• search hit 12 of 28
Back to Result List

Managers’ Risk Preferences and Firm Training Investments

  • We provide the first estimates of the impact of managers’ risk preferences on their training allocation decisions. Our conceptual framework links managers’ risk preferences to firms’ training decisions through the bonuses they expect to receive. Risk-averse managers are expected to select workers with low turnover risk and invest in specific rather than general training. Empirical evidence supporting these predictions is provided using a novel vignette study embedded in a nationally representative survey of firm managers. Risk-tolerant and risk-averse decision makers have significantly different training preferences. Risk aversion results in increased sensitivity to turnover risk. Managers who are risk-averse offer significantly less general training and, in some cases, are more reluctant to train workers with a history of job mobility. All managers, irrespective of their risk preferences, are sensitive to the investment risk associated with training, avoiding training that is more costly or targets those with less occupationalWe provide the first estimates of the impact of managers’ risk preferences on their training allocation decisions. Our conceptual framework links managers’ risk preferences to firms’ training decisions through the bonuses they expect to receive. Risk-averse managers are expected to select workers with low turnover risk and invest in specific rather than general training. Empirical evidence supporting these predictions is provided using a novel vignette study embedded in a nationally representative survey of firm managers. Risk-tolerant and risk-averse decision makers have significantly different training preferences. Risk aversion results in increased sensitivity to turnover risk. Managers who are risk-averse offer significantly less general training and, in some cases, are more reluctant to train workers with a history of job mobility. All managers, irrespective of their risk preferences, are sensitive to the investment risk associated with training, avoiding training that is more costly or targets those with less occupational expertise or nearing retirement. This suggests the risks of training are primarily due to the risk that trained workers will leave the firm (turnover risk) rather than the risk that the benefits of training do not outweigh the costs (investment risk).show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • cepa44.pdfeng
    (728KB)

    SHA-512:561d2b49a1faaf2c0de82b8e7608f7e395e7b3559f441663888044070486d8d0d06995178b1bfc2407a17d7b28e3e0e42f98ea8a46d73fba9e41845666c99f3b

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Marco CaliendoORCiDGND, Deborah A. Cobb-ClarkORCiDGND, Harald PfeiferORCiDGND, Arne UhlendorffORCiDGND, Caroline WehnerORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-538439
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-53843
ISSN:2628-653X
Title of parent work (English):CEPA Discussion Papers
Publication series (Volume number):CEPA Discussion Papers (44)
Publication type:Working Paper
Language:English
Date of first publication:2022/02/15
Publication year:2022
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2022/02/15
Tag:Employee Training; Human Capital Investments; Manager Decisions; Risk Attitudes
Issue:44
Number of pages:45
RVK - Regensburg classification:QP 300, QP 370, QV 578, QV 584, QV 240
Organizational units:Extern / Extern
Zentrale und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen / Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA)
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
JEL classification:D Microeconomics / D9 Intertemporal Choice and Growth / D91 Intertemporal Consumer Choice; Life Cycle Models and Saving
J Labor and Demographic Economics / J2 Demand and Supply of Labor / J24 Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
D Microeconomics / D2 Production and Organizations / D22 Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
Peer review:Nicht referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Bronze Open-Access
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.