290 Andere Religionen
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (33)
- Postprint (18)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (11)
- Doctoral Thesis (11)
- Master's Thesis (7)
- Review (4)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Moving Images (1)
- Other (1)
Keywords
- Genisa (13)
- Geniza (13)
- Jüdische Studien (13)
- Jewish studies (10)
- Judentum (7)
- Judaism (4)
- Antisemitismus (3)
- Haskalah (3)
- Jewish Studies (3)
- Antisemitism (2)
Institute
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (43)
- Institut für Religionswissenschaft (17)
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (17)
- Extern (14)
- Institut für Jüdische Theologie (4)
- Historisches Institut (3)
- Philosophische Fakultät (2)
- Abraham Geiger Kolleg gGmbH (1)
- Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät (1)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (1)
It is seen that the Alevi-Sunni relations are mostly shaped by the stereotyped perceptions of the two groups about each other.
In particular, the fact that Alevism is a closed society due to the pressure they have experienced throughout history has prevented them from being perceived correctly.
As such, it is seen that there are many misconceptions about Alevis and their rituals that do not match the reality but are accepted as correct by the society.
Due to the lack of communication that could not be developed through this "unknown" in the historical process, Alevi-Sunni relations have always been open to manipulations. As a matter of fact, it is seen that Alevis' relations with Islam, the Djem ceremonies that form the basis of Alevism, and the content of Djem ceremonies have always remained a mystery to Sunnis.
Unfortunately, this misperception also reflected negatively on the communication between the two groups.
As it is known, if stereotypes arise when there is incorrect information about the target group, the best way to correct them is to create common contact environments that will bring individuals to the right information. Here in this article, the unknown Djem ritual and especially the Qur'anic verses that they refer to during the Djem ceremonies are discussed.
„Wir Juden verwalten den geistigen Besitz eines Volkes, das uns die Berechtigung und die Fähigkeit dazu abspricht.“ In diesem Satz kulminiert der Aufsatz „Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß“, den der jüdische Verfasser Moritz Goldstein 1912 in der nationalkonservativen Kunst- und Kulturzeitschrift Der Kunstwart publizieren lässt.
In seiner Abhandlung durchleuchtet Goldstein das kulturelle Leben und Schaffen seiner jüdischen wie nichtjüdischen Zeitgenossen und ihre gesellschaftlichen Begegnungsorte. Er prangert eine vermeintliche Passivität jüdisch-deutscher Künstlerinnen und Künstler an, die sich in einem administrativen Akt mit deutscher Kultur beschäftigten, aber nicht selbst kreativ seien. In gleicher Manier kommt auch seine Kritik an den nichtjüdischen Deutschen daher, denen er vorwirft, Jüdinnen und Juden ihre kulturelle Schaffenskraft und Deutschheit abzusprechen. Sie sähen Jüdinnen und Juden trotz aller Bemühungen und Gefühle als „ganz undeutsch.“ Aus diesem attestierten Distanzverhältnis beider Gruppen fordert er selbstbewusst die Dissimilation und die Errichtung einer eigenen jüdischen Kulturlandschaft.
Goldstein evoziert mit seinem Text am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges eine Debatte innerhalb kulturkonservativer deutscher Kreise, in der renommierte Autoren ihre Ansichten über Jüdischkeit und Deutschheit preisgeben. Unter ihnen befinden sich der Kunstwart-Herausgeber Ferdinand Avenarius, der Lyriker Ernst Lissauer, der völkische Schriftsteller Philipp Stauff, der Zionist Ludwig Strauss und Jakob Loewenberg, Mitglied im Centralverein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens.
Moritz Goldsteins „Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß“ stößt eine Debatte an, die zur Blaupause wird für das Verhältnis von jüdischen und nichtjüdischen Deutschen im ausgehenden Kaiserreich und für einen langen Nachhall in der deutsch-jüdischen Geschichte sorgt.
Miguel de Luna as arbitrista
(2023)
This article deals with Miguel de Luna, a Morisco from Granada, who is most famous for his involvement in the Lead Books of Sacromonte affair. In the following pages I will, however, focus on a facet of his life that has been rather neglected. Rather than recount again his activities as translator for Arabic, I will shed light on his work as physician and claim that his medical paper on the benefits of bathing and the reopening of public baths in Granada may very well put him in league with the arbitristas, a group of intellectuals who advised the monarch in economic and financial matters.
Ramadan ABC
(2022)
Der Ramadan ist der soziale und spirituelle Höhepunkt des religiösen Lebens der Muslim:innen. Motiviert und veranlasst durch den Ramadan soll jede:r Muslim:in diese Möglichkeit nutzen, um zuerst inneren Frieden zu schließen und dieses Wohlbefinden dann auf sein:ihr Umfeld zu übertragen.
In diesem Monat des Fastens kommen täglich Verwandte, Freund:innen und Nachbar:innen an Iftar-Abenden zum Essen zusammen. In diesem Sinne strebten wir als Forum Dialog e.V. an, diese besonderen Momente und Erlebnisse mit unseren Freund:innen und Mitmenschen zu teilen und somit an Iftar-Abenden unter dem Motto “Sharing Ramadan” zusammenzukommen.
Doch Aufgrund der Corona-Pandemie ist es leider nur bedingt möglich, an solchen gemeinschaft- und freundschaftsstiftenden Abenden zusammenzukommen.
