• Treffer 9 von 30
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity

  • We develop a model of optimal carbon taxation and redistribution taking into account horizontal equity concerns by considering heterogeneous energy efficiencies. By deriving first- and second-best rules for policy instruments including carbon taxes, transfers and energy subsidies, we then investigate analytically how horizontal equity is considered in the social welfare maximizing tax structure. We calibrate the model to German household data and a 30 percent emission reduction goal. Our results show that energy-intensive households should receive more redistributive resources than energy-efficient households if and only if social inequality aversion is sufficiently high. We further find that redistribution of carbon tax revenue via household-specific transfers is the first-best policy. Equal per-capita transfers do not suffer from informational problems, but increase mitigation costs by around 15 percent compared to the first- best for unity inequality aversion. Adding renewable energy subsidies or non-linear energy subsidies, reducesWe develop a model of optimal carbon taxation and redistribution taking into account horizontal equity concerns by considering heterogeneous energy efficiencies. By deriving first- and second-best rules for policy instruments including carbon taxes, transfers and energy subsidies, we then investigate analytically how horizontal equity is considered in the social welfare maximizing tax structure. We calibrate the model to German household data and a 30 percent emission reduction goal. Our results show that energy-intensive households should receive more redistributive resources than energy-efficient households if and only if social inequality aversion is sufficiently high. We further find that redistribution of carbon tax revenue via household-specific transfers is the first-best policy. Equal per-capita transfers do not suffer from informational problems, but increase mitigation costs by around 15 percent compared to the first- best for unity inequality aversion. Adding renewable energy subsidies or non-linear energy subsidies, reduces mitigation costs further without relying on observability of households’ energy efficiency.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • cepa28.pdfeng
    (663KB)

    SHA-512:168e403e355b9141509d780084577ceb045ac5d7430097cac0402f8bbd06bc0717accaeb053ea8cc18696fa06952dbfc54cd87efa3b03ede203715918890f567

Metadaten exportieren

Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Martin C. HänselORCiDGND, Max FranksORCiDGND, Matthias KalkuhlORCiDGND, Ottmar EdenhoferORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-498128
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-49812
ISSN:2628-653X
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):CEPA Discussion Papers
Untertitel (Englisch):A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):CEPA Discussion Papers (28)
Publikationstyp:Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:11.03.2021
Erscheinungsjahr:2021
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:11.03.2021
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:carbon price; climate policy; horizontal equity; just transition; redistribution; renewable energy subsidies
Ausgabe:28
Seitenanzahl:51
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:QT 800, QT 200, QD 020, AR 28100
Organisationseinheiten:Extern / Extern
Zentrale und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen / Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA)
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Peer Review:Nicht referiert
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.