Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (76) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (76)
Language
- English (76)
Keywords
- experiment (11)
- communication (5)
- COVID-19 (4)
- Entrepreneurship (4)
- Innovation (4)
- entrepreneurship (4)
- gender (4)
- E-DSGE (3)
- Start-Up Subsidies (3)
- air pollution (3)
- cartel (3)
- cooperation (3)
- machine learning (3)
- mental health (3)
- Experiment (2)
- Human Capital Investment (2)
- Job Creation (2)
- Minimum Wage (2)
- Policy Reform (2)
- Productivity (2)
- R&D (2)
- Survival (2)
- Work-related Training (2)
- climate policy (2)
- collusion (2)
- energy prices (2)
- gender pay gap (2)
- health (2)
- inequality (2)
- innovation (2)
- labor supply (2)
- linked employer-employee data (2)
- migration (2)
- population density (2)
- self-employment (2)
- strategic uncertainty (2)
- survival (2)
- welfare (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Africa (1)
- Ask avoidance (1)
- Backward ownership (1)
- Balancing weights (1)
- Business Grow (1)
- Carbon Capture (1)
- Carbon Dioxide Removal (1)
- Charitable giving (1)
- Climate Policy (1)
- Continuous Treatment (1)
- Counterfactual Analysis (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- DiD (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- Earnings (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Employment (1)
- Entry deterrence (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Foreclosure (1)
- Gender Wage Gap (1)
- High growth firms (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Impermanence (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Instrumental Variables (1)
- Intertemporal Choice (1)
- Job Satisfaction (1)
- Job Search (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Language (1)
- Large firms (1)
- Linguistic Saving Hypothesis (1)
- Long-term Crisis (1)
- MSMEs (1)
- Macroeconomic Dynamics (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Matching (1)
- Minority shareholdings (1)
- Monte-Carlo simulation (1)
- Observational studies (1)
- PHQ-4 score (1)
- Partial ownership (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Policy Design (1)
- Propensity Score Matching (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- Quality of regional governments (1)
- Regional Bite (1)
- Regions (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Repeated request (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Service Sector (1)
- Small firms (1)
- Social Cost of Carbon (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Start-up Subsidies (1)
- Start-ups (1)
- Ultimatum Game (1)
- Uniform pricing (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Vertical integration (1)
- Well-Being (1)
- Working Hours (1)
- accidents (1)
- alcohol consumption (1)
- ambiguity attitudes (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- beliefs (1)
- blended learning (1)
- board diversity (1)
- business expansion (1)
- business services (1)
- business venturing (1)
- buyer behavior (1)
- carbon emissions (1)
- carbon price (1)
- carbon pricing (1)
- cardiovascular disease (1)
- career costs of children (1)
- child care (1)
- childcare provision (1)
- climate (1)
- climate change (1)
- commuting (1)
- compliance behavior (1)
- congestion (1)
- corporate leniency program (1)
- crowding out (1)
- cycling (1)
- decomposition (1)
- decomposition methods (1)
- deliberate ignorance (1)
- depression (1)
- dictator game (1)
- discrimination (1)
- divergent thinking (1)
- double dividend (1)
- drugs (1)
- dynamic binary choice (1)
- dynamic panel estimation (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emergency-aid (1)
- emotion regulation (1)
- employer (1)
- employment (1)
- employment growth (1)
- endogenous growth (1)
- energy expenditure (1)
- entrepreneurial performance (1)
- entrepreneurship policy (1)
- environment (1)
- environmental tax reform (1)
- envy (1)
- equity crowdfunding (1)
- extensive margin (1)
- finance (1)
- financial access and inclusion (1)
- firm growth (1)
- firm performance (1)
- fiscal policy (1)
- food prices (1)
- gambler’s fallac (1)
- gender wage gap (1)
- general self-efficacy (1)
- generalized difference-in-difference (1)
- gentrification (1)
- goal-setting (1)
- gratitude (1)
- gridded data (1)
- habit formation (1)
- hate crime (1)
- health behavior (1)
- high-dimensional fixed effects (1)
- home office (1)
- horizontal equity (1)
- horizontal innovation (1)
- hot hand fallacy (1)
- hours restrictions (1)
- housing market (1)
- human capital (1)
- incidental parameter bias correction (1)
- income (1)
- inequality of opportunity (1)
- infinitely repeated game (1)
- inflation (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- involuntary unemployment (1)
- irrelevant information (1)
- job creation (1)
- judgment of communication (1)
- just transition (1)
- labor productivity (1)
- labour migration (1)
- leadership (1)
- locus of control (1)
- loss aversion (1)
- market-entry game (1)
- maternal employment (1)
- meta-analysis (1)
- military conflicts (1)
- mother’s labor supply (1)
- multi-valued treatment (1)
- natural field experiment (1)
- non-Ricardian households (1)
- obesity (1)
