• Treffer 43 von 662
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Continuous treatment with antidementia drugs in Germany 2003–2013

  • Background: Continuous treatment is an important indicator of medication adherence in dementia. However, long-term studies in larger clinical settings are lacking, and little is known about moderating effects of patient and service characteristics. Methods: Data from 12,910 outpatients with dementia (mean age 79.2 years; SD = 7.6 years) treated between January 2003 and December 2013 in Germany were included. Continuous treatment was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. In addition, multivariate Cox regression models were fitted with continuous treatment as dependent variable and the predictors antidementia agent, age, gender, medical comorbidities, physician specialty, and health insurance status. Results: After one year of follow-up, nearly 60% of patients continued drug treatment. Donezepil (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82-0.95) and memantine (HR: 0.85; 0.79-0.91) patients were less likely to be discontinued treatment as compared to rivastigmine users. Patients were less likely to be discontinued if they were treatedBackground: Continuous treatment is an important indicator of medication adherence in dementia. However, long-term studies in larger clinical settings are lacking, and little is known about moderating effects of patient and service characteristics. Methods: Data from 12,910 outpatients with dementia (mean age 79.2 years; SD = 7.6 years) treated between January 2003 and December 2013 in Germany were included. Continuous treatment was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. In addition, multivariate Cox regression models were fitted with continuous treatment as dependent variable and the predictors antidementia agent, age, gender, medical comorbidities, physician specialty, and health insurance status. Results: After one year of follow-up, nearly 60% of patients continued drug treatment. Donezepil (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82-0.95) and memantine (HR: 0.85; 0.79-0.91) patients were less likely to be discontinued treatment as compared to rivastigmine users. Patients were less likely to be discontinued if they were treated by specialist physicians as compared to general practitioners (HR: 0.44; 0.41-0.48). Younger male patients and patients who had private health insurance had a lower discontinuation risk. Regarding comorbidity, patients were more likely to be continuously treated with the index substance if a diagnosis of heart failure or hypertension had been diagnosed at baseline. Conclusions: Our results imply that besides type of antidementia agent, involvement of a specialist in the complex process of prescribing antidementia drugs can provide meaningful benefits to patients, in terms of more disease-specific and continuous treatment.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • phr522.pdfeng
    (262KB)

    SHA-1: c16e4b7d8ba4c7acc69d631ef4833c93afa0c1c1

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Jens Bohlken, Simon Weber, Michael Armin RappORCiDGND, Karel Kostev
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414718
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-41471
ISSN:1866-8364
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Untertitel (Englisch):a retrospective database analysis
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (522)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:11.02.2019
Erscheinungsjahr:2015
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:11.02.2019
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Alzheimer’s disease; adherence; cholinesterase inhibitors; dementia; memantine; persistence; treatment continuation
Ausgabe:522
Seitenanzahl:8
Quelle:International Psychogeriatrics 27 (2015) 8, pp. 1335–1342 DOI 10.1017/S1041610215000654
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät
DDC-Klassifikation:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access
Fördermittelquelle:Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.