• search hit 19 of 237
Back to Result List

Supporting agricultural ecosystem services through the integration of perennial polycultures into crop rotations

  • This review analyzes the potential role and long-term effects of field perennial polycultures (mixtures) in agricultural systems, with the aim of reducing the trade-offs between provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. First, crop rotations are identified as a suitable tool for the assessment of the long-term effects of perennial polycultures on ecosystem services, which are not visible at the single-crop level. Second, the ability of perennial polycultures to support ecosystem services when used in crop rotations is quantified through eight agricultural ecosystem services. Legume-grass mixtures and wildflower mixtures are used as examples of perennial polycultures, and compared with silage maize as a typical crop for biomass production. Perennial polycultures enhance soil fertility, soil protection, climate regulation, pollination, pest and weed control, and landscape aesthetics compared with maize. They also score lower for biomass production compared with maize, which confirms the trade-off between provisioning andThis review analyzes the potential role and long-term effects of field perennial polycultures (mixtures) in agricultural systems, with the aim of reducing the trade-offs between provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. First, crop rotations are identified as a suitable tool for the assessment of the long-term effects of perennial polycultures on ecosystem services, which are not visible at the single-crop level. Second, the ability of perennial polycultures to support ecosystem services when used in crop rotations is quantified through eight agricultural ecosystem services. Legume-grass mixtures and wildflower mixtures are used as examples of perennial polycultures, and compared with silage maize as a typical crop for biomass production. Perennial polycultures enhance soil fertility, soil protection, climate regulation, pollination, pest and weed control, and landscape aesthetics compared with maize. They also score lower for biomass production compared with maize, which confirms the trade-off between provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. However, the additional positive factors provided by perennial polycultures, such as reduced costs for mineral fertilizer, pesticides, and soil tillage, and a significant preceding crop effect that increases the yields of subsequent crops, should be taken into account. However, a full assessment of agricultural ecosystem services requires a more holistic analysis that is beyond the capabilities of current frameworks.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • pmnr1069.pdfeng
    (2412KB)

    SHA-512:1c0073da110b22c6dbe9d6971b4825c2c96f389a5b318b17abe4a27a1eab8db3fc79cbf00f49bc7a2a9b94570f62a0c13415efb75561f318cee8294a95cbfb26

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Peter WeißhuhnORCiD, Moritz RecklingORCiD, Ulrich StachowGND, Hubert WiggeringORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-474410
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-47441
Title of parent work (German):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe (1069)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2021/01/07
Publication year:2017
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2021/01/07
Tag:agroecosystem; assessment; legume-grass mixture; mixed cropping; perennial crop; wildflower mixture
Issue:1069
Number of pages:22
Source:Sustainability 2017, 9(12), 2267 DOI:10.3390/su9122267
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie
6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 69 Hausbau, Bauhandwerk / 690 Hausbau, Bauhandwerk
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Green Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
External remark:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.