Department Erziehungswissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (43) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (30)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Other (2)
- Postprint (2)
- Review (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (43)
Keywords
- cyberbullying (5)
- Instructional quality (3)
- Teacher beliefs (2)
- Teacher training (2)
- anxiety (2)
- bullying (2)
- bystander (2)
- depression (2)
- empathy (2)
- longitudinal (2)
Institute
In many countries, students are asked about their perceptions of teaching in order to make decisions about the further development of teaching practices on the basis of this feedback. The stability of this measurement of teaching quality is a prerequisite for the ability to generalize the results to other teaching situations. The present study aims to expand the extant empirical body of knowledge on the effects of situational factors on the stability of students’ perceptions of teaching quality. Therefore, we investigate whether the degree of stability is moderated by three situational factors: time between assessments, subjects taught by teachers, and students’ grade levels. To this end, we analyzed data from a web-based student feedback system. The study involved 497 teachers, each of whom conducted two student surveys. We examined the differential stability of student perceptions of 16 teaching constructs that were operationalized as latent correlations between aggregated student perceptions of the same teacher’s teaching. Testing metric invariance indicated that student ratings provided measures of teaching constructs that were invariant across time, subjects, and grade levels. Stability was moderated to some extent by grade level but not by subjects taught nor time spacing between surveys. The results provide evidence of the extent to which situational factors may affect the stability of student perceptions of teaching constructs. The generalizability of the students’ feedback results to other teaching situations is discussed.
When knowing is believing
(2018)
In an effort to understand teachers' technology use, recent scholarship has explored the idea of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK or TPACK). Many studies have used self-reports to measure this knowledge (SR TPCK). Several studies have examined the construct validity of these assessments by analysing the internal relationships of the knowledge domains, but little attention has been paid to how SR TPCK relates to external criteria. We tackled this question of discriminant validity by reanalysing 2 data sets. We used correlation and multiple regression analyses to explore whether conceptually related constructs explain any variance in participants' SR TPCK. In Study 1, we applied this strategy to German pre-service teachers using technology use, attitudinal variables, and objective measures of teachers' knowledge of technology and pedagogy as external criteria. In Study 2, we examined measures of technology knowledge, experience, and pro-technology beliefs for in-service teachers in the United States. Across both studies, a sizeable amount of the variance in SR TPCK is explained by teachers' prior technology use and pro-technology attitudes. In contrast, fact-based tests of technology and pedagogy are distinct from SR TPCK. We discuss implications for these findings and argue that researchers should gather complementary measures in concert.
Die bisherige Forschung zur Lehrerfortbildung fokussierte das Teilnahmeverhalten und die Merkmale von Lehrkräften, die an Fortbildungen teilnehmen. Welche Lehrkräfte hingegen keine Fortbildungen besuchen, blieb bislang ebenso unberücksichtigt wie die Frage, was sie an der Teilnahme hindert. Die vorliegende Studie verfolgt das Ziel, Nicht-Teilnehmer/-innen von Lehrerfortbildungen anhand demografischer und professionsbezogener Merkmale zu beschreiben und die Bedeutung von Teilnahmebarrieren zu analysieren. Die Daten der vorliegenden Untersuchung stammen aus der Lehrkräftebefragung des IQB-Ländervergleichs 2012. Die Stichprobe umfasst mehr als 2400 Lehrkräfte der Sekundarstufe I an allgemeinbildenden Schulen. Als Teilnahmebarrieren konnten die Faktoren Disengagement, Qualitätsmangel, Familie, Kosten und Arbeit identifiziert werden. Die deskriptive Analyse dieser Teilnahmebarrieren zeigt, dass die Gründe gegen Fortbildungsbesuche variieren. Hohe Zustimmungswerte erhalten die Faktoren Arbeit und Qualitätsmangel. Statistisch signifikante Zusammenhänge zwischen Teilnahmebarrieren und Fortbildungsaktivität ergeben sich hingegen für die Faktoren Disengagement und Qualitätsmangel. Die Befunde deuten darauf hin, dass u. a. ein geringes Interesse sowie die wahrgenommene Qualität des Fortbildungsangebots die Entscheidung zur Teilnahme beeinflussen.
