800 Literatur und Rhetorik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (35) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Preprint (17)
- Article (8)
- Postprint (6)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Master's Thesis (1)
Language
- English (35) (remove)
Keywords
- Akan (2)
- exhaustivity (2)
- Affekt (1)
- Affektökonomie, Affektökonomien (1)
- Annemarie Schwarzenbach (1)
- Anti-Causatives (1)
- Argument-Structure-Ordering Principle (1)
- Association with Focus (1)
- Awing (1)
- Aymara (1)
Think local sell global
(2010)
Filming illegals
(2013)
Introduction
(2013)
Modality in Kakataibo
(2015)
This paper explores the semantic space of modality in Kakataibo
(Panoan). It is found that Kakataibo makes a distinction in the modal
space based on the modality type. Circumstantial modality is encoded
by a construction while the epistemic space is conveyed by the second
position enclitics =dapi ‘inferential’, =id ‘second-hand information’
and =kuni ‘contrastive assertion’. However, none of these strategies to
encode modality restricts the quantificational force, leaving it
underspecified. These facts are consistent with the predictions of
current typologies of modal systems.
It has been observed for many African languages that focussed subjects
have to appear outside of their syntactic base position, as opposed to
focussed objects, which can remain in-situ. This is known as subjectobject
asymmetry of focus marking, which Fiedler et al. (2010) claim
to hold also for Akan. Genzel (2013), on the other hand, argues that
Akan does not exhibit a subject-object focus asymmetry. A questionnaire
study and a production experiment were carried out to investigate
whether focussed subjects may indeed be realized in-situ in Akan. The
results suggest that (i) focussed subjects do not have to be obligatorily
realized ex-situ, and that (ii) the syntactic preference for the realization
of a focussed subject highly depends on exhaustivity.
Sentence type marking is realized by two suffixes in Aymara, one marks
declaratives and the other polar sentences (polar questions and negated
sentences) by picking out one or two propositions, respectively. A third
suffix, initially associated with wh-questions, turns out to be a (scalar)
additive and unrelated to sentence type. The sentence-type-related suffixes
associate with focus and the additive can associate with focus by
attaching to the focused constituent.