• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Truncation error estimates in process life cycle assessment using input-output analysis

  • Process life cycle assessment (PLCA) is widely used to quantify environmental flows associated with the manufacturing of products and other processes. As PLCA always depends on defining a system boundary, its application involves truncation errors. Different methods of estimating truncation errors are proposed in the literature; most of these are based on artificially constructed system complete counterfactuals. In this article, we review the literature on truncation errors and their estimates and systematically explore factors that influence truncation error estimates. We classify estimation approaches, together with underlying factors influencing estimation results according to where in the estimation procedure they occur. By contrasting different PLCA truncation/error modeling frameworks using the same underlying input-output (I-O) data set and varying cut-off criteria, we show that modeling choices can significantly influence estimates for PLCA truncation errors. In addition, we find that differences in I-O and process inventoryProcess life cycle assessment (PLCA) is widely used to quantify environmental flows associated with the manufacturing of products and other processes. As PLCA always depends on defining a system boundary, its application involves truncation errors. Different methods of estimating truncation errors are proposed in the literature; most of these are based on artificially constructed system complete counterfactuals. In this article, we review the literature on truncation errors and their estimates and systematically explore factors that influence truncation error estimates. We classify estimation approaches, together with underlying factors influencing estimation results according to where in the estimation procedure they occur. By contrasting different PLCA truncation/error modeling frameworks using the same underlying input-output (I-O) data set and varying cut-off criteria, we show that modeling choices can significantly influence estimates for PLCA truncation errors. In addition, we find that differences in I-O and process inventory databases, such as missing service sector activities, can significantly affect estimates of PLCA truncation errors. Our results expose the challenges related to explicit statements on the magnitude of PLCA truncation errors. They also indicate that increasing the strictness of cut-off criteria in PLCA has only limited influence on the resulting truncation errors. We conclude that applying an additional I-O life cycle assessment or a path exchange hybrid life cycle assessment to identify where significant contributions are located in upstream layers could significantly reduce PLCA truncation errors.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Hauke WardORCiDGND, Leonie WenzORCiDGND, Jan Christoph SteckelORCiDGND, Jan Christoph MinxORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12655
ISSN:1088-1980
ISSN:1530-9290
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verlag:Wiley
Verlagsort:Hoboken
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:19.09.2018
Erscheinungsjahr:2018
Datum der Freischaltung:22.09.2021
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:industrial ecology; input-output (I-O) analysis; process life cycle assessment; service sectors; system boundary; truncation error estimate
Band:22
Ausgabe:5
Seitenanzahl:12
Erste Seite:1080
Letzte Seite:1091
Fördernde Institution:German Research Association (DFG)German Research Foundation (DFG); Collaborative Research Center "Sustainable Manufacturing - Shaping Global Value Creation" of Technische Universitat Berlin [1026]; German Environmental Foundation (DBU); European Union Seventh Framework Program FP7/2007-2013 [603864]
Organisationseinheiten:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Geowissenschaften
DDC-Klassifikation:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 55 Geowissenschaften, Geologie / 550 Geowissenschaften
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.