- objective health measures (1)
- parental leave (1)
- personality (1)
- physical activity (1)
- prescriptions (1)
- price competition (1)
- primary school (1)
- prisoners' dilemma (1)
- prisoner’s dilemma (1)
- productivity slowdown (1)
- promises (1)
- property taxes (1)
- public good (1)
- public transport (1)
- punishment (1)
- quantile regression (1)
- rebate and discount (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- redistribution (1)
- refugees (1)
- regulation of dominant firms (1)
- removal subsidies (1)
- renewable energy subsidies (1)
- rent control (1)
- representative longitudinal survey data (1)
- representative real-time survey data (1)
- resilience (1)
- retirement policies (1)
- returns to education (1)
- revenue recycling (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- risk aversion (1)
- risk perception (1)
- sanctions (1)
- school health examinations (1)
- selection into employment (1)
- self-employed (1)
- sickness (1)
- social investment (1)
- soft information (1)
- spillover effects (1)
- stag-hunt game (1)
- stochastic uncertainty (1)
- strategic ignorance (1)
- strategic-uncertainty attitudes (1)
- subjective survival probability (1)
- sustainability (1)
- tax competition (1)
- taxpayer subsidies (1)
- terms-of-trade effects (1)
- text analysis (1)
- trade (1)
- trade policy (1)
- traffic (1)
- training (1)
- transport subsidies (1)
- treatment effects (1)
- two-way fixed effects (1)
- unemployment (1)
- unilateral climate policy (1)
- urban (1)
- vocational education (1)
- voting (1)
- voucher (1)
- wages (1)
- wars (1)
- wealth (1)
- windfall gains (1)
- women in management (1)
- women’s careers (1)
Institute
- Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA) (76) (remove)
The present paper proposes a novel approach for equilibrium selection in the infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma where players can communicate before choosing their strategies. This approach yields a critical discount factor that makes different predictions for cooperation than the usually considered sub-game perfect or risk dominance critical discount factors. In laboratory experiments, we find that our factor is useful for predicting cooperation. For payoff changes where the usually considered factors and our factor make different predictions, the observed cooperation is consistent with the predictions based on our factor.
In this paper, we study one channel through which communication may facilitate cooperative behavior – belief precision. In a prisoner’s dilemma experiment, we show that communication not only makes individuals more optimistic that their partner will cooperate but also increases the precision of this belief, thereby reducing strategic uncertainty. To disentangle the shift in mean beliefs from the increase in precision, we elicit beliefs and precision in a two-stage procedure and in three situations: without communication, before communication, and after communication. We find that the precision of beliefs increases during communication.
Leadership plays an important role for the efficient and fair solution of social dilemmas but the effectiveness of a leader can vary substantially. Two main factors of leadership impact are the ability to induce high contributions by all group members and the (expected) fair use of power. Participants in our experiment decide about contributions to a public good. After all contributions are made, the leader can choose how much of the joint earnings to assign to herself; the remainder is distributed equally among the followers. Using machine learning techniques, we study whether the content of initial open statements by the group members predicts their behavior as a leader and whether groups are able to identify such clues and endogenously appoint a “good” leader to solve the dilemma. We find that leaders who promise fairness are more likely to behave fairly, and that followers appoint as leaders those who write more explicitly about fairness and efficiency. However, in their contribution decision, followers focus on the leader’s first-move contribution and place less importance on the content of the leader’s statements.
Access to digital finance
(2024)
Financing entrepreneurship spurs innovation and economic growth. Digital financial platforms that crowdfund equity for entrepreneurs have emerged globally, yet they remain poorly understood. We model equity crowdfunding in terms of the relationship between the number of investors and the amount of money raised per pitch. We examine heterogeneity in the average amount raised per pitch that is associated with differences across three countries and seven platforms. Using a novel dataset of successful fundraising on the most prominent platforms in the UK, Germany, and the USA, we find the underlying relationship between the number of investors and the amount of money raised for entrepreneurs is loglinear, with a coefficient less than one and concave to the origin. We identify significant variation in the average amount invested in each pitch across countries and platforms. Our findings have implications for market actors as well as regulators who set competitive frameworks.
