Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (29) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (16)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Course Material (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Review (2)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Postprint (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (29)
Keywords
- L2 German (2)
- Lehrkräftebildung (2)
- Sprachbildung (2)
- case-animacy (2)
- sentence interpretation (2)
- Akzeptanz (1)
- Barocklyrik (1)
- Barockpoetik (1)
- Bildungssprache (1)
- Brockes (1)
Institute
- Institut für Germanistik (29) (remove)
Während der hemdsärmelige Reporter lediglich für den Tag schreibt, schafft der Literat Texte für die Ewigkeit. Mit diesem über Jahrhunderte tradierten Klischee brechen zwei Autoren ganz bewusst, die in beiden Bereichen erfolgreich sind: Joseph Roth und Tom Wolfe - in Personalunion Journalisten wie Literaten - hinterfragen den Wertungsunterschied, der gemeinhin zwischen den Bereichen gemacht wird. Fanny Opitz zeichnet die diskursiven Umfelder nach, in denen die Debatte um die Leistung von Journalismus und Literatur breit geführt wurde: im Deutschland der 1920er Jahre im Kontext der gesamtkulturellen Strömung der Neuen Sachlichkeit und im US-amerikanischen New Journalism der 1960er und 1970er Jahre.
Of Sources and Files
(2019)
Files produced by the secret police forces of former Eastern Bloc countries are complex documents, not completely reliable and yet not fully untrustworthy either—or as the British historian Timothy Garton Ash has remarked, “There is a truth that can be found [in a secret police file]. Not a single, absolute Truth with a capital T but still a real and important one” (2002, 282). As historical documents—texts anchored in a time and place and resulting from specific circumstances—files in general “supplement or rework ‘reality’” and are never “mere sources that divulge facts about ‘reality’” (LaCapra 1985, 11)
Introduction
(2019)
Trotz unzähliger Forschungsbeiträge zur Literaturnobelpreisträgerin Elfriede Jelinek und dem „Verweigerungskünstler“ Thomas Bernhard wurde den Verbindungslinien beider Autoren noch nie vergleichend nachgegangen. Der Band erschließt zum 30. Todestag Bernhards (u. 15 Jahre Nobelpreis für Jelinek) anschaulich ein breit gefächertes Spektrum an Themen, Perspektiven und Werken beider Schriftsteller im Vergleich. Mit einem Essay von Elfriede Jelinek.
The point of departure of this paper is the claim by Heyvaert, Maekelberghe & Buyle (2019) that the suffix -ing has no aspectual meaning in English gerunds. Rather, the interpretation of nominal and verbal gerunds depends, so they argue, on situation or viewpoint aspect, a claim that contradicts the wide-spread view that the aspectual meaning of English gerunds is brought about by the nominalizing suffix. The present paper addresses the issue from a comparative perspective, focusing on German ung-nominals: while they share aspectual features with their English counterparts, empirical evidence from productivity, distribution, and argument linking shows (i) that the derivational suffix -ung imposes aspectual restrictions on possible verb bases, and (ii) that with respect to argument linking, the deverbal nominal favors the state component of a complex event predicate over its process component. From the historical record of German, we learn that these aspectual restrictions do not hold for ung-nominals in earlier periods of German. With the rise of aspectual restrictions, the nominalization pattern turns more nominal resulting in a position further towards the nominal end of the deverbalization continuum. It appears, then, that it is only in the historical pariods of German that ung-nominals pattern with English nominals as regards their aspectual features. Currently, German ung-nominals are more noun-like than nominal (and verbal) gerunds in English. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.