How do people interpret the value concept?
- Value research has a long and extensive history of theoretical definitions and empirical investigations using large scale quantitative surveys. However, the way the general population understands, defines, and relates to the concept of values, and how these views vary across individuals is seldom addressed. The present study examined subjective interpretations of the term through focus group interviews, and reports on the development of a Value Conceptualisation Scale (VCS) that distinguishes six dimensions of different views on values: normativity, relevance, validity, stability, consistency, and awareness. Focus group interviews (n = 38) as well as several surveys (n = 100, n = 1519, n = 903, n = 94) were used to develop, refine, and test the scale in terms of response variety, temporal stability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. These systematic results show that views on values do indeed vary significantly between participants. Correlations with dogmatism, preference for consistency, and metacognition were foundValue research has a long and extensive history of theoretical definitions and empirical investigations using large scale quantitative surveys. However, the way the general population understands, defines, and relates to the concept of values, and how these views vary across individuals is seldom addressed. The present study examined subjective interpretations of the term through focus group interviews, and reports on the development of a Value Conceptualisation Scale (VCS) that distinguishes six dimensions of different views on values: normativity, relevance, validity, stability, consistency, and awareness. Focus group interviews (n = 38) as well as several surveys (n = 100, n = 1519, n = 903, n = 94) were used to develop, refine, and test the scale in terms of response variety, temporal stability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. These systematic results show that views on values do indeed vary significantly between participants. Correlations with dogmatism, preference for consistency, and metacognition were found for corresponding dimensions. The VCS provides an original measure, which enables future research to explore this variation on the conceptualisation of values.…
Download full text files
SHA-5129540ab060bd989ac62636e5ee8ff07662f628edf9afe35be34c56dabfbf6a73de216c45a18be9fe7c5615f6ade9d273ec5d3c11b1707335ac76d36d979b41b52
Additional Services
| Author details: | Lena SeewannORCiDGND, Roland VerwiebeORCiDGND |
|---|---|
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-515843 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-51584 |
| ISSN: | 1867-5808 |
| Title of parent work (German): | Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe |
| Subtitle (English): | development and evaluation of the value conceptualisation scale using a mixed method approach |
| Publication series (Volume number): | Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe (191) |
| Publication type: | Postprint |
| Language: | English |
| Date of first publication: | 2020/01/08 |
| Publication year: | 2020 |
| Publishing institution: | Universität Potsdam |
| Release date: | 2024/04/29 |
| Tag: | focus group; human values; mixed methods; scale development |
| Issue: | 4 |
| Number of pages: | 16 |
| Source: | Journal of Beliefs & Values, 41:4, 419-432, DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2019.1707748 |
| Organizational units: | Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
| DDC classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften |
| Peer review: | Referiert |
| Publishing method: | Open Access / Green Open-Access |
| License (German): |  CC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International |
| External remark: | Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle |
