Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (185)
Year of publication
- 2021 (185) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (185) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (185)
Keywords
- cultural conceptualizations (3)
- Mittelschicht (2)
- browser platforms (2)
- digital platforms (2)
- knowledge management (2)
- platform innovation (2)
- 4IR (1)
- 4th industrial revolution (1)
- African English (1)
- Ali Smith (1)
Institute
- Bürgerliches Recht (64)
- Öffentliches Recht (25)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (20)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (14)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (10)
- Historisches Institut (7)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (6)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (5)
- Institut für Jüdische Theologie (5)
- Institut für Romanistik (5)
- Strafrecht (5)
- Philosophische Fakultät (4)
- Sozialwissenschaften (4)
- Institut für Künste und Medien (3)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (2)
- Institut für Germanistik (2)
- Institut für Philosophie (2)
- Abraham Geiger Kolleg gGmbH (1)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (1)
- Department Musik und Kunst (1)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (1)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (1)
- Klassische Philologie (1)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek (1)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1)
- Zentrum für Qualitätsentwicklung in Lehre und Studium (ZfQ) (1)
Choice-Based Conjointanalyse
(2021)
Die auswahlbasierte oder auch Choice-Based Conjointanalyse (CBC) ist die derzeit wohl beliebteste Variante der Conjointanalyse. Gründe dafür bestehen einerseits in der leichten Verfügbarkeit benutzerfreundlicher Software (z.B. R, Sawtooth Software), andererseits weist das Verfahren aufgrund seiner Sonderstellung auch aus methodischer sowie praktischer Sicht Stärken auf. So werden bei einer CBC im Gegensatz zur bewertungsbasierten Conjointanalyse keine Präferenzurteile, sondern diskrete Entscheidungen der Auskunftspersonen erhoben und ausgewertet. Bei der CBC handelt es sich also genau genommen um eine Discrete Choice Analyse (DCA), die auf ein conjointanalytisches Erhebungsdesign angewandt wird. Beide Bezeichnungen werden nach wie vor verwendet, die Methodik wird in diesem Kapitel grundlegend und anhand eines Anwendungsbeispiels diskutiert.
Government as a platform?
(2021)
Digital platforms, by their design, allow the coordination of multiple entities to achieve a common goal. Motivated by the success of platforms in the private sector, they increasingly receive attention in the public sector. However, different understandings of the platform concept prevail. To guide the development and further research a coherent understanding is required. To address this gap, we identify the constitutive elements of platforms in the public sector. Moreover, their potential to coordinate partially autonomous entities as typical for federal organized states is highlighted.
This study contributes through a uniform understanding of public service platforms. Despite constitutive elements, the proposed framework for platforms in the public sector may guide future analysis. The analysis framework is applied to platforms of federal states in the European Union.
Software platforms regularly introduce new features to remain competitive. While platform innovation is considered to be a critical success factor, adding certain features could hurt the ecosystem. If platform owners provide functionality that was previously provided by a contributor, the owners enter complementary product spaces. Complementary market entry frequently occurs on software platforms and is a major concern for third-party developers.
Divergent findings on the impact of complementary market entry call for the consideration of additional factors. As prior research neglected the third-party perspective, this contribution aims to address this gap. We explore the use of measures to prevent complementary market entry using a survey approach on browser platforms. The research model is tested with 655 responses among developer from Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome. To explain countermeasures employment, developer’s attitude and perceived likelihood are important. The results reveal that developers employ countermeasures if complementary market entry is assessed negatively and perceived as likely for their extension. Differences among browser platforms concerning complementary market entry are identified. Product spaces of extensions being available on multiple platforms are less likely to be entered and more heavily protected. Implications for research and stakeholders, i.e. platform owners and contributors are discussed.
Modern browsers are digital software platforms, as they allow third parties to extend functionality by providing extensions. In a highly competitive environment, differentiation through provided functionality is a key factor for browser platforms. As the development of browsers progress, new functions are constantly being released. Browsers could thus enter complementary markets by adding functionality previously provided by third-party extensions, which is referred to as ‘platform coring’. Previous studies have missed the perspective of the parties involved. To address this gap, we conducted interviews with third-party and core developers in the security and privacy domain from Firefox and Chrome. This study provides three contributions. First, insights into stakeholder-specific issues concerning coring. Second, measures to prevent coring. Third, strategical guidance for developers and owners. Third-party vendors experienced and core developers confirmed that coring occurs on browser platforms. While developers with extrinsic motivations assess coring negatively, developers with intrinsic motivations perceive coring positively.
§ 256 Nichtigkeit
(2021)
Smend, Rudolf
(2021)