Do unions shape political ideologies at work?
- Labor unions’ greatest potential for political influence likely arises from their direct connection to millions of individuals at the workplace. There, they may change the ideological positions of both unionizing workers and their non-unionizing management. In this paper, we analyze the workplace-level impact of unionization on workers’ and managers’ political campaign contributions over the 1980-2016 period in the United States. To do so, we link establishment-level union election data with transaction-level campaign contributions to federal and local candidates. In a difference-in-differences design that we validate with regression discontinuity tests and a novel instrumental variables approach, we find that unionization leads to a leftward shift of campaign contributions. Unionization increases the support for Democrats relative to Republicans not only among workers but also among managers, which speaks against an increase in political cleavages between the two groups. We provide evidence that our results are not driven byLabor unions’ greatest potential for political influence likely arises from their direct connection to millions of individuals at the workplace. There, they may change the ideological positions of both unionizing workers and their non-unionizing management. In this paper, we analyze the workplace-level impact of unionization on workers’ and managers’ political campaign contributions over the 1980-2016 period in the United States. To do so, we link establishment-level union election data with transaction-level campaign contributions to federal and local candidates. In a difference-in-differences design that we validate with regression discontinuity tests and a novel instrumental variables approach, we find that unionization leads to a leftward shift of campaign contributions. Unionization increases the support for Democrats relative to Republicans not only among workers but also among managers, which speaks against an increase in political cleavages between the two groups. We provide evidence that our results are not driven by compositional changes of the workforce and are weaker in states with Right-to-Work laws where unions can invest fewer resources in political activities.…
Author details: | Johannes Matzat, Aiko SchmeißerORCiDGND |
---|---|
Handle: | https://hdl.handle.net/10419/271945 |
ISSN: | 2364-1428 |
ISSN: | 1617-9595 |
Title of parent work (English): | CESifo Working Paper |
Publisher: | CESifo GmbH (Münchener Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft) |
Place of publishing: | München |
Publication type: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Date of first publication: | 2023/02/24 |
Publication year: | 2023 |
Release date: | 2024/04/11 |
Tag: | campaign contributions; labor unions; political ideology; worker-manager relations |
Issue: | 10301 |
Number of pages: | 61 |
Organizational units: | Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre |
DDC classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft |
Publishing method: | Open Access |
Peer review: | Nicht ermittelbar |
License (German): | Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz |