@misc{Lampart2019, author = {Lampart, Fabian}, title = {Rezension zu: Agethen, Matthias: Vergemeinschaftung, Modernisierung, Verausgabung : National{\"o}konomie und Erz{\"a}hlliteratur in der zweiten H{\"a}lfte des 19. Jahrhunderts. - G{\"o}ttingen: V \& R unipress, 2018. - (Literatur- und Mediengeschichte der Moderne ; 5). - Zugl.: Diss., M{\"u}nster, 2017. - ISBN: 978-3-8471-0788-0}, series = {Scientia poetica : Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften}, volume = {23}, journal = {Scientia poetica : Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften}, number = {1}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, Boston}, issn = {1431-5041}, doi = {10.1515/scipo-2019-030}, pages = {358 -- 364}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Opitz2019, author = {Opitz, Fanny}, title = {Literarische Journalisten - journalistische Literaten}, publisher = {transcript}, address = {Bielefeld}, isbn = {978-3-8394-5460-2}, doi = {10.14361/9783839454602}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2019}, abstract = {W{\"a}hrend der hemds{\"a}rmelige Reporter lediglich f{\"u}r den Tag schreibt, schafft der Literat Texte f{\"u}r die Ewigkeit. Mit diesem {\"u}ber Jahrhunderte tradierten Klischee brechen zwei Autoren ganz bewusst, die in beiden Bereichen erfolgreich sind: Joseph Roth und Tom Wolfe - in Personalunion Journalisten wie Literaten - hinterfragen den Wertungsunterschied, der gemeinhin zwischen den Bereichen gemacht wird. Fanny Opitz zeichnet die diskursiven Umfelder nach, in denen die Debatte um die Leistung von Journalismus und Literatur breit gef{\"u}hrt wurde: im Deutschland der 1920er Jahre im Kontext der gesamtkulturellen Str{\"o}mung der Neuen Sachlichkeit und im US-amerikanischen New Journalism der 1960er und 1970er Jahre.}, language = {de} } @article{Petrescu2019, author = {Petrescu, Corina L.}, title = {Of Sources and Files}, series = {Cold War spy stories from Eastern Europe}, journal = {Cold War spy stories from Eastern Europe}, publisher = {University of Nebraska Press}, address = {Lincoln}, isbn = {978-1-64012-200-0}, doi = {10.2307/j.ctvhhhgcw.9}, pages = {137 -- 159}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Files produced by the secret police forces of former Eastern Bloc countries are complex documents, not completely reliable and yet not fully untrustworthy either—or as the British historian Timothy Garton Ash has remarked, "There is a truth that can be found [in a secret police file]. Not a single, absolute Truth with a capital T but still a real and important one" (2002, 282). As historical documents—texts anchored in a time and place and resulting from specific circumstances—files in general "supplement or rework 'reality'" and are never "mere sources that divulge facts about 'reality'" (LaCapra 1985, 11)}, language = {en} } @misc{LewisGlajarPetrescu2019, author = {Lewis, Alison and Glajar, Valentina and Petrescu, Corina L.}, title = {Introduction}, series = {Cold War Spy Stories from Eastern Europe}, journal = {Cold War Spy Stories from Eastern Europe}, publisher = {University of Nebraska Press}, address = {Lincoln}, isbn = {978-1-64012-200-0}, pages = {1 -- 26}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @article{Goetze2019, author = {G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, title = {Dieses Interview hat mich v{\"o}llig dekonstruiert}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-010}, pages = {113 -- 129}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{OPUS4-50491, title = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, journal = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, editor = {Reinert, Bastian and G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675}, pages = {274}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Trotz unz{\"a}hliger Forschungsbeitr{\"a}ge zur Literaturnobelpreistr{\"a}gerin Elfriede Jelinek und dem „Verweigerungsk{\"u}nstler" Thomas Bernhard wurde den Verbindungslinien beider Autoren noch nie vergleichend nachgegangen. Der Band erschließt zum 30. Todestag Bernhards (u. 15 Jahre Nobelpreis f{\"u}r Jelinek) anschaulich ein breit gef{\"a}chertes Spektrum an Themen, Perspektiven und Werken beider Schriftsteller im Vergleich. Mit einem Essay von Elfriede Jelinek.}, language = {de} } @article{Sorg2019, author = {Sorg, Bernhard}, title = {Zur Konstruktion eines transzendentalen {\"a}sthetischen Subjekts bei Bernhard und Jelinek}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-008}, pages = {89 -- 99}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Jelinek2019, author = {Jelinek, Elfriede}, title = {Der Einzige und wir, sein Eigentum : ein Nachruf auf Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard : Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard : Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-002}, pages = {11 -- 14}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{MeyerKalkus2019, author = {Meyer-Kalkus, Reinhart}, title = {Dramenvorlesen als Kunst - das Beispiel Ludwig Tiecks}, series = {Belebungsk{\"u}nste : Praktiken lebendiger Darstellung in Literatur, Kunst und Wissenschaft um 1800}, journal = {Belebungsk{\"u}nste : Praktiken lebendiger Darstellung in Literatur, Kunst und Wissenschaft um 1800}, publisher = {Fink}, address = {Paderborn}, isbn = {978-3-7705-6292-3}, doi = {10.30965/9783846762929_005}, pages = {61 -- 82}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Demske2019, author = {Demske, Ulrike}, title = {Aspectual features and categorial shift}, series = {Language sciences}, volume = {73}, journal = {Language sciences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0388-0001}, doi = {10.1016/j.langsci.2018.08.006}, pages = {50 -- 61}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The point of departure of this paper is the claim by Heyvaert, Maekelberghe \& Buyle (2019) that the suffix -ing has no aspectual meaning in English gerunds. Rather, the interpretation of nominal and verbal gerunds depends, so they argue, on situation or viewpoint aspect, a claim that contradicts the wide-spread view that the aspectual meaning of English gerunds is brought about by the nominalizing suffix. The present paper addresses the issue from a comparative perspective, focusing on German ung-nominals: while they share aspectual features with their English counterparts, empirical evidence from productivity, distribution, and argument linking shows (i) that the derivational suffix -ung imposes aspectual restrictions on possible verb bases, and (ii) that with respect to argument linking, the deverbal nominal favors the state component of a complex event predicate over its process component. From the historical record of German, we learn that these aspectual restrictions do not hold for ung-nominals in earlier periods of German. With the rise of aspectual restrictions, the nominalization pattern turns more nominal resulting in a position further towards the nominal end of the deverbalization continuum. It appears, then, that it is only in the historical pariods of German that ung-nominals pattern with English nominals as regards their aspectual features. Currently, German ung-nominals are more noun-like than nominal (and verbal) gerunds in English. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} }