• search hit 3 of 16
Back to Result List

Confessional divides, cross-confessional connections, and Jewish responses

  • Studies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their 'New Jewish' coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselvesStudies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their 'New Jewish' coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselves into their newly created religious maps and orders. The argument is based on a close reading of one chapter of the last volume of Menasseh ben Israel's Conciliador (1651) as well as Daniel Levi de Barrios's poem Libre Alvedrio y Harmonia del Cuerpo, por disposicion del alma (1680).show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Sina RauschenbachORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5117/SR2021.1.001.RAUS
ISSN:1783-1792
ISSN:1781-7838
Title of parent work (English):Studia Rosenthaliana : journal of the history, culture and heritage of the jews in the Netherlands
Subtitle (English):Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios on De auxiliis and Dordt
Publisher:Peeters
Place of publishing:Leuven
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Year of first publication:2021
Publication year:2021
Release date:2023/01/16
Tag:Arminians; Arminius; Conciliador; Controversia de auxiliis; Counter-Remonstrants; Daniel Levi de Barrios; Early Modern Amsterdam; Libre Albedrio; Libre Alvedrio; Menasseh ben Israel; Molina; Molinists; New Jews; Portuguese Jews; Remonstrants; Synod of Dordt; auxilium; connections; cross-confessional; free will; grace; predestination; religious landscapes; scientia media
Volume:47
Issue:1
Number of pages:26
First page:1
Last Page:26
Organizational units:Philosophische Fakultät / Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft
DDC classification:2 Religion / 29 Andere Religionen / 290 Andere Religionen
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.