We examine how the gender of business-owners is related to the wages paid to female relative to male employees working in their firms. Using Finnish register data and employing firm fixed effects, we find that the gender pay gap is – starting from a gender pay gap of 11 to 12 percent - two to three percentage-points lower for hourly wages in female-owned firms than in male-owned firms. Results are robust to how the wage is measured, as well as to various further robustness checks. More importantly, we find substantial differences between industries. While, for instance, in the manufacturing sector, the gender of the owner plays no role for the gender pay gap, in several service sector industries, like ICT or business services, no or a negligible gender pay gap can be found, but only when firms are led by female business owners. Businesses in male ownership maintain a gender pay gap of around 10 percent also in the latter industries. With increasing firm size, the influence of the gender of the owner, however, fades. In large firms, it seems that others – firm managers – determine wages and no differences in the pay gap are observed between male- and female-owned firms.
While inequality of opportunity (IOp) in earnings is well studied, the literature on IOp in individual net wealth is scarce to non-existent. This is problematic because both theoretical and empirical evidence show that the position in the wealth and income distribution can significantly diverge.We measure ex-ante IOp in net wealth for Germany using data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Ex-ante IOp is defined as the contribution of circumstances to the inequality in net wealth before effort is exerted. The SOEP allows for a direct mapping from individual circumstances to individual net wealth and for a detailed decomposition of net wealth inequality into a variety of circumstances; among them childhood background, intergenerational transfers, and regional characteristics. The ratio of inequality of opportunity to total inequality is stable from 2002 to 2019. This is in sharp contrast to labor earnings, where ex-ante IOp is declining over time. Our estimates suggest that about 62% of the inequality in net wealth is due to circumstances. The most important circumstances are intergenerational transfers, parental occupation, and the region of birth. In contrast, gender and individuals’ own education are the most important circumstances for earnings.
High growth firms (HGFs) are important for job creation and considered to be precursors of economic growth. We investigate how formal institutions, like product- and labor-market regulations, as well as the quality of regional governments that implement these regulations, affect HGF development across European regions. Using data from Eurostat, OECD, WEF, and Gothenburg University, we show that both regulatory stringency and the quality of the regional government influence the regional shares of HGFs. More importantly, we find that the effect of labor- and product-market regulations ultimately depends on the quality of regional governments: in regions with high quality of government, the share of HGFs is neither affected by the level of product market regulation, nor by more or less flexibility in hiring and firing practices. Our findings contribute to the debate on the effects of regulations by showing that regulations are not, per se, “good, bad, and ugly”, rather their impact depends on the efficiency of regional governments. Our paper offers important building blocks to develop tailored policy measures that may influence the development of HGFs in a region.
The effects of energy price increases are heterogeneous between households and firms. Financially constrained poorer households, who spend a larger relative share of their income on energy, are particularly affected. In this analysis, we examine the macroeconomic and welfare effects of energy price shocks in the presence of credit-constrained households that have subsistence-level energy demand. Within a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model calibrated for the German economy, we compare the performance of different policy measures (transfers and energy subsidies) and different financing schemes (income tax vs. debt). Our results show that credit-constrained households prefer debt over tax financing regardless of the compensation measure due to their difficulty to smooth consumption. On the contrary, rich households tend to prefer tax-financed measures as they increase the labor supply of poor households. From an aggregate perspective, tax-financed measures targeting firms effectively cushion aggregate output losses.
Economic agents often irrationally base their decision-making on irrelevant information. This research analyzes whether men and women react to futile information about past outcomes. For this purpose, we run a laboratory experiment (Study 1) and use field data (Study 2). In both studies, the behavior of men is consistent with falsely assumed negative autocorrelation, often referred to as gambler’s fallacy Women’s behavior aligns with falsely assumed positive autocorrelation, a notion of the hot hand fallacy. On the aggregate, the two fallacies cancel out. Even when individuals are, on average, rational, the biases in the decision-making of subgroups might cause inefficient outcomes. In a mediation analysis, we find that a) the agents stated perceived probabilities of future outcomes are not blurred by irrelevant information and b) about 40 % of the observed biases are driven by differences in the perceived attractiveness of available choices caused by the irrelevant information.
Leveraging two cohort-specific pension reforms, this paper estimates the forward-looking effects of an exogenous increase in the working horizon on (un)employment behaviour for individuals with a long remaining statutory working life. Using difference-in-differences and regression discontinuity approaches based on administrative and survey data, I show that a longer legal working horizon increases individuals’ subjective expectations about the length of their work life, raises the probability of employment, decreases the probability of unemployment, and increases the intensity of job search among the unemployed. Heterogeneity analyses show that the demonstrated employment effects are strongest for women and in occupations with comparatively low physical intensity, i.e., occupations that can be performed at older ages.
Carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is becoming an important option to achieve net zero climate targets. This paper develops a welfare and public economics perspective on optimal policies for carbon removal and storage in non-permanent sinks like forests, soil, oceans, wood products or chemical products. We derive a new metric for the valuation of non-permanent carbon storage, the social cost of carbon removal (SCC-R), which embeds also the conventional social cost of carbon emissions. We show that the contribution of CDR is to create new carbon sinks that should be used to reduce transition costs, even if the stored carbon is released to the atmosphere eventually. Importantly, CDR does not raise the ambition of optimal temperature levels unless initial atmospheric carbon stocks are excessively high. For high initial atmospheric carbon stocks, CDR allows to reduce the optimal temperature below initial levels. Finally, we characterize three different policy regimes that ensure an optimal deployment of carbon removal: downstream carbon pricing, upstream carbon pricing, and carbon storage pricing. The policy regimes differ in their informational and institutional requirements regarding monitoring, liability and financing.
Self-efficacy reflects the self-belief that one can persistently perform difficult and novel tasks while coping with adversity. As such beliefs reflect how individuals behave, think, and act, they are key for successful entrepreneurial activities. While existing literature mainly analyzes the influence of the task-related construct of entrepreneurial self-efficacy, we take a different perspective and investigate, based on a representative sample of 1,405 German business founders, how the personality characteristic of generalized self-efficacy influences start-up performance as measured by a broad set of business outcomes up to 19 months after business creation. Outcomes include start-up survival and entrepreneurial income, as well as growth-oriented outcomes such as job creation and innovation. We find statistically significant and economically important positive effects of high scores of self-efficacy on start-up survival and entrepreneurial income, which become even stronger when focusing on the growth-oriented outcome of innovation. Furthermore, we observe that generalized self-efficacy is similarly distributed between female and male business founders, with effects being partly stronger for female entrepreneurs. Our findings are important for policy instruments that are meant to support firm growth by facilitating the design of more target-oriented offers for training, coaching, and entrepreneurial incubators.
What is it good for?
(2023)
Military conflicts and wars affect a country’s development in various dimensions. Rising inflation rates are a potentially important economic effect associated with conflict. High inflation can undermine investment, weigh on private consumption, and threaten macroeconomic stability. Furthermore, these effects are not necessarily restricted to the locality of the conflict, but can also spill over to other countries. Therefore, to understand how conflict affects the economy and to make a more comprehensive assessment of the costs of armed conflict, it is important to take inflationary effects into account. To disentangle the conflict-inflation-nexus and to quantify this relationship, we conduct a panel analysis for 175 countries over the period 1950–2019. To capture indirect inflationary effects, we construct a distance based spillover index. In general, the results of our analysis confirm a statistically significant positive direct association between conflicts and inflation rates. This finding is robust across various model specifications. Moreover, our results indicate that conflict induced inflation is not solely driven by increasing money supply. Furthermore, we document a statistically significant positive indirect association between conflicts and inflation rates in uninvolved countries.
Divergent thinking is the ability to produce numerous and diverse responses to questions or tasks, and it is used as a predictor of creative achievement. It plays a significant role in the business organization’s innovation process and the recognition of new business opportunities. Drawing upon the cumulative process model of creativity in entrepreneurship, we hypothesize that divergent thinking has a lasting effect on post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes related to innovation and growth, but that this relation might not always be linear. Additionally, we hypothesize that domain-specific experience has a moderating role in this relation. We test our hypotheses based on a representative longitudinal sample of 457 German business founders, which we observe up until 40 months after start-up. We find strong relative effects for innovation and growth outcomes. For survival we find conclusive evidence for non-linearities in the effects of divergent thinking. Additionally, we show that such effects are moderated by the type of domain-specific experience that entrepreneurs gathered pre-launch, as it shapes the individual’s ideational abilities to fit into more sophisticated strategies regarding entrepreneurial creative achievement. Our findings have relevant policy implications in characterizing and identifying business start-ups with growth and innovation potential, allowing a more efficient allocation of public and private funds.
