• search hit 31 of 190
Back to Result List

Does ideology influence the ambition level of climate and renewable energy policy?

  • We investigate whether political ideology has an observable effect on decarbonization ambition, renewable power aims, and preferences for power system balancing technologies in four European countries. Based on the Energy Logics framework, we identify ideologically different transition strategies (state-centered, market-centered, grassroots-centered) contained in government policies and opposition party programs valid in 2019. We compare these policies and programs with citizen poll data. We find that ideology has a small effect: governments and political parties across the spectrum have similar, and relatively ambitious, decarbonization and renewables targets. This mirrors citizens' strong support for ambitious action regardless of their ideological self-description. However, whereas political positions on phasing out fossil fuel power are clear across the policy space, positions on phasing in new flexibility options to balance intermittent renewables are vague or non-existent. As parties and citizens agree on strong climate andWe investigate whether political ideology has an observable effect on decarbonization ambition, renewable power aims, and preferences for power system balancing technologies in four European countries. Based on the Energy Logics framework, we identify ideologically different transition strategies (state-centered, market-centered, grassroots-centered) contained in government policies and opposition party programs valid in 2019. We compare these policies and programs with citizen poll data. We find that ideology has a small effect: governments and political parties across the spectrum have similar, and relatively ambitious, decarbonization and renewables targets. This mirrors citizens' strong support for ambitious action regardless of their ideological self-description. However, whereas political positions on phasing out fossil fuel power are clear across the policy space, positions on phasing in new flexibility options to balance intermittent renewables are vague or non-existent. As parties and citizens agree on strong climate and renewable power aims, the policy ambition is likely to remain high, even if governments change.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Richard ThonigORCiD, Pablo Del Rio, Christoph Kiefer, Lara Lazaro TouzaORCiD, Gonzalo EscribanoORCiD, Yolanda Lechon, Leonhard Spaeth, Ingo Wolf, Johan LilliestamORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2020.1811806
ISSN:1556-7249
ISSN:1556-7257
Title of parent work (English):Energy sources, part B: economics, planning, and policy
Subtitle (German):Insights from four European countries
Publisher:Taylor & Francis Group
Place of publishing:Philadelphia
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/10/16
Publication year:2020
Release date:2023/02/07
Tag:Union; climate policy; energy policy; europe; european; flexibility; political ideology; renewable energy
Volume:16
Issue:1
Number of pages:19
First page:4
Last Page:22
Funding institution:European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme; [764626]; European Research CouncilEuropean Research Council; (ERC)European Commission [715132]
Organizational units:Extern / Extern
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Sozialwissenschaften / Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
External remark:Zweitveröffentlichung in der Schriftenreihe Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 161
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.