivity analyses show that these findings are highly robust.
Expanding public or publicly subsidized childcare has been a top social policy priority in many industrialized countries. It is supposed to increase fertility, promote children’s development and enhance mothers’ labor market attachment. In this paper, we analyze the causal effect of one of the largest expansions of subsidized childcare for children up to three years among industrialized countries on the employment of mothers in Germany. Identification is based on spatial and temporal variation in the expansion of publicly subsidized childcare triggered by two comprehensive childcare policy reforms. The empirical analysis is based on the German Microcensus that is matched to county level data on childcare availability. Based on our preferred specification which includes time and county fixed effects we find that an increase in childcare slots by one percentage point increases mothers’ labor market participation rate by 0.2 percentage points. The overall increase in employment is explained by the rise in part-time employment with relatively long hours (20-35 hours per week). We do not find a change in full-time employment or lower part-time employment that is causally related to the childcare expansion. The effect is almost entirely driven by mothers with medium-level qualifications. Mothers with low education levels do not profit from this reform calling for a stronger policy focus on particularly disadvantaged groups in coming years.
In 2015, Germany introduced a statutory hourly minimum wage that was not only universally binding but also set at a relatively high level. We discuss the short-run effects of this new minimum wage on a wide set of socio-economic outcomes, such as employment and working hours, earnings and wage inequality, dependent and self-employment, as well as reservation wages and satisfaction. We also discuss difficulties in the implementation of the minimum wage and the measurement of its effects related to non-compliance and suitability of data sources. Two years after the minimum wage introduction, the following conclusions can be drawn: while hourly wages increased for low-wage earners, some small negative employment effects are also identifiable. The effects on aspired goals, such as poverty and inequality reduction, have not materialized in the short run. Instead, a tendency to reduce working hours is found, which alleviates the desired positive impact on monthly income. Additionally, the level of non-compliance was substantial in the short run, thus drawing attention to problems when implementing such a wide-reaching policy.
What Makes an Employer?
(2019)
As the policy debate on entrepreneurship increasingly centers on firm growth in terms of job creation, it is important to better understand which variables influence the first hiring decision and which ones influence the subsequent survival as an employer. Using the German Socio-economic Panel (SOEP), we analyze what role individual characteristics of entrepreneurs play in sustainable job creation. While human and social capital variables positively influence the hiring decision and the survival as an employer in the same direction, we show that none of the personality traits affect the two outcomes in the same way. Some traits are only relevant for survival as an employer but do not influence the hiring decision, other traits even unfold a revolving door effect, in the sense that employers tend to fail due to the same characteristics that positively influenced their hiring decision.
A rich literature links knowledge inputs with innovative outputs. However, most of what is known is restricted to manufacturing. This paper analyzes whether the three aspects involving innovative activity - R&D; innovative output; and productivity - hold for knowledge intensive services. Combining the models of Crepon et al. (1998) and of Ackerberg et al. (2015), allows for causal interpretation of the relationship between innovation output and labor productivity. We find that knowledge intensive services benefit from innovation activities in the sense that these activities causally increase their labor productivity. Moreover, the firm size advantage found for manufacturing in previous studies nearly disappears for knowledge intensive services.