Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (12)
- 2022 (16)
- 2021 (17)
- 2020 (28)
- 2019 (17)
- 2018 (16)
- 2017 (13)
- 2016 (13)
- 2015 (17)
- 2014 (18)
- 2013 (36)
- 2012 (31)
- 2011 (85)
- 2010 (41)
- 2009 (39)
- 2008 (45)
- 2007 (27)
- 2006 (36)
- 2005 (39)
- 2004 (38)
- 2003 (36)
- 2002 (22)
- 2001 (44)
- 2000 (31)
- 1999 (36)
- 1998 (34)
- 1997 (23)
- 1996 (28)
- 1995 (17)
- 1994 (20)
- 1993 (10)
- 1992 (1)
- 1991 (3)
Document Type
- Article (889) (remove)
Language
- German (889) (remove)
Keywords
- 1799-1804 (14)
- Kosmos (11)
- Briefe (9)
- Carl Friedrich Gauß (9)
- Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg (9)
- BBAW (8)
- neu gelesen (8)
- von Humboldts Hand (8)
- Berlin (7)
- Briefwechsel (7)
Institute
- Institut für Romanistik (889) (remove)
KRB hat an anderer Stelle das Technikverständnis Alexander von Humboldts behandelt und ihn als "geistigen Ahnherrn der Förderung industriellen Fortschritts" gewürdigt. Hier und heute sei Humboldts frühes Interesse an der Anwendung der Botanik belegt, um dem Bevölkerungswachstum, der Preissteigerung bei Lebensmitteln, der Zerrüttung der Staatsfinanzen, dem einreißenden Mangel durch Erschließung neuer Nahrungsquellen, Nutzung ignorierter Naturkräfte und Schaffung neuer Arbeitsplätze zu steuern. Dabei beachtete Humboldt, nahezu noch ein Teenager, bereits ökologische Gesichtspunkte.
In letters to trusted friends and in conversations Humboldt often showed an inclination to make fun of persons, institutions and situations. In most cases he did this tongue in cheek, rarely hurting people seriously. A special target of Humboldt’s ironical remarks was the Prussian ministry of education and culture because of its animosity to the natural sciences which Humboldt wanted to promote. Often Humboldt expressed his frustration about narrow-mindedness and arrogance which he observed in his hometown of Berlin. Sometimes he had reasons to criticize the Prussian Academies of Sciences and of Arts. Humboldt had a fine sense of humor and many critical remarks can only be understood in the context in which they were made. The reader should therefore be warned, not to take any ironical or sarcastic characterization of a person or an institution literally.
This article argues that a "Memoir about the Spanish Colonies in South America" allegedly written by Alexander von Humboldt in 1818 for the Holy Alliance’s Conference at Aix-la-Chapelle in reality never existed and therefore could not serve as an impediment to Humboldt’s effort to visit India.
The present paper investigates the conceptual development of Alexander on Humboldt. The point of reference is his relation to Schelling and to a series of investigators of nature and of physicians closely connected to Naturphilosophie. It is shown that in the correspondence of Humboldt with this group the content underwent a transformation. Scientific exchanges and a general interpretative consensus were over the years more and more replaced by social cooperation over academic appointments, and collaboration over other political problems within the scientific establishment. Humboldt fit Schelling and other partners with whom he cooperated into a network of relationships that rested on mutual social support.
Alexander von Humboldt has been characterized as the second, scientific discoverer of the New World, as the last universal scientist, Aristotle of modern times, etc. However, more or less hidden in his correspondence we find certain self-characterizations which are not that well-known. Some of them are quoted and discussed in the paper. Thus, an attempt is made to answer the question why Humboldt liked to call himself "the old man from the mountains", and whether or not he found it appropriate to be called "Aristotle of our age."
On the 17th of July 1800 Alexander von Humboldt was elected as an extraordinary member of the Prussian Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres at Berlin. The paper first deals with Humboldt’s scientific activities before his election and then goes into detail as far as his integration into the work of the Academy is concerned. Humboldt was elected as a chimiste célèbre, but as a member of the Academy he did not work as a chemist. When Humboldt proposed in 1837 to classify the members of each class in special fields, he chose for himself the field of "mineralogy-geology".
Unterwegs zum Weltbewußtsein
(2000)
Towards Global Consciousness. Alexander von Humboldt's Conception of Science and the emerging ethical Weltanschauung. In the context of recent reflections upon global ethics (Hans Küng), global democracy (Otfried Höffe) and a new cultural situation after the end of the Cold War (Clifford Geertz), Alexander von Humboldt's concept of global consciousness (Weltbewußtsein) marks a decisive point in the ungoing process of the construction of a new ethics of globalization. This article tries to show how Humboldt's transdisciplinary and intercultural conception of sience as WorldWideWeb integrates Kant's philosophical visions of global political institutions and formulates a critique of the non-empirical foundations of Hegel's teleological Weltanschauung. From his Visions of Nature and his Personal Narrative to his Cosmos, Humboldt's theory and practice of science help us to find a new ethos and new answers to the contemporary questions of divergent modernities.
Enthaltener Parallelsachtitel des Werkes: Réserves sur la Passion; Marguerite Duras et la métaphorisation du monde. Enthält zusätzlich den Beitrag: Diskussion im Anschluss an den Eröffnungsvortrag am 20. April 2005 im Filmmuseum Potsdam, sowie dessen Parallelsachtitel: Discussion consécutive à la conférence inaugurale du 20 avril 2005, au « Filmmuseum Potsdam » (Musée du cinéma de Potsdam)
Sex trouble
(2006)