Livnat Landau

• Cells and tissues are sensitive to mechanical forces applied to them. In particular, bone forming cells and connective tissues, composed of cells embedded in fibrous extracellular matrix (ECM), are continuously remodeled in response to the loads they bear. The mechanoresponses of cells embedded in tissue include proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, internal signaling between cells, and formation and resorption of tissue. Experimental in-vitro systems of various designs have demonstrated that forces affect tissue growth, maturation and mineralization. However, the results depended on different parameters such as the type and magnitude of the force applied in each study. Some experiments demonstrated that applied forces increase cell proliferation and inhibit cell maturation rate, while other studies found the opposite effect. When the effect of different magnitudes of forces was compared, some studies showed that higher forces resulted in a cell proliferation increase or differentiation decrease, while other studies observed theCells and tissues are sensitive to mechanical forces applied to them. In particular, bone forming cells and connective tissues, composed of cells embedded in fibrous extracellular matrix (ECM), are continuously remodeled in response to the loads they bear. The mechanoresponses of cells embedded in tissue include proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, internal signaling between cells, and formation and resorption of tissue. Experimental in-vitro systems of various designs have demonstrated that forces affect tissue growth, maturation and mineralization. However, the results depended on different parameters such as the type and magnitude of the force applied in each study. Some experiments demonstrated that applied forces increase cell proliferation and inhibit cell maturation rate, while other studies found the opposite effect. When the effect of different magnitudes of forces was compared, some studies showed that higher forces resulted in a cell proliferation increase or differentiation decrease, while other studies observed the opposite trend or no trend at all. In this study, MC3T3-E1 cells, a cell line of pre-osteoblasts (bone forming cells), was used. In this cell line, cell differentiation is known to accelerate after cells stop proliferating, typically at confluency. This makes this cell line an interesting subject for studying the influence of forces on the switch between the proliferation stage of the precursor cell and the differentiation to the mature osteoblasts. A new experimental system was designed to perform systematic investigations of the influence of the type and magnitude of forces on tissue growth. A single well plate contained an array of 80 rectangular pores. Each pore was seeded with MC3T3-E1 cells. The culture medium contained magnetic beads (MBs) of 4.5 μm in diameter that were incorporated into the pre-osteoblast cells. Using an N52 neodymium magnet, forces ranging over three orders of magnitude were applied to MBs incorporated in cells at 10 different distances from the magnet. The amount of formed tissue was assessed after 24 days of culture. The experimental design allowed to obtain data concerning (i) the influence of the type of the force (static, oscillating, no force) on tissue growth; (ii) the influence of the magnitude of force (pN-nN range); (iii) the effect of functionalizing the magnetic beads with the tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD). To learn about cell differentiation state, in the final state of the tissue growth experiments, an analysis for the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), a well - known marker of osteoblast differentiation, was performed. The experiments showed that the application of static magnetic forces increased tissue growth compared to control, while oscillating forces resulted in tissue growth reduction. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the amount of tissue grown and the magnitude of the oscillating magnetic force. A positive but non-significant correlation of the amount of tissue with the magnitude of forces was obtained when static forces were applied. Functionalizing the MBs with RGD peptides and applying oscillating forces resulted in an increase of tissue growth relative to tissues incubated with “plain” epoxy MBs. ALP expression decreased as a function of the magnitude of force both when static and oscillating forces were applied. ALP stain intensity was reduced relative to control when oscillating forces were applied and was not significantly different than control for static forces. The suggested interpretation of the experimental findings is that larger mechanical forces delay cell maturation and keep the pre-osteoblasts in a more proliferative stage characterized by more tissue formed and lower expression of ALP. While the influence of the force magnitude can be well explained by an effect of the force on the switch between proliferation and differentiation, the influence of force type (static or oscillating) is less clear. In particular, it is challenging to reconcile the reduction of tissue formed under oscillating forces as compared to controls with the simultaneous reduction of ALP expression. To better understand this, it may be necessary to refine the staining protocol of the scaffolds and to include the amount and structure of ECM as well as other factors that were not monitored in the experiment and which may influence tissue growth and maturation. The developed experimental system proved well suited for a systematic and efficient study of the mechanoresponsiveness of tissue growth, it allowed a study of the dependence of tissue growth on force magnitude ranging over three orders of magnitude, and a comparison between the effect of static and oscillating forces. Future experiments can explore the multiple parameters that affect tissue growth as a function of the magnitude of the force: by applying different time-dependent forces; by extending the force range studied; or by using different cell lines and manipulating the mechanotransduction in the cells biochemically.…