• search hit 7 of 69
Back to Result List

Kalman filter and its modern extensions for the continuous-time nonlinear filtering problem

  • This paper is concerned with the filtering problem in continuous time. Three algorithmic solution approaches for this problem are reviewed: (i) the classical Kalman-Bucy filter, which provides an exact solution for the linear Gaussian problem; (ii) the ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF), which is an approximate filter and represents an extension of the Kalman-Bucy filter to nonlinear problems; and (iii) the feedback particle filter (FPF), which represents an extension of the EnKBF and furthermore provides for a consistent solution in the general nonlinear, non-Gaussian case. The common feature of the three algorithms is the gain times error formula to implement the update step (to account for conditioning due to the observations) in the filter. In contrast to the commonly used sequential Monte Carlo methods, the EnKBF and FPF avoid the resampling of the particles in the importance sampling update step. Moreover, the feedback control structure provides for error correction potentially leading to smaller simulation variance andThis paper is concerned with the filtering problem in continuous time. Three algorithmic solution approaches for this problem are reviewed: (i) the classical Kalman-Bucy filter, which provides an exact solution for the linear Gaussian problem; (ii) the ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF), which is an approximate filter and represents an extension of the Kalman-Bucy filter to nonlinear problems; and (iii) the feedback particle filter (FPF), which represents an extension of the EnKBF and furthermore provides for a consistent solution in the general nonlinear, non-Gaussian case. The common feature of the three algorithms is the gain times error formula to implement the update step (to account for conditioning due to the observations) in the filter. In contrast to the commonly used sequential Monte Carlo methods, the EnKBF and FPF avoid the resampling of the particles in the importance sampling update step. Moreover, the feedback control structure provides for error correction potentially leading to smaller simulation variance and improved stability properties. The paper also discusses the issue of nonuniqueness of the filter update formula and formulates a novel approximation algorithm based on ideas from optimal transport and coupling of measures. Performance of this and other algorithms is illustrated for a numerical example.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Amirhossein Taghvaei, Jana de WiljesORCiDGND, Prashant G. Mehta, Sebastian ReichORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037780
ISSN:0022-0434
ISSN:1528-9028
Title of parent work (English):Journal of dynamic systems measurement and control
Publisher:ASME
Place of publishing:New York
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2017/07/31
Publication year:2017
Release date:2022/01/19
Volume:140
Issue:3
Number of pages:11
Funding institution:Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) Fellowship at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC); National Science Foundation (NSF)National Science Foundation (NSF) [1334987, 1462773]; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)German Research Foundation (DFG) [CRC 1114, CRC 1294]
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Mathematik
DDC classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 51 Mathematik / 510 Mathematik
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.