Für die Analyse der Unterrichtsqualität von Schulen durch Schülerurteile sollten drei Voraussetzungen erfüllt sein: (1) eine angemessene Übereinstimmung der Schülerurteile innerhalb der Schulen, (2) systematische Variabilität der Schülerurteile zwischen Schulen, (3) ein ausreichendes Maß an Reliabilität der aggregierten Urteile. Diese Studie untersucht mit internationalen PISA-Daten (Zyklen 2000–2012; 81 Länder, über 55.300 Schulen, über 1,3 Millionen 15-Jährige), inwiefern dies für Indikatoren der Qualitätsdimensionen des Unterrichts (Klassenführung, Kognitive Aktivierung, Konstruktive Unterstützung) zutrifft. Dafür bestimmten wir das Übereinstimmungsmaß rWG(J) sowie die Intraklassenkorrelationen ICC(1) und ICC(2). Es zeigte sich, dass (1) die Mehrzahl der Unterrichtsmerkmale eine moderate oder starke Übereinstimmung in Schulen aufwies, (2) sich Unterrichtsmerkmale aus Sicht der Schülerschaft systematisch zwischen Schulen unterschieden, jedoch (3) die Reliabilität der aggregierten Schülerurteile in vielen Ländern nicht ausreichte. Die Ergebnisse diskutieren wir vor dem Hintergrund von Konventionen zur Beurteilung der Übereinstimmung, Variabilität und Reliabilität auf Schulebene.
Background:
The overall goal of the project ‘StiEL’ is to contribute to the professional development of teachers and other educational staff working at German secondary schools. The aim is to develop an evidence-based training concept for the inclusion of students with diverse abilities. The project is organized as a collaborative research effort of three partnering institutions and funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research from 2018-2021.
Methods:
To support the on-going transition towards inclusive school practices, a multi-stage approach is envisaged. The first phase aims at a scoping review of existing literature and programmes on inclusion. The overview is supplemented by interviews with school staff members. Training modules are developed in the second project phase. The third phase of StiEL puts the newly developed training program into practice. The knowledge and skills acquired by the participants through the training as well as the teaching and management of inclusive classrooms after the training are evaluated through longitudinal and ethnographic approaches. The final project phase creates a best practice manual and makes the modules available via open access databases.
Results:
The presentation will focus on the first phase and try to explore the health-related consequences of the transition towards an inclusive school system in Germany for different participants. We will present preliminary results of expert interviews as well as some results from the literature screening. Due to our findings the current practice on German schools towards the road to inclusion is very stressful for all participants. We will explore recommendations for health promoting schools under conditions of inclusion.
Conclusions:
In terms of health-related consequences for all participants, the road to inclusion is very ambitious but also very stressful. Regarding the development of an inclusive school system, we need to focus much more on health and health promotion.
Ein diagnostisches Ziel der „Profilanalyse nach Grießhaber“ ist die Testung der grammatischen Fähigkeit zur Verbstellung im Deutschen. Zur erstmaligen Evaluation der Testgüte wurden 403 ein- und mehrsprachige Grundschulkinder randomisiert drei verschiedenen Testmaterialien zugewiesen: Testmaterial, das die Zielkompetenz spezifisch stimulierte, führte zu den besten Testergebnissen. Dies spricht für eine geringe Durchführungsobjektivität. Zudem wurden Deckeneffekte für Grundschulkinder nachgewiesen, weshalb die Profilanalyse nur wenig zwischen den Grammatikfähigkeiten der Kinder differenzieren kann. Auch die Retest-Reliabilität und Auswertungsobjektivität sind noch zu gering. Zusammenfassend wird die Testgüte hinsichtlich aller betrachteten Testgütekriterien als verbesserungswürdig bewertet. Daraus werden die Empfehlungen abgeleitet, die Profilanalyse stärker zu standardisieren und um sensitivere diagnostische Kriterien für das Grundschulalter zu ergänzen. Weitere Ziele der Profilanalyse, z. B. die Verbesserung diagnostischer Kompetenzen von Lehrkräften, sind in Folgeprojekten zu evaluieren.
Effects of achievement differences for internal/external frame of reference model investigations
(2018)
Background
Achievement in math and achievement in verbal school subjects are more strongly correlated than the respective academic self-concepts. The internal/external frame of reference model (I/E model; Marsh, 1986, Am. Educ. Res. J., 23, 129) explains this finding by social and dimensional comparison processes. We investigated a key assumption of the model that dimensional comparisons mainly depend on the difference in achievement between subjects. We compared correlations between subject-specific self-concepts of groups of elementary and secondary school students with or without achievement differences in the respective subjects.
Aims
The main goals were (1) to show that effects of dimensional comparisons depend to a large degree on the existence of achievement differences between subjects, (2) to demonstrate the generalizability of findings over different grade levels and self-concept scales, and (3) to test a rarely used correlation comparison approach (CCA) for the investigation of I/E model assumptions.
Samples
We analysed eight German elementary and secondary school student samples (grades 3–8) from three independent studies (Ns 326–878).
Method
Correlations between math and German self-concepts of students with identical grades in the respective subjects were compared with the correlation of self-concepts of students having different grades using Fisher's Z test for independent samples.
Results
In all samples, correlations between math self-concept and German self-concept were higher for students having identical grades than for students having different grades. Differences in median correlations had small effect sizes for elementary school students and moderate effect sizes for secondary school students.
Conclusions
Findings generalized over grades and indicated a developmental aspect in self-concept formation. The CCA complements investigations within I/E-research.