• search hit 64 of 2397
Back to Result List

Resurrecting organization without renouncing society

  • In a recent article in this journal, Ahrne, Brunsson, and Seidl (2016) suggest a definition of organization as a ‘decided social order’ composed of five elements (membership, rules, hierarchies, monitoring, and sanctions) which rest on decisions. ‘Partial organization’ uses only one or a few of these decidable elements while ‘complete organization’ uses them all. Such decided orders may also occur outside formal organizations, as the authors observe. Although we appreciate the idea of improving our understanding of organization(s) in modern society, we believe that Ahrne, Brunsson, and Seidl's suggestion jeopardizes the concept of organization by blurring its specific meaning. As the authors already draw on the work of Niklas Luhmann, we propose taking this exploration a step further and the potential of systems theory more seriously. Organizational analysis would then be able to retain a distinctive notion of formal organization on the one hand while benefiting from an encompassing theory of modern society on the other. With thisIn a recent article in this journal, Ahrne, Brunsson, and Seidl (2016) suggest a definition of organization as a ‘decided social order’ composed of five elements (membership, rules, hierarchies, monitoring, and sanctions) which rest on decisions. ‘Partial organization’ uses only one or a few of these decidable elements while ‘complete organization’ uses them all. Such decided orders may also occur outside formal organizations, as the authors observe. Although we appreciate the idea of improving our understanding of organization(s) in modern society, we believe that Ahrne, Brunsson, and Seidl's suggestion jeopardizes the concept of organization by blurring its specific meaning. As the authors already draw on the work of Niklas Luhmann, we propose taking this exploration a step further and the potential of systems theory more seriously. Organizational analysis would then be able to retain a distinctive notion of formal organization on the one hand while benefiting from an encompassing theory of modern society on the other. With this extended conceptual framework, we would expect to gain a deeper understanding of how organizations implement and shape different societal realms as well as mediate between their particular logics, and, not least, how they are related to non-organizational social forms (e.g. families).show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Maja ApeltGND, Cristina BesioGND, Giancarlo CorsiGND, Victoria von GroddeckORCiD, Michael Grothe-HammerORCiDGND, Veronika TackeGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.01.002
ISSN:0263-2373
ISSN:1873-5681
Title of parent work (English):European management journal
Subtitle (English):a response to Ahrne, Brunsson and Seidl
Publisher:Elsevier Science
Place of publishing:Oxford
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2017/01/31
Publication year:2017
Release date:2022/06/29
Tag:Formal organization; Functional differentiation; Luhmann; Niklas; Organization theory; Organizations and society; Partial organization
Volume:35
Issue:1
Number of pages:7
First page:8
Last Page:14
Organizational units:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Sozialwissenschaften
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.