We analyze the impact of women’s managerial representation on the gender pay gap among employees on the establishment level using German Linked-Employer-Employee-Data from the years 2004 to 2018. For identification of a causal effect we employ a panel model with establishment fixed effects and industry-specific time dummies. Our results show that a higher share of women in management significantly reduces the gender pay gap within the firm. An increase in the share of women in first-level management e.g. from zero to above 33 percent decreases the adjusted gender pay gap from a baseline of 15 percent by 1.2 percentage points, i.e. to roughly 14 percent. The effect is stronger for women in second-level than first-level management, indicating that women managers with closer interactions with their subordinates have a higher impact on the gender pay gap than women on higher management levels. The results are similar for East and West Germany, despite the lower gender pay gap and more gender egalitarian social norms in East Germany. From a policy perspective, we conclude that increasing the number of women in management positions has the potential to reduce the gender pay gap to a limited extent. However, further policy measures will be needed in order to fully close the gender gap in pay.
This paper studies the effect of public child care on mothers’ career trajectories. To this end, we combine county-level data on child care coverage with detailed individual-level information from the German social security records and exploit a set of German reforms leading to a substantial temporal and spatial variation in child care coverage for children under the age of three. We conduct an event study approach that investigates the labor market outcomes of mothers in the years around the birth of their first child. We thereby explore career trajectories, both in terms of quantity and quality of employment. We find that public child care improves maternal labor supply in the years immediately following childbirth. However, the results on quality-related outcomes suggest that the effect of child care provision does not reach far beyond pure employment effects. These results do not change for mothers with different ‘career costs of children’.
Optimal carbon pricing with fluctuating energy prices — emission targeting vs. price targeting
(2022)
Prices of primary energy commodities display marked fluctuations over time. Market-based climate policy instruments (e.g., emissions pricing) create incentives to reduce energy consumption by increasing the user cost of fossil energy. This raises the question of whether climate policy should respond to fluctuations in fossil energy prices? We study this question within an environmental dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (E-DSGE) model calibrated on the German economy. Our results indicate that the welfare implications of dynamic emissions pricing crucially depend on how the revenues are used. When revenues are fully absorbed, a reduction in emissions prices stabilizes the economy in response to energy price shocks. However, when revenues are at least partially recycled, a stable emissions price improves overall welfare. This result is robust to different modeling assumptions.
This paper analyzes the effect of new bicycle lanes on traffic volume, congestion, and accidents. Crucially, the new bike lanes replace existing car lanes thereby reducing available space for motorized traffic. In order to obtain causal estimates, I exploit the quasi-random timing and location of the newly built cycle lanes. Using an event study design, a two-way fixed effects model and the synthetic control group method on geo-coded data, I show that the construction of pop-up bike lanes significantly reduced average car speed by 8 to 12 percentage points (p.p.) and up to 16 p.p. in peak traffic hours. In contrast, the results for car volume are modest, while the data does not allow for a conclusive judgment of accidents.
Ticket to Paradise?
(2022)
This paper provides novel evidence on the impact of public transport subsidies on air pollution. We obtain causal estimates by leveraging a unique policy intervention in Germany that temporarily reduced nationwide prices for regional public transport to a monthly flat rate price of 9 Euros. Us-ing DiD estimation strategies on air pollutant data, we show that this intervention causally reduced a benchmark air pollution index by more than six percent. Our results illustrate that public transport subsidies – especially in the context of spatially constrained cities – offer a viable alterna-tive for policymakers and city planers to improve air quality, which has been shown to crucially affect health outcomes.
Predicting entrepreneurial development based on individual and business-related characteristics is a key objective of entrepreneurship research. In this context, we investigate whether the motives of becoming an entrepreneur influence the subsequent entrepreneurial development. In our analysis, we examine a broad range of business outcomes including survival and income, as well as job creation, expansion and innovation activities for up to 40 months after business formation. Using self-determination theory as conceptual background, we aggregate the start-up motives into a continuous motivational index. We show – based on a unique dataset of German start-ups from unemployment and non-unemployment – that the later business performance is better, the higher they score on this index. Effects are particularly strong for growth oriented outcomes like innovation and expansion activities. In a next step, we examine three underlying motivational categories that we term opportunity, career ambition, and necessity. We show that individuals driven by opportunity motives perform better in terms of innovation and business expansion activities, while career ambition is positively associated with survival, income, and the probability of hiring employees. All effects are robust to the inclusion of a large battery of covariates that are proven to be important determinants of entrepreneurial performance.