Wir möchten jedoch weiterhin im Geiste des Ramadans und gemäß unserem Motto “Sharing Ramadan” handeln und freuen uns, euch die zweite Auflage unseres Sharing Ramadan-Heftes zu präsentieren. Mit seinen informativen, spirituellen und unter-haltenden Inhalten hoffen wir, dass wir Ihnen die spirituelle Seite des Ramadans und seine Bedeutung für die Glaubenswelt der Muslim:innen näherbringen können.
This study on the Messianic Jewish movement and its relationship to the Torah explores the various aspects of the relationship to the Torah on the basis of 10 interviews with selected Yeshua-believing Jews in leadership positions. The selection of interviewees results in a range of different positions typical of the movement as a whole, which overlap in many respects but are often fundamentally different and sometimes contradictory. Particular attention is paid to the theologically based, divergent and contradictory positions in an attempt to make these understandable.
After a brief introduction to the Messianic Jewish movement, aspects of the Messianic Jewish dual identity are examined and their relevance for the relationship to the Torah is demonstrated. This is followed by an overview of the forums in which Yeshua-believing Jews discuss their relationship to the Torah. The extensive bibliography at the end of the work provides an insight into a lively discussion process within the movement that is still far from complete. A briefly annotated differentiation of terms serves as an overview of the most important meanings of Torah used in the Messianic Jewish movement. Following this preliminary work, the field study is presented. A description of the research field and methodological reflections precede the interviews. In the interviews, the associations with the term Torah are first recorded and the conceptual meaning and use clarified. This already reveals some serious differences. The theological positions and understandings of Torah are presented with the biographical context and main field of influence, and the most important formative influences are named. The points on which they all agree are noted first, as they serve as a common basis. All study the written Torah and consider it, as well as the rest of the Tanakh and the writings of the New Testament in their present form, to be divinely inspired and authoritative. All have found a positive approach to the Torah according to their own definition of the term. For all of them, the written Torah and the Tanakh point to Yeshua. All agree that Yeshua did not abrogate the Torah, but fulfilled it. And all feel a responsibility as a Jew to the Torah in some way. With regard to keeping commandments, all say that no one can earn their way to heaven by doing so. G-d's faithfulness to His promises to Israel is affirmed by all, but whether the new covenant in Yeshua superseded the old covenant of Mt. Sinai, or whether it is simply added to the already existing covenant of Sinai, whether ritual commandments are to continue to be kept after Yeshua's death and resurrection and the destruction of the Temple, whether the commandments aiming at separation from the nations should continue to be kept, whether and under what conditions rabbinic halacha should be followed and what individuals do and teach in their families and communities - all this is discussed interview by interview. It becomes clear how different ways of reading and weighting key scriptures produce different positions. Just as the diversity of positions in relation to the Torah already suggests, the interview partners are divided on the question of a Messianic Jewish Halacha. But here too, the term halacha is interpreted differently by the representatives. At the end of the field study, the attempts to produce Messianic Jewish Halacha and the problems and points of criticism expressed by other interviewees are explained. The work concludes with a theological framework able to contain all the different positions and relationships to the Torah and some starting points for a possible Messianic Jewish hermeneutic theology of the Torah.
Zimzum
(2023)
The Hebrew word zimzum originally means “contraction,” “withdrawal,” “retreat,” “limitation,” and “concentration.” In Kabbalah, zimzum is a term for God’s self-limitation, done before creating the world to create the world. Jewish mystic Isaac Luria coined this term in Galilee in the sixteenth century, positing that the God who was “Ein-Sof,” unlimited and omnipresent before creation, must concentrate himself in the zimzum and withdraw in order to make room for the creation of the world in God’s own center. At the same time, God also limits his infinite omnipotence to allow the finite world to arise. Without the zimzum there is no creation, making zimzum one of the basic concepts of Judaism.
The Lurianic doctrine of the zimzum has been considered an intellectual showpiece of the Kabbalah and of Jewish philosophy. The teaching of the zimzum has appeared in the Kabbalistic literature across Central and Eastern Europe, perhaps most famously in Hasidic literature up to the present day and in philosopher and historian Gershom Scholem’s epoch-making research on Jewish mysticism. The Zimzum has fascinated Jewish and Christian theologians, philosophers, and writers like no other Kabbalistic teaching. This can be seen across the philosophy and cultural history of the twentieth century as it gained prominence among such diverse authors and artists as Franz Rosenzweig, Hans Jonas, Isaac Bashevis Singer, Harold Bloom, Barnett Newman, and Anselm Kiefer.
This book follows the traces of the zimzum across the Jewish and Christian intellectual history of Europe and North America over more than four centuries, where Judaism and Christianity, theosophy and philosophy, divine and human, mysticism and literature, Kabbalah and the arts encounter, mix, and cross-fertilize the interpretations and appropriations of this doctrine of God’s self-entanglement and limitation
This paper addresses terrorism trials as sites of research and proposes an approach for the analysis of ethnographic data collected during these trials. The suggested approach offers multi-level analytical access, it centers around interactionist conceptions and knowledge discourses. The conceptual framework we suggest is spelled out in terms of how to observe and being sensitive of (re-)production of power structures inside the courtroom as well as in regard to relations imported into the courtroom. For this purpose, we integrate (i) the micro-level of courtroom interactions and (ii) (self-)presentation, (iii) the meso-level of knowledge (re)production and the establishment of knowledge orders and (iv) an intersectional perspective on gender, race, and class in knowledge discourses. By applying a multi-level approach, we open up new explanatory avenues to understand the constitution of terrorism as a socio-legal object. The methodical framework connects hitherto unconnected elements, that is, participants' interactions and negotiation, their (self-)representations, ascriptions and narrative performances, and knowledge (re-)production in order to establish or maintain political